logo
Apartment developers gear up for tariffs

Apartment developers gear up for tariffs

Yahoo05-06-2025
This story was originally published on Multifamily Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Multifamily Dive newsletter.
As executives at Houston-based Camden Property Trust underwrite their apartment developments with tariffs on the horizon, they're only figuring in a 2% to 3% increase in construction costs.
With the ever-changing threat of tariffs from President Donald Trump, that number may appear suspiciously low. But it's not a mistake, according to Camden CEO Ric Campo.
'The reason it's not more is that we've been to this movie before,' Campo said on the REIT's first-quarter earnings call last month. 'Under the [Trump] administration 1.0, there were tariffs and there were issues, and COVID created a lot of interesting supply chain issues, as we all know.'
That tariff and pandemic experience created a practice run for apartment developers, setting them up to meet 2025's challenges. 'What a lot of folks have done, including the apartment industry and construction industry, is we have tried to get our supply chain closer to our projects, and a lot of effort has gone into getting supply chains that are not as vulnerable as Asian supply chains,' Campo said.
Though those experiences have helped apartment developers plan for tariffs 2.0, there are still challenges this time around. There is a universal 10% tariff on all imports this time, and uncertainty lingers, with the timing and scale of Trump's levies remaining a moving target.
Then there's the issue of legality.
With the U.S. Court of International Trade striking down April's 'Liberation Day' tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China last week, questions linger about whether the trade war will end before shots are really even fired. A day later, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed that ruling.
But even with the ground shifting beneath them, apartment developers have to plan for the worst, which includes high prices and potential shortages for the materials and products they need to complete their projects. Here is how they're preparing.
Count Rene Bello, founder and CEO of Miami-based real estate investment and development firm BLDG Ventures, among those dusting off his playbook from the first Trump administration.
'Because we have had experience with this before, we're looking at retooling on some of the strategies we use,' Bello told Multifamily Dive.
For Bello, preparing ahead means cutting out the middleman for price-sensitive materials. He went directly to vendors to order 75,000 square feet of flooring for an entire building, for example, six to 10 months ahead of time. 'We can buy in large quantities, well in advance,' he said.
In other cases, Bello is flying to other countries to line up materials. During the winter, he met with his Colombia-based glazing manufacturer.
'We knew that we need to get ahead of that, and then we just had a very clear and honest conversation with our contractors and our suppliers about how can we effectively get on their books well in advance rather than waiting six to nine months down the pipeline and then having to absorb the full run on these tariffs,' Bello said.
Bello isn't the only executive buying more than he currently needs before he needs it. Cameron Gunter, co-CEO of PEG, a Provo, Utah-based owner, operator and developer of multifamily, hospitality and build-to-rent properties, has two multifamily projects currently in development, with one in Tucson, Arizona, slated to open later this year.
'We bought a bunch of our cabinets out of China,' Gunter told Multifamily Dive. 'So we took our first shipment as we started to see this issue on tariffs. We haven't installed it, but it's all stored on property.'
With Trump's May 90-day pause on Chinese tariffs to allow for time to negotiate with different countries, Gunter expects to get his second shipment before the levies kick in. 'We'll be able to get those here in the next 90 days,' he said in May.
Bello isn't just ordering ahead to try to beat tariffs. He's putting his projects through a value-engineering process to avoid countries with the highest tariffs.
'We're not buying things from the Asian markets,' Bello said. 'We should see a higher pricing and tariff on those materials coming from those parts of the globe.'
But so far, the cost increases haven't hit all products in the same way.
'We're seeing, on average, between 3% and 5% increases for trades like glazing, electrical [and] raw materials,' Bello said. 'With fixtures and lighting, you'll definitely see an increase between 10% and 20%. We're also seeing lead times extended.'
Bello is also opening the door to American-made products, like paints and bath fixtures. In May, he was on a call with an architect deciding between two options for toilets — German-made Toto and American Standard made in the U.S. The choice was easy, even if it wasn't what he wanted.
'As much as I'd love to put in a beautiful Toto bath fixture, we said, 'Look, American Standard is American made,'' Bello said. 'We know that there won't be any tariffs implemented on those American-made fixtures. So we'll go in that direction.'
PEG also builds hotels, which require it to purchase furniture, fixtures and equipment. With many of those products, the firm is sourcing from new countries. 'We shifted from China to Vietnam or Taiwan,' Gunter said.
But Gunter said there are limits, specifically related to costs, to buying what is produced in America. 'We're finding some ways around it,' Gunter said. 'I don't think the answer is sourcing stuff out of the U.S., unless rents really climb or AI takes [manufacturing] jobs because it's just tough [to make the numbers work].'
With about 4,500 units in annual starts, Tysons Corner, Virginia-based owner, manager and developer Middleburg Communities can lock in purchasing agreements with suppliers and vendors. So far, CEO Chris Finlay, who has seen tariffs push up costs roughly 3%, said his subcontractors are basically eating the costs of the increases as construction starts have fallen.
'Work is just more scarce now,' Finlay told Multifamily Dive. 'If you're a subcontractor, you're trying to win the business. Taking some tariff risk to win the deal is what I think a lot of people are doing.'
For PEG's Gunter, the goal is to share the burden of price hikes. 'I can create contingencies where they have it as part of their [guaranteed maximum price] and we use that contingency to cover any tariffs based on the general contractor piece,' he said. 'If it goes over that, there's a responsibility. If it comes under that, there's a shared savings clause.'
Still, Gunter said there are some questions about whether general contractors are willing to take those risks going forward, even if work is more scarce. However, even if subs are reluctant to eat the additional tariffs, general savings in labor prices may help developers offset the additional burden of tariffs.
On AvalonBay Communities' first-quarter earnings call last month, Chief Investment Officer Matthew Birenbaum said materials costs are generally 25% to 30% of the Arlington, Virginia-based REIT's overall hard costs and 20% of total project costs.
While tariffs could push overall costs by 3% to 4%, a reduction in labor prices could offset some of that. 'On those jobs we are actively bidding today, our phones are ringing off the hook with deeper bid coverage and stronger subcontractor availability than we have seen in years,' Birenbaum said.
Brad Hill, CEO of Memphis-based REIT MAA, said his development team is getting the same calls. 'Given the reduction in the new starts and the supply pipeline, we're getting better pricing at the moment from many of our GCs and development partners,' he said on the REIT's first-quarter earnings call last month. 'Margins are tightening up a bit, and they're getting a little bit hungrier for new starts.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Energy Transfer Playing The Long Game While Everyone Else Panics
Energy Transfer Playing The Long Game While Everyone Else Panics

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Energy Transfer Playing The Long Game While Everyone Else Panics

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET)'s share price was under pressure from the broader market since early 2025. This is one of those stocks that doesn't make headlines like the flashy tech companies, but is quietly building something huge while most investors are looking for the next AI company. In this article I'll analyze ET in light of recent developments and give my investment decision. Pipeline Empire Getting Bigger Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with ET. ET has one of the biggest networks in America when it comes to energy. I'm talking about over 125,000 miles of pipeline that crosses more than 30 states. That shows that ET is a company that is essentially the American energy's circulatory system. The first thing I want to touch on is how their volumes are growing overall. Interstate natural gas volumes are increased by 3% in Q1 2025 and reached a new partnership record, while crude oil shipments are up 10%, NGL shipments are up 4% and NGL exports are up 5%. Those are some really big numbers and we can clearly see the huge amount of energy that's flowing through their system every day. Before starting the year ET announced that they made an investment decision for the Hugh Brinson Pipeline which is a $2.7 billion project. That project links the Dallas/Fort Worth area to the Permian Basin. They say that the first phase will be able to handle 1.5 billion cubic feet of water every day and will be fully operational by the end of 2026. There's Also An AI Effect These days any company I analyze has AI related to it. ET is no different. They said they will make their first business contract to send natural gas straight to a data center. They worked out an agreement with CloudBurst Data Centers to develop a building just for AI. The facility will produce roughly 1.2 gigawatts of power which is enough for 750,000 homes. Co-CEO Tom Long said ET got requests for potential connections from 62 power plants it doesn't currently serve in 13 states and 15 power plants it currently serves. It also received requests from more than 70 potential data centers in 12 states. Companies are lining up to connect to ET's network in order to meet the massive power requirements of AI. LNG Export Opportunity The Lake Charles LNG export project by ET is going forward now that it received permission from the government to export 2.33 billion cubic feet of natural gas every single day. Facility will have a liquefaction capacity (this means maximum amount of liquefied natural gas (LNG) that the facility can produce) of 16.45 million tons yearly and will be operational by December 2028. In April 2025, ET also signed a development deal with MidOcean Energy. We really need to discuss about that essential matter. Because MidOcean promised to pay for 30% of the building costs. ET definitely benefit from increasing global LNG demand. As Europe continues to reduce its reliance on Russian gas and Asian markets expand ET has very good opportunity to take advantage of that. Debt Management Energy Transfer's long-term debt is $59 billion in Q1 2025. This was 14% greater than the year before. That might sound scary, but the company produces a lot of money and uses it to grow instead of merely paying off debt. The debt/equity ratio is also 130%, which is very bad for a regular corporation. But I can say that it's a fair sum for a midstream company that requires a lot of cash. For example if you look at peers of ET you'll see that average debt to equity ratio is around %157. That's why I can say that %130 is pretty okay ratio for ET. Dividend Analysis I clearly see that ET was distributing dividends since its IPO but it doesn't have a stable dividend growth. Even though the average dividend growth is around 8.29%, it saw a maximum of 42% and a minimum of -42% YoY dividend change. When I consider that dividend growth will grow by 6% on average in the coming years with a linear regression calculation I think we will encounter a DPS of $1.79 in 2030. This indicates a yield on cost of 10.14% which I think is not bad at all. When I look at the dividend yield, I again see serious volatility rather than stability. I calculate that the dividend yield fluctuates around 11.76% on average. In addition to that the linear regression calculation indicates a dividend yield of 8.26% in 2030. In the scenario where the dividend per share is $1.79, a dividend yield between 8.26 - 11.76% indicates that the stock price will be between $15.2 - 21.7 in 2030. If I calculate dividend growth with CAGR instead of linear regression, I reach a slightly different result. The dividend growth rate over the last five years is 16.48%. If I assume that this growth rate will continue for the next five years, I predict that the dividend per share will be $2.80 in 2030. This again indicates a share price in the range of approximately $23.8 - 34 with the same dividend yield level. The dividend analysis indicates a worst-case dividend of $1.79 per share and a share price of $15 in 2030, while the best-case dividend of $2.80 per share and a share price of $34. Since this range is mostly above ET's current share price, I can say that the dividend analysis is giving a bullish signal for the stock. Revenue Growth Seems Steady When I look at ET's revenue, especially since the beginning of 2023, I don't see any particular trend, neither positive nor negative. The revenue, which was stable at $20 billion, continues to keep net income around $1.2 billion. Net margin was fluctuating quite steadily around 5.24% since 2021. If I assume that revenue will shrink by an average of 3.9% in the next quarter, as it has in every second quarter since 2022, I can expect a revenue of $20.21 billion. This revenue indicates that net profit will be announced at $1.06 billion with an average net margin of 5.24%. With the current shares outstanding, this also indicates an EPS of $0.31. I see analyst consensus of $24 billion for revenue and $0.31 for EPS. But my calculations suggest that this is below expectations and almost the same EPS. This isn't surprising given ET consistently reported less income than expected. It looks like it might do it again. In conclusion, I can say that I see stability in the financials in general. Even if there are below expectations reports the stability continues and there is no negative trend in sight. Valuations and Profitability ET currently stands at 11.86x forward P/E, above its historical average of 8.63x. At the same time, while it historically diverged negatively from the SP500 index's forward P/E by an average of 11.60x, this divergence is currently at -10.26x. So it can't be easily said that the stock is a cheap stock according to forward P/E analysis, but it doesn't appear to be seriously expensive either. Compared to Kinder Morgan (KMI), ET offers a higher dividend yield (7.43% vs. 4.17%) but more leverage. ET's 14.77% ROE beats KMI's 8.43%, while its forward P/E ratio of 11.86 is lower than Kinder Morgan's 22.07. ET's more aggressive growth strategy and higher leverage create more risk but also more upside potential compared to the more conservative KMI. Price Performance and Charting ET made serious lows in 2020 and 2021 due to COVID. But it recovered very well from these levels and especially in 2022 it rose above the Hodrick-Prescott filter that I use to determine the trend. After this process, the trend officially became bullish and ET ran to $20, testing these levels again for the first time since 2017. Even though it fell below $15 in early 2025, affected by the general market trend and international relations, it managed to recover again by finding support from this HP filter. Even though the stability of its financials supported ET's recovery very well, unfortunately there is not enough positive momentum. Especially the MACD shows that negative momentum is currently taking over the stock on the monthly time frame. When I go down to the weekly timeframe, I see that especially the 100 and 200-week weighted moving averages were in a bullish trend since mid-2022. But especially with the effects of the general market sell-off in the first half of 2025, the 200-week moving average seems to have been tested for the first time since 2020. It seems likely that ET, which couldn't find enough buying, will encounter a new negative momentum when looking at the MACD. This shows that ET will retreat to at least around $16. My thought here is that the financials and its position in the general market will help and support ET's price to remain at a certain level. Even though I don't think this uptrend will be easily broken, if it drops below $16 we can see ET fall to $13. Because $13 level is a support level. I still see the worst-case scenario as one where ET fluctuates between $20-13. In the positive scenario where it stays above the moving averages, I think the bullish trend will continue as long as the $20 level is broken. Risks Especially in the financials I see that ET is having difficulty fully translating its revenue growth into net profit growth. ET's PEG ratio of 0.91 may be pricing in overly optimistic growth assumptions that could disappoint the market. In addition to that I said that the company has a fee-based revenue model, but still 10% of it is inevitably exposed to volatile commodity prices. The fact that wars are currently on the agenda in the international arena increases the volatility of oil prices, which in one way or another creates potential threats or advantages to ET's production volumes. I think this issue should be monitored carefully. Finally, the fact that the volatility and instability in dividend growth are seriously high reduces confidence for dividend investors, while volume cuts may cause a dividend decrease of 42% as in 2020. ESG and Environmental Issues ET is working on emissions reduction initiatives, including its Dual Drive compression technology, which saved 789,908 tons of CO2 by 2023. They also invested in renewable energy projects and renewable natural gas initiatives, such as the Maplewood 2 Solar Project and the Eiffel Solar Project. But the company faces ongoing environmental scrutiny due to projects such as the Dakota Access Pipeline and traditional fossil fuel focuses. ESG-focused investors may continue to steer clear of the stock despite operational improvements. Bottom Line Energy Transfer is essentially a pick-and-shovel game for America's energy infrastructure. While everyone else is arguing about renewables vs. fossil fuels, ET is building the pipelines and processing facilities that transport energy across the country, regardless of source. The AI ??and data center boom are creating a huge new demand for reliable power and Energy Transfer's network is positioned to take advantage of it. The stock is unattractive, but it pays a 7.4% dividend that is well-covered by cash flow, trades at reasonable valuations and invests in projects that should drive growth in the coming years. Its debt load is manageable given its cash generation and recent acquisitions are already showing in volume numbers. The biggest risk is probably a major recession that crushes energy demand, but even then, Energy Transfer's diversified network and core infrastructure role provide some defensive features. The only negative is that in the short term, the technical data from the charting analysis is biased toward momentum, which could put ET's stock price in a somewhat sideways trend. This isn't a get rich quick story, but it is a solid dividend-paying infrastructure company that should compound returns over time as America's energy consumption continues to grow. I think it's a good long-term investment and I'm a long-term buy, although the chart shows some downside potential down to $16. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Loss of central bank independence could lead to instability, IMF warns
Loss of central bank independence could lead to instability, IMF warns

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Loss of central bank independence could lead to instability, IMF warns

By Andrea Shalal (Reuters) -The International Monetary Fund on Tuesday warned that any loss of central bank independence could undermine efforts to keep inflation expectations in check, potentially triggering a wave of financial, monetary and macroeconomic instability. The IMF hammered home that message in an update to its World Economic Outlook, released Tuesday, and in a separate interview with IMF chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas. In the update, the IMF said the current economic climate of prolonged trade tensions and uncertainty over evolving tariffs heightened the need for robust policies to safeguard financial stability and ensure central bank independence. In some cases, if tariff shocks resulted in disruptive movements in foreign exchange and risk premiums, it said it might be suitable for countries to implement temporary foreign exchange interventions or capital flow management measures. "Crucially, the ambiguous and volatile landscape also requires clear and consistent messaging from central banks and the protection of central bank independence, not only in legal terms, but also in practice," the global lender said. U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly exhorted the U.S. Federal Reserve to cut interest rates while questioning the leadership and continued tenure of Chair Jerome Powell, whose term at the Fed's helm is due to end in May 2026. Those statements have unsettled markets, worried about a loss of the longstanding principle of Fed independence. The two men sparred over cost overruns on a Fed renovation project on Friday, as Trump repeated his call for lower rates. Asked about Trump's efforts to push Powell out of office, Gourinchas underscored the importance of maintaining central bank independence to keep inflation expectations anchored. "This is really a core plank for macroeconomic stability overall. That's one of the hard learned lessons of the last 40 years," the IMF chief economist told Reuters in an interview, without mentioning the Fed specifically. "We have a very, very clear message on this - it's very important to keep central bank independence and to implement it," he said. Central bank independence was foundational to macroeconomic frameworks in both advanced and emerging economies, he said. Despite the recent era of large price increases from 2021 to 2024, markets and consumers maintained confidence in policymakers' determination to keep inflation in check over the medium term, averting a broad de-anchoring of inflation expectations. "They think that someone is at the helm, someone is in the driving seat and is going to implement monetary policy to achieve price stability," he said. "That's the credibility." Should that credibility become called into question or threatened, the link from inflation to inflation expectations would become "much more brittle," he said. Inflation could rise again suddenly due to myriad shocks, and if people did not trust central banks to do their jobs, inflation expectations would start rising, triggering wage increases, which would beget higher prices, higher interest rates and ultimately a need to "crash the economy." "So now you have macroeconomic instability. You have monetary instability and you have financial instability," he said, underscoring the need to ensure consumers and financial markets were certain that central banks would act on their own. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Sponsor branding finally removed ahead of new season beginning
Sponsor branding finally removed ahead of new season beginning

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sponsor branding finally removed ahead of new season beginning

The branding of Nationwide has finally been removed from the Nigel Eady County Ground after they ended their sponsorship of Swindon Town. In May, it was announced that the Swindon-based building society Nationwide would end its long-standing partnership with Swindon Town, having been involved with the club across two spells during 20 of the last 28 years. The agreement officially came to an end on May 31, with the deal that saw Nationwide sponsor the Don Rogers Stand and obtain a ticket discount for their employees. Swindon Town Chief Commercial Officer James Watts revealed the move came after 'an internal business review' at Nationwide, and the company said they had been 'honoured' to have supported the club. Despite the agreement ending over a month ago, their branding remained on the Don Rogers Stand and inside the ground until last week, when it was finally removed. The branding remained on the outside of the stand, and also on advertising hoardings inside, but was removed before the beginning of the new season, with Swindon set to host Cambridge United on August 9. Swindon have been pursuing new agreements for sponsorship of the Don Rogers Stand, although, as yet, no deal has been struck.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store