
I lost five stone on a weight loss jab...but there's an alarming truth about what happens when you stop
John Kane, 76, from Dublin, weighed nearly 19 stone and plummeted to under 14 within a year of taking liraglutide in 2016.
Liraglutide works in a similar way to semaglutide—the generic name for Ozempic—triggering the release of the hormone GLP-1 that makes us feel full.
The jabs, which he obtained privately, initially vastly improved Mr Kane's life.
The medication helped get his type 2 diabetes into remission, and enjoy active social excursions that he couldn't before, including hikes in Spain.
Despite the success, he decided to stop the injections in 2018 due to the eye-watering £232 a month cost.
Speaking to the Irish Independent, he said his raging appetite returned with a vengeance almost immediately.
'I had really put a lot of effort into the last two years, and was determined not to put back on the weight,' he said.
'But whether I liked it or not, even watching my food, the weight just started to creep back up.'
Within six months, Mr Kane had regained half the weight he'd lost.
The major setback caused him to 'hit the rocks, mentally'. 'It was really affecting me,' he said. 'I'm not one to be depressed, but it really bit into me.'
After six months without the medicine, Mr Kane's wife suggested he 'bite the bullet' and pay for more injections, to stop the decline of his health.
When semaglitude, better known as Ozempic, was rolled out at a cheaper cost of £118, it became a more affordable option.
He has now been on taking the medication for nearly eight years—a maintenance dose of 1mg a week.
He has no plans to stop again and said if he were to ever come off he'd become a 'very sad, dejected, depressed person.'
Weight-loss drugs like Ozempic have burst onto the scene in recent years, hailed as a potential fix for the UK's spiraling obesity crisis.
Semaglutide mimics glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), a naturally occurring hormone released in the small intestine when you eat. It tells your brain you're full and slows digestion.
After years of rigorous scientific trials, semaglutide has been chemically modified to last far longer than the body's own, short-lived supply of GLP-1. As a result, it keeps people feeling fuller for longer.
US researchers at Cornell University in New York found those on the injections typically lost lost around 13.7 per cent of their body weight, on average, over a 72-week period.
But a study in the journal Epic Research found that 44 per cent of people who lost at least five pounds using semaglutide and then stopped the drug regained at least 25 per cent of their lost weight within a year.
Dr Emma Cunningham, an aesthetics expert who treats patients suffering cosmetic complications of Ozempic, said some choose to go on a maintenance dose and wean off the drug that way.
'You can't be solely reliant on the drug,' she said. 'You need to be using this as an opportunity to address your lifestyle. Our most successful patients will have really gotten on board with healthy eating and exercise.'
She said the jabs help people stay motivated to make a change to a healthy lifestyle because they are seeing rapid weight loss.
It's those who become completely reliant on the drug, and fail to make lifestyle changes, who end up putting the weight back on, Dr Cuningham said.
Scientists at Oxford University discovered the effects of GLP-1 drugs like Wegovy are short-lived if patients do not maintain a healthy lifestyle afterwards.
Even those taking newer, more powerful jabs drugs like Mounjaro put their weight back on once treatment was removed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
A four-day work week improves productivity and health, new study shows
A landmark study by Boston College, in collaboration with 4 Day Week Global, has found significant benefits to a four-day work week without pay reduction. The research, involving over 100 companies and nearly 2,900 workers across several countries including the UK, revealed high satisfaction for both employers and employees. Key positive outcomes included improved productivity, revenue growth, better physical and mental health for workers, and reduced stress and burnout. Companies maintained productivity by cutting low-value activities like excessive meetings, while employees used their extra day off for personal appointments, leading to lower healthcare costs and reduced turnover. While not suitable for all industries, the study, published in Nature Human Behaviour, indicates that the positive effects of the four-day week persisted six months after the trials concluded.


The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Warning to fat jabs users as patients start pilling on pounds after treatment stops, research shows
PEOPLE on weight-loss jabs start piling the flab back on just two months after they stop taking them, research shows. The drugs work well for those who have failed other methods or are very large. However, the hunger signals they block can start up again once the treatment ends. A review of 11 studies covering more than 2,000 slimmers found they kept the weight off for at least four weeks after stopping, but started putting it back on by the eight-week mark. And their weight gain tended to continue for five months before it stabilised. Patients who took popular fat jab Mounjaro regained almost half the weight they had lost while on the drug. Study author Dr Xiaoling Cai, from Peking University People's Hospital in China, said: 'Weight regain is common, so it is necessary to establish long-term anti-obesity treatment.' Katherine Jenner, director of Britain's Obesity Health Alliance, said: 'This underlines why we can't medicate ourselves out of the obesity crisis. "Without tackling the root causes, people are left swimming against the tide.' A separate study at Oxford University suggested many fat jab patients regain all the weight they lose within two years of stopping medication. NHS prescriptions for jabs like Wegovy and Mounjaro hit 2.7million in England last year — and more people are buying privately, potentially missing out on diet and lifestyle advice. I've lost nearly 6 stone in 9 months on fat jabs - trolls call me 'lazy' & say it's the 'easy way out' but I don't care 1


Times
32 minutes ago
- Times
Angela Rayner blocked from allowing councils to tax tourists
Angela Rayner pushed for councils to be given powers to tax tourists as part of the government's devolution agenda but was rebuffed by the Treasury. The deputy prime minister wanted to give directly elected mayors the ability to charge their own taxes on hotel stays as part of the government's Devolution Bill, published earlier this month. However, the move, first reported by The Daily Telegraph, was rebuffed by Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, amid fears that it could reduce revenues for businesses already struggling with higher national insurance taxes and rises in the minimum wage. A spokesman for Rayner's department did not deny the rift, saying only that there were 'currently no plans to introduce a tourism tax in England'. Many European cities, including Barcelona, Lisbon, Venice and Amsterdam, charge tourists a tax on the cost of hotel rooms and private rentals, either as a flat rate or percentage of the room charge. Cities in Scotland have their own tax-raising powers. Visitors to Edinburgh and Glasgow will pay 5 per cent on hotel stays from July next year and January 2027 respectively. Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, is among the local leaders pushing to be allowed to charge more in England, while Sir Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, has suggested he would be open to a tourist tax in the capital that would provide more revenue for local projects. Last month, both mayors signed a joint letter with their counterparts in Liverpool, the North East, West Yorkshire and the West Midlands, calling for 'Barcelona-style' tourist tax. • The Sunday Times view: Business is an easy target for tax. Ministers should resist News of the disagreement over a tourism levy came as polling suggested the public would support a new tax regime to attract wealthy foreigners to the UK, provided they use private schools and private healthcare. In total, 67 per cent of people — and 69 per cent of Labour voters — supported special tax treatment for high net-worth investors, according to a report published on Tuesday. A majority of the population said they believed Britain should allow more of the world's wealthiest investors into the country, but only if they make a contribution to the economy and its public finances. Some 66 per cent thought part of that contract should be that foreign investors are banned from using the NHS or the state education system. The survey results were contained in a report jointly published by Onward, a think tank set up by the former Conservative MP Sir Simon Clarke, and the Adam Smith Institute, the free-market campaign group. Called The Prosperity Package, the report calls for a new tax regime for global investors to help stop the exodus of wealth from the UK. Britain is estimated to have lost a quarter of its billionaires over the past two years and is expected to lose a record 16,500 millionaires this year, according to research published over the past month. The acceleration in wealth migration since Labour came to power follows Reeves's decision to abolish the non-domiciled tax regime and apply inheritance tax to family businesses and farms. The old non-dom regime allowed wealthy foreigners who had lived in Britain for more than seven years to avoid paying UK taxes on their worldwide earnings in exchange for a fee starting at £30,000 a year. In its place, Labour introduced a new residence-based system that makes wealthy foreigners pay UK tax on their global earnings after living in the UK for four years, while their worldwide assets become subject to UK inheritance tax after ten years. • Surge in wealthy using insurance to beat inheritance tax hit The authors of The Prosperity Package report suggest an alternative that they believe would boost growth and increase tax revenue by attracting global investors to the UK. Under their scheme, wealthy foreigners would be allowed to move to the UK and keep their global assets, income and gains away from the taxman for 15 years in exchange for an annual fee of £300,000. In addition, applicants would be required to invest a minimum of £3 million into one of eight government-designated 'Industrial Strategy Sectors', delivering cash into areas such as clean energy, the life sciences, and digital technologies. Those who apply to the scheme would also have 'no recourse to public funds' and be required to take out private health insurance and educate their children in the private school system. When the proposed scheme was put to a representative sample of 2,000 Britons, it was supported by 53 per cent of respondents and opposed by only 15 per cent. • Non-dom crackdown 'could leave £4bn hole in public finances' The report says that modelling of the regime suggests that if implemented and taken up by 1,000 people, it would give a £30 billion boost to the economy after ten years and raise a cumulative £13 billion in extra tax revenues. The proposal has similarities to the previous Conservative government's Tier 1 investor visa scheme, which required applicants to invest a minimum of £2 million in either UK government bonds, British shares or loans to UK-registered companies. That scheme was abolished in 2022 after being criticised for being open to abuse by allowing foreigners with questionable sources of wealth to gain residency. The authors of The Prosperity Package report say their proposal would raise more tax revenue and they propose stricter checks on applicants. • Why the super-rich are leaving Britain Maxwell Marlow, of the Adam Smith Institute and author of the report, said: 'The public are clear — they want fairness, not a fortress. If the wealthy contribute significantly and don't draw on the state, most voters are open to their investment. Our proposal meets this test and puts Britain back in the race to attract global capital.' The plan has already attracted some cross-party support. Lord Mendelsohn, the Labour peer and the party's former business and trade spokesman in the House of Lords, said: 'I do not agree with some colleagues that we should wave goodbye to the wealthy; we should be doing whatever we can to welcome them back, and new investors, entrepreneurs, and high spenders to our shores. 'Crucially though, they must contribute to Britain, rather than just using it.'