Brits told to check their wallets for three coins in circulation worth over £40,000
Brits have been urged to keep an eye out for three highly sought after coins. These pieces, that are still in circulation, could be worth more than £43,000 combined.
However, each coin needs to have a specific feature or date to be particularly valuable. In a video uploaded to social media platform TikTok, an expert known as the Coin Collecting Wizard detailed what to look for.
He highlighted the importance of the Brexit 50p coin, the Olympics aquatics 50p coin, and a Lord Kitchener £2 coin. The expert also explained what it is specifically you should be looking for.
Firstly he shared that a certain 50p coin could sell for as much as £40,000. The coin minted to commemorate the date that the UK left the EU on January 31, 2020.
But a number of these coins were produced prior to this date with what is now an incorrect date. This is because it had been planned that Brexit would take place the previous year.
Therefore, the specific dates you want to find are March 29, 2019, or October 31, 2019. The reverse side of the coin (also known as the tail side) is easy to spot and features the phrase 'peace, prosperity and friendship with all nations'.
On its obverse side (head side) you will see the image of Queen Elizabeth II. The expert said: 'This is the Brexit 50p coin from 2020.
'Now before you get excited it's actually a different date you are looking for. If your Brexit 50 pence says anything other than 31 January 2020, then you have found a super rare coin estimated to be worth £40,000.'
Next, he shared how a 50p coin from 2011 could be worth £2,000. Known as the Olympic aquatics coin, this features the image of a swimmer.
However, you want to find an earlier version of this coin where the lines representing water go over the swimmer's face. 'This one is 50 pence from 2011, part of the Olympics set you can find in your change,' he said.
'If you find this aquatics 50p but there are lines over the swimmers face then you have just found a rare first edition coin worth £2,000.' Finally, he revealed that a £2 from 2014 could be worth as much as £1,000.
On its reverse side it features the image of Lord Kitchener to mark 100 years since the start of the First World War. But only an error version of this coin is valuable.
He added: 'This is a two pound coin from 2014 known as the First World War Lord Kitchener. Again just like the other coins, you are looking for something different.
'If you were to flip this coin over and it doesn't have the words 'two pounds' on the obverse then you have found the rare mule error worth over £1,000.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The dizzying fall of the King of Davos
Klaus Schwab was the undisputed 'King of Davos' for 55 years. But when his downfall came, it was swift. The 87-year-old founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF), which holds the annual conference in the Swiss alpine ski resort, fought until the end. But over two days in April, beset by allegations of misusing WEF funds, manipulating research and inappropriate behaviour with staff, he was forced out of his personal fiefdom. 'He had the chance to step back 10, seven, five years ago. But he hung on,' one WEF insider told The Telegraph. On Sunday, the early findings of a second investigation into the WEF were leaked. They alleged Mr Schwab had misspent WEF money and manipulated research for political reasons, including rigging data to make Brexit look like a failure. Mr Schwab also allegedly put his crotch in front of a female staffer's face, splurged $50m on a luxury villa, and ran up £836,000 in expenses that were not sufficiently linked to WEF activities. His credibility now lies in ruins and the future of Davos is openly questioned. Some see the investigation in response to a whistleblower complaint as a barely disguised attempt to push Mr Schwab out. For his part, he denies any wrongdoing. 'He wasn't perfect, but he has been stitched up because he wouldn't go when people wanted him to go,' one person close to the organisation told The Telegraph. Other insiders fear that the push to remove Mr Schwab will come at too high a reputational cost to the WEF itself. 'They've used a sledgehammer to crack a nut,' one said. It is an astonishing fall from grace from the former executive chairman, who was awarded an honorary knighthood by the UK in 2006. The German-born professor built his empire from humble beginnings, establishing the WEF in 1971 as a forum for policymakers and CEOs to discuss global issues. Over the years it mutated into a magnet for world leaders, a capital of fevered dealmaking, a byword for elitism and a lightning rod for conspiracy theories. The title of his book 'The Great Reset' – about how the pandemic could remake global economies – has become shorthand for online extremists convinced that plots to create a world government are hatched at Davos. Mr Schwab, the quintessential 'Davos Man,' was front and centre every year as he welcomed a galaxy of heads of state and government. They included prime ministers and presidents as different as Angela Merkel and Donald Trump, Emmanuel Macron and Narendra Modi or Baroness May and Vladimir Putin. At this year's gathering, in January, there was no Sir Keir Starmer, French president or German chancellor in Davos. The demise of Davos has often been predicted, but rivals are circling. China has the Boao Forum, colloquially known as 'the Asian Davos', and Saudi Arabia has launched the Future Investment Initiative, which is dubbed 'Davos in the Desert'. The rumblings of what would become an avalanche of revelations about Mr Schwab began with a 2024 investigation by the Wall Street Journal, which accused the WEF of having a workplace culture that was hostile to black people and women. Women were allegedly sidelined after becoming pregnant, while two staff members used the n-word, according to the Journal. The WEF said at the time it had zero tolerance for discrimination and harassment and disputed the allegations in the newspaper report. Staff alleged that Mr Schwab was inappropriate and made unwanted suggestive remarks, while one female staffer claimed he put his leg on her desk with his crotch in front of her face. She said Mr Schwab told her he wished she was Hawaiian because he'd like to see her in Hawaiian costume, which the WEF fiercely denied. Others told the Wall Street Journal that attractive women were chosen to meet international delegates. There was a slang term for such encounters – 'white on blue action' – a reference to the different coloured lanyards worn at the conference by officials and famous guests. Former staff at the non-profit were reported to have set up a WhatsApp group called 'WEFugees' in which they shared horror stories about their experiences. A former staffer told the Journal: 'We promote inclusion and improving the state of the world and women's issues but do the opposite.' Mr Schwab complained bitterly about the Journal's reporting but was determined to craft a graceful, prolonged exit from the WEF, which generates about $500m a year. The WEF's founding bylaws state 'the Founder himself designates his successor', and stipulates he or 'at least one member of his immediate family' is on the board of trustees. Mr Schwab's plan was to move to a role as non-executive chairman and retire in stages, picking his successor. But then whistleblowers sent a letter in an email to WEF trustees, including luminaries such Al Gore, the former US vice-president, and cellist Yo Yo Maa. It accused Mr Schwab and his wife, Hilde, of misusing WEF funds. It said Mr Schwab had used company funds to pay for private massages, and he had redirected WEF resources and staff in a vainglorious bid to get nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. 'This was not a WEF initiative, but a self-driven effort disguised as organisational work,' the letter said. It complained about Hilde Schwab's spending of about $50m on Villa Mundi, a mansion next to WEF headquarters overlooking Lake Geneva. It alleged she controlled access to the property and that one entire floor was reserved for the couple's exclusive use, according to the Wall Street Journal. They denied the allegations. In April this year, a WEF audit committee recommended opening an independent investigation into the new allegations. Mr Schwab went on the attack. He wrote a furious email to the committee demanding the probe be dropped within 24 hours and threatened to file a criminal complaint. The gamble backfired. After the WEF board insisted the investigation had to go ahead, Mr Schwab resigned 48 hours after sending his email. He insisted his legacy was 'well established', adding he had received 'the highest national distinction from numerous countries for my efforts in helping economic developments, reconciliation efforts and even avoiding a war'. After a two-hour emergency meeting of trustees, Mr Schwab's ouster was announced on April 21. He was swiftly replaced by Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, the WEF's vice-chairman and former Nestle CEO. A law-firm led independent investigation began in accordance with Swiss regulations. Last Sunday, some preliminary findings were published in Switzerland's SonntagsZeitung newspaper. Law firm Homburger has looked into some £836,000 in expenses submitted by Mr Schwab and his wife which, it was reported, were not sufficiently linked to WEF activities. Mr Schwab sent suggestive emails and had 'embarrassing interactions' with younger WEF staff, according to the leaked findings. The newspaper revealed he had told staff that the UK 'must not see any improvement' in the WEF's annual Global Competitiveness Report, which ranks countries on productivity. Otherwise it would be 'exploited by the Brexit camp', he wrote. In the 2017/2018 report, the UK's ranking improved from seventh to fourth after a change in methodology. The final report published in 2017 – a year after the Brexit referendum – showed the UK had dropped one place to eighth. It was not the only example of political manipulation of research, according to the newspaper. Mr Schwab has denied all the allegations. The once all powerful king of the globalists was reduced to a chuntering complaint from the ruins of his empire. He accused the WEF board of breaking a media silence pact over the investigation, but now faces a nervous wait until the official end of the probe later this year. 'I feel deceived,' he huffed on Sunday. 'I am not available for further investigations.'
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Qatar threatened to cut EU LNG supplies over sustainability law, letter shows
BRUSSELS, July 26 (Reuters) - Qatar has threatened to cut gas supplies to the European Union in response to the bloc's due diligence law on forced labour and environmental damage, a letter from Qatar to the Belgian government, seen by Reuters, showed. Qatar is the world's third-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG), after the United States and Australia. It has provided between 12% and 14% of Europe's LNG since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. In a letter to the Belgian government dated May 21, Qatari Energy Minister Saad al-Kaabi said the country was reacting to the EU's corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD), which requires larger companies operating in the EU to find and fix human rights and environmental issues in their supply chains. "Put simply, if further changes are not made to CSDDD, the State of Qatar and QatarEnergy will have no choice but to seriously consider alternative markets outside of the EU for our LNG and other products, which offer a more stable and welcoming business environment," said the letter. A spokesperson for Belgium's representation to the EU declined to comment on the letter, which was first reported by German newspaper Welt am Sonntag. The European Commission also received a letter from Qatar, dated May 13, a Commission spokesperson told Reuters, noting that EU lawmakers and countries are currently negotiating changes to the CSDDDD. "It is now for them to negotiate and adopt the substantive simplification changes proposed by the Commission," the spokesperson said. Brussels proposed changes to the CSDDD earlier this year to reduce its requirements - including by delaying its launch by a year, to mid-2028, and limiting the checks companies will have to make down their supply chains. Companies that fail to comply could face fines of up to 5% of global turnover. Qatar said the EU's changes had not gone far enough. In the letter, Kaabi said Qatar was particularly concerned about the CSDDD's requirement for companies have a climate change transition plan aligned with preventing global warming exceeding 1.5 celsius - the goal of the Paris Agreement. "Neither the State of Qatar nor QatarEnergy have any plans to achieve net zero in the near future," said the letter, which said the CSDDD undermined countries' right to set their own national contributions towards the Paris Agreement goals. In an annex to the letter, also seen by Reuters, Qatar proposed removing the section of CSDDD which includes the requirement for climate transition plans. Kaabi is also chief executive of QatarEnergy ( Qatar Energy gas has long-term supply contracts with major European companies, including Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab, TotalEnergies ( opens new tab and ENI ( opens new tab.
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Buy now, pay later shake-up explained as shoppers face being refused credit
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has just announced that buy now, pay later is going to be fully regulated from July, 2026 - here is what you need to know In recent years, a new form of 'free' credit has revolutionised the way we Brits shop. It's simple, popular and you can use it to buy pretty much anything you can think of, from clothes to cars. Buy now, pay later (BNPL) credit is available at virtually every online store you visit. Retailers love it, because it allows us all to buy more than we can afford. It also makes us more likely to commit to buy what's in the online basket, rather than walking away if money is tight that month. Credit firms love it as they get paid in a variety of ways for offering this type of lending on behalf of retailers. And many readers love it too, as I find out every time I write about my BNPL concerns when I criticise aspects of the industry! But those concerns are justified. BNPL allows, or even encourages people to 'sleepwalk' in to debt, by making it easier to purchase things we neither want or need – and can't afford. It's been used for silly, frivolous purchases like pizza. And most concerningly, some firms have been worryingly quick to lend to people massively in debt, or to pass on outstanding balances to debt collectors far too quickly. So it's good news that the regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has just announced that BNPL is going to be fully regulated from 15 July, 2026. The FCA has also announced a whole range of new rules and requirements for the industry to tackle some of these concerns. Here's my guide to how BNPL works. Get the best deals and tips from Mirror Money WHATSAPP GROUP: Get money news and top deals straight to your phone by joining our Money WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. What is buy now, pay later credit? BNPL works by giving you a short-term loan, with or without interest, so you can buy goods or services even if you can't afford to pay the full price up front. Retailers have been actively pushing BNPL credit and you'll be hard pressed to find one that doesn't offer BNPL when you shop online. There are three main types of BNPL credit. Limited instalments The most well-known form of BNPL deal works by letting you pay in a limited number of instalments interest-free – usually in three payments. This means you can buy things up front that you may not have the money for in full at point of purchase. However, you have committed to buy. This is unregulated at the moment. Try before you buy This is where you have a short period of time – usually 30 days but sometimes as low as 14 days – to 'inspect' goods before committing to buy them. These deals allow you to try things on, check goods out and see if they work for you before committing to buy. However, if you don't return the goods on time, you could find you've bought them. Bear in mind the 14 days just mirrors your existing online shopping rights under the Consumer Rights Act. This is unregulated at the moment. Credit agreements These deals are closer to the older credit deals in that you pay in instalments over a longer period and pay interest. This isn't as high as some retailers charged in the past – it's usually less than credit card interest - but is still higher than a standard bank loan. How popular is buy now, pay later lending? There are lots of different types of regulated credit agreement out there. These include: Personal loans Overdrafts Car finance Short term, high interest loans (formerly payday lending, but over longer periods of time) Catalogue credit Regulated BNPL loans Unregulated buy now, pay later loans are referred to by the regulator as 'Deferred Payment Credit (DPCs) – and they are massively popular. It's estimated that around 11 million people used BNPL credit last year alone for short term borrowing. That's 20% of all adults (up 3% from the year before). However, 1.1 million people had over £500 outstanding on their unregulated BNPL loans. Just under 10% of people used BNPL to pay for essential goods, like food or utility bills. What happens if you can't pay? While BNPL firms may not charge debt interest, many readers have reported that businesses are quick to pass on debts to debt collectors who have a whole range of penalties and pressure tactics they can apply – and they can register financial debts with credit reference agencies. Worryingly, this can happen for relatively small sums. What do the new rules say? According to the FCA, from next year businesses offering BNPL will have to: Carry out upfront checks to make sure people can repay what they borrow. Offer 'fairer and faster access to refunds' You'll also have the right to complain to the Financial Ombudsman like other regulated forms of credit. At present, BNPL firms are rather vague about the checks they undertake to see if you can afford to borrow money. With most forms of lending the business will undertake a 'soft' or 'hard' credit check to see if you can afford to borrow. Soft checks don't go on to your credit file, hard ones do. If the lender doesn't check your credit file, it won't know how much you've borrowed – which means you might be hopelessly in debt and they won't know. You might also have multiple BNPL loans too. At the height of the payday lending frenzy, the average number of loans per borrower was seven. So people were drowning in debt and just getting in deeper. These new proposals will mean that stricter affordability checks will be required which should identify people who are overstretched financially and are already in debt. The FCA estimates that over the next decade, this will mean that people will be £1.8 billion better off. Assuming that they don't borrow money elsewhere instead, that is.
