logo
Overlooked, Underpriced, and Built to Thrill—These Cars Are Hiding in Plain Sight

Overlooked, Underpriced, and Built to Thrill—These Cars Are Hiding in Plain Sight

Yahoo12-06-2025
Fun, affordable cars are getting harder to find. With every new collector trend, social media hype cycle, and YouTube build series, it feels like every manual-equipped, analog-driving gem gets snatched up—or marked up—before you can even hit 'save' on the listing.
But not all the good ones are gone.
We hunted for underrated enthusiast cars—models that still fly under the radar, despite offering impressive performance, unique styling, or just a ton of personality per dollar. Some are modern sleepers, others are forgotten classics, but all are still (mostly) attainable. Just don't wait too long—because once the crowd catches on, the prices will follow.
This list isn't about rare exotics or overpriced auction queens. We focused on cars that real enthusiasts can still buy and enjoy—models that offer a compelling mix of performance, style, or uniqueness, but haven't yet been fully embraced (or inflated) by the market.
We leaned on a mix of online classifieds, enthusiast forums, and auction data (like Bring a Trailer and Cars & Bids). Most of all, we relied on good old-fashioned car nerd intuition, our team's collective years of driving, modding, and obsessively browsing listings at 2 a.m.
If it's fun to drive, still relatively attainable, and unfairly overlooked? It made the cut.
As you may have guessed, Mazdaspeed3 is the performance version of the Mazda3. It packs a decent punch thanks to a turbocharged 2.3-liter engine that sends 263-hp to the front wheels via a 6-speed manual.
Edmunds compared the MazdaSpeed3 to the Mitsubishi Evo and Subaru WRX, two of the most iconic heavyweights in the JDM performance car game.
Why It's Overlooked: FWD torque steer and interior quality kept it from earning the same cachet as AWD rally heroes like Evo and WRX.
If you want more space than the MazdaSpeed3 offers, its bigger sibling, the MazdaSpeed6, may be the perfect choice. It also uses a turbocharged 2.3-liter 4-cylinder unit, but its 274-hp is sent to all four wheels via the 6-speed manual.
Only the initiated can tell there's something special hiding underneath its sleeper body. Once the lights turn green, it'll launch to 60 mph in just 6.2 seconds and has a 150mph top speed. We're surprised that not more gearheads are buying the MazdaSpeed6. It may not be as exciting as the Mitsubishi Evo or Subaru WRX, but it's probably more dependable than both, and they're available for a fraction of the price.
Why It's Overlooked: Despite real performance chops, its subtle styling and sedan shape made it easy to miss next to flashier rivals.
The Chrysler Crossfire might look like a concept car that accidentally made it to production, and honestly, that's part of its charm. Built during the DaimlerChrysler era, the Crossfire borrowed heavily from the Mercedes-Benz SLK320, sharing its platform, V6 engine, and even many interior components. But its wild, fastback styling and boat-tail rear end were all Chrysler.
The standard Crossfire had a 3.2-liter V6 making 215 horsepower, but the real fun lies in the SRT-6, which added a supercharger for 330 hp and serious performance—0–60 in the mid-5-second range. It's essentially a Mercedes in American clothing, often priced far lower than its German cousin.
Why It's Overlooked: People didn't know what to make of it—part German engineering, part retro-futuristic styling. But for what it costs today, the Crossfire is a bizarre, badge-engineered bargain.
At first glance, the original Lexus IS300 looks like just another early-2000s luxury compact sedan. But under the hood? Toyota quietly dropped in the legendary 2JZ inline-six—the same engine family that powers the iconic Mk4 Supra. Sure, this version wasn't turbocharged, but the potential is still there.
Rear-wheel-drive, bulletproof reliability, and a clean, understated design make it one of the best hidden gems of the early 2000s. Manual versions were rare (and highly desirable), but even the automatics are a blast with the right mods. The drift crowd has known its value for years, but the IS300 is still criminally overlooked outside that niche.
Why It's Overlooked: Overshadowed by its more famous sibling and often dismissed as just another luxury compact.
Honda sold the Prelude over five generations from 1978 to 2001. It was the brand's flagship model, and the last two generations packed all of Honda's fanciest tech.
Still, it was never as popular as certain other Japanese sports coupes. That's good news, though, as buying one for extraordinarily little money is possible. We'd either go for the third-generation with its cool pop-up headlights or the fifth and last generation with plenty of power and excellent driving dynamics.
Why It's Overlooked: Always the bridesmaid to the Civic and Integra when it came to tuning culture and track cred.
If you've never seen a Buick Reatta, you're not alone fewer than 22,000 were ever built. This front-wheel-drive personal luxury coupe (later offered as a convertible) was hand-assembled and packed with ahead-of-its-time features, including a touchscreen interface on early models and a fully digital dash.
While it's not a canyon carver, the Reatta offered a smooth ride, respectable V6 power, and a level of design ambition rarely seen from Buick in the late '80s. Think of it as a tech-forward alternative to the Eldorado or Riviera, with far more exclusivity.
Why It's Overlooked: When new, it didn't exactly set hearts racing, and its unusual place in Buick's lineup confused buyers. But as a quirky, comfortable cruiser with a dash of retro-futurism, it's aging better than many remember.
Fiat's 124 Spider is built on the same platform as the latest Mazda MX-5 Miata, so you know it'll be fun to drive. Mazda used a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter engine, while Fiat used the turbocharged 1.4-liter engine from the 500 Abarth.
That decision, perhaps combined with Fiat's less-than-perfect reputation for reliability, means it's not as popular as its Japanese cousin. However, that little 1.4-liter is very tunable. Abarth extracted 180-hp from it, and that was with a factory warranty.
Why It's Overlooked: Fiat's shaky reliability reputation and unusual engine choice kept it in the Miata's shadow.
The Pontiac G8 GT is one of those cars that didn't get the recognition it deserved when new, but it's aged into something special. Underneath its understated four-door body is a genuine rear-wheel-drive performance sedan powered by a 6.0-liter LS V8 making 361 horsepower. That's Camaro SS power in a family-friendly package.
Built on GM's Australian Holden Commodore platform, the G8 GT handled better than most American sedans of its era and came standard with a 6-speed automatic (a 6-speed manual was reserved for the GXP variant). It was Pontiac's last hurrah—and most people missed it. Today, it's one of the few modern V8 sedans that still fly under the radar, especially compared to the prices of newer CTS-Vs or Chargers.
Why It's Overlooked: It wore a Pontiac badge in an era when the brand was fading fast. But the G8 GT was a genuine muscle sedan hiding in plain sight.
Toyota has built seven generations of the Celica, and the last one is actually the most affordable, at least compared to the turbocharged models. Car enthusiasts seem to either love or hate the seventh-gen Celica, primarily because of its divisive looks.
In GT-S spec, it packs a 2ZZ 1.8-liter engine with close to 200-hp. In fact, the same engine was used in the Lotus Elise. The Celica is an excellent sports coupe if you can look past its exterior design and don't mind driving an FWD car.
Why It's Overlooked: FWD layout and edgy styling split the fanbase, especially as the tuner crowd moved toward AWD and RWD platforms.
Before Nissan revived the Z nameplate with the 350Z, it quietly debuted the same bones under the Infiniti G35 Coupe. With a 3.5-liter V6 sending power to the rear wheels, a slick 6-speed manual available, and styling that still holds up, the G35 Coupe delivered legitimate performance with luxury trimmings.
It's not exactly a secret anymore, but the G35 Coupe is still surprisingly underappreciated in enthusiast circles, especially when compared to its Nissan sibling or newer rivals. With prices still hovering in accessible territory, it's one of the best RWD coupes from the early 2000s.
Why It's Overlooked: It wore a luxury badge during an era when import enthusiasts were chasing tuner cred. But today, the G35 Coupe stands out as a stylish, balanced, and well-rounded alternative to both the 350Z and BMW's E46.
The Subaru SVX boasts one of the most distinctive designs of the 1990s, a testament to its bold styling. Crafted by the renowned Italian designer Giorgetto Giugiaro. The SVX features a sleek, aerodynamic profile complemented by unique "window-within-a-window" side glass. This aircraft-inspired design element evokes comparisons to the Lamborghini Countach's iconic windows, offering a futuristic flair that sets the SVX apart from its contemporaries.
Less than 20k units were sold in the U.S. between 1992 and 1997, making the SVX a rare sight on today's roads.
This limited production and its unique design have led to a growing interest among collectors. While prices are beginning to rise, diligent enthusiasts can still find well-maintained examples at reasonable prices. However, potential buyers should be aware that certain parts, especially those unique to the SVX, can be challenging to source due to the vehicle's age and limited production run.
Under the hood, the SVX is powered by Subaru's largest-ever engine at the time: a 3.3-liter EG33 flat-six producing 230 horsepower and 228 lb-ft of torque. Paired with a 4-speed automatic transmission and Subaru's signature all-wheel-drive system, the SVX delivers a smooth and confident driving experience. Inside, it offers a range of '90s-era luxury features, including leather seating, power accessories, and a premium sound system, positioning it as a grand tourer that dares to be different.
Why It's Overlooked: Its quirky styling and high curb weight made it a niche oddity, not a mainstream sports car.
Mercedes-Benz introduced the first-gen SLK in 1995, and by the time production ended in 2004, over 300,000 units had been sold. It's fair to say that its looks are a bit dated now, and that's probably why it's not as popular as it once was.
The SLK was one of the models that pioneered the folding metal roof, so it's not as bad for winter use as many other convertibles. Supercharged 2.3-liter models can be found for under $10,000; even the 3.2-liter AMG is available for less than $15,000.
Why It's Overlooked: Early models prioritized comfort over sharp handling, and the looks have not aged as gracefully as the badge suggests.
The BMW Z3 offered a range of engines from 1.8 to 3.2 liters. The 1.9-liter four-cylinder variant, producing between 118 and 140 horsepower depending on the model year, is often described as "underpowered" by enthusiasts. In automotive terms, "underpowered" refers to a vehicle's limited acceleration and top speed capabilities compared to its peers. For instance, the 1.9-liter Z3's 0-60 mph time is approximately 8.2 seconds, whereas the 2.8-liter six-cylinder version achieves this in about 6.2 seconds, as reported by Kelly Blue Book. Other outlets have the 1.9-liter pegged slower.
This performance gap is noticeable when comparing the Z3 to contemporaries like the Mazda MX-5 Miata. While the Miata's 1.6-liter engine produces around 115 horsepower, its lighter weight allows a spirited driving experience. The Z3 1.9, being heavier, doesn't offer the same level of agility, leading some drivers to prefer the six-cylinder variants for a more dynamic performance.
However, it's essential to note that many Z3 1.9 owners appreciate the model for its balance and handling characteristics. The lighter engine contributes to a more balanced weight distribution, enhancing the car's nimbleness on winding roads. As one enthusiast noted, "Around town or on twisty roads it's just amazingly good fun and in no way underpowered so long as you keep the revs up.
Why It's Overlooked: Base four-cylinder models felt underpowered, and the roadster's retro styling wasn't everyone's cup of tea.
The Ford Probe was originally intended to be the next-generation Mustang until passionate backlash from enthusiasts forced Ford to rethink that plan. And thank goodness they did, because the Probe, with its front-wheel-drive layout and Japanese underpinnings (thanks to a partnership with Mazda), was quite a different kind of car.
That said, the Probe wasn't a bad enthusiast car, especially the GT model with a 2.5-liter Mazda-sourced V6. It was nimble, reasonably quick, and looked the part of a '90s sports coupe. Unfortunately, its awkward name and Mustang-alternative baggage kept it from gaining widespread love. Today, it's an overlooked bargain with potential, assuming you can find one that's been cared for.
Why It's Overlooked: FWD layout and awkward name turned off muscle car purists, and it never escaped its almost-a-Mustang reputation.
When it debuted in the early 1980s, the C4 Corvette was a technological leap for American sports cars. With its digital dash, sleek wedge styling, and impressive handling for the era, it became the dream car for a generation of enthusiasts.
It gets overlooked today partly because the C5 and C6 offer more modern performance, and partly because the styling screams '80s. But that's exactly the charm. Packing classic small-block V8 power, a driver-focused cockpit, and plenty of upgrade potential, the C4 is a retro performance bargain that finally gets the respect it deserves. Clean examples can still be found for reasonable prices, but don't expect that to last forever.
Why It's Overlooked: The boxy styling and dated interior don't scream 'dream car' to younger buyers, and it's long lived in the shadow of the more modern C5 and C6.
When Ford introduced the original Ford Taurus SHO (Super High Output) sedan in 1989, it featured plenty of performance upgrades over the regular model. The most important of them all was the Yamaha-built V6 DOHC engine.
The SHO was so performance-oriented that it wasn't even initially available with an automatic transmission. With 220-hp, it could reach 60 mph in roughly six seconds and had a top speed of 143 mph.
Why It's Overlooked: A fast family sedan with anonymous styling and a badge better known for rental cars than redlines.
At first glance, the Volvo C30 T5 may not look like much, but we all know that looks can be deceiving.
Open the hood, and you'll see the turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-five engine. While it only delivers 217 hp and 240 lb.-ft of torque in stock form, it has lots of untapped potential. This is the same engine found in the Ford Focus ST and RS models; owners have extracted over 1,000 hp from them!
Why It's Overlooked: Hot hatch performance wrapped in sensible Swedish design, too mature for the tuner crowd, too oddball for everyone else.
Many gearheads overlook the Kia Stinger, probably because the brand's past consisted of cheap, underpowered cars with questionable build quality.
The Stinger is a proper sports sedan with a range of turbocharged engines, including a 365-hp V6 unit. The Koreans have 'stolen' some of the best engineers from Audi and BMW's performance divisions, so the Stinger certainly delivers exciting driving dynamics. As a bonus, they even have some of the best warranties.
Why It's Overlooked: Despite its capabilities, the Stinger wore a badge few took seriously, especially in the performance segment.
Performance purists have long dismissed Hyundai, but the Veloster N proves that times have changed. Again, it's a brand with a questionable past, which still affects it today.
Hyundai's performance division, N, fine-tuned the Veloster, and its turbocharged four-cylinder engine produces a decent 275-hp. While it won't set the world ablaze, it's a fun hatchback that's the perfect companion during a spirited drive on your favorite backroad.
Why It's Overlooked: A great car hampered by its brand's past and a body style some found more polarizing than practical.
These cars might not dominate auction headlines or rack up millions of views on YouTube, but that makes them special, for now. They're the kinds of cars you buy because you love how they drive, not because someone told you they're a 'smart investment.'
But that doesn't mean they won't appreciate. Prices will follow as more enthusiasts wake up to what these machines offer. So, if one of these underrated gems speaks to you, don't wait. Buy it, drive it, and enjoy getting in early—while you still can.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Right Stuff: 2006 Ford GT vs. Dodge Viper SRT10 vs. Chevrolet Corvette Z06
The Right Stuff: 2006 Ford GT vs. Dodge Viper SRT10 vs. Chevrolet Corvette Z06

Motor Trend

time24 minutes ago

  • Motor Trend

The Right Stuff: 2006 Ford GT vs. Dodge Viper SRT10 vs. Chevrolet Corvette Z06

[Editor's Note: This story first appeared in the December 2005 issue of MotorTrend] America is going through a tough patch. Our forces are taking relentless flak in Iraq, and the best place in the country for jazz music has been flattened by a bitch of a storm. Our beloved auto industry also is in big trouble. Too few Big-Three models have the sizzle to sell well without epic discounts, and high gas prices paint a bleak future for the jumbo guzzler pickups and SUVs about to make their debuts. As a result, GM and Ford now enjoy junk-bond investment status, while DaimlerChrysler clings to the next rung up the debt-rating ladder. Layoffs have been announced, bankruptcies rumored. Isn't there any good news out there? The 2006 Chevy Corvette Z06, Dodge Viper SRT10, and Ford GT compete for top American supercar. The Corvette wins with superior performance and value, while the Ford GT offers unmatched allure and exclusivity, but at a higher price. The Viper is powerful but less refined. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next Why, yes! Look up at yon hilltop, where the morning's first rays of sunshine are backlighting three American supercars, poised to perform heroic acts of derring-do, providing just the sort of ego-boosting, pride-swelling distraction our weary nation could use right about now. The Chevy Corvette Z06 manages to generate 505 ultraconservative horsepower (see "Dyno Might" sidebar) from a pushrod two-valve small-block V-8 with no high-falutin' blowers and no fancy variable-valve gimcrackery. It weighs 100 pounds less than its next-best-performing Z51 sibling, thanks to extensive use of exotic materials (the structure underlying the carbon fiber and fiberglass skin is all aluminum and magnesium). No foreigner can touch this Vette's 6.3-pound/horsepower rating for under $100 grand. The Z06's price premium over the Z51 is under $20,000--half the surcharge commanded by Chevy's first exotic, the Corvette ZR-1 (in today's dollars). And the Z06 earns bonus points for delivering exoticar performance in a Clark Kent wrapper with the visibility and useful trunk space of a daily-driver--and without incurring a gas-guzzler tax. Dodge transformed a torquaholic V-10 truck engine into a light, 510-horse aluminum race-car mill that's earned the Viper a long resume of motorsport credits and successfully challenged the Corvette's decades-old status as "America's Sports Car." Its 535-pound-foot torque rating easily out-twists any foreign production car with a five-digit price tag. Its cartoonish schoolboy study-hall styling still looks as powerful, confident, and outrageous as anything ever built in Sant'Agata, Italy. And the fact that this outrageous shape doesn't take to the skies like Superman at 180-plus mph is truly a miracle of aerodynamic engineering. Ford's GT has rekindled Hank the Deuce's Ferrari feud, taking on the F430 with arguably similar results, though the wins and losses are harder to score this time around because this GT only does battle on public roads, not in international endurance races. That Ford managed to rework the original GT40's pre-wind-tunnel styling to produce significant aerodynamic downforce and enlarge it for comfort without compromising the proportions of that original American icon is astonishing. That such a windmill-tilting 550-horse fantasy car ever found its way down a production line at Ford is yet another marvel. But most miraculous of all is the fact that this Ford is still, in its third model year, finding buyers willing to pay almost double its enormous sticker price. "Hold the phone!" you sticklers for automotive parity protest. "The Chevy and Dodge start at $65,800 and $86,995, while the Ford's base price equals the sum of those two plus $550. No fair!" Well, lower your voices and listen carefully: Our secret mission here is to first determine a conclusive winner in the long-promised Chevy/Dodge face-off and then press on to determine--informed by the full weight of hard scientific evidence and soft hormonal excretions--whether the GT is indeed twice as fabulous as the winner. It won't be easy--but a battered nation is counting on us, so let's take to the wild blue yonder and give 'em hell. Our first theater of operations is the DaimlerChrysler Proving Ground near Chelsea, Michigan, and our opening sortie involves a three-hour strafing run on a deserted 1.6-mile concrete straight. These torque-monsters are all tricky to launch hard. Without deft footwork, each will easily stand in the starting box smoking its rear tires right down to the air inside them. The Viper proved least difficult. Dial up just enough revs to break traction (just under 2000 or so), then feed in the power as the gigantic Michelin Pilots hook up. From then on, it's foot-to-floorboard in between shifts. Tester Chirico found the Viper's shifter easier to hustle than the Corvette's (they share internal gearsets), thanks to its roomier gates. Get it all just right, and she'll lay down a 4.0-second blast to 60 mph, en route to a 12.0-second, 121.9-mph quarter-mile run. That's better than last month's car ran, but still a tick or two off the pace of our quickest Viper roadster. The Z06 is a different animal. Its traction and stability-control systems work wonders in dynamic handling situations, but not on the dragstrip. Coincidently, each car delivers about 1600 pounds of force to the contact patches at 2000 revs (based on the gearing, tire sizes, and rear-wheel dyno horsepower data). Since the Corvette has the least amount of weight pressing down on those tires, the driver's ankle must roll onto the throttle with extreme care as the tires begin to hook up, or they'll still be slipping at the top of first gear. The Corvette compensates for its 12-percent-rated torque deficiency relative to the Viper with overall gearing that's 15 percent shorter, but by spinning the engine to just a hair beyond the 7000-rpm redline, the Corvette can carry first gear through 60 mph, eliminating the 0.2-second a shift requires. The Viper hits its 6000-rev redline at 58 mph. Traction on our concrete track limited launch performance somewhat, but, by the quarter mile, each car's true power-to-weight shines through, and here the Corvette scores a victory, besting the Viper by four-tenths and 4.7 mph (11.6 seconds at 126.6 mph versus 12.0 at 121.9). With almost 2000 of its 3497 pounds pressing down on the rear wheels (even more when weight transfers aft at launch), the GT produced Heaven's own hole-shot, as easy as dialing up 2000 revs and rolling off the clutch. Taller ratios take first gear to 62 mph, with the mile-a-minute falling in 3.5 seconds. The quarter flashes by in 11.5 seconds at 128.7 mph in third gear (the others require a shift into fourth). Bright-red calipers on all three cars squeeze hard enough on their pizza pans to detach the driver's retinas, and our main competitors stopped on the same dime--100 feet from 60 mph (from 100 mph, the Viper halted three feet shorter, at 280 feet). The GT trailed with stops in 114 and 321 feet, which we suspect was tire-traction limited. Each provided superb balance, control, and pedal feel, though the Viper's anti-lock system seemed less refined. Then it was off to storm the black lake for figure-eight testing. Once again, the Chevy and Dodge posted nearly identical performances, so it fell to our ace pilot to differentiate them subjectively. "The Viper's steering turn-in feel and superior Michelin Pilot Sport tires allow you to push the car with confidence right up to the limits of the tires' grip," he notes. "The Z06 is a more demanding car. It was the hardest to control in the transition from the fast straights into the corners, but it also felt the most capable. The GT was easiest to manage in the transition between trail braking and getting back on the gas through the arc of the figure eight. It's easy to push this car to its limits--it can make a zero feel like a hero." The GT's slightly slower performance is attributable to too-tall gearing for this short course. We ended our Chelsea operations on a 1.6-mile handling circuit consisting mostly of smooth, flat, medium to high-speed turns with a few slow kinks thrown in for good measure. Dodge provides no electronic safety net, but, despite having the highest torque-to-rear-axle-weight rating of the three, the Viper seldom threatened to break loose its 345/35R19 rear tires and wag its tail. High cornering grip (peaking at 1.27 g) compensated for noticeably less urgent acceleration on the straights to bring the Viper in just 1.3 seconds slower than the Corvette, but the tight footwell, confining cockpit, and a steering wheel location too far aft made this a difficult car to feel comfortable going fast in. There's also a peculiar sensation of sitting way back on the rear axle and swinging the nose from side to side in turns. It's not a bad thing, just odd. Your humble scribe, who's never held a pro-racing license, found the Corvette the easiest to drive fast on a largely unfamiliar track, by running all timed laps with StabiliTrak set to the "competition mode." The system meters out as much thrust to each rear wheel as surface conditions will permit, allowing a bit of oversteer to point the car, without ever dousing the fire. That's not to say you can flat-foot the go-pedal and just steer around the course--this front-engine car will push if thrown at a curve clumsily. But given the least amount of finesse, the Corvette generates big numbers with ease: highest top speed (133.6 mph), hardest acceleration (0.71 g), and peak braking and cornering within 10 percent of the GT's and Viper's. Score a decisive victory for team bow-tie. The GT's mid-engine layout makes it behave much more like a textbook race car. Brake too late for a corner or too hard with the front wheels turned, and the rear end--which wears the smallest tires in this test--will come unstuck. Braking performance on the track was stellar, with the GT decelerating 0.1 to 0.2 g harder than the others. Of course, that may be because a major tail-wag on lap one (the GT employs no safety nannies, either) may have prompted extra driver caution on corner entries. The supercharger can easily overwhelm the rear-wheel traction on corner exits as well, but once hooked up it builds speed quickly, reaching within just 1.4 mph of the Corvette's top speed. During the first hot lap with our initial test car, a couple of over-torqued half-shaft companion-flange bolts failed, sending the open differential into freewheeling mode. The replacement car that laid down these lap times was an engineering car with 40,000 hard miles on it. It dyno'd 21 horsepower down on the original. Those extra ponies, and perhaps more bravado at the entrance to the corners, might well have put the GT ahead of the Corvette (or possibly wadded it into a little ball). The Viper feels bred of big-boned, working-class stock--honest, brutal, in your face. Nevertheless, its ladder-frame chassis offers a more compliant ride with better bump isolation and lower overall noise levels. Its suspension copes with bumpy turns better than the Chevy's. But the cramped, claustrophobic cockpit, and the offset footwell (the accelerator lines up under the steering wheel) would be hard to live with long-term. The Corvette is a featherweight that's had all the right vitamins and adhered to an extreme workout regimen in order to take on the big bruisers. It's technical. Agile. Adroit. Its cockpit is the roomiest and most accommodating. It provides the best rearward visibility, and it's the only one that'll accommodate serious luggage, so it's the best choice for a 1000-mile run, though the road, tire, and suspension noises sneaking in past the minimal sound-deadening can be fatiguing. The Z06 is also the only car that doesn't need contortions to get in and out of. The Viper requires a broad-jump over wide, piping-hot door sills, and the GT's guillotine door tops command immense respect after the first emergency-room visit for cranial trauma. Verdict? The Chevy-versus-Dodge competition was close, but the Vette edged out the Viper in most objective tests at lower cost and with better fuel economy. Its 7000-rev scream and visceral control feel kept our juices boiling and redlined our subjectivometers, so the big giant brass-tone trophy goes to Chevy and America can sleep soundly, knowing our national pride is well defended against the German 911s, English V8 Vantages, and anything Japan can currently throw at us. How does the Ford GT stack up? Personality-wise it's the Ivy-League old-money fraternity president and rugby-team captain, a product of impeccable breeding. While the Viper and Vette are busy defending America's honor against the upper-middle-class competition, the GT packs the power, poise, and panache to parry and thrust with the blue-blooded Ferrari and Porsche flagships. Is it better than the other cars put together? The raw numbers may not make the case, but its emotional appeal is extraordinary. Sure, it's hard to wriggle into, it's tight fitting, there's no place to put anything, and the ventilation is so-so. The same can be said about Superman's Lycra costume, but if it could make you fly, what would you pay to own it? Dyno Might Rumors have been flying for the last few months, alleging that the pilot-build Z06s driven and tested in conjunction with the car's Nuerburgring launch were juiced to well beyond their SAE certified 505-horsepower ratings. So we ran all three test cars on a new, state-of-the-art 200-mph Mustang eddy-current dynamometer, courtesy of Wheel-to-Wheel Powertrain, LLC in Madison Heights, Michigan. This dyno simulates actual road and aerodynamic loads to provide more realistic results (hence the rear-wheel-output numbers may trail those generated on less sophisticated dynos). According to program manager Dan Sienkiewicz, the typical drivetrain losses for a car with a manual transmission and independent suspension fall within 14 to 15 percent of crankshaft horsepower. Heavier rotating components (wheels, tires, axles, joints) increase losses, as do heftier gears, high viscosity lubricants, etc. Based on these expectations, the dyno printouts suggest our Z06 was producing more like 530 horses. But Chevy isn't alone underestimating the output of its hero motor: These figures show the Viper's V-10 also was good for 530 horses, and the GT's supercharged V-8 was pumping out at least 600 ponies. As for those initial Corvettes, the 0.3-second difference in 0-to-60-mph times between the original pilot-build test car and this regular production car is largely attributable to launch conditions at two different test tracks, while the one-tenth-second, half-mph difference in the quarter mile suggests the cars are equally strong.

There's a Reason Why Subaru WRX Sales Are Way Down
There's a Reason Why Subaru WRX Sales Are Way Down

Motor 1

time2 days ago

  • Motor 1

There's a Reason Why Subaru WRX Sales Are Way Down

People aren't buying the Subaru WRX, or so it would seem. Through June of this year, the company has only sold 6,431 examples of its iconic sports sedan, marking a 30.8 percent decrease from last year. In June, only 350 of them made their way to buyers—a significant 74 percent drop compared to last year. But it's not just that people aren't interested in the new WRX (although the numbers would indicate that many buyers are shying away from the latest generation). According to Subaru, in a statement to CarBuzz , WRX sales are down largely due to production shifts at the automaker's Gunma Prefecture manufacturing facility in Japan. Photo by: Subaru According to a spokesperson, Subaru has reduced WRX production to meet the demand of the Forester and Forester Hybrid models. The Forester is Subaru's best-selling vehicle of 2025 so far, with 95,972 units moved. The recent arrival of the Forester Hybrid means that even more customers will be eager to get their hands on the brand's compact SUV. Subaru also cites "very low inventory levels" for WRX. The company notes that "there are fewer than 500 units of WRX on the ground at the moment." The silver lining for the WRX is that Subaru will soon shift production of the Forester to its Lafayette, Indiana, manufacturing facility alongside other SUVs like the Ascent, Crosstrek, and Outback. That could, in theory, make room for higher WRX production numbers in Japan. Photo by: Subaru These sales figures from June only compound the WRX's struggles in 2025. In May, sales were down a whopping 71.2 percent, with just 482 examples rolling off dealer lots. That marks a 23.6 percent year-over-year. Subaru as a whole has seen its sales decrease slightly in 2025, with the entire brand down 10.4 percent in May, and down still by 0.2 percent in June. That said, the Crosstrek, Forester, and even the BRZ sports car are all on pace for sales increases in 2025. The Latest From Subaru We're Not Getting Another WRX STI. But That's Okay Subaru Is Teasing a New Performance Model. Could It Be an STI? Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: CarBuzz Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )

SRT Is Making a Comeback, and Tim Kuniskis Is Leading the Charge
SRT Is Making a Comeback, and Tim Kuniskis Is Leading the Charge

Car and Driver

time2 days ago

  • Car and Driver

SRT Is Making a Comeback, and Tim Kuniskis Is Leading the Charge

Stellantis is resurrecting the SRT performance brand a fter it was unofficially disbanded during the FCA merger with PSA Group. Tim Kuniskis, the CEO of Ram, will head the reestablished SRT division, which will oversee the group's motorsports initiatives. The brand's revival aims to bring high-performance engineers from Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram under a single umbrella. Stellantis is relaunching the SRT name as the brand reignites its focus on high-performance models. When Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (a.k.a. FCA) merged with PSA Group to create Stellantis, FCA's established performance division was quietly left on the shelf to collect dust. A new video from Dodge reverses course on that, and it announces an intent to revive the original spirit of the brand. Tim Kuniskis, the CEO of Ram, will lead the reestablished SRT (Street and Racing Technology) performance division. "We're getting the band back together," said Kuniskis of the revival. Specifically, Kuniskis plans to cherry-pick the best powertrain and vehicle dynamics engineers from each brand and bring them together on one dedicated team. Once established, the SRT team will oversee Dodge's Direct Connection division along with Stellantis's North American motorsports initiatives. According to Stellantis, it will also "deliver vehicles that push the boundaries of power, aerodynamics, handling, and technology." The automaker says those performance promises include precision on the track as well. "It is time now for us to harness our past, to accelerate harder and faster towards our future," Kuniskis said in the video. As part of today's announcement, Stellantis also said that Kuniskis has been appointed head of American brands and North America marketing and retail strategy. He will report to Antonio Filosa, the newly minted Steallantis CEO. Stellantis hasn't yet made any specific promises regarding the revival of SRT, but paired with the automaker restarting production of the Hemi V-8 in August, it all could lead to a resurgence of Hellcat models. Jack Fitzgerald Associate News Editor Jack Fitzgerald's love for cars stems from his as yet unshakable addiction to Formula 1. After a brief stint as a detailer for a local dealership group in college, he knew he needed a more permanent way to drive all the new cars he couldn't afford and decided to pursue a career in auto writing. By hounding his college professors at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, he was able to travel Wisconsin seeking out stories in the auto world before landing his dream job at Car and Driver. His new goal is to delay the inevitable demise of his 2010 Volkswagen Golf. Read full bio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store