logo
FAMU presidency controversy continues into contract conversation

FAMU presidency controversy continues into contract conversation

Yahoo06-06-2025
A brick sign welcomes visitors to the Florida A&M campus in Tallahassee. (Photo by Jay Waagmeester/Florida Phoenix)
Controversy continues to swirl around the president designate of Florida A&M University with the latest dispute over Marva Johnson's five- year contract and how she will earn her pay.
FAMU Board of Trustees Chair Kristin Harper said Friday Johnson's contract puts the university at odds with the FAMU Foundation, which is responsible for providing most of the money in the contract. That's because state law caps state contributions at $200,000 annually for presidential salaries.
FAMU Foundation's board chair said it could not afford a $750,000 base salary, the Tallahassee Democrat reported, which is what Johnson requested.
The FAMU Foundation anticipated the new president's salary would be $588,562, Harper said, reading from a letter from the foundation.
The contract says the board 'shall use its best efforts to cause the foundation to contribute to the university portions of all payments' beyond $200,000. That language concerns Harper, who said she is not sure trustees have the ability to make the foundation, a direct support organization of the university, do anything.
'I have concerns about the burden, the financial burden that this places on the university and the university's inability to fund this sweetheart deal of sweetheart deals,' Harper said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
There was significant pushback among alumni to Johnson's candidacy much of which was centered around Johnson's political connections to former Gov. Rick Scott and Gov. Ron DeSantis. Alumni also cited the lack of higher education administration experience as a reason to reject. Johnson.
Despite the opposition the FAMU Board of Trustees voted 8-4 last month to select Johnson its next president. Harper voted against selecting Johnson. After the trustees approved Johnson, the board voted to put FAMU trustee Nicole Washington in charge of negotiating the contract. At the time, Harper said she was offended.
The pick to run Florida's only public HBCU is an ally to top Florida Republicans
On Friday Washington disagreed with Harper's assessment about the foundation's ability to pay.
'It's my understanding that the foundation will be required to amend their budget to accommodate this expense,' Washington said.
'Required is quite a strong word,' Harper replied.
Washington on Friday stood by the contract she negotiated, which was ultimately approved with an 8-3 vote.
'I compare this process to, similar to, buying a house. I still regret not buying a house back in 2017 when the median home price in Florida was $237[,000]. In 2025, that median price is $389,400, a 60% increase. The market has changed,' Washington said, calling the contract 'competitive yet balanced.'
Johnson is yet to be approved by the Board of Governors. If approved, her contract would take effect Aug. 1.
Total compensation would be about $840,000 in the first year and rises up to about $981,000 in the final year.
Comparing the contract to other historically Black colleges and universities, the FAMU contract rises above the average HBCU contracts that search consultants evaluated of $446,094. The average of other institutions with a similar research capacity as FAMU is $617,021, according to consultants.
Trustee Craig Reed took issue with the size of the contract compared to former President Larry Robinson, whose total salary was $591,669 in his last year.
'I find it highly difficult to approve a contract that significantly exceeds, essentially, what we paid our previous president that had significant experience as a sitting president and as a faculty member in a higher ed institution,' Reed said.
Compared to other State University institutions, FAMU's package would land it below the 50th percentile in the first year, which is $899,644.
The contract also provides Johnson a spot as a faculty member at the FAMU college of law after her presidency.
One concern voiced by some trustees and a pack of people during public comment, was whether the contract prioritizes retention rather than performance.
The five-year contract would start Johnson at a base salary of $650,000 with a 3% annual increase.
The contract provides annual performance compensation of $86,000, if the board deems her performance worthy. For comparison, the recently negotiated University of Florida contract would've provided Santa Ono with a 20% performance bonus. Johnson's performance bonus would be approximately 13% of her salary.
Her contract provides a $150,000 annual retention payment, able to be cashed out after the three and five-year marks. The retention bonus would be approximately 23% of her annual base salary.
'I'm just concerned, you know, about what matters more to this board: Occupying a seat or delivering outcomes for student success?' Harper said, adding that she would prefer that performance and retention were swapped.
Trustee Zayla Bryant, a student, stood with Harper.
'And with that only being less than half of what her retention payment would be, I feel like that sets a clear standard or sets a clear indicator that her presence is more important than her performance,' Bryant said.
But Washington countered that the two are intertwined.
'It's interesting that you see that as an 'either or.' I see that as a 'both and.' In order for the president to remain for three years would require that she has performed over that time,' Washington responded, adding that 'This is not a contract that anybody is going to get just for sitting in the seat.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not
Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump keeps saying that Republicans' mega tax and spending cut legislation will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. It does not. At best, Donald Trump's 'no tax on Social Security' claim exaggerates the benefits to seniors if either the House or Senate-passed proposals is signed into law. Here's a look at Trump's recent statements, and what the proposals would — or would not — do. What Trump has said Trump repeatedly told voters during his 2024 campaign that he would eliminate taxes on Social Security. As his massive legislative package has moved through Congress, the Republican president has claimed that's what the bill would do. Trump said on a recent appearance on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures" that the bill includes 'no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime.' A temporary tax deduction But instead of eliminating the tax, the Senate and House have each passed their own versions of a temporary tax deduction for seniors aged 65 and over, which applies to all income — not just Social Security. And it turns out not all Social Security beneficiaries will be able to claim the deduction. Those who won't be able to do so include the lowest-income seniors who already don't pay taxes on Social Security, those who choose to claim their benefits before they reach age 65 and those above a defined income threshold. The Senate proposal includes a temporary $6,000 deduction for seniors over the age of 65, contrasted with the House proposal, which includes a temporary deduction of $4,000. The Senate proposal approved Tuesday would eliminate Social Security tax liability for seniors with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less or $150,000 if filing as a married couple. If passed into law, the tax deduction would last four years, from 2025 to 2029. The deductions phase out as income increases. White House touts impact Touting a new Council of Economic Advisers analysis, the White House said Tuesday that '88% of all seniors who receive Social Security — will pay NO TAX on their Social Security benefits," going on to say that the Senate proposal's $6,000 senior deduction 'is estimated to benefit 33.9 million seniors, including seniors not claiming Social Security. The deduction yields an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per senior who benefits from it.' Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation think tank, said conflating the tax deduction with a claim that there will be no tax on Social Security could end up confusing and angering a lot of seniors who will expect to not pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits,' Watson said. Economic effect The cost of actually eliminating the tax on Social Security would have massive impacts on the economy. University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits 'would reduce revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase federal debt by 7 percent by 2054" and speed up the projected depletion date of the Social Security Trust Fund from 2034 to 2032. Discussions over taxes on Social Security are just part of the overall bill, which is estimated in its Senate version to increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Administration officials have said the cost of the tax bill would be offset by tariff income. Recently, the CBO separately estimated that Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall.

Morning Bid: Deadline? What deadline?
Morning Bid: Deadline? What deadline?

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Morning Bid: Deadline? What deadline?

LONDON (Reuters) -What matters in U.S. and global markets today Global stocks are tiptoeing higher, while the U.S. dollar continues to struggle at three-year lows against a basket of currencies. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell says the central bank is in no rush to raise rates - despite pressure from President Donald Trump. With a week to go until the July 9 deadline tariffs and a raft of key employment data in the next two days, market activity is, for the most part, pretty subdued for now. Mike Dolan is enjoying some well-deserved time off over the next two weeks, but the Reuters markets team is here to provide you with all the information you need to start your day. Today's Market Minute * U.S. Senate Republicans passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill on Tuesday by the narrowest of margins. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. * The Iranian military loaded naval mines onto vessels in the Gulf last month, a move that intensified concerns in Washington that Tehran was gearing up to blockade the Strait of Hormuz following Israel's strikes on sites across Iran, according to two U.S. officials. * The United States could reach a trade deal with India that would help American companies compete in the South Asian country and leave it facing far lower tariffs, President Donald Trump said on Tuesday, while casting doubt on a possible deal with Japan. * A core tenet of sovereign debt investment is that strong institutions keep down a country's borrowing costs and vice versa. So then why, ask professors Ugo Panizza and Mitu Gulati, has the bond market's response to U.S. President Donald Trump's institutional norm-busting been so tame? * It's easy to come up with reasons to be bearish about U.S. equities given elevated valuations and the uncertainty surrounding the country's economic outlook. But Stephanie Guild, Chief Investment Officer of Robinhood Markets, claims there is a positive trend cutting across all this negativity: capital expenditure growth. Deadline? What deadline? Blink and you'll miss it. Two weeks ago, markets were fretting about the prospect of all-out war in the Middle East, as Israel and Iran bombed one another. One week ago, global markets were rallying in relief as the oil price cratered following the U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, and a fragile ceasefire that appeared to be holding. Now, with a week to go until Trump's July 9 deadline on tariffs, markets have moved on to how long Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell can resist pressure from the president to cut interest rates. Markets are already preparing for a Trump loyalist to replace Powell when his term expires next May. Almost four quarter-point cuts over the next year are now priced into the equation in 2026, up from closer to three just a month ago. Investors have largely expressed their views on tariffs through the currency market and, as far as forex is concerned, July 9 is shaping up to be just another day at the office. Implied currency options volatility - a measure of demand from traders to buy protection against large price swings - surged in early April, when Trump unveiled his raft of tariffs on practically every country on the planet, and continued to do so even after he'd hit the pause button on April 9, peaking shortly afterwards. Since then, volatility has subsided, whether for stocks, bonds or currencies, as investors have become more immune to the president's on-again-off-again approach to trade policy. And that's no surprise. Having said he would secure 90 deals in 90 days, so far there is just one fairly limited deal in the bag, with the UK. In fact, Trump's to-ing and fro-ing on tariffs has been so frequent, it's given rise to the acronym TACO, which stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out", something many investors now factor in when placing trades. Last Friday, Trump said the July 9 deadline was not fixed. "We can do whatever we want," he told reporters at the White House. Then, on Tuesday, he said he wasn't thinking of extending it at all, mentioning Japan as his latest bugbear. In the face of such dizzying switches, forex traders are assuming there will ultimately be some kind of market-soothing pause, reversal, compromise or general can-kicking while the U.S. administration attempts to hash out agreements. Implied volatility for euro options expiring on July 9 is around 8.5%, very much in line with its recent range. For comparison, a month ago, the one-month options - which then expired on July 9 - were at exactly this level, while two-month options two months ago were above 9%. Back in early April, at the time of the pause, three-month euro implied volatility topped 10%. The pattern is virtually identical for all the major currencies that are exposed to tariffs, including the Canadian dollar, Japanese yen and Mexican peso. It's not just currencies either. The VIX volatility index, known as Wall Street's "fear index", has been trading below the attention-grabbing 20 mark, for much of the last two months following a spike to 60 in early April. Drilling down, weekly VIX futures that expire on July 9 have drifted into "sanguine" territory, at around 18.65 from a peak above 20 in mid-June, when Israel/Iran hostilities boiled over. In the run-up to Liberation Day, the weekly VIX futures contract that expired on April 2 hit a top of around 25. Central bankers, major asset managers, private equity giants, politicians, the heads of the world's largest companies and just about everyone has cited tariffs as the biggest uncertainty facing the world right now. As always with markets, someone will be right and someone will be wrong. There is still some time to go before July 9. Chart of the day The monthly ADP private payrolls report is due later in the day and, based on a survey of economists by Reuters, is expected to have risen by 95,000 in June, up from May's three-year low of 37,000, but below June 2024's 150,000 rise. The ADP report usually lands two days before the more comprehensive monthly non-farm payrolls report and, although there is no correlation between the two, investors inevitably use ADP as some form of steer on what to expect from the upcoming government report. Since hitting a COVID-era peak of 807,000 in late 2021, private sector payrolls growth has been moderating. Today's events to watch * June ADP payrolls report * Tesla second-quarter deliveries * ECB Forum on Central Banking 2025 in Sintra, Portugal wraps up * EIA weekly crude inventories * World UFO Day on the anniversary of the Roswell incident Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. Want to receive the Morning Bid in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for the newsletter here. (By Amanda Cooper; Editing by Anna Szymanski.) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store