Notorious Ecuadorian gang leader extradited to U.S.
President Daniel Noboa of Ecuador confirmed late Sunday that Macias, leader of the Los Choneros gang and who is also known as Fito, has arrived in the United States.
"Goodbye forever, Fito," Noboa said in a statement to social media. "Fito is now in the USA."
The U.S. government has yet to confirm Macias' extradition.
Hasta nunca, Fito.
Fito ya está en EEUU. Esto es gracias a ustedes, ecuatorianos, que dijeron sí a la consulta popular. Espero con gusto las teorías creativas que dirán que no.
Interceptamos también 14 toneladas de droga, eso es 560 millones de dólares menos para el... pic.twitter.com/BQ4hYs75nT— Daniel Noboa Azin (@DanielNoboaOk) July 21, 2025
Macias was recaptured in late June amid a controversial crackdown on gang violence in the country, conducted by Noboa using recently acquired powers granted to him by the National Assembly to combat internal armed conflict.
Macias was serving a 34-year sentence for a slew of crimes, including murder, when he escaped from Guayaquil's regional prison in January, as gang violence was erupting in prisons across the nation.
In response to the violence, Noboa declared the country was in the midst of an "internal armed conflict" and launched a nationwide law enforcement effort targeting drug cartels and gangs after declaring them terrorists.
Macias was then sanctioned by the U.S. State Department in February and charged in a seven-count indictment with drug trafficking-related offenses in Brooklyn, N.Y., in April.
If convicted in the United States, he faces up to life in prison.
Noboa described Macias' extradition as validation of his crackdown that has received international criticism from human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch, over concerns that the new powers pose to the rights of Ecuadorians.
"This is thanks to you, Ecuadorians, who said yes to the referendum. I eagerly await the creative theories that will claim otherwise," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Columbia to pay $221M over 3 years in settlement with Trump admin.
1 of 2 | Students attend the Columbia University commencement ceremony in Manhattan, New York City, on May 21. Pool photo by Jeenah Moon/UPI | License Photo July 24 (UPI) -- Columbia University announced on Wednesday it will pay $221 million for the New York City private school to settle its dispute with the Trump administration and restore funding. Under terms of the deal, Columbia won't admit to violating anti-discrimination laws and will pay $200 million to the federal government over three years and a one-time $21 million to settle investigations by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In return, "a vast majority of the federal grants which were terminated or paused in March 2025 -- will be reinstated and Columbia's access to billions of dollars in current and future grants will be restored," the Ivy League school said in a news release. This includes funding from the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Health and Human Services. In March, the federal government revoked $400 million in federal funding over campus protests by pro-Palestinian activists. Also, the majority of the school's future $1.3 billion in funding had been put on hold, including science research. Policies already were implemented on March 21 regarding restrictions on demonstrations, new disciplinary procedures and a review of the Middle East curriculum. An independent monitor will oversee the agreement implementation. The university also agreed to provide the federal government with "all relevant data and information to rigorously assess compliance with its commitment to merit-based hiring and admissions," a senior White House official told CNN. And Columbia will review its admission procedures and "strengthen oversight of international students," the official said. "While Columbia does not admit to wrongdoing with this resolution agreement, the institution's leaders have recognized, repeatedly, that Jewish students and faculty have experienced painful, unacceptable incidents, and that reform was and is needed," the university said. University President Claire Shipman said she was pleased with the settlement. "The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track," Shipman said in a statement. "Importantly, it safeguards our independence, a critical condition for academic excellence and scholarly exploration, work that is vital to the public interest." Shipman also separately addressed the Columbia community, writing "as I have discussed on many occasions with our community, we carefully explored all options open to us. We might have achieved short-term litigation victories, but not without incurring deeper long-term damage -- the likely loss of future federal funding, the possibility of losing accreditation, and the potential revocation of visa status of thousands of international students." Education Secretary Linda McMahon also touted the settlement. "The Trump Administration's deal with Columbia University is a seismic shift in our nation's fight to hold institutions that accept American taxpayer dollars accountable for antisemitic discrimination and harassment," she said in a statement. "For decades, the American public has watched in horror as our elite campuses have been overrun by anti-western teachings and a leftist groupthink that restricts speech and debate to push a one-sided view of our nation and the world. These dangerous trends fueled the outbreak of violent antisemitism that paralyzed campuses after the October 7th massacre and was previously unthinkable in the United States of America." The announcement came a day after Columbia said it had disciplined dozens of pro-Palestine protesters who had participated in protests in May. Other elite schools, including Harvard, have been under pressure to adhere to the Trump administration's policies, including cracking down on anti-Semitism and ending Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives. "Columbia's reforms are a roadmap for elite universities that wish to regain the confidence of the American public by renewing their commitment to truth-seeking, merit, and civil debate," McMahon said. "I believe they will ripple across the higher education sector and change the course of campus culture for years to come." Harvard has implemented some changes but sued the federal government over a loss of $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts. Trump told CNN earlier this month: "I think we're going to probably settle with Harvard. We're going to probably settle with Columbia. They want to settle very badly. There's no rush." Shipman had been concerned about the effects on research. "Columbia's top scientists are facing the decimation of decades of research," Shipman said in a letter on June 12. "Graduate students, postdocs, mid-career researchers, and established, celebrated scientists, have all had their breakthroughs lauded by the world one minute and defunded the next. We're in danger of reaching a tipping point in terms of preserving our research excellence and the work we do for humanity." The university had a total enrollment of 26,272 graduate students and 9,111 undergrads in the 2024-2025 academic year. Tuition is $70,000-pus each year with about 90% getting student aid. About 40% of the student body are international students, Politico reported. Jewish students comprise 19% undergraduates and 15.9% graduate students, according to Hillel International. "This announcement is an important recognition of what Jewish students and their families have expressed with increasing urgency: antisemitism at Columbia is real, and it has had a tangible impact on Jewish students' sense of safety and belonging and, in turn, their civil rights," Brian Cohen, executive director of Columbia/Barnard Hillel, posted on X. "Acknowledging this fact is essential, and along with the new path laid out by the President and Trustees, I am hopeful that today's agreement marks the beginning of real, sustained change."
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Appeals court: Trump's birthright citizenship EO unconstitutional
US President Donald Trump participates in a reception with Republican Members of Congress in the East Room at the White House in Washington, DC on Tuesday, July 22, 2025. On Wednesday, an appeals court ruled his effort to end birthright citizenship was unconstitutional. Photo by Yuri Gripas/UPI | License Photo July 24 (UPI) -- A divided federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its 2-1 ruling Wednesday. Though already blocked by the courts, Wednesday's ruling marks the first time an appellate court has judged the merit's of Trump's executive order. "We conclude that the Executive Order is invalid because it contradicts the plain language of the 14th Amendment's grant of citizenship to "all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," the three-judge panel said in its ruling. Judge Patrick Bumatay, a Trump appointee, dissented, stating the states lacked standing to bring the challenge. Trump issued his executive order among his first actions after being inaugurated as the 47th president of the United States on Jan. 20. It has since been met with challenges in court in lawsuits filed by both states and civil rights organizations. The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 following the Civil War to grant citizenship to people who were born in the United States, including children of formerly enslaved Black people. The Trump administration argues that the 14th Amendment should be narrowly interpreted so that birthright citizenship is not granted to children if their parents are undocumented or if their parents' presence was lawful but temporary, such as those on work or student visas, at the time of birth. Trump, who campaigned on leading an anti-immigration administration, had vowed during his campaign to end birthright citizenship, despite legal experts questioning his ability to do so. The Democratic-led states countered that denying citizenship to children born here is unconstitutional, and that if his executive order was allowed to stand newborns would lose their ability to participate in American society. Washington State, Oregon, Arizona and Illinois filed their challenge to the executive order on Jan. 21. They were awarded an injunction in the case in early February. And last month, in a win for Trump in the case, the conservative-dominated Supreme Court ruled along ideological lines 6-3 in a case that consolidated the plaintiffs from three separate litigations, that judges could not issue nationwide injunctions against the president, but allowed those in class-action lawsuits. "The court agrees that the president cannot redefine what it means to be American with the stroke of a pen," Washington Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement Wednesday. "He cannot strip away the rights, liberties and protections of children born in our country."
UPI
6 hours ago
- UPI
House subpoenas Maxwell; judge denies Epstein grand jury files release
1 of 4 | Protesters hold photos of Jeffrey Epstein and President Donald Trump outside a bail hearing at Manhattan Federal Court in July 2019 after Epstein's arrest on sex-trafficking charges in New York City. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo July 23 (UPI) -- In the ongoing political drama over the so-called Jeffrey Epstein list of sex offenders, several developments took place Wednesday. A U.S. House panel on Wednesday formally subpoenaed Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, while a U.S. district judge on the same day refused to unseal the grand jury testimony and records from cases against Epstein in the past. The House Oversight Committee on Wednesday subpoenaed Maxwell to depose her on Aug. 11 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee, Fla. Maxwell, 63, was an associate of former financier and convicted sex offender Epstein, who killed himself while jailed in New York City and awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges that included minors in 2019. She also is the daughter of former British media mogul Robert Maxwell and is serving a 20-year prison sentence in Florida after a jury found her guilty of sex trafficking in 2021. "The facts and circumstances surrounding both your and Mr. Epstein's cases have received immense public interest and scrutiny," House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said in the subpoena. Comer said the Justice Department also is undertaking "efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to your and Mr. Epstein's cases." "It is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally," he added, "and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of you and Mr. Epstein." House speaker questions Maxwell's credibility Comer submitted the subpoena a day after a House Oversight subcommittee approved a motion that directed him to seek Maxwell's testimony before the Oversight Committee. The Justice Department on Tuesday also announced it will interview Maxwell soon to provide greater transparency in the case against Epstein. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on Wednesday questioned the credibility of Maxwell's testimony. "Could she be counted on to tell the truth?" Johnson asked reporters. "Is she a credible witness?" He called Maxwell "a person who's been sentenced to many, many years in prison for terrible, unspeakable conspiratorial acts and acts against innocent young people." The subpoena announcement comes on the same day that a federal judge denied one of three Justice Department requests to release grand jury records from Epstein's grand jury trial there. U.S. District of Southern Florida Judge Robin Rosenberg refused to unseal the grand jury testimony and records from cases against Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Rosenberg said the Justice Department did not sufficiently outline arguments to unseal the court records. She also denied a request to transfer the matter to the U.S. District Court for Southern New York. Two federal judges there similarly are considering DOJ motions to unseal grand jury files from the former Epstein cases. Bondi said Trump's name is in the files While those rulings are pending, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump his name appears in the Epstein files, The New York Times reported on Wednesday. Bondi did not state the context in which Trump is mentioned, and White House Communications Director Steven Cheung said Trump did not engage in any wrongdoing. Instead, Trump expelled Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club because the president thought Epstein was a "creep," Cheung added. Bondi earlier suggested she would release files related to the Epstein case, but recently said they don't contain anything noteworthy. Her announcement regarding the files triggered controversy, including among Republican congressional members. Johnson canceled Thursday's House session and said the chamber will recess until Sept. 2.
