Martin Lewis issues urgent statement to anyone saving money in Lifetime ISA
Martin Lewis has voiced his concerns following a scathing report that labelled a key ISA product as 'confusing' and in need of 'more warnings'. The personal finance guru responded after a group of MPs suggested that the dual-purpose design of the Lifetime Isa, or Lisa, could be leading people astray from more suitable products and causing them to opt for unsuitable investment strategies.
The Lifetime ISA (LISA) is a savings account designed to assist individuals aged 18-39 in purchasing their first home or saving for retirement. It provides a 25% government bonus on savings up to £4,000 per annum until the account holder reaches 50.
Withdrawals for a first home purchase (up to £450,000) or from age 60 are tax-free, while other withdrawals incur a 25% government charge.
Mr Lewis, a long-standing critic, has pointed out that the £450,000 LISA house price limit has remained static since its inception in 2017, despite a significant increase in house prices during this period. This has resulted in some first-time buyers struggling to find a suitable property within the limit, and savers who purchase a home that no longer qualifies are effectively hit with a 6.25% penalty to withdraw funds.
The founder of MoneySavingExpert.com weighed in on the report this morning, highlighting a significant issue with Lifetime ISAs: "Lifetime ISAs have worked well for many, but there is a growing hole that needs urgently addressing. No first-time buyer should be penalised for accessing their LISA savings to buy their first property - as that's what the state, and the marketing, encourages them to do."
"Yet that's what happens when young people, priced out by inflation, try to use their LISA savings for a home above the £450,000 threshold (which hasn't moved since LISAs launched in 2017) - as is getting more common in the SE of England. It's understandable that they don't get the 25% bonus, but they are effectively fined 6.25% of their money (so £625 per £10,000 saved) to withdraw it. This is unfair, unjust and the rules need changing. If a LISA is used to buy a property above the threshold, there's should be no fine, they should get back at least what they put in.
"And this flaw doesn't just hurt those with LISAs. It puts off many young people, especially from lower-income backgrounds, who tend to be more risk-averse, from opening LISAs in the first place.
"This is something we've banged the drum about for years. So, I'm glad it appears in the Treasury Committee report. It's a small fix, with very little cost to the state, that would enable and encourage many young people to feel confident about LISAs - and so it's critical it's addressed in the government's imminently expected ISA review."
The Treasury Committee has raised concerns that the dual-purpose design of the Lifetime Isa, or Lisa, might be leading savers astray from more appropriate financial products. The MPs highlighted that the Lisa's twin goals of supporting short and long-term savings could result in people opting for investment strategies that don't suit their needs.
For those saving towards buying their first home, cash Lisas may be appropriate, but they fall short for individuals looking to use them as a retirement savings vehicle, where the inability to invest in higher-risk, potentially higher-return options like bonds and equities is a disadvantage, according to the committee.
Furthermore, the committee criticised the current regulations that penalise benefit recipients as "nonsensical". They pointed out that under the existing rules, any funds in a Lisa can impact one's eligibility for universal credit or housing benefit – a stark contrast to other pension schemes such as workplace pensions and Sipps (self-invested personal pensions), which are not considered in the same way for benefits assessments.
The report stated: " The Government provides higher levels of contribution through tax relief to many other pension products that are not included in the universal credit eligibility assessment, such as workplace pensions and Sipps (self-invested personal pensions). Treating one retirement product differently from others in that regard is nonsensical."
The report urged caution, stating: "If the Government is unwilling to equalise the treatment of the Lifetime Isa with other Government-subsidised retirement savings products in universal credit assessments, Lifetime Isa products must include warnings that the Lifetime Isa is an inferior product for anyone who might one day be in receipt of universal credit."
It warned that without such alerts, "Such warnings would guard against savers being sold products that are not in their best financial interests, which might well constitute mis-selling."
The Lisa scheme allows savers under 50 to put away up to £4,000 each year, securing a generous 25% bonus from the Government.
The incentive can amount to as much as £1,000 annually until the saver turns 50. Withdrawals from a Lisa are free for certain life events like purchasing a first home, reaching 60, or facing terminal illness with less than a year to live.
However, those withdrawing funds for other reasons will be hit with a stiff 25% fee, potentially ending up with even less than they invested. The report outlined: "The withdrawal charge of 25% is applied to unauthorised withdrawals, causing Lisa holders to lose the Government bonuses that they have received, plus 6.25% of their own contributions."
"Several witnesses described that loss of 6.25% as a 'withdrawal penalty'." Lisas also come with property price caps for those looking to buy their first home; homes over £450,000 aren't eligible under the scheme.
The report highlighted concerns, stating: "Many people have lost a portion of their savings due to a lack of understanding of the withdrawal charge or because of unforeseen changes in their circumstances, such as buying a first home at a price greater than the cap. However, the case for reducing the charge must be balanced against the impact on Government spending. The Lifetime Isa must include a deterrent to discourage savers from withdrawing funds from long-term saving."
It further cautioned: "Before considering any increase in the house price cap, the Government must analyse whether the Lifetime Isa is the most effective way in which to spend taxpayers' money to support first-time buyers."
The committee observed a worrying trend in the 2023-24 financial year, noting that nearly double the number of people made an unauthorised withdrawal (99,650) compared to those who used their Lisa to purchase a home (56,900), suggesting the product may not be fulfilling its purpose.
By the close of the tax year 2023-24, there were approximately 1.3 million Lisa accounts in existence, according to the report.
Dame Meg Hillier, chairwoman of the Treasury Committee, expressed support for the scheme's aims but questioned its efficiency: "The committee is firmly behind the objectives of the Lifetime Isa, which are to help those who need it onto the property ladder and to help people save for retirement from an early age. The question is whether the Lifetime Isa is the best way to spend billions of pounds over several years to achieve those goals.
"We know that the Government is looking at Isa reform imminently, which means this is the perfect time to assess if this is the best way to help the people who need it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
10 hours ago
- Metro
Martin Lewis demands 'critical' action as LISA savers face losing thousands
Martin Lewis has called on the government to fix a 'growing hole' in the Lifetime ISA (LISA) scheme. The Money Saving Expert warns that thousands of first-time buyers are being unfairly penalised by outdated rules. He says that action is 'critical' and must be taken. LISAs were first launched by the Conservative Government in 2017 to help under-40s save for a retirement or first home. You can open one at 18 and put in up to £4,000 a year. The government adds 25% on top — so essentially, it's 'free' money. Since its launch, more than one million people have opened a LISA. If you opened one in 2017, and deposited the maximum £4,000 a year, you'd already have £32,000 of your own savings. The government's extra 25% brings you to £40,000. But despite their popularity, Martin says the scheme is now actively discouraging people from saving. This is due to the fact that the maximum property you can buy with a LISA is £450,000 — a threshold which hasn't budged since it launched nearly a decade ago. If someone then needed to withdraw their LISA money to buy a property over this cap, they'd lose the government bonus completely, and face a 6.25% penalty on their own savings. Fuel your wanderlust with our curated newsletter of travel deals, guides and inspiration. Sign up here. On the maximum £40,000 saved, that's a £2,500 penalty. This money is taken from the saver's own contributions. With house prices soaring, particularly in the south east of England, the Money Saving Expert says more and more people are exceeding the limit. And when that happens, the cost is steep. 'No first-time buyer should be penalised for accessing their LISA savings to buy their first property – as that's what the state, and the marketing, encourages them to do,' Lewis said. 'It's understandable that they don't get the 25% bonus, but they're effectively fined £625 for every £10,000 they've saved. It's unfair, it's unjust, and the rules need changing.' The Money Saving Expert claimed that the current system is putting off a whole generation of hopeful savers. 'This flaw doesn't just hurt those with LISAs,' he said. 'It puts off many young people, especially from lower-income backgrounds, who tend to be more risk-averse, from opening LISAs in the first place.' MPS on the Treasury Committee have been investigating whether LISAs remain fit for purpose. In their new report, they argue that the dual purpose of helping savers prepare for both home ownership and retirement 'makes it more likely consumers will choose unsuitable investment strategies'. 'Cash LISAs may suit those saving for a first home but may not achieve the best outcome for those using it as a retirement savings product,' the report reads. 'As they are unable to invest in higher-risk but potentially higher-return products such as bonds and equities.' Martin, who has highlighted the issue previously, welcomed the report's findings. He said: 'This is something we've banged the drum about for years. So, I'm glad it appears in the Treasury Committee report. More Trending Martin Lewis has campaigned for a reduction in the withdrawal charge to 20%. He said: 'I have no problem with the withdrawal penalty in its own right. I have a problem with it for first-time buyers buying a house. 'We have a succession of young people who are saving in the vehicle they have been encouraged to save in by the state, who are then trying to use their savings to buy a first-time property, but due to house price inflation their property has just tripped above the £450,000 level. 'Then not only do they not get the £1,000 a year bonus they were intended to get, which I understand is legitimate as a threshold, but they are fined by the state effectively 6.25% of their own money in order to withdraw that money to get the cash out.' Martin describes the removal of the charge as a 'small fix', that would have very little cost to the state. He adds that it would encourage many young feel to feel confident about LISAs and that it's 'critical it's dressed'. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Council tax is set to rise – here's how to save money MORE: How to get money off your supermarket shop at Aldi and Iceland this summer MORE: The holiday scam that could rob you of thousands of pounds
The Herald Scotland
11 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Is it time to ditch your Premium Bonds and bank your money?
New figures obtained via a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to NS&I show that Premium Bond holders are waiting 3.5 years to win a prize, and when they do win, 9 out of 10 walk away with less than £2,000. The vast majority of jackpots go to those holding over £25,000, making this savings product far less rewarding than putting the money into the bank with a high-interest account. Why do so many people give children Premium Bonds? Premium Bonds are only a decent bet if - You've a big whack in, say £10,000+ - & you pay tax on savings interest Most kids have/do neither. With £1,000 in over a year with typical (median average) luck you'll win nothing — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) December 10, 2024 That's before bond holders factor in the cuts in the prize pot in recent months, with fewer big wins to go round. How many Premium Bonds winners are there each month? There will be an estimated 75 prizes of £100,000 for future draws, down from 79. Meanwhile, the number of £50,000 prizes will be reduced to 151 from 159. The number of £25,000 prizes will fall to 302 from 317, and £10,000 prizes to 754 from 792. However, the number of £1 million prizes will remain the same, at two. The number of £25 prizes is also set to increase for August's draw, with an estimated 2.56 million available, up from 2.19 million. How many people have Premium Bonds? Premium Bonds have become a national savings staple, with more than 24 million people holding over £130 billion in total. A survey of 2,000 UK adults by Octopus Money reveals the main reason for investing in Premium Bonds is the perceived lack of risk in losing the initial investment, followed by the tax-free status of a win and the possibility of a large return. While Premium Bonds do offer the chance of winning prizes, the analysis suggests Britain's favourite savings product is failing to deliver real value for everyday savers - most never win anything at all and the odds are highly skewed in favour of those with the biggest holdings. ERNIE (Electronic Random Number Indicator Equipment) was created by the team who built Colossus, the WWII code breaker. The first ERNIE used neon tubes to generate random numbers and took a full 10 days to complete a Premium Bonds draw!🖥️ — nsandi (@nsandi) June 18, 2025 In the past five years, 94% of Premium Bond jackpot winners held over £10,000, while three quarters (75%) held over £25,000. In 2024, 88% of Premium Bond prize winners took home less than £2,000 and just 0.32% of all winners won more than £10,000. Less than a fifth of UK adults (19%) believe they could generate better long-term results elsewhere, while the same proportion don't understand how Premium Bonds work - indicating a limited understanding of the saving product's actual value. Over £4.25 billion has been held in Premium Bond accounts that have had no activity in the past decade - earning zero interest. Ruth Handcock, CEO of Octopus Money says: 'While products like Premium Bonds may work well for some, others are missing out on strategies that could grow their wealth and deliver stronger returns over time. Recommended reading: "Premium Bonds are unlikely to outpace inflation, so your money may seem 'safe' but it's quietly shrinking in value over time. "The truth is that millions of people could be getting more from their money, but they need access to affordable, personalised advice to help them figure out what's right for them - something that only 9% of people in the UK currently receive. "Without it, they stick with what feels familiar or they're left in financial limbo, unsure how to take that first step.'
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Martin Lewis recommends making one swap when paying by card on holiday
Martin Lewis shared a handy tip for holidaymakers who are keen to keep costs down when it comes to dining out abroad and it all comes down to how you pay Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis has shared a nifty tip for globetrotters seeking to pinch their pennies - particularly when dining or drinking out overseas, and it all comes down to your mode of payment. On his latest instalment of The Martin Lewis Podcast on BBC Sounds, the financial guru offered key advice for those opting to use cards. In an intriguing segment titled "Should you pay in Pounds or Euros on plastic abroad?" Martin reveals his insider knack for cutting costs. Encountering the option to pay in either the local currency or Great British Pounds at checkouts and ATMs is common, prompting a decision every traveller faces. Martin, however, asserts that there's indeed an optimal choice here. Martin advised: "Well the correct answer is you should always pay in Euros or whatever the local currency is, because that means it's your plastic that's doing the exchange rate conversion, not the overseas shop or ATM." For getting true bang for your buck, Martin suggests acquiring a specialised overseas debit or credit card that offers "near perfect exchange rate" - a savvy move for any thrifty traveller, reports the Express. He elaborated: "But even if you don't have one of those, then even your bog standard UK credit or debit card that's adding about a three per cent fee onto the exchange rate, in all the experiments I've done and when most people go abroad, they do a pub crawl, I do an ATM crawl to check these rates." Summing up his findings, he said: "In all the experiments I've done, even a bog standard UK card is beating most overseas ATMs, or shops exchange rates so you want it to do the conversion which means you must always pay in the local currency." His advice was clear: "Pay in Euros, pay in dollars, pay in Dong if you're in Vietnam." Martin Lewis and the team at Money Saving Expert have detailed a number of the best travel credit and debit cards available. Find more information, here.
