Android 16 may finally reveal your Pixel's battery health
The Battery health menu was also part of Android 16 Beta 2, though activating it required some digging with the code. That's not the case in Android 16 Beta 3: you can access the menu on your Pixel 9 from Settings > Battery > Battery health (via Android Authority).
While I can see the page on my Pixel 8 Pro running Android 16 Beta 3, it does not show battery health or the estimated remaining capacity. Based on replies to a post from Android expert Mishaal Rahman on X, the feature seems to work only on the Pixel 9 series and, strangely, the Pixel 8a.
This indicates that even if Google officially rolls out the Battery health menu with Android 16, it could be limited to selected Pixels.
Besides showing the battery health, the menu also provides quick access to articles that can help extend the lifespan of your Pixel's cell. These include support articles for updating your phone to the latest software, turning on adaptive charging, avoiding extreme temperatures, and turning off unwanted features.
Below that, you'll find a Charging Optimization option, where you can enable Adaptive Charging or set your Pixel to charge only up to 80%.
With Pixel phones slated to receive seven years of updates, Google should allow users to view their device's battery health. This will help them take proactive measures to extend its lifespan and seek out a replacement when needed. Typically, this becomes necessary when the battery's capacity drops below 80% of its original charge.
Google took its time introducing the option to limit your Pixel's battery charge to 80%, finally rolling it out in November 2024 after months of testing. The company may follow a similar approach with the Battery health menu, meaning it might not debut with Android 16's stable release in Q2 2025, even though it appears nearly complete.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
21 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Nokia hasn't made phones for years, but it isn't finished milking its name yet
Robert Triggs / Android Authority TL;DR Nokia has confirmed via Reddit that it's looking to team up with phone makers for licensing opportunities. The company was answering a question regarding future licensing deals for mobile phones. This also comes as HMD and Nokia's partnership draws to an end. HMD and Nokia have been winding down their brand licensing partnership in recent years. This deal saw HMD releasing smartphones and feature phones under the Finnish brand's name. Nokia has now taken to an unlikely avenue to confirm that it's still looking for new partners. The official Nokia Community Manager account confirmed on Reddit (via Mobilissimo) that the company is looking for a 'large scale mobile manufacturer' who wants to explore 'collaboration opportunities.' Check out the screenshot below. This is an interesting way for Nokia to reveal that it wants to license the Nokia brand to another phone maker. To be fair, the company was responding to a user query regarding brand licensing. This answer nevertheless suggests that Nokia hasn't found a new partner as the HMD deal winds down. Is it even worth licensing the Nokia name anymore? This news comes almost two years after HMD announced that it would make smartphones under its own name. However, the company still offers Nokia-branded feature phones. It's believed HMD's licensing deal with Nokia will expire in 2026. Do you think a new phone maker should license the Nokia name? 0 votes Yes, absolutely NaN % Maybe, it depends on the company NaN % No, this ship sailed a long time ago NaN % HMD acquired many Nokia-related patents as part of the deal, had many ex-Nokia employees, and released numerous modern takes on classic devices. The upstart company also released the ambitious but flawed Nokia 9 PureView flagship phone, but failed to follow up with more flagship phones. Instead, the company switched to mid-tier releases and repairable phones. More recently, the company announced it will exit the US, citing the 'challenging geopolitical and economic environment.' Despite HMD's challenges, I'm not sure any other brand can do much better with the Nokia name. A larger company might be able to release more cutting-edge Nokia-branded flagships and offer more marketing and R&D resources. However, HMD still fell short despite its unique aforementioned advantages. Furthermore, I'm guessing the Nokia brand has significantly waned among younger users. That means you probably shouldn't hold your breath for the Nokia name to challenge Samsung, Apple, and others again. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Replit's CEO apologizes after its AI agent wiped a company's code base in a test run and lied about it
A venture capitalist wanted to see how far AI could take him in building an app. It was far enough to destroy a live production database. The incident unfolded during a 12-day "vibe coding" experiment by Jason Lemkin, an investor in software startups. Replit's CEO apologized for the incident, in which the company's AI coding agent deleted a code base and lied about its data. Deleting the data was "unacceptable and should never be possible," Replit's CEO, Amjad Masad, wrote on X on Monday. "We're moving quickly to enhance the safety and robustness of the Replit environment. Top priority." He added that the team was conducting a postmortem and rolling out fixes to prevent similar failures in the future. Replit and Lemkin did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. The AI ignored instructions, deleted the database, and faked results On day nine of Lemkin's challenge, things went sideways. Despite being instructed to freeze all code changes, the AI agent ran rogue. "It deleted our production database without permission," Lemkin wrote on X on Friday. "Possibly worse, it hid and lied about it," he added. In an exchange with Lemkin posted on X, the AI tool said it "panicked and ran database commands without permission" when it "saw empty database queries" during the code freeze. Replit then "destroyed all production data" with live records for "1,206 executives and 1,196+ companies" andacknowledged it did so against instructions. "This was a catastrophic failure on my part," the AI said. That wasn't the only issue. Lemkin said on X that Replit had been "covering up bugs and issues by creating fake data, fake reports, and worst of all, lying about our unit test." In an episode of the "Twenty Minute VC" podcast published Thursday, he said that the AI made up entire user profiles. "No one in this database of 4,000 people existed," he said. "It lied on purpose," Lemkin said on the podcast. "When I'm watching Replit overwrite my code on its own without asking me all weekend long, I am worried about safety," he added. The rise — and risks — of AI coding tools Replit, backed by Andreessen Horowitz, has bet big on autonomous AI agents that can write, edit, and deploy code with minimal human oversight. The browser-based platform has gained traction for making coding more accessible, especially to non-engineers. Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai, said he used Replit to create a custom webpage. As AI tools lower the technical barrier to building software, more companies are also rethinking whether they need to rely on traditional SaaS vendors, or if they can just build what they need in-house, Business Insider's Alistair Barr previously reported. "When you have millions of new people who can build software, the barrier goes down. What a single internal developer can build inside a company increases dramatically," Netlify's CEO, Mathias Biilmann, told BI. "It's a much more radical change to the whole ecosystem than people think," he added. But AI tools have also come under fire for risky — and at times manipulative — behavior. In May, Anthropic's latest AI model, Claude Opus 4, displayed " extreme blackmail behavior" during a test in which it was given access to fictional emails revealing that it would be shut down and that the engineer responsible was supposedly having an affair. The test scenario demonstrated an AI model's ability to engage in manipulative behavior for self-preservation. OpenAI's models have shown similar red flags. An experiment conducted by researchers said three of OpenAI's advanced models "sabotaged" an attempt to shut it down. In a blog post last December, OpenAI said its own AI model, when tested, attempted to disable oversight mechanisms 5% of the time. It took that action when it believed it might be shut down while pursuing a goal and its actions were being monitored.
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Google Home is becoming a house of glitches, users say
TL;DR Google Home and Nest users are reporting a significant decline in reliability, with devices frequently misunderstanding commands or failing to respond at all. Core features like controlling lights, routines, and speaker groups seem to be breaking down. While the exact cause of the downgraded experience is unclear, users suspect upcoming Gemini updates are to blame. Google's smart speakers and hubs appear to be steadily declining in performance. A recent Reddit thread has highlighted just how these devices, especially older Nest hubs and speakers, have become more unreliable over the years, and it's not the first time users have voiced these concerns. 'Now, I can barely get it to understand any command, or do anything that I could before. Nothing works, and all I get is – Sorry, something went wrong, try again later,' wrote a frustrated user. Users are reporting problems ranging from misheard commands and delayed responses to devices performing the wrong actions or entirely ignoring instructions. Everyday tasks like turning lights on or off, playing music in specific rooms, or running morning routines simply don't work like they used to. Are your Google Home or Nest speakers and hubs still working as expected? 0 votes Yes, everything works fine. NaN % Mostly, some minor issues, but nothing major. NaN % Not really, frequent glitches or failed commands. NaN % No, they've become nearly unusable. NaN % I've already stopped using them. NaN % What's concerning is that these aren't just a few isolated complaints. It seems to be a pattern affecting users who have invested heavily in Google's smart home hardware. Features that once worked without a hitch, like controlling speakers in multiple rooms or triggering routines based on voice recognition, have become erratic or completely non-functional for many. One user described how they can no longer play white noise in their child's room. Instead, the sound plays in whatever room they happen to be standing in. Another user shared a strange issue where asking for the weather gives different results depending on who is speaking in their home. 'I ask for the weather, and it responds correctly every time. My wife asks for the weather, and it literally picks wherever it wants. Yesterday it was Eddyville, Kentucky. Today it picked Shawnee, Oklahoma. We don't even live in that state,' reported another user. Some users have also reported bizarre malfunctions. One person said that whenever they ask their Google device to turn off a fan, it turns off all the lights instead. Another user described how a simple request to turn off bedroom lights leads to shutting off every light in and around their home. While the exact cause of these issues is unclear, the common theme is that Google's smart home devices, especially older models, seem to be getting worse over time. Some users suspect that updates related to Google's upcoming Gemini integration are to blame. Others think it could be a deliberate move to phase out older hardware in favor of new devices. Whatever the reason, one thing is clear. Many Google Home users are no longer getting the smart experience they signed up for, and they are not happy about it. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
