logo
Plea against Aadhaar for school admissions: Kerala HC seeks state govt's views

Plea against Aadhaar for school admissions: Kerala HC seeks state govt's views

Time of India2 days ago
Kochi: A high court division bench has directed the state govt to file a counter affidavit in an appeal challenging a single bench order which had upheld the state's directive requiring aided schools to provide the Aadhaar numbers of all students to prevent duplicity and bogus admissions.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The bench of Justices Anil K Narendran and S Muralee Krishna further adjourned the appeal, which was filed by the manager of St Antony's LP School at Mala in Thrissur, to Aug 8. Earlier, the single bench had dismissed the petition filed by the manager challenging the requirement to furnish Aadhaar numbers of students while determining the sanctioned staff strength of the school. The single bench had observed that the state govt, while providing grant-in-aid, was justified in insisting upon the Aadhaar numbers of all students to avoid duplicity and bogus admissions, and that there was no illegality in such action.
However, in the appeal, the manager contended that the Supreme Court, in the K S Puttaswamy case, had explicitly held that Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for school admissions, as education is neither a service nor a subsidy. He further argued that denying education to children solely because they lack an Aadhaar number would violate their fundamental right to education under Article 21A of the Constitution.
The petitioner's main grievance is that three students who were admitted to Class I do not possess UID Aadhaar numbers, and their admissions will not be considered for the purpose of sanctioning divisions and posts. Since no other student has joined Class I, and the school is classified as 'uneconomic,' no class division or teaching post will be sanctioned in light of the amended KER.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No respite as confusion prevails over Delhi fuel ban, orders awaited
No respite as confusion prevails over Delhi fuel ban, orders awaited

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

No respite as confusion prevails over Delhi fuel ban, orders awaited

After an intense backlash over the recent fuel ban targeting End-of-Life (EOL) vehicles, the Delhi Government yesterday announced that EOL vehicles will not be impounded. Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa clarified on Thursday that the government is working on an alternative system to manage vehicular pollution without compromising citizens' rights.'We will not let Delhi's environment be harmed, nor will we permit the confiscation of vehicles owned by its residents,' Sirsa assured, signaling a softened stance after days of confusion and controversy stems from a direction issued under the 2018 Supreme Court ruling that bans diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years in Delhi. A separate 2014 NGT order also bars such vehicles from parking in public spaces. The implementation of this directive recently extended to fuel stations, prohibiting fuel sales to EOL vehicles, a move that was heavily criticised. In a letter addressed to the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), Sirsa urged a pause to the enforcement of the order until the Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system is fully functional across the entire National Capital Region (NCR).The minister highlighted multiple operational roadblocks:Technological glitches and improperly placed ANPR cameras within DelhiLack of integration with NCR states' databasesUninstalled ANPR systems in adjoining regions like Gurugram and NoidaPotential rise in illegal fuel procurement due to cross-border loopholesWater Minister Parvesh Verma echoed these concerns, stating that ANPR implementation is flawed and age-based bans are irrational. 'Vehicles should be banned by looking at their pollution levels, not just their age,' he asserted, adding that uniform enforcement is absent across NCR also confirmed that Delhi officials are planning to meet with CAQM to iron out these the Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued notices to the Delhi government and CAQM, following a plea by the Delhi Petrol Dealers Association, which challenged the legality of enforcing the at fuel Minister Rekha Gupta, in a statement on X, acknowledged the public distress, "This decision is adversely affecting the daily lives and livelihoods of millions of families We are fully committed to fighting air pollution, but the transition must be balanced with citizens' social and economic needs."Senior AAP leaders Saurabh Bharadwaj and Atishi, launched a scathing attack on the BJP-led Delhi Government over the controversial vehicle fuel ban, accusing it of acting in haste and lacking administrative clarity. Saurabh Bharadwaj mocked the government's handling of the policy, likening it to the fictional 'Phulera ki Panchayat,' and questioned why the government was so eager to enforce a ban allegedly based on a Supreme Court directive, only to now seek to bypass it. He criticised the overzealous push to implement the order by March 31 and questioned the role of the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), calling it a bureaucratic body rather than a judicial authority. "If they could revoke it now, why didn't they do so earlier?" he asked, raising doubts about the motivations behind the Leader of Opposition Atishi echoed similar sentiments, branding the BJP as a 'government of U-turns' that acts under public pressure without any consistency or accountability. She pointed out that despite the public statements, no official order has yet been issued to withdraw the ELV fuel ban, further deepening the confusion. Atishi also alleged collusion between the BJP and automobile manufacturers, claiming the sudden push to scrap over 62 lakh vehicles in Delhi was driven by vested commercial interests rather than environmental concern. Demanding transparency, she challenged the BJP to reveal how much funding it had received from car manufacturers and scrap dealers, calling for answers to what she termed a betrayal of public the Delhi government's plea for postponement, CAQM is yet to issue a formal response, leaving fuel station operators in limbo. A worker at a Connaught Place petrol pump said, 'We haven't received any written order yet. Only when the company sends us a letter can we act accordingly.'advertisementUntil CAQM officially places the directive on hold, the ban technically remains in effect, adding to the ongoing confusion among citizens and enforcement to Auto Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch

'Is Election Commission God?': Pappu Yadav's 'do-or-die battle' call as roll revision row heats up
'Is Election Commission God?': Pappu Yadav's 'do-or-die battle' call as roll revision row heats up

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Is Election Commission God?': Pappu Yadav's 'do-or-die battle' call as roll revision row heats up

NEW DELHI: , who is a Congress-leaning Independent Lok Sabha MP, made a call for the "do-or-die battle" over the 's (ECI) move to revise the electoral roll as part of its special intensive revision (SIR) ahead of the . Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Labelling the poll body as "office of the ," the Purnia MP asked if the "Election Commission was God?" Pappu Yadav, who is a six-time MP, said he would lay his life for "the identity of Bihar and Bihari". "The commission is precisely the office of the RSS and should be stopped. The people are ready to end anything that threatens constitutional responsibility. Talks have been held with the Congress incharge regarding this... Is the Election Commission God?... There will be a battle across the state. And for the identity of Bihar and Bihari, if we have to sacrifice our lives, then we will do it," Pappu Yadav told news agency ANI. Earlier in the day, Congress alleged that the poll body's special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar was a "sinister exercise" to deprive lakhs of voters of their franchise and a clear effort to "destroy" the electoral system in the state. In a post on X, Congress general secretary in-charge organisation, K C Venugopal, said, "This government specialises in giving people hell. The SIR is a sinister exercise to deprive lakhs of voters of their franchise." "The unnecessary haste, and their absolute refusal to address genuine concerns raised by the Opposition, points to this being a clear effort to destroy the electoral system in Bihar," he said. "We will not let this go through. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They must halt this ridiculous exercise immediately," Venugopal said. On Wednesday, leaders of several INDIA bloc parties met the EC over the SIR issue and raised concerns over its timing, alleging that over two crore voters of the state may be disenfranchised by this mammoth exercise being done just ahead of assembly elections. The Election Commission on Thursday said it has decoded the entire exercise to a group of opposition parties to assuage their fears. While the EC said that the revision, happening after 22 years, is in line with the Constitution and the Representation of the People Act, opposition parties claim the timing is suspiciously close to the assembly polls and could "skew the voter base". The opposition has maintained that a revision this close to elections casts doubt on the EC's intentions. However, contrary to their protests, opposition parties have gone all in. The RJD has deployed 47,143 BLAs, second only to BJP's 51,964. Congress has appointed 8,586, while Left outfits like CPI(ML), CPM, and CPI have sent in their own agents. On the NDA side, JDU, LJP, and RLSP have mobilised more than 30,000 BLAs in total.

Original Preamble in focus, how the socialist-secular debate played out in recent years
Original Preamble in focus, how the socialist-secular debate played out in recent years

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Original Preamble in focus, how the socialist-secular debate played out in recent years

Over the past week, several BJP leaders have spoken about revisiting the inclusion of the word 'secular' in the Preamble to the Constitution during the Emergency, pointing out that the words 'socialist' and 'secular' were not part of the original founding document. This has brought to the fore the question of whether these words should continue to remain in the Preamble, a question first raised by RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale last week. Following Hosabale's comments, BJP leaders and Union Ministers such as Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, and even Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar have waded into the debate. In the past decade, this debate has prominently come up twice, with the Opposition accusing the government of trying to omit the words from the Preamble. On January 26, 2015, newspaper advertisements issued by the Union Information and Broadcasting Ministry had a backdrop with the Preamble stating, 'We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Democratic Republic…' This was the original Preamble and not the current one that was changed through the 42nd Amendment in 1976, and reads, 'We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic…' The advertisement drew flak from the Opposition, with Congress leader Manish Tewari saying that 'stifling and trampling' the Constitution was an 'unforgivable sacrilege'. 'The Constitution of India, as it stands today, is very clear that India would be a Sovereign Democratic Secular and Socialist Republic … Action should be taken against the officers involved and the minister should explain how it has happened,' he said. A month later, then Union Minister Arun Jaitley told the Rajya Sabha that the representation was from the original Constitution and was aimed at honouring the founding fathers without any malafide intentions. 'The Directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity (DAVP) annually issues print advertisements to all empanelled publications on Republic Day to commemorate the date and the moment when India became a Republic by adopting the Constitution. This year also a similar practice was followed and six different designs were given to all the empanelled publications. In one of the advertisement designs issued, the photograph of the original calligraphic representation of the Preamble to the Constitution has been used in the background as a water-mark for enhancing the aesthetic and artistic value,' he said. 'The calligraphic representation and decorated Preamble as available in the Parliament Museum is the only such decorated copy till date… The photo of the original Preamble was a way of honouring founding fathers of the Constitution and there was no mala fide intention to the publication of the unamended version,' Jaitley added. However, this wasn't all. While former Vice-President M Venkaiah Naidu, then a Union Minister, said the words would stay in the Constitution, Ravishankar Prasad, also a Union Minister, hit back at the Congress, asking it if it thought that former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru did not understand secularism. 'Secularism is in the blood of Indian people, that's part of our culture. It was not there in the original Preamble and was inserted during Emergency. But the government advertisement was about the original Preamble. We are committed to secularism and we don't have any idea to drop it,' Naidu said on January 30, 2015, at a conference organised by the Confederation of Indian Industries. The following day, Prasad told journalists, 'Did Nehru have no understanding of secularism? These words were added during the Emergency. Now what is the harm if there is a debate on it? We have put before the nation the original Preamble … The Preamble and the Constituent Assembly that prepared it had leaders such as Jawaharlal Nehru, B R Ambedkar, and others. These two words were not there then.' Union Home Minister Amit Shah, then the BJP national president, also weighed in, telling The Hindu in an interview, 'This debate too is meaningless. The BJP believes that the Preamble as it stands today is fine. There is no need to change it.' When Parliament began functioning from the new building two years ago, a similar controversy erupted after the Congress leader in the Lok Sabha at the time, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, said the copy of the Constitution distributed to MPs to mark the occasion did not have the current Preamble. 'They (the government) can say it is an older version. But they should have included the amended version too. They may say they have given us the original version. I think there is a deliberate design,' Chowdhury told The Indian Express on September 20, 2023. However, Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal played down the issue, saying the MPs may have been given a copy of the original Constitution. 'It (Preamble) was like this when the Constitution was adopted. After that, the 42nd amendment came… So it must be the original copy.' The Lok Sabha Secretariat also clarified the matter. In a bulletin issued on September 18, it said that MPs would be given a copy of the Constitution and a calligraphed copy of the original document. 'To mark the historic first sitting in the Parliament House of India (new building of Parliament) a copy of the Constitution of India, calligraphed copy of the original Constitution of India, newsletter 'Gaurav', and the commemorative stamp and coin released on the occasion of inauguration of the new building of Parliament will be presented to Hon'ble Members,' read the bulletin.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store