
Govt to thoroughly review Federal Court decision on SIS fatwa
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs), Datuk Dr. Mohd. Na'im Mokhtar (picture) stressed that fatwas still play an important role in guiding Muslims on current issues that require Shariah guidance.
'Therefore, close cooperation between the judiciary, legal and religious authorities is very important so that the function and authority of the fatwa institution remains respected within the framework of our country's constitutional system.
'The government will ensure that the administration of Islamic affairs in Malaysia is carried out fairly and based on the principles of shura, knowledge and based on the full implementation of the country's laws,' he said in a statement today.
Mohd. Na'im said he took note of the decision made by the Federal Court in favour of the SIS in its challenge against the fatwa issued by the Selangor State Fatwa Committee on 17 July 2014.
'As the Minister of Religious Affairs, I respect the principle of the rule of law and judicial decisions made by the Federal Court as the highest judicial institution in the country's legal system.
'At the same time, the government will continue to defend the position of Islamic religious institutions in line with Article 3 of the Federal Constitution which provides that Islam is the religion of the Federation,' he added.
Today, the Federal Court allowed the appeal filed by SIS Forum and its founder, Datin Paduka Zainah Mahfoozah Anwar, regarding the dispute over the decision of the Selangor Fatwa Committee, Selangor Islamic Religious Council.
The decision previously declared the organisation as deviant and perverting the true teachings of Islam which were issued and gazetted 11 years ago, thus setting aside the previous decisions of the High Court and Court of Appeal.
The Federal Court ruled that the words 'persons who profess the religion of Islam' used in the fatwa can only refer to real people and not artificial persons such as companies or organisations.
The Court also added that they, however do not scrutinised the content of the fatwa as it is the purview of the Fatwa Committee — TMR
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ex-soldier loses appeal over dismissal for refusing Covid-19 jab
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today dismissed a former soldier's appeal against his termination from the Malaysian Armed Forces for refusing the Covid-19 vaccination. The three-member bench led by Justice Datuk Azimah Omar ruled that there was no illegality or procedural impropriety on the part of the respondents in dismissing Wan Ramli Wan Seman from service. "The court is of the view that the appeal is without merit and therefore, dismissed," she said. No order as to costs was made. Sitting with her were Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim. Wan Ramli, 43, was appealing against the High Court's 2023 dismissal of his judicial review challenging the decision of the respondents. In his judicial review, Wan Ramli had named Lt-Col Sharull Hesham Md Yasin, Lt Mohamad Azammunir Mohd Ashri, Army Chief General Tan Sri Zamrose Mohd Zain, the Malaysian Armed Forces, and the Malaysian Government as respondents. He sought a certiorari order to quash the termination letter dated Aug 4, 2021, which discharged him from service, and a declaration that the discharge letter was null and void. He claimed that the dishonourable discharge had caused him to lose his right to a pension under Article 147 of the Federal Constitution. Wan Ramli also argued that his dismissal was invalid as it was disproportionate in the circumstances, oppressive, irrational, unreasonable, amounted to unlawful discrimination, and took into account irrelevant considerations. Then High Court judge Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid (now a Court of Appeal judge) had ruled that the decision to discharge Wan Ramli was lawful and not tainted with illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety. At today's hearing, Wan Ramli was represented by lawyer Hafiz Norkhan, while senior federal counsel Nurhafizza Azizan and federal counsel Solehheen Mohammad Zaki appeared for the respondents.


New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Netherlands bars two hardline Israeli ministers
AMSTERDAM: The Netherlands has declared Israel's finance and national security ministers persona non grata for inciting violence and urging ethnic cleansing in Gaza. In June, the Netherlands backed a failed Swedish proposal to impose EU sanctions on Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. "They repeatedly incited settler violence against Palestinians, promoted illegal settlement expansion, and called for ethnic cleansing in Gaza," Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp told parliament in a letter released late Monday. Smotrich responded on X, saying European leaders had succumbed to "the lies of radical Islam that is taking over" and "rising antisemitism." Ben-Gvir said he would continue to act for Israel, even if he was banned from entering "all of Europe." "In a place where terrorism is tolerated and terrorists are welcomed, a Jewish minister from Israel is unwanted, terrorists are free, and Jews are boycotted," he wrote on X. Veldkamp said the Netherlands wanted to "relieve the suffering of the population in Gaza" and was exploring further ways to contribute to humanitarian aid. "Airdrops of food are relatively expensive and risky," he said. "This is why the Netherlands is also taking steps to further support land-based aid delivery." Aid drops resumed in Gaza on Sunday as Israel announced temporary humanitarian pauses in parts of the besieged territory. Around 2.4 million Palestinians in Gaza are facing what UN aid agencies have warned is a deadly wave of starvation and malnutrition. The UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification Initiative (IPC) said on Tuesday that famine is unfolding across much of Gaza, with thresholds breached and over 20,000 children treated for acute malnutrition since April. Veldkamp said the Netherlands would push to suspend the trade element of the EU-Israel Association Agreement if Israel fails to meet its humanitarian obligations. "The summons will also be used to remind Israel to comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law," he said. After speaking by phone with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said the government's position was "crystal clear." "The people of Gaza must be given immediate, unfettered, safe access to humanitarian aid," he said. Israel's foreign ministry said Foreign Affairs Minister Gideon Sa'ar had summoned the Dutch ambassador Marriët Schuurman to Jerusalem for a formal reprimand on Tuesday afternoon. "The conversation will take place in light of the Dutch government's decisions to take measures against Israel, including against its right to defend itself and against ministers in its government," the ministry said in a statement. The war in Gaza was sparked by Hamas's Oct 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed 59,921 Palestinians, also mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.


Focus Malaysia
6 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
PMX and the mid-term danger of becoming an ex-PM
I WAS in a restaurant witnessing the televised oath-taking ceremony of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, later fondly called PMX, on Nov 24, 2022. The moment he took the oath of office everybody in the restaurant regardless of race became euphoric, and people celebrated by hugging one another in happiness to see this auspicious moment culminating after decades of trials and tribulations. Indians were particularly overjoyed as they saw him as a leader who understood their need for equal treatment through affirmative action policies and other Indian-centric initiatives. However, within a few months people became disillusioned with Anwar when his government stalled over the much anticipated reform and affirmative programmes. It was shocking to see Anwar's descent to unpopularity so soon. Very few of the promised reforms have seen the light of day. Anwar started justifying the status quo and began behaving like previous leaders. To the consternation of his multi-racial supporters he began focusing more on Islamic issues and Palestine. Although these issues are important for him he could have also in tandem started his reforms as he has a parliamentary majority. Most if not all the reforms needed only a simple majority to become law but he has been lukewarm or procrastinating leading to plenty of criticism from the people. The biggest test he now faces is the total loss of confidence by the Indian community and it is going to reflect very badly in the next general elections especially in the multi-racial seats mainly in the west coast states. Anwar's descent and loss of popularity began soon after he became prime minister and I have listed some of the issues which he could have handled more wisely, diplomatically and effectively and not allowing them to snowball to risky levels. When an Indian student in a meeting brought up the issue of the unfairness in the intake of university students he brushed her off by bumbling about the social contract and other justifications. The country's education system continues to be discriminatory and lopsided. To date there are no affirmative action policies by the government for the B40 except the cash and other hand-outs. Anwar also referred to the Kuala Lumpur Masjid India temple as haram when he could have settled the issue more amicably. Most Indians were unhappy that the PM, for whom they rallied for so much earlier, had offended them on the temple issue. Furthermore, he has not increased any major allocations or special programmes for the poorer section of the Indian and other communities. The cost of living has risen and burdened the people as the government has not been able to control price increases, citing wars in the Ukraine and Middle East as excuses. His foreign trips in to enhance the image of the country and draw investments has not had the desired effect as investments have hardly trickled in to prop up the national economy. The government's strict control of public assemblies restricted the much needed freedom to voice their concerns and opposition to important issues and luckily the Federal Court recently decided against some of the unfair restrictions. Not doing enough about the Teoh Beng Hock case and the recent Pamela Ling disappearance has also tarnished his image. Similarly, he acted too late in the Yusuf Rawther case when he could have settled the case amicably a long time back and now when it threatens his PM position he applies for immunity for himself. There was also dissatisfaction over how former premier Datuk Seri Najib Razak's royal addendum issue was handled. Wise handling of this issue could have helped him win crucial Malay support. These are some of the issues that have fuelled opposition to PMX leading to the 'Turun Anwar' rally on July 26, and Anwar should realise the negative impact the demonstrations can bring about in Malaysia. Recall that it was the Bersih rallies and the Hindraf protest that brought down Barisan Nasional (BN) in five states in 2008 and 10 years later led to BN losing control of the federal government. As if all these domestic troubles are not enough, as Asean Chair Anwar has to mediate between Cambodia and Thailand where the border clashes are in full swing and endangering the unity of the association. It is still not too late for Anwar as he has more than two years to make amends as well as initiate the much anticipated reforms and socio-economic policies that could become a hallmark of his premiership, and justify the happiness and joy that greeted him when he became PMX. ‒ July 29, 2025 V. Thomas is a Focus Malaysia viewer. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bernama