Analysis: Delaying details of big projects stinks of distraction ahead of the budget
Today's document setting out the list of infrastructure projects the current coalition hopes to deliver over the next decade comes in at just under 50 pages and is rather scant on detail.
The NDP is the government's long-term plan for what large-scale infrastructure projects will be needed in Ireland over the next five to ten years.
Numbers in the billions were bandied about by the Taoiseach, Tánaiste and Minister of State Sean Canney
as they announced the plan at Government Buildings
, but details on the top projects, the timescale and how they will delivered, were thin on the ground.
There was no mention of road projects, new hospitals, or specific schools that were going to be built. They only real specific mention was that the MetroLink was getting fully funded, but the government still doesn't know how much it will cost.
Instead of providing a list of projects, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said each line minister had a body of work to do over the next couple of weeks.
Announcements to be made closer to October's budget
Those various ministers will come back and outline their priorities and what they can do with the money allocated to them 'closer to the budget', which has been confirmed for October.
Interesting timing.
The Journal
asked if pushing out the departmental announcements is an attempt to distract the public with shiny capital spending announcements ahead of what is expected to be
a lacklustre budget, particularly for workers.
The Taoiseach's response?
He said the previous NDP in previous years was 'too big a document, if I'm frank'.
He outlined how each minister will now have to prioritise the projects they want to get over the line.
Advertisement
'They have work to do within the department in terms of prioritising the allocation of that funding and prioritisation is going to be key.'
He denied there was any attempt to distract the public.
'I mean, this is concrete substance in terms of investment in projects, be it roads, in active travel, be it in third level education, be it in research projects, the people receiving that funding won't see it as a distraction. They'll see it as very real.'
Martin said today's slimmed down document with little detail was the 'right approach', in his view.
'Doing things differently'
Similarly, the Tánaiste said in the past, there has been a 'big rush' to publish the NDP, which included a 'long list of projects'.
'We've tried to do things differently here. We've tried to provide ministers and their senior officials with certainty as to the envelope of money that they have for the next five years. And now we're telling them to go back and look through and tell us what can be delivered and the pace in which it can be delivered.
'We have to be agile in relation to this. You know, when it comes to capital projects, you might have two projects. One gets planning quicker than the other. We have to provide people, I think, with the flexibility here on what can be delivered quickly and ensure that value for money,' said Harris.
Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers also defended the document today, stating that he never intended to publish a long list of detailed projects.
While the Taoiseach denied that departmental announcements in the run up to the budget were a form of distraction to keep the focus off budget measures, such a tactic would not be a surprise move.
Why? There was a stark warning from government ministers today that October's budget projections could be built on sand.
After the NDP was launched today, the government also published its Summer Economic Statement (SES), which outlines the parameters for the upcoming Budget.
While in previous years there has been talk of 'bumper budgets' and once-off measures, there was no such talk today.
Instead, the budget spending pot was revealed under a cloud of uncertainty.
Related Reads
Houses, water, health and Metrolink: The key points from the National Development Plan
Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers and Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe, speaking to the media at a press conference.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
While this could in fact be a very large budget, in terms of increased spending on last year, the Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe cautioned that a 'deterioration in the tariff landscape' would result in a 'recalibration' of its €9.4 billion Budget 2026 package announced today.
The paper also stated there will be a €1.5 billion taxation package, essentially tax cut measures.
However, this could be gobbled up if the hospitality VAT rate is reduced from 13.5% to 9% at a cost of €1 billion. The finance minister confirmed that there will be 'trade-offs' where other tax cuts might not get the green light due to the hospitality VAT cut.
Fantasy economics
Donohoe also confirmed that the SES published today is based on the workings that there will be 0% tariffs between the EU and the US.
Yes, you read that right. Zero per cent.
This is despite Tánaiste Simon Harris and other senior ministers stating that a 10% tariff is 'baked in' to government projections… just not for the budget package projection published today it would seem.
Essentially, the SES published today is not worth the paper it is written on as no-one in government is working to the optimistic view that Trump will roll over on tariffs.
If anything, the predictions are the landing zone could be above the 10%.
Hocus pocus projections and fantasy figures are how the SES projections published today could be described.
Even amid the economic uncertainty that comes with the ongoing standoff over tariffs, capital spending will be protected, the Taoiseach said, stating that 'current spending would be under pressure'.
'Our budget day decisions could change,' if the global uncertainty does come to pass, Donohoe said today.
Chambers said the government will 'absolutely have to revisit' the €9.3bn budget allocation 'if there is a deterioration'.
All this points to a strategy of delaying 'good news' infrastructure announcements until the autumn – by which point, presumably, we'll have a better idea of how grim the economic situation is looking.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
21 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Alcohol health labelling 'will add over a third to costs'
Taoiseach Micheál Martin was lobbied by business representative group Ibec to delay the introduction of alcohol warning labels for 'at least' four years due to tariff fears. Ibec chief executive Danny McCoy warned the Fianna Fáil leader that the new requirements would lead to packaging and labelling costs increasing by 'over one-third'. The letter also suggested that some distillers had even suspended brewing in fear of impending tariffs by the US administration. Mr McCoy also sent the letter to Tánaiste and trade minister Simon Harris and health minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill in early June. The Government agreed earlier last week to suspend the rollout of warning labels for two years. In May 2023, then health minister Stephen Donnelly signed the Public Health (Alcohol) (Labelling) Regulations 2023. It was envisaged that the law would make it mandatory for alcohol product labels to state the calorie content and grams of alcohol in the product. They would also warn about the risk of consuming alcohol when pregnant and about the risk of liver disease and fatal cancers from alcohol consumption. The change was due to come into effect in May 2026, to allow a three-year implementation period for the drinks industry. However, there have been rumblings in recent weeks that the plan would be postponed, with Mr Harris saying that it would be additional disruption and a 'potential trade barrier' as tariff negotiations continue. At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, the Tánaiste told ministers that Ms Carroll MacNeill will defer the plans for two years. This is despite reports that it would be a four-year pause. Correspondence released under Freedom of Information (FoI) shows that the Taoiseach was being lobbied by Ibec to drop the labelling plans. On June 3, Mr McCoy called for the plans to be dropped for four years 'at least'. 'The wider drinks sector, but particularly many of the new emerging distilleries, have significant exposure to these new tariffs and the wider trade uncertainty,' wrote Mr McCoy. 'The majority of distilling across the country is now suspended. The introduction of new labelling requirements for the drinks sector, which will add over one-third to product labelling and packaging costs, should be suspended for at least four years to give some certainty to operators. 'Reducing regulatory burden costs to free up resources to allow companies invest in finding new markets would be a positive development.' Mr McCoy said that the legislation had been cited by the US administration in its 2025 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers, which he said was 'cause for further concern and reason for this legislation to be deferred'. He added: 'The industry does not want this to be an issue of disagreement in overall efforts to secure a resolution on trade relations and restoration of a tariff-free trading environment.' Further correspondence shows the letter was also forwarded from the Taoiseach's office to the Department of Enterprise several days later seeking an update on enterprise minister Peter Burke's engagement with Ms Carroll MacNeill. A letter sent from Mr Burke to Ms Carroll MacNeill on May 15 was also released under FoI. He said that recent months have seen 'significant global uncertainty and a rapidly shifting trading landscape', which he said 'could have profound competitiveness implications for small open economies like Ireland'. Mr Burke said that Ireland would be the first country in Europe to introduce the labels. 'The proposed measures will mean increased production and sale costs for Irish producers and importers and add to the price payable by consumers at a time when prices are also rising due to a multitude of other factors,' wrote Mr Burke. 'Notwithstanding the overarching health benefits of the proposal, I would ask you to consider pausing the introduction of the proposed new requirements.' Calls not to delay plans Meanwhile, Mr Martin was urged not to delay the plans and received a letter just last week from Alcohol Action Ireland chief executive Sheila Gilheany. She said that 'postponing alcohol health information labelling is not consequence free given the thousands harmed by alcohol in Ireland.' Read More Delaying alcohol warning labels prioritises profiteering over health, says Irish Medical Organisation
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Jobseekers are avoiding part-time roles in fear of losing other social welfare
JOBSEEKERS ARE DETERRED from taking up part-time employment in case they lose out on other social welfare entitlements, a specialist expert group has told the government ahead of Budget 2026. In order to ensure unemployed people are motivated to get a job again in the future, the government has been told to increase means-tested social welfare allowance thresholds so that they are in line with the national minimum wage or a recipient's earnings. It comes as Fine Gael leader and Tánaiste Simon Harris floats the possibility that the jobseekers' allowance would be removed from the overall increases to social welfare, in favour of higher increases to pensioners. The Tax Strategy Group, an expert advisory panel at the Department of Finance, said this week that 'inconsistencies' have appeared in Ireland's social welfare system as it has evolved since the late 1800s. It explained, in its annual reports to government ahead of the budget this year, that jobseekers are disincentivised from picking up shifts in part-time roles in case they impact the specific thresholds of income which are disregarded from social welfare payments. A portion of a person's income is not taken into account when assessing how much they are entitled to from a social welfare payment. This means that you can earn a certain amount of money, without it affecting your entitlements. Advertisement In some cases, the threshold of income that is disregarded from the means test, which will later determine the value of the total payment, is surpassed when jobseekers take up part-time roles, leaving them with not enough money to rely on each week. It can also impact any other means-tested social welfare payments that they may be receiving, the tax experts' report said. 'This is a penal approach that acts to disincentive an unemployed person from taking up part-time work,' the report from the Tax Strategy Group said this year . It has recommended that a system should be agreed whereby the values of these thresholds increase annually, 'whether aligned with the National Minimum Wage or earnings', to make sure that jobseekers find work. It added that this change would avoid situations where a person's social welfare entitlements are impacted or reduced, and that it should be done in order to achieve Ireland's policy aims for social welfare. The report later questioned if there was indeed a 'policy rationale for creating this deviation' – in which case, the state should disregard the advice, it said. Speaking earlier this month, Tánaiste Harris said he was not convinced that dole increases should be in line with other social welfare payments, such as pensions and disability payments. 'When there are other supports out there for very many people who can't work for very many good reasons. That's my opinion. We'll thrash it out all that out at the time of budget,' he told reporters. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
First kite of pre-budget season flew over Leinster House
Bird watchers sometimes herald the sighting of the first swallow of the year as the start of spring. And, not to be outdone, political anoraks have a similar phrase too. The first kite of the pre-budget season flew high and mighty over a quieter than usual Leinster House this week, as the beginning of the Dáil's summer recess was interrupted by a potentially serious political row gliding into view. Not for the first time, it involved a once cast-iron pre-election promise whose carefully choreographed landing now risks becoming a victim of some not exactly unexpected post-election economic turbulence. And, not for the last time, the planned flight trajectory could yet be replaced by an all too public nose dive as the Coalition checks its political radar for signs of how to navigate its way between two competing financial priorities. Hospitality tax cut The reason for the situation is a Programme for Government promise which is now at real risk of being delayed. In the January document, which outlines what Government intends to do in power, the Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael-Independents Coalition confirmed that the existing 13.5% hospitality VAT rate would be reduced. That commitment, which was one of Fine Gael's key commitments in last November's General Election, was widely seen as indicating but did not explicitly point to this October's Budget as the moment the 13.5% rate would be cut to 9%. Such a move would support struggling restaurants, bars, cafes, pubs and hotels, and therefore help protect jobs. "Our Budget decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in." But its near €1 billion price tag would mean less financial space for cost of living supports for the wider pubic, an issue that was made crystal clear as Government outlined its immediate economic plans this week. During a press conference at Government Buildings on Tuesday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Tánaiste Simon Harris, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe and Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers announced the Coalition's National Development Plan and Summer Economic Statement. The former outlined a €275bn capital projects war chest for the coming decade, including aspirational promises and dazzling numbers like €36bn for housing, €22bn for transport infrastructure such as the long-delayed Dublin Metro, and almost €10bn for health. But the latter was more pragmatic, detailing in practical terms how much money Government actually has to play with in its coffers right now - and, specifically, space for €1.5bn worth of tax cuts in Budget 2026. The figure may seem like a lot, and it is, but it still does not pay for everything voters want. And, inevitably, that means difficult choices for the coalition to make, including when it comes to promises previously given. Despite both Mr Martin and Mr Harris saying in recent months that the cut will happen, Mr Donohoe told reporters that the expected hospital VAT reduction from 13.5% to 9% was not as certain as previously indicated. Rarely one to misspeak, Minister Donohoe explained that if the hospitality VAT rate is reduced it is important "to be open" about the fact "trade offs" with other sections of society may be necessary. "I have always made clear my intention with regard to that [the hospitality VAT cut]," he said. His use of the word "intention" rather than anything stronger peaked the interest of attending reporters. "But I have also said there are trade offs, and there are consequences to that," he said. "And there are therefore other things that we are not going to be able to do. "If you were to bring forward a tax package that was to fund a full year measure that was in relation to the VAT, the cost of that would be nearly a €1bn." "And then if I was to add to that other measures we've done in the past, we would have a tax package that is far bigger than what I believe would be safe," he said. He added: "Our Budget decisions could change depending on the economic environment we find ourselves in." A pre-budget kite, in other words. And one that has caused if not a split, then certainly some friction, within the Coalition as competing political priorities have emerged. Internal Coalition friction While Minister Donohoe's comments were likely designed to point out the reality of the dilemma for Government rather than specifically rule out the hospitality tax cuts this year, they did open the door to the prospect within at least some sections of the coalition. By Wednesday, several Government sources had indicated privately that the cut should be delayed until July 2026, with Fianna Fáil members - including the wily long-time Limerick City TD Willie O'Dea - among those to publicly nudge forward the argument. Speaking on Friday on RTÉ's Morning Ireland programme, Deputy O'Dea said given the limited scope for tax reductions in the upcoming budget, he would "like to see it [the €1.5bn in available tax cuts] more equitably divided", with "an increase in tax credits and tax bands in line with inflation" his priority. Asked if this is because it would be difficult to convince voters to support helping the hospitality sector first, given a disputed reputation for price gouging by some businesses in that sector, Deputy O'Dea said: "It's not just a question of would it be hard to sell to the public, it's would it be good for the economy." Responding to suggestions of friction in the Coalition over the situation, he added: "I wouldn't describe it as friction, people have different views and that's what Coalition government is about." "I don't understand what kind of kites the Government are flying in relation to this cut for the hospitality industry, the Government are sewing massive seeds of confusion on this yet again." Deputy O'Dea's view was echoed privately by numerous Fianna Fáil TDs, and a smaller number of Fine Gael colleagues, who questioned how prioritising help for businesses instead of cost of living supports for the wider public might play out. And senior Government sources did little to kill off the suggestion when asked. But Fine Gael TD and Minister for Enterprise and Tourism Peter Burke - the politician responsible for the sector - had a different view during a hastily organised press briefing at Government Buildings on Thursday. Asked if he would acknowledge the hospitality VAT tax rate cut will now be delayed until next summer, Minister Burke responded: "Absolutely not acknowledging that, any negotiations will form part of the budget. "We're now still in July and it's very important to note the Budget will consider all options in every different sector." Opposition criticism The opposition, it is fair to say, were less than impressed over the apparent confusion over whether the hospitality tax cut would still go ahead on 1 January or be delayed until at least next July. Labour TD Duncan Smith said bluntly: "I don't understand what kind of kites the Government are flying in relation to this cut for the hospitality industry, the Government are sewing massive seeds of confusion on this yet again." That view was shared by other opposition TDs, including Sinn Féin's Donnchadh O'Laoghaire who said the Coalition needs to find a way to help both the hospitality sector and the wider public through cost of living supports. And it was echoed too by non-political groups representing those in the sector, which became locked in a war of words over what should happen next. Responding to the watering down of the previous tax cut promise, Restaurants Association of Ireland Chief Executive Adrian Cummins said: "If the VAT rate doesn't reduce to 9% from January 1, you'll see more and more closures" and resulting job losses, noting more than 200 restaurants have already closed this year. However, the view was countered by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions general secretary Owen Reidy. "The proposal to cut the VAT rate at a time of huge economic uncertainty flies in the face of all available evidence, and would amount to nothing less than economic vandalism," he said. "The Government has identified many laudable priorities as part of its programme for Government: housing, reductions in child poverty, and investment in disability services. "Given that ministers have been giving serious warnings about economic uncertainty, why would they prioritise a corporate handout costing almost €1bn?" Government dilemma That latter point goes to the heart of the difficulty now facing Government, and in part helps to explain the early nature of this week's at times contradictory pre-budget kite flying. While there is a strong argument for the need to protect businesses, and therefore jobs, in the hospitality sector during a period of intense global financial uncertainty, few politicians would want to be seen to be doing so at the expense of supports for households during that same economic turbulence. In that context a calculated delay to the hospitality VAT rate cut plans makes some sense, as it would allow Government to continue to argue it will - eventually - keep its promise while giving itself more short-term financial space to protect the wider public. That plan, however, comes with a significant catch, in that the hospitality sector is insistent a delay to the tax cut will see people lose their jobs. But, more than one Government TD has privately noted this week, not delaying the tax cut in order to have more space for wider public cost of living supports would put households at risk and give opposition parties an obvious line of attack the coalition could do without. The first kite of the pre-budget season has now soared into view. Depending on which way the economic and public wind blows, it could yet lead to an unexpectedly bumpy political ride.
