logo
No respite as confusion prevails over Delhi fuel ban, orders awaited

No respite as confusion prevails over Delhi fuel ban, orders awaited

India Today3 days ago
After an intense backlash over the recent fuel ban targeting End-of-Life (EOL) vehicles, the Delhi Government yesterday announced that EOL vehicles will not be impounded. Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa clarified on Thursday that the government is working on an alternative system to manage vehicular pollution without compromising citizens' rights.'We will not let Delhi's environment be harmed, nor will we permit the confiscation of vehicles owned by its residents,' Sirsa assured, signaling a softened stance after days of confusion and outrage.advertisementThe controversy stems from a direction issued under the 2018 Supreme Court ruling that bans diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years in Delhi. A separate 2014 NGT order also bars such vehicles from parking in public spaces. The implementation of this directive recently extended to fuel stations, prohibiting fuel sales to EOL vehicles, a move that was heavily criticised.
In a letter addressed to the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), Sirsa urged a pause to the enforcement of the order until the Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system is fully functional across the entire National Capital Region (NCR).The minister highlighted multiple operational roadblocks:Technological glitches and improperly placed ANPR cameras within DelhiLack of integration with NCR states' databasesUninstalled ANPR systems in adjoining regions like Gurugram and NoidaPotential rise in illegal fuel procurement due to cross-border loopholesWater Minister Parvesh Verma echoed these concerns, stating that ANPR implementation is flawed and age-based bans are irrational. 'Vehicles should be banned by looking at their pollution levels, not just their age,' he asserted, adding that uniform enforcement is absent across NCR cities.Verma also confirmed that Delhi officials are planning to meet with CAQM to iron out these issues.Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued notices to the Delhi government and CAQM, following a plea by the Delhi Petrol Dealers Association, which challenged the legality of enforcing the at fuel stations.Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, in a statement on X, acknowledged the public distress, "This decision is adversely affecting the daily lives and livelihoods of millions of families We are fully committed to fighting air pollution, but the transition must be balanced with citizens' social and economic needs."Senior AAP leaders Saurabh Bharadwaj and Atishi, launched a scathing attack on the BJP-led Delhi Government over the controversial vehicle fuel ban, accusing it of acting in haste and lacking administrative clarity. Saurabh Bharadwaj mocked the government's handling of the policy, likening it to the fictional 'Phulera ki Panchayat,' and questioned why the government was so eager to enforce a ban allegedly based on a Supreme Court directive, only to now seek to bypass it. He criticised the overzealous push to implement the order by March 31 and questioned the role of the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), calling it a bureaucratic body rather than a judicial authority. "If they could revoke it now, why didn't they do so earlier?" he asked, raising doubts about the motivations behind the policy.advertisementDelhi Leader of Opposition Atishi echoed similar sentiments, branding the BJP as a 'government of U-turns' that acts under public pressure without any consistency or accountability. She pointed out that despite the public statements, no official order has yet been issued to withdraw the ELV fuel ban, further deepening the confusion. Atishi also alleged collusion between the BJP and automobile manufacturers, claiming the sudden push to scrap over 62 lakh vehicles in Delhi was driven by vested commercial interests rather than environmental concern. Demanding transparency, she challenged the BJP to reveal how much funding it had received from car manufacturers and scrap dealers, calling for answers to what she termed a betrayal of public trust.Despite the Delhi government's plea for postponement, CAQM is yet to issue a formal response, leaving fuel station operators in limbo. A worker at a Connaught Place petrol pump said, 'We haven't received any written order yet. Only when the company sends us a letter can we act accordingly.'advertisementUntil CAQM officially places the directive on hold, the ban technically remains in effect, adding to the ongoing confusion among citizens and enforcement bodies.Subscribe to Auto Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vijay's TVK Rules Out Alliance with BJP, DMK for 2026
Vijay's TVK Rules Out Alliance with BJP, DMK for 2026

The Hindu

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Vijay's TVK Rules Out Alliance with BJP, DMK for 2026

Published : Jul 07, 2025 14:10 IST - 5 MINS READ The line-up of alliances for the 2026 Assembly election in Tamil Nadu appears to be nearly complete with actor Vijay's party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), announcing that it will have no truck with the 'ideological enemy,' the BJP, or the 'political enemy,' the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). The All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) has aligned with the BJP for the election, which rules out TVK joining hands with the AIADMK. TVK itself ensured that the AIADMK will not able to have any truck with it by announcing that Vijay will be the chief ministerial candidate. Speaking to Frontline recently, K.G. Arunraj, TVK's general secretary (propaganda and policy), had said: 'TVK does not need any tie-up with any party. Vijay is a phenomenon unlike anything Tamil Nadu politics has seen before. But we are still open to anyone who wants to be part of our front. We will welcome them.' Similar sentiments were expressed by senior leaders of the party in separate conversations with this correspondent. On the stage of an executive committee meeting on July 4, Vijay himself clarified, yet again, that his party does not need any of the established parties. 'TVK is not DMK or AIADMK to ally with the BJP for selfish political gains. If we form an alliance, it will always be against both the DMK and the BJP,' he thundered to the loud acceptance of the boisterous and partisan gathering of executive committee members, who are yet to transition from a fan club into a political party cadre. Also Read | Thalapathy Vijay's grand political entry stumbles on basic ideological contradictions Main alliances in fray There are two main alliances in the race for the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly election. One is led by the ruling DMK and includes the Congress, the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), and the Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (MDMK). This alliance, which also includes a few smaller sub-regional parties, has stayed intact since the 2019 Lok Sabha election. The AIADMK-led front has the BJP as the lead partner, although the national party's strength in the State is minuscule. A clutch of one-man parties, such as the ones run by John Pandian, A.C. Shanmugham, and Pari Vendhar, are also part of this alliance. But none of these parties have any heft and are largely in the front for the leaders' personal reasons and because the BJP is part of it. The two sub-regional parties that the front wants in its fold are the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam (DMDK) and the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK). Miffed over AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami not offering the DMDK a Rajya Sabha, party leader Premalatha announced that the party would make an announcement on alliances in January 2026. 'There is no need to hastily join anyone,' she told mediapersons, in response to a question, adding that any front that respects the DMDK's contribution will be the party's preferred alliance partner. PMK's internal troubles The PMK is in the middle of a huge internal dispute between founder and and current president S. Ramadoss and his son, Anbumani. Party sources said that Anbumani was keen on joining hands with the BJP but Ramadoss would have none of it. However, political analysts in the State insist that both father and son are essentially saying the same thing: Ramadoss is comfortable with an alliance with the AIADMK and the son wants to tie up with the BJP. Since both are in the same alliance, there should not be a problem. But the issue has now been sucked into family war turf. Every day there are expulsions and counter expulsions. For instance, on July 5, Ramadoss threw Anbumani out of an executive body, only for Anbumani's advisor Arul Rathinam to hit out, claiming that the expulsion had no effect because Ramadoss had no powers to do so. Anbumani is on record saying that he is now president and cannot be removed by anyone barring the elected general council. Anbumani has packed this forum with his supporters. There have been several mediation efforts but given the complex situation in the PMK, no such ceasefire talks have been effective so far. The PMK is still quite the force in some northern Tamil Nadu constituencies where it can be the deciding factor. This is why Palaniswami called all like-minded parties to join hands against the DMK. 'It is our objective that all like-minded parties should come together and contest the election,' Palaniswami told mediapersons on July 5. Asked if he will join hands with TVK, he said: 'We will be happy to align with those who want to remove the DMK government.' Also Read | Ramadoss-Anbumani face off as PMK's general council meeting turns stormy AIADMK, BJP begin outreach On July 7, Palaniswami began his State-wide public outreach tour from Coimbatore to make people of Tamil Nadu aware of the 'anti-people policies' of the 'corrupt and inefficient' DMK government. 'The Stalin government has not fulfilled a majority of the promises it made ahead of the [2021] election. The people of Tamil Nadu are angry because of this,' he said in an open letter to his party members. The BJP is slated to begin its 2026 election campaign with a zonal conference in Tirunelveli on August 17. The party has decided to organise six more such conferences ahead of the election. Apart from strengthening the grass-roots party structure, the conferences will showcase the achievements of 11 years of BJP rule at the Centre. In effect, political parties in the State have begun preparing for the 2026 election way ahead of time. Before the 2021 election, preparations were muted until about six months before the election. This time, election season has begun about 10 months ahead.

Kerala Crime Branch questioned Union Minister Suresh Gopi as part of Thrissur Pooram ‘disruption' probe
Kerala Crime Branch questioned Union Minister Suresh Gopi as part of Thrissur Pooram ‘disruption' probe

The Hindu

time39 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Kerala Crime Branch questioned Union Minister Suresh Gopi as part of Thrissur Pooram ‘disruption' probe

The Kerala Police confirmed on Monday (July 7, 2025) that State Crime Branch (CB) investigators had questioned Union Minister Suresh Gopi as part of a sweeping government-ordered inquiry into the alleged disruption of Thrissur Pooram in 2024. However, CB officials averred that the agency preferred to keep the time or where they questioned Mr. Gopi confidential for now, given the politically sensitive nature of the investigation. The Thrissur Pooram controversy took on political overtones as it dominated the campaign narrative in the run-up to the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. Mr. Gopi found himself at the centre of the dispute after he rode in an ambulance, allegedly flashing its overhead lights and sounding the siren, to the festival office, which the police and district authorities had declared off-limits for vehicles and civilians on the night of the iconic fireworks. Seva Bharathi, an affiliate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), owned the ambulance. Subsequently, the police and the Motor Vehicles department (MVD) booked Mr. Gopi and the operator on the charge of misusing an emergency response vehicle for casual transport. Mobile phone videos of Mr. Gopi parleying with apparently distraught Thiruvambady and Paramekkavu Devaswoms went viral on conventional and social media in the run-up to the poll day on April 26, 2024. The Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) Opposition quickly accused the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) of throwing the Thrissur Lok Sabha poll to Mr Gopi, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) candidate from the constituency, by 'wilfully scuttling Thrissur Pooram to stoke Hindu majoritarian religious sentiment among voters.' Mr. Gopi's opponent, Communist Party of India (CPI) leader V.S. Sunilkumar and Congress' standard-bearer in the constituency, K. Muraleedharan, accused the State police of allowing the BJP candidate to gain political mileage by emerging as a champion of Thrissur Pooram lovers, a significant electoral bloc in the constituency. The alleged disarray in the conduct of the festival had caused considerable disquiet among the mammoth festival crowd and the general public, prompting Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan to order a three-tier investigation last year. Subsequently, the CB formed a special investigation team (SIT) to investigate the cognisable offences detailed in the preliminary police enquiry report about the festival 'disruption'. The SIT will likely submit its report to the Additional Director General of Police, Crime Branch, H. Venkatesh.

Supreme Court to hear petitions against Bihar voter list revision on July 10
Supreme Court to hear petitions against Bihar voter list revision on July 10

Scroll.in

timean hour ago

  • Scroll.in

Supreme Court to hear petitions against Bihar voter list revision on July 10

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear petitions challenging the Election Commission's decision to carry out a special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar on July 10, Live Law reported. The special intensive revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24, ahead of the Assembly elections expected to be held in the state in October or November. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. This means that 2.9 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore voters – or about 37% of the electors – will have to submit documentary evidence. Petitions against the exercise have been filed by Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Kumar Jhal, Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, non-governmental organisations Association for Democratic Reforms and People's Union for Civil Liberties and activist Yogendra Yadav. The lawyers representing the petitioners on Monday mentioned the matter before a two-judge bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi, requesting an urgent hearing. They argued that if voters do not submit forms along with specific documents by the deadline, their names could be removed from the voter list, even if they have been voting for over two decades. Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing one of the petitioners, told the court that the Election Commission's June 24 notification imposed a strict deadline on marginalised voters to produce documents, and that the accepted documents did not include commonly used ones such as Aadhaar and ration cards, The Hindu reported. The court, while agreeing to hear the case on July 10, allowed the petitioners to give advance notice to the Election Commission. Revision of electoral rolls The special intensive revision guidelines state that the voters born before July 1, 1987, must show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, will need proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. If the officers are satisfied with the details provided, the voters will be re-enrolled to a new voter list by electoral registration officers. If not, they will be removed from the voter lists. A draft roll will be published on August 1 and the final roll will be out on September 30. On Wednesday, eleven INDIA bloc parties told the Election Commission that the exercise risked disenfranchising more than 2.5 crore voters, as they may not be able to produce the necessary documents. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Sunday defended the ongoing special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls, claiming that the exercise had to be carried out as no one was satisfied with the current voter rolls.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store