logo
Tírlan urged to seek expert advice on Glanbia holding

Tírlan urged to seek expert advice on Glanbia holding

Irish Times12-05-2025
The board of dairy co-op
Tírlan
has been urged to seek expert advice on how it should dispose of its stake in
Glanbia
plc.
The group, which owns the
Avonmore
and Kilmeaden brands, has lost up to €500 million on the value of its holding amid a slump in Glanbia's share price.
It is currently in the process of spinning out 15 million Glanbia shares to members but at a greatly reduced value, an issue that has created tensions within the group.
At a heated AGM this month, Tírlan shareholders repeatedly asked the board if it had sought outside advice on how best to divest of its holding in the Kilkenny-based nutritionals group, and what – as Glanbia's largest shareholder – it planned to do about the PLC's recent underperformance.
READ MORE
Glanbia shares have slumped in recent months on the back of a profit warning and questions about the strategic direction of the company.
Activist investor Clearway Capital, which has a 1 per cent stake in Glanbia, has called for a strategic review of the company, with the goal of splitting it up, and has attempted to enlist support from Tírlan.
'The time has come to conduct a formal, board-led strategic review focused specifically on separating the businesses from one another,' Clearway's founder and chief executive Gianluca Ferrari said in a recent letter to Tírlan.
A separation could be achieved through various means, including sales of its US dairy and global ingredients assets, or a spin-off its biggest division, Glanbia Performance Nutrition (GPN), which sells protein powders and shakes to gym-goers and dieters, to existing shareholders and a listing on a US exchange, he said.
At Glanbia's AGM last month, Mr Ferrari said the 'sprawling corporate structure' was undervaluing the business and amplifying shocks.
At the Tírlan AGM, one shareholder asked why it took an investor with barely 1 per cent of shares to raise questions about Glanbia's operation.
In response to queries from The Irish Times, Tírlan, formerly Glanbia Ireland, declined to comment.
Glanbia has linked its poor share performance and recent profit warning to a sudden and unexpected jump in the price of whey protein, its main input.
The company has also signalled it planned to offload its ailing SlimFast brand, acquired in 2018 for $350 million, following a fall-off in sales.
Chief executive
Hugh McGuire
insisted last month that 2024 was a strong year for the group but it had been hit by two notable headwinds: the high-than-expected price of whey protein and, more recently,
US tariffs
which he described as a 'massive distraction for the business'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Irish Times view on the choices facing the EU: finding its place in a changing world
The Irish Times view on the choices facing the EU: finding its place in a changing world

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on the choices facing the EU: finding its place in a changing world

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa will be in Beijing on Thursday for an EU-China summit that is overshadowed by disputes over market access, export controls and Russia's war in Ukraine. Just over a week later, the United States is due to impose a 30 per cent tariff on goods imported from the EU, unless a deal is agreed before then. When Donald Trump announced his tariffs on about 60 countries and trading blocs four months ago, they looked set to push China and the EU closer together. But relations between Brussels and Beijing have deteriorated so sharply in recent weeks that China has scaled back this week's summit, which will now last for just one day instead of two as originally planned. The US, which at one stage imposed a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods, is now negotiating with China and Trump is expected to meet Xi Jinping later this year. Washington has lifted its ban on the export of some advanced semiconductors to China and Beijing has restored the supply of rare earth magnets to the US. For much of the 21st century, Europe could rely on Russia for energy, the US for security, and China as an export market. But Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago severed the EU's economic relationship with Russia, Trump has brought the US security guarantee into question and China has lost much of its appetite for high-end European products. READ MORE Most EU member-states now see Russia, which has the world's largest nuclear arsenal, as a potentially existential security threat if it prevails in Ukraine and they are ramping up defence spending accordingly. However, Trump's support for Ukraine is contingent at best and could be deployed as a bargaining chip if the EU responds aggressively to tariffs by using its Anti-Coercion Instrument to target US services, intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. The EU's fear of Russia, its grievances against China and its anxiety about the US's intentions are all based in reality and Europe needs to become more self-reliant in defence while protecting its industrial base from Chinese competition. But its response to a rapidly changing geopolitical environment has too often been piecemeal, defensive and lacking in vision. Mario Draghi's report on competitiveness and Enrico Letta's on the single market last year offered bold blueprints for action to combat Europe's economic weaknesses. The EU needs similarly fresh thinking on its place in the world, the security architecture of the continent, the future of the transatlantic relationship, the rise of China and the growing importance of middle powers such as Brazil and Saudi Arabia in an increasingly multipolar world.

The Irish Times view on funding water infrastructure: the €12 billion spanner
The Irish Times view on funding water infrastructure: the €12 billion spanner

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on funding water infrastructure: the €12 billion spanner

The squeaky wheel gets the grease, or perhaps in the case of Uisce Éireann the dripping tap gets the €12 billion spanner. For months, the utility has been decrying its lack of funds at every opportunity in a concerted and coordinated fashion to ensure the Government and the public could be in no doubt that unless pipes went into the ground there would be no more homes. In March the utility's chairman Jerry Grant told a Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland conference that the State's water and sewerage systems were in 'a desperate state' because of 'extraordinary complacency' and 'passive indifference' to investment in infrastructure. The goal of building 50,000 homes on average each year could not be met unless there was a 'new approach from the Government' in developing water services, Grant said, READ MORE The utility has to be commended for taking this forthright approach. After all, the strategy worked. A hefty chunk has been allocated to Uisce Éireann u nder the National Development Pla n – €2 billion in equity funding, another €2.5 billion for new large-scale projects, and €7.6 billion to improve water services. The establishment of Irish Water was predicated on a model where, like other utility providers such as electricity and gas companies, user charges would provide its core funding. When in 2016 household charges were suspended and subsequently scrapped, the utility was left – so to speak – high and dry, largely reliant on the annual State budget which mitigated against long-term planning. Finally, the Government appears to be realising that certainty is funding is needed for these vital infrastructural investments, rather than State organisations having to wait to see what emerges in each budget. Private sector infrastructure investors in national projects need similar reassurance. Ministers now recognise the need to guarantee a flow of funding over a long period of years. Whether they can deliver on this if the budget numbers get tight is, of course, the big question.

Solicitor facing professional misconduct allegations over handling of €100,000 in client account
Solicitor facing professional misconduct allegations over handling of €100,000 in client account

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Solicitor facing professional misconduct allegations over handling of €100,000 in client account

A solicitor is facing three allegations of professional misconduct linked to his handling of a €100,000 deposit placed into his practice's client account. Michael A O'Brien, solicitor and principal of a firm of the same name based in Carrick on Suir, Co Tipperary , denies any wrongdoing. The Legal Services Regulatory Authority 's case against Mr O'Brien, being heard by the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal , follows a complaint by Dolores Barrett Burke who sought to invest €100,000 in a scheme to purchase the Heritage Hotel and Spa in 2018. She told the tribunal she was 'shocked' to read in a newspaper that the Co Laois hotel had instead been purchased by FBD Hotels & Resorts, yet Mr O'Brien made no attempt to return her money to her. READ MORE Ms Barrett Burke, who is retired and lives in Castlebar, Co Mayo , said she transferred the money after receiving a letter from Mr O'Brien in June 2018 that she believed provided the required assurances. The investment opportunity had been suggested to her by her brother-in-law Cyril Burke. The proposed purchase was being led by Mary Parton, a woman she never met, she said. However, she said she later learned FBD had purchased the hotel. She believed she would receive her money back 'in the same way I had sent it', but did not immediately worry about why it was not returned. More than a year later, she consulted her solicitor, Thomas J Walsh, who sent the first of a number of letters to Mr O'Brien seeking the return of the funds. After no reply to initial correspondence, the tribunal heard, Mr O'Brien responded to explain that the terms of his undertaking had been adhered to and the money had been dispensed in accordance with the instructions of his client, Ms Parton. Barrister Mark Finan, for Mr O'Brien, put it to Ms Barrett Burke that the letter his client sent to her clearly stated his understanding was that she would be paying the money into the client account 'for and on behalf of Mary Parton'. It was also put to her that, while she had indicated when making a complaint about Mr O'Brien to the Legal Services Regulatory Authority that she had engaged Mr O'Brien, she had never actually done so and was not, in fact, his client. 'I figured because I sent him the money and it was a client account, I was now a client,' she said. The tribunal is scheduled to resume on October 29th. In the interim, it is to be clarified whether the tribunal's chair, Tom Coughlan, is acquainted with Ms Barrett Burke's brother-in-law Cyril Burke. He told the hearing he became aware of a possible connection after seeing the list of witnesses and hearing the evidence but was not sure if it is the same Cyril Burke who he knows but not well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store