logo
‘I don't have regrets': Stokes doubles down on fiery handshake drama

‘I don't have regrets': Stokes doubles down on fiery handshake drama

News.com.au2 days ago
Injured England captain Ben Stokes insists that he does not regret his actions from the final day handshake drama during the drawn fourth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy at Old Trafford.
Stokes, who will sit out the series finale starting Thursday with a right shoulder injury, offered the draw to Indian batters Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar at the drinks break in the final session of day five in Manchester, but spat the dummy when the pair of all-rounders refused to shake Stokes' hand.
India were four wickets down and led by 71 runs at the time with both Jadeja and Washington closing on centuries - a first in Test cricket for the latter - and Stokes was furious that the two batters wanted to push on to their personal milestones.
In an already feisty series, Stokes poured more fuel on the fire by telling Jadeja: 'You're going to get a Test hundred against Harry Brook and Ben Duckett'.
He then refused to continue using his front line bowlers and instead allowed Brook to lob up pies in what was an embarrassing end to the Test match.
But Stokes says he does not regret how the situation unfolded, nor how he handled it, despite gaining greater perspective on India's viewpoint.
'I don't have regrets, but it is one of those when you have not been in the field for 250 overs, you do have a bit more of an understanding towards both sides,' Stokes said.
'Two lads in Jadeja and Washington played incredibly well up until that point, so you sort of understand as to why as they wanted to stay out there and get their 100s.
'But as I said at the end of the game, fair enough but I am not going to bowl my bowlers in a situation where we can't win the game.
'We are over it, I think India are over that whole thing.
'Let's just try our best not to focus on a 20-minute period of cricket when it has been such a great series so far.'
The incident was the latest in an ever-growing list throughout the five-Test series which England leads 2-1.
Tempers flared in the days leading up to The Oval finale when Indian coach Gautam Gambhir had a run in with head curator Lee Fortis over not being allowed to inspect the pitch up close, and a cool box being put on the square as India practised.
Things also got hot under the collar during the third Test at Lords as India did not take kindly to England's time wasting tactics when they managed to face only one over late on day three despite having to bat for seven minutes.
Stokes' opposite number Shubman Gill, who has been a revelation with the bat since being handed the captaincy making four centuries in the series, was certain in his pre-match press conference that both teams were able to leave the on field spats behind them.
'I think I have already explained what happened at Lord's and about even the incident that happened on the last day in the previous Test,' Gill said.
'Both the teams have been very competitive. And sometimes when you are competitive, you know, in the heat of the moment, you do or say things that you might not do (otherwise).
'But I think once the match is over, there is mutual respect between both the teams.'
Stokes shared similar sentiments, saying that 'it has been a tough series, but it has been class to play in'.
'It has been a test of characters, a test of physicality, all that kind of stuff, and I think the way each team has fronted up every single day and every single session giving everything for their countries is testament to how much this format means to England and India and every other team in the world,' he added.
'The easy option would just be to not turn up and give up, but you have seen both teams turn up every day, give everything, and leave everything out on the field.
'I don't think it will be any different this week.'
Stokes is set to be sidelined for six to seven weeks as a result of his shoulder issue, and he is one of four changes to the England XI for the fifth Test.
Highly touted 21-year-old Jacob Bethell, who batted at number three during their tour of New Zealand late last year despite never having scored a professional century, will take Stokes' place at number six.
Bethell will also take on the all-rounder duties as a spin option alongside Joe Root with fellow left arm spinner Liam Dawson discarded after playing at Old Trafford following an eight-year hiatus from the Test side.
Fast bowlers Jofra Archer and Brydon Carse also make way with Josh Tongue, Gus Atkinson and Jamie Overton all coming into the side to form a four-man pace attack alongside Chris Woakes.
Ollie Pope will take on captaincy duties in Stokes absence, as he did for the home series against Sri Lanka and for the first Test of the Pakistan last year.
'We have got some incredible leaders out in that 11 still,' Stokes said.
'I know I am captain, but I seek advice from quite a few people, and we have got some fantastic cricket brains out there.
'We have got a team of 11 match-winners; one person doesn't win you a game.
'Just because I am playing or not, it doesn't mean we are going to win or lose.
'We have had some people put in some special individual performances throughout this series and this is another opportunity for 11 people to be able to put their hand up and hopefully win a game for England as well.'
India on the other hand are set to be without superstar fast bowler Jasprit Bumrah as part of the management of his troublesome pack.
Entertaining wicket keeper batter Rishabh Pant will also be sidelined with the foot injury he sustained while batting in Manchester, but the final make up of India's XI remains uncertain.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find out what it means, Benny
R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find out what it means, Benny

Sydney Morning Herald

time36 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find out what it means, Benny

What transpired was particularly unpleasant. England's batters being brought on to bowl like an under-10s team to serve up anything but Test standard bowling. To this was added vituperative sledging, albeit hardly of the venomous kind. England's fielders ambled after balls struck through the cordon, running like puppets with broken strings. Only muted acknowledgment was given when each Indian batter brought up three figures. The match ended almost immediately after that. Fairly assessed, it was sooky and petulant conduct, driven by Stokes' incandescence at not getting his own way. This, to all intents and purposes, is of course the same England team that cried with poisonous fury after the Lord's Test of the 2023 Ashes series, once Jonny Bairstow was stumped by Australian wicketkeeper Alex Carey having absent-mindedly meandered from his crease. You almost get the sense of a theme … By any sensible analysis of what is legislated for under the Laws of Cricket, Bairstow was fairly dismissed that day. Equally, Gill's decision to not agree to prematurely end the Test match at Old Trafford was entirely within the rules of the game. The England team's posturing and remonstrations were misguided, unedifying and wrong. In almost any other sport – golf is the true exception which comes to mind – you would readily cop Stokes' and his teammates' behaviour. In any football code, Stokes' conduct would be seen as positively de rigueur. Yet cricket is supposedly different. For not only is it governed by the laws of the game, but also the esoteric spirit of cricket, which ties the laws together with a veritable golden thread. What the Laws of Cricket say is that although the laws themselves have governed the playing of the game for nearly three centuries, cricket owes much of its particular appeal and enjoyment to the fact that it should also be played within the right 'spirit'. But if indeed it exists, what constitutes cricket's spirit is hard to identify. The preamble to the Laws of Cricket are directed to this concept of the spirit of the game. The opening paragraphs state that the notion of respect is central to the spirit of cricket. It is expressly written that central to the spirit of this noble sport is to play hard and fair; to show respect for your opponents; to show self-discipline even in the face of adversity; to congratulate the opposition on their successes; and to establish an overall positive atmosphere. Could the case be prosecuted that the England team's actions in the fourth Test were consistent with this idea of the spirit of cricket? It would seem not. The England team's feigned incredulousness at India's decision to play on despite the likely impossibility of a match result, and everything that occurred thereafter, certainly has a spirit interwoven. But a slightly malicious one. The swearing of England's fielders, picked up by the stump microphones, and the incredulity displayed by Stokes and Harry Brook especially, bears scant correlation to the notion of the good spirit of anything at all. A mountain of pressure can reveal character; however this was not a situation where pressure existed. This was a Test match meandering towards oblivion. Stokes' ungracious reaction to his team being required to play on revealed much, but not much of it positive. Loading All of this leaves this columnist unconvinced that the spirit of cricket exists otherwise than in a form of words written within the rules of the sport. In 2013, the Australian Test umpire Simon Taufel delivered the Marylebone Cricket Club's Cowdrey Spirit of Cricket lecture at a black tie dinner at Lord's, during which he argued that the spirit of cricket means that the values of the game take priority over personal gain or advancement. If that's an accurate summation, you have to question whether it still exists at all.

R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find out what it means, Benny
R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find out what it means, Benny

The Age

time36 minutes ago

  • The Age

R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Find out what it means, Benny

What transpired was particularly unpleasant. England's batters being brought on to bowl like an under-10s team to serve up anything but Test standard bowling. To this was added vituperative sledging, albeit hardly of the venomous kind. England's fielders ambled after balls struck through the cordon, running like puppets with broken strings. Only muted acknowledgment was given when each Indian batter brought up three figures. The match ended almost immediately after that. Fairly assessed, it was sooky and petulant conduct, driven by Stokes' incandescence at not getting his own way. This, to all intents and purposes, is of course the same England team that cried with poisonous fury after the Lord's Test of the 2023 Ashes series, once Jonny Bairstow was stumped by Australian wicketkeeper Alex Carey having absent-mindedly meandered from his crease. You almost get the sense of a theme … By any sensible analysis of what is legislated for under the Laws of Cricket, Bairstow was fairly dismissed that day. Equally, Gill's decision to not agree to prematurely end the Test match at Old Trafford was entirely within the rules of the game. The England team's posturing and remonstrations were misguided, unedifying and wrong. In almost any other sport – golf is the true exception which comes to mind – you would readily cop Stokes' and his teammates' behaviour. In any football code, Stokes' conduct would be seen as positively de rigueur. Yet cricket is supposedly different. For not only is it governed by the laws of the game, but also the esoteric spirit of cricket, which ties the laws together with a veritable golden thread. What the Laws of Cricket say is that although the laws themselves have governed the playing of the game for nearly three centuries, cricket owes much of its particular appeal and enjoyment to the fact that it should also be played within the right 'spirit'. But if indeed it exists, what constitutes cricket's spirit is hard to identify. The preamble to the Laws of Cricket are directed to this concept of the spirit of the game. The opening paragraphs state that the notion of respect is central to the spirit of cricket. It is expressly written that central to the spirit of this noble sport is to play hard and fair; to show respect for your opponents; to show self-discipline even in the face of adversity; to congratulate the opposition on their successes; and to establish an overall positive atmosphere. Could the case be prosecuted that the England team's actions in the fourth Test were consistent with this idea of the spirit of cricket? It would seem not. The England team's feigned incredulousness at India's decision to play on despite the likely impossibility of a match result, and everything that occurred thereafter, certainly has a spirit interwoven. But a slightly malicious one. The swearing of England's fielders, picked up by the stump microphones, and the incredulity displayed by Stokes and Harry Brook especially, bears scant correlation to the notion of the good spirit of anything at all. A mountain of pressure can reveal character; however this was not a situation where pressure existed. This was a Test match meandering towards oblivion. Stokes' ungracious reaction to his team being required to play on revealed much, but not much of it positive. Loading All of this leaves this columnist unconvinced that the spirit of cricket exists otherwise than in a form of words written within the rules of the sport. In 2013, the Australian Test umpire Simon Taufel delivered the Marylebone Cricket Club's Cowdrey Spirit of Cricket lecture at a black tie dinner at Lord's, during which he argued that the spirit of cricket means that the values of the game take priority over personal gain or advancement. If that's an accurate summation, you have to question whether it still exists at all.

Chris Woakes injured as England-India Test series finale kicks off at The Oval
Chris Woakes injured as England-India Test series finale kicks off at The Oval

ABC News

time19 hours ago

  • ABC News

Chris Woakes injured as England-India Test series finale kicks off at The Oval

Frustrated by a defiant India last time out, England's attack has had more success on the first day of the fifth and final Test but still has work to do after the visitors closed on 6-204 at The Oval. Gus Atkinson (2-31) and Josh Tongue (2-47) claimed a pair of wickets each at the Oval and on an impressive day for Atkinson on his return to the Test team, he also ran out series-leading run-maker and India captain Shubman Gill (21). But Karun Nair's 52 not out on a rain-impacted day helped India recover from 38-2 when the wickets of Yashasvi Jaiswal (2) and KL Rahul (14) went before lunch. Nair's stand was his first trip past 50 since scoring a triple century in his third Test in 2016, and was typical of India's resilience this series, which was showcased to great effect at Old Trafford last week. India needs to win the match to tie the series, which England leads 2-1, but the already-depleted English bowling attack suffered a blow when Chris Woakes fell awkwardly as he tried to prevent a four late in the day. The 61-Test veteran, who also claimed the wicket of Rahul, was clearly in pain as he held his left shoulder outside the boundary. He was treated by medical staff and left the field with his arm cradled in a makeshift sling fashioned out of his sweater. With all-rounder and captain Ben Stokes missing due to his own shoulder injury, and pace spearheads Brydon Carse and Jofra Archer rested for this game, Woakes's injury strips England of its only bowler with more than 12 Tests under his belt. "It doesn't look great. We haven't really spoken about it yet. I will be surprised if he takes any part in the game," Atkinson said. On a rain-hit day one at The Oval, England was far more effective with the ball at the Oval than in previous games, largely thanks to Atkinson. The fast bowler took the first and last wickets of the day — trapping Jaiswal LBW early on and it was off his ball that Dhruv Jurel (19) was caught by Harry Brook. Perhaps most impressive was his run-out of Gill, gathering the ball in his follow-through and throwing the wicket down. "There was pressure on for the bowling side with the conditions that were overhead. We didn't want to get too far ahead of ourselves," Atkinson told the BBC. "6-200, we are happy with that. An early wicket tomorrow and we will be in good position." AP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store