logo
Pam Duncan-Glancy 'over the moon' at King's MBE honour

Pam Duncan-Glancy 'over the moon' at King's MBE honour

BBC News13-06-2025
Scottish Labour politician Pam Duncan-Glancy leads a host of Scots who have been recognised in the King's Birthday Honours.The Glasgow MSP becomes a Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE) for her public and political service.Duncan-Glancy told BBC Scotland News the award had left her feeling "overwhelmed".She added: "I'm over the moon. It's for services to community, disability, equality and politics - things I am really really passionate about - which is lovely."
'Working class woman in a wheelchair'
Duncan-Glancy was the first permanent wheelchair user to be elected to the Scottish Parliament in 2021 and is a tireless disability campaigner.On the moment she found out about the honour, the MSP said: "I was in a meeting and my husband phoned me. I could see my phone ringing and I thought I will get that later."Then he phoned me back and then texted me saying 'you've got a letter that you need to open - because it had the royal seal on it'. But I couldn't talk to him."He texted me back and said 'I've opened it - you've got an MBE'. So that's how I found out."The 43-year-old said it was a massive honour.She added: "When I got elected as an MSP, I said I was a wee working class woman in a wheelchair. "To think that I could be a wee working class woman in a wheelchair who's also got an MBE, I just thought that was pretty special."
With just 11 months until the next Holyrood election, the MSP said more needed to be done to encourage disabled people to seek election."We need to support people to be active in their communities in the first place," Duncan-Glancy said."For disabled people, it can often be about giving them help to get out of bed in the morning."There's quite a mountain to climb for us to support disabled people to get into politics and it's a mountain we absolutely have to climb."There should be no space about us, without us."The MSP said she was looking forward to her investiture and hoped to take her sister and husband along because they had "sacrificed a lot over the years for my activism". She also joked she might bump into a football legend who has been honoured with a knighthood.She said: "I mean, if David Beckham happens to be getting his the same day that would be a double bonus."
Elsewhere in the honours list, John and Lorna Norgrove are both made OBEs for services to women and children abroad and in Scotland.They set up the Linda Norgrove Foundation in memory of their daughter Linda.The aid worker, from Lewis, was kidnapped by the Taliban and died in an attempted rescue by US forces in October 2010.Recently the charity worked with both the Scottish and UK governments to bring 19 female Afghan medical students to Scotland to continue their degrees as they were barred by the Taliban from completing their studies in Afghanistan.The couple said: "We dedicate this honour to all those brave women who remain in Afghanistan, or who have made the decision to leave their homes and families behind to move abroad and continue their studies and careers. "Their struggle continues and they are the real heroes of this story."
Nationwide CEO Debbie Crosbie, the only woman to lead a "big six" bank in the UK, gets a damehood for her services to financial services.Dame Debbie, who grew up in Glasgow, said: "I try to encourage people to think beyond, 'I'm a female', but when it comes to this (honour) I am actually hugely proud."Meanwhile, Roisin Currie, a fellow Glaswegian, has been made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) for her services to hospitality.The Strathclyde University graduate was appointed chief executive of Greggs in 2022 having joined the Newcastle-based bakery chain, in 2010.Historian Alistair Moffat, 74, who founded the Borders Book Festival, is also recognised in the list.He becomes an MBE in recognition of services to literature and culture.
Others recognised include Charles Pelling, manager of the Lady Haig Poppy Factory in Edinburgh.He becomes an OBE in recognition of services to veterans.A social media influencer known as the Hillwalking Hijabi has also been recognised.Zahrah Mahmood, 34, president of Ramblers Scotland, is made an MBE for her contribution to voluntary service in Scotland.Recently retired Police Scotland Assistant Chief Constable Gary Ritchie has been honoured with the King's Police Medal (KPM).The force's chief officer of human resources, Nicky Page, becomes an MBE for services to policing, equality and health.And Jenna Speirs, and her parents Caroline and Duncan Speirs, have each been awarded a British Empire Medal (BEM) for founding a charity in honour of Jenna's twin brother, Calum, who died of cancer aged 12.The family, from the Isle of Bute, started Calum's Cabin to provide holiday facilities for children undergoing cancer treatment and their families.Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: "The honours list showcases the remarkable achievements of individuals across Scotland who have gone above and beyond in their respective fields."Their service to our communities represents the spirit of dedication and excellence that makes Scotland proud."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nigel Farage's Reform charging potential MSPs £200 to stand for party in 2026 election
Nigel Farage's Reform charging potential MSPs £200 to stand for party in 2026 election

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Nigel Farage's Reform charging potential MSPs £200 to stand for party in 2026 election

Reform UK is charging Holyrood hopefuls who want to stand in next year's election - partly to fund their own vetting checks. Nigel Farage is charging Holyrood hopefuls £200 to apply to stand for his party - with some of the money funding their own vetting checks. Reform UK is asking members who want to put themselves forward for the next Scottish Parliamentary elections to pay to apply and for training. ‌ The party leader previously said Reform was sabotaged by a professional vetting firm in the general election run-up and threatened to sue. ‌ He claimed the company had been handed £144,000 to probe potential candidates and had produced nothing. A raft of negative stories later appeared about candidates, including those who made racist online posts. Despite promising to "rigorously" vet future candidates, more extremist social media posts have emerged from some of the party's 677 new councillors elected in the English local elections. Experts have said the party needs to tackle vetting and put forward serious candidates. In a recruitment email to members, Reform's head of campaigns said running for Holyrood was a "once in a lifetime opportunity" and they wanted "the best of Scotland to come forward". ‌ Those interested must "complete a short application form and pay a £50 fee to cover vetting and admin costs", and if successful they're charged £150 attendance fee for a "one-day, in-person Parliamentary Assessment Centre". It said it would "consider hardship waivers in some cases". None of Scotland's main political parties charge candidates to apply to stand. ‌ For Westminster elections, Lib Dems charge £75 for selection and assessment while the UK Tory party has previously charged £250 for an assessment centre day and £115 for "due diligence". The Scottish Tories charge a fee for attending an assessment centre day to "cover tea and coffee", according to a party source. Tom Brake, of campaign group Unlock Democracy said: "Politicians should be as representative of the population as possible. ‌ "Charging prospective candidates a fee to cover the cost of their vetting and assessment will act as a significant barrier for some, and risk reducing the talent pool of potential MSPs." Reform's application process asks candidates for details of all their social media accounts and usernames and if they have ever been members of online forums or newspaper comment sections. It also asks if they have been a "member of a proscribed organisation" such as "the BNP or Britain First" and if they have criminal convictions. ‌ After filling out the online form, prospective candidates must pay a £50 non-refundable fee to submit applications. Reform has previously come under criticism due to the way the party is structured. Unlike other major political parties, Nigel Farage registered Reform as a business in 2018 with himself, deputy Richard Tice and Zia Yusuf listed as shareholders. ‌ After complaints from members, party chiefs relinquished their shares in February, renaming the company Reform 2025 Ltd. Its overall owner is Reform UK Party Ltd, which has no controlling person, according to Companies House. Its directors are still Farage and Tice. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ A Reform UK spokesman insisted it was normal for political parties to charge candidates and said: "All political parties charge for their parliamentary lists, we are just more honest. "If no party does it in Scotland that is just a sign that they don't treat the Scottish Parliament as seriously as they treat Westminster. The £50 covers vetting - something the other parties don't do. "The £150 is for a full day event assessment centre so we can ensure only the highest quality candidates are put forward, showing how seriously we take the Scottish parliament. ‌ "As a party we also offer hardship waivers so that anyone can apply and we are fair to all of our members regardless of their personal financial situations." "Reform are looking for those who can dig into their wallets and hand over a wad of cash."

Starmer wins vote on UK welfare reform but suffers damaging rebellion
Starmer wins vote on UK welfare reform but suffers damaging rebellion

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Starmer wins vote on UK welfare reform but suffers damaging rebellion

LONDON, July 1 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer won a vote on his welfare plans on Tuesday at significant political cost as he suffered the biggest parliamentary rebellion of his premiership and was forced to back down on key parts of the package. After his lawmakers pushed him into a series of embarrassing U-turns to sharply scale back plans to cut benefits, lawmakers in the House of Commons gave their initial approval to a package of measures Starmer says are vital to securing the future of the welfare system. But the scale of the rebellion - with 49 Labour lawmakers voting against the reforms - underlined the prime minister's waning authority. A year after winning one of the largest parliamentary majorities in British history, Starmer has seen his personal approval ratings collapse and been forced into several policy reversals by his increasingly rebellious lawmakers. "It's been a bumpy time tonight," work and pensions minister Liz Kendall told reporters after a session of parliament when lawmakers took turns to mostly criticise the planned changes. "There are definitely lessons to learn from this process." Starmer came into office last year promising his big parliamentary majority would bring an end to the political chaos that defined much of the Conservative Party's 14 years in power. But the revolt over the welfare bill underlines the difficulty he has pushing through unpopular changes. In the run-up to the vote, ministers and party enforcers known as "whips" had been locked in frantic last-ditch lobbying of undecided members of parliament to try to win their backing. In a further concession to rebels about two hours before the vote, the government said it would not finalise changes in eligibility for a key benefit payment until a review into the welfare system had been completed. Paula Barker, a Labour member of parliament, called the attempt to pass the plans "the most unedifying spectacle that I have ever seen". In the end, the government suffered by far the biggest rebellion of Starmer's premiership, eclipsing the 16 members of parliament who opposed an infrastructure bill earlier this month. Mel Stride, the opposition Conservative Party finance policy chief, described Starmer's team as "a government that's lost control", only able to pass the legislation by having "ripped the heart of it out". Labour lawmaker Henry Tufnell said by agreeing to the concessions Starmer had shown "he's willing to take on board these criticisms that people have raised." Almost 90 disability and human rights groups before the vote urged lawmakers to vote down the legislation. The proposed reforms are designed to reduce the cost of Britain's growing welfare bill, which the government has described as economically indefensible and morally wrong. Annual spending on incapacity and disability benefits already exceeds the country's defence budget and is set to top 100 billion pounds ($137 billion) by 2030, according to official forecasts, up from 65 billion pounds now. More than half of the rise in working-age disability claims since the COVID-19 pandemic relates to mental health conditions, opens new tab, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank. The government had initially hoped to save 5 billion pounds ($6.9 billion) a year by 2030 by tightening rules for people to receive disability and sickness benefits. But after the government conceded to pressure from its lawmakers, it said the new rules would now apply only to future applicants, not to the millions of existing claimants as had been proposed. Analysts estimated the savings would likely be closer to 2 billion pounds. It was not clear how the additional last-minute change would impact the hoped-for savings in the welfare reform package. Opposition politicians said the government would now have to raise taxes or cut government spending elsewhere to balance the public finances in the annual budget later this year. The government has said there would be no permanent increase in borrowing, but has declined to comment on possible tax rises. While Starmer is under no immediate threat, and the next election is not expected until 2029, his party now trails behind Nigel Farage's populist Reform UK in opinion polls. John Curtice, Britain's most respected pollster, said this week that Starmer was the most unpopular elected prime minister in modern British history, and that voters still did not know what he stood for a year after he was elected.

The PM faced down his party on welfare and lost. I suspect things may only get worse
The PM faced down his party on welfare and lost. I suspect things may only get worse

Sky News

time4 hours ago

  • Sky News

The PM faced down his party on welfare and lost. I suspect things may only get worse

So much for an end to chaos and sticking plaster politics. Yesterday, Sir Keir Starmer abandoned his flagship welfare reforms at the eleventh hour - hectic scenes in the House of Commons that left onlookers aghast. Facing possible defeat on his welfare bill, the PM folded in a last-minute climbdown to save his skin. 0:23 The decision was so rushed that some government insiders didn't even know it was coming - as the deputy PM, deployed as a negotiator, scrambled to save the bill or how much it would cost. "Too early to answer, it's moved at a really fast pace," said one. The changes were enough to whittle back the rebellion to 49 MPs as the prime minister prevailed, but this was a pyrrhic victory. Sir Keir lost the argument with his own backbenchers over his flagship welfare reforms, as they roundly rejected his proposed cuts to disability benefits for existing claimants or future ones, without a proper review of the entire personal independence payment (PIP) system first. PM wins key welfare vote - follow latest 4:31 That in turn has blown a hole in the public finances, as billions of planned welfare savings are shelved. Chancellor Rachel Reeves now faces the prospect of having to find £5bn. As for the politics, the prime minister has - to use a war analogy - spilled an awful lot of blood for little reward. He has faced down his MPs and he has lost. 4:38 They will be emboldened from this and - as some of those close to him admit - will find it even harder to govern. After the vote, in central lobby, MPs were already saying that the government should regard this as a reset moment for relations between No 10 and the party. The prime minister always said during the election that he would put country first and party second - and yet, less than a year into office, he finds himself pinned back by his party and blocked from making what he sees are necessary reforms. I suspect it will only get worse. When I asked two of the rebel MPs how they expected the government to cover off the losses in welfare savings, Rachael Maskell, a leading rebel, suggested the government introduce welfare taxes. Meanwhile, Work and Pensions Select Committee chair Debbie Abrahams told me "fiscal rules are not natural laws" - suggesting the chancellor could perhaps borrow more to fund public spending. 0:45 These of course are both things that Ms Reeves has ruled out. But the lesson MPs will take from this climbdown is that - if they push hard in enough and in big enough numbers - the government will give ground. The fallout for now is that any serious cuts to welfare - something the PM says is absolutely necessary - are stalled for the time being, with the Stephen Timms review into PIP not reporting back until November 2026. 1:10 Had the government done this differently and reviewed the system before trying to impose the cuts - a process only done ahead of the Spring Statement in order to help the chancellor fix her fiscal black hole - they may have had more success. Those close to the PM say he wants to deliver on the mandate the country gave him in last year's election, and point out that Sir Keir Starmer is often underestimated - first as party leader and now as prime minister. But on this occasion, he underestimated his own MPs. His job was already difficult enough - and after this it will be even harder still. If he can't govern his party, he can't deliver change he promised.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store