Tírlan urged to seek expert advice on Glanbia holding
Tírlan
has been urged to seek expert advice on how it should dispose of its stake in
Glanbia
plc.
The group, which owns the
Avonmore
and Kilmeaden brands, has lost up to €500 million on the value of its holding amid a slump in Glanbia's share price.
It is currently in the process of spinning out 15 million Glanbia shares to members but at a greatly reduced value, an issue that has created tensions within the group.
At a heated AGM this month, Tírlan shareholders repeatedly asked the board if it had sought outside advice on how best to divest of its holding in the Kilkenny-based nutritionals group, and what – as Glanbia's largest shareholder – it planned to do about the PLC's recent underperformance.
READ MORE
Glanbia shares have slumped in recent months on the back of a profit warning and questions about the strategic direction of the company.
Activist investor Clearway Capital, which has a 1 per cent stake in Glanbia, has called for a strategic review of the company, with the goal of splitting it up, and has attempted to enlist support from Tírlan.
'The time has come to conduct a formal, board-led strategic review focused specifically on separating the businesses from one another,' Clearway's founder and chief executive Gianluca Ferrari said in a recent letter to Tírlan.
A separation could be achieved through various means, including sales of its US dairy and global ingredients assets, or a spin-off its biggest division, Glanbia Performance Nutrition (GPN), which sells protein powders and shakes to gym-goers and dieters, to existing shareholders and a listing on a US exchange, he said.
At Glanbia's AGM last month, Mr Ferrari said the 'sprawling corporate structure' was undervaluing the business and amplifying shocks.
At the Tírlan AGM, one shareholder asked why it took an investor with barely 1 per cent of shares to raise questions about Glanbia's operation.
In response to queries from The Irish Times, Tírlan, formerly Glanbia Ireland, declined to comment.
Glanbia has linked its poor share performance and recent profit warning to a sudden and unexpected jump in the price of whey protein, its main input.
The company has also signalled it planned to offload its ailing SlimFast brand, acquired in 2018 for $350 million, following a fall-off in sales.
Chief executive
Hugh McGuire
insisted last month that 2024 was a strong year for the group but it had been hit by two notable headwinds: the high-than-expected price of whey protein and, more recently,
US tariffs
which he described as a 'massive distraction for the business'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Where does the EU-US tariff deal leave Ireland?
It is rare there is more consensus than division between Government and Opposition on the implications of a big policy moment. The domestic political response to the announcement of the deal that would allow the US impose a 15 per cent tariff on exports from the EU was markedly glum on both sides of the house. The Government was unable to muster anything more than a subdued acknowledgment it would 'bring clarity and predictability'. Coalition leaders have been saying for many months that tariffs are not good for anyone, so the confirmation that EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump had agreed a 15 per cent level was hardly something to be welcomed. 'We will now study the details of what has been agreed, including its implications for businesses exporting from Ireland to the US, and for different sectors operating here,' Taoiseach Micheál Martin said in his initial reaction. READ MORE Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke, speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, did not specifically disagree with the earlier assessment of Ibec director general Danny McCoy that it was a capitulation. He said the EU was four days away from 30 per cent tariffs and the possibility of a prolonged trade war, which he warned would have been far more significant. That said, he did not shy away from the challenges the tariff would present for the Irish economy, not least the State's substantial exports to the US. On Monday, politicians on both sides of the House were still looking for clarity on the finer details of the deal. On the face of it, the Irish whiskey industry will find itself facing a higher tariff than its Scottish competitors (the UK has a 10 per cent tariff) though it might possibly benefit from carveouts announced for aircraft, chemicals and agri-food. The other key question for Ireland revolves around pharmaceuticals and if that sector (which is the main component of Irish exports to the US) will be subject to tariffs, or will face additional ones. Despite Mr Trump saying negotiations on pharmaceuticals would be separate, Ms von der Leyen indicated it was part of the agreement. Sinn Féin's enterprise spokeswoman, Rose Conway-Walsh, said the deal was 'nothing to be celebrated'. She also said she was very concerned about the lack of differential between North and South, and its repercussions for both economies and for supply chains. 'It is very obvious that there is a need for a package for business and for exporters,' she said. 'We have to protect jobs. We cannot have people losing their jobs.' The Labour spokesman on enterprise, George Lawlor, said a revised summer economic statement was needed as the one published this month was predicated on tariff levels of 10 per cent. 'We face uncertainty as to what's going to happen in the pharma sector. We also face uncertainty as to what's going to happen with the drinks industry. 'There's no doubt it's going to have serious implications. I think there was a prediction of some 45,000 jobs that would have a cloud hanging over them with a 10 per cent tariff. So with a 15 per cent tariff, that can only be a bad deal for Ireland.' Opposition figures pointed to what they said was the inherent weakness of the EU as a political bloc. Mr Lawlor said the US emerging with zero tariffs plus side deals seemed 'ludicrous' to him. 'The notion that we come away from this in a much worse position than when we went in is something that has to be seriously examined.' Edgar Morgenroth, professor of economics at DCU, said the deal did not give certainty. He referred to a deal Mr Trump did with Canada during his first term that he subsequently unpicked. 'Nothing is certain with this guy, except if you give him something, he will come back for more. So the whole strategy of going and negotiating was just stupid,' he said. He also criticised the lack of political cohesion within the EU. 'In Germany they worry about the German car makers. In Ireland, we had the whiskey makers. 'Every country sees itself like a country, and never sees the power of the bloc, and it means we are an easy target because you can kind of divide and conquer,' Prof Morgenroth said. In a worse-case scenario, if US multinationals reduced their presence in Ireland (as a result of Mr Trump's policies), and if there was also a change in the treatment of intellectual property (both big drivers of corporation tax), this would undoubtedly lead to a substantial 'fiscal shock' for Ireland, he said.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Small Irish businesses say tariffs will hurt US consumers most
Many smaller Irish exporters have mixed feelings about the trade agreement between the European Union and the United States. Last week, they understood there was still an outside chance that discussions could go off the rails with the possibility of a trade war. At the same time, they are less than impressed with the outline deal being presented in the media. Sarah Furno, of Cashel Blue, greeted the news from Scotland yesterday with a 'degree of relief' and the sense that the Tipperary cheese company can now make more definite plans for the US market. Sarah and Sergio Furno of Cashel Blue cheesemakers 'Uncertainty is impossible and disabling especially in a prolonged manner,' she says. 'Overall we feel it could have been worse. It's a relatively even playing field for imports and there is enough light to keep doors open. READ MORE 'Of course it will hurt the average American most'. Ms Furno said the 30 per cent rate threatened by US President Donald Trump would have pushed Cashel products off US shelves. Leo Cummins, of Hazelbrook Confectionery in Co Kildare, decided earlier this year to shun the US market due to the uncertainty. On hearing the news of the agreement, he said he was even more convinced that ignoring the US market in the short term was 'the right thing to do'. 'Obviously one has a concern that the deal as it stands looks quite lopsided in favour of the US,' he says. Leo Cummins of Hazelbrook Confectionary in Newbridge, Co. Kildare. Photograph Nick Bradshaw 'I personally think that American candy sales will decline in Ireland, the UK and Europe over the next three years as consumer sentiment towards America becomes more negative. 'Whilst it appears that there will be no tariffs on US candy imports into Europe, American candy manufacturers will have to pay extra for their cocoa and other ingredients that are not produced in America and that will push their costs higher and hence their prices to European customers.' Mr Cummins says more expensive US confectionery will open doors for Hazelbrook in the UK and Europe as importers there will look to find cheaper alternatives. Whiskey manufacturers were particularly concerned at the possibility of trade talks failing. Brendan Carty, of Killowen Distillery in Co Down, will now have to contend with two different trade deals – the EU deal at 15 per cent and the UK one at 10 per cent. As Irish whiskey is bottled and bonded on both sides of the Border, it presents new headaches for the likes of Killowen. 'If a distillery sells 50 per cent distilled in Killowen and 50 per cent distilled in the Republic, I suppose our tariffs will be complicated and will fall between the two,' says Mr Carty. 'That's the nature of navigating a global market. It's always changing and very complex. It's the consumers who will take the hurt in the end. 'It's always a navigation exercise working things out with overseas partners, part and parcel of the business, so we won't get too upset about it'. The Irish Whiskey Association still hasn't ruled out the chance that the agreement could yet see the return of 'zero-for-zero' trade in spirits. Director Eoin Ó Catháin says the 10 per cent rate currently being applied, along with a weakened US dollar, has forced some operators to shut their doors. 'We are hopeful that, as we learn more about this deal and discussions on its implementation continue, a mutually beneficial arrangement and the removal of tariffs can be secured,' he says. The overriding sentiment from many exporters is that the deal represents an unwanted regression. With no upsides for Irish businesses – other than avoiding even worse terms – it is the new price of doing business with the US.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
EU-US trade deal: Ireland ‘no doubt' in challenging position over tariffs, says Minister
There is 'no doubt' that Ireland is in a challenging position in relation to tariffs but the recently announced agreement does bring 'some clarity', the Minister for Enterprise has said. Peter Burke said the deal reached on Sunday, which will lock in tariffs of 15 per cent on most EU imports to the US , had avoided a 'direct trade war'. Speaking on RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland on Monday, Mr Burke said the EU was four days away from 30 per cent tariffs, which would have been 'significant', while the Government is awaiting more details to emerge. The final terms of the deal were worked out during a meeting between European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland on Sunday. READ MORE The accord effectively sees the EU accepting import taxes of 15 per cent on most of its huge volume of trade with the US. The two sides agreed that no tariffs would be charged on imports of aircraft, certain chemicals and some agri-food goods, though the finer details of what agricultural products will benefit from these exemptions are still to be worked out. [ EU-US trade deal analysis: Tariffs have a price for both sides. Trump was willing to pay it Opens in new window ] Mr Burke said there would be a number of 'carveouts' for particular sectors such as aviation, agri-foods and spirits. He said the Government was concerned about the 'stacking mechanism', which refers to the cumulative effect of multiple tariffs applied to the same imported product. 'All of those areas have been called out for separate carveouts, so we have to see what that will look like and what will that amount to on paper, and that's where the devil is going to be in the detail,' he said. 'But the critical thing is that at all costs we have to avoid escalation because it would be devastating in terms of the impact because the scale of the market is so huge.' The Fine Gael TD said the Government had been 'very clear that tariffs are bad'. 'They constrain supply, they drive prices up. They're not good for the US economy, or indeed for the Irish economy,' he said. 'Ireland's position is very clear – we always favour an open, rules-based fair trade at every hand's turn. When you have the talk of tariffs and a deal like this, it is going to be challenging, and I think we have to be very honest about that.' [ EU-US trade deal represents 'substantial burden' for Irish businesses Opens in new window ] The deal includes EU commitments to purchase set amounts of US oil, nuclear power and liquefied natural gas annually. In terms of Ireland buying US oil or gas, Mr Burke said he was not aware of it at this point in time but could not 'give a definitive answer'. Mr Burke added that a deal between China and the US had yet to happen, which would affect Irish exports and they would also have to see what separate carveouts will emerge. 'Until we get flesh on the bones in all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what the budgetary parameters will end up with.' He also said he and the Government remained committed to cutting the hospitality VAT rate to 9 per cent and that it was in the programme for government, which had been agreed by all parties.
