UCT should not cave into pressure over Gaza stance, say alumni group
Image: File
UCT Alumni for Palestine have described the legal challenge action against the institution over its stance on the ongoing Israeli attacks on Gaza as yet another attempt to pressure the university into rescinding its resolutions condemning state-sponsored violence and the systematic destruction of education and healthcare in Gaza.
The university has been hauled before the courts to defend two resolutions that it passed in 2024. The resolutions aimed to show solidarity with Palestinians amid the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
They include a 'call, again, for an immediate ceasefire, the passage of humanitarian aid and the return of all captives as contained in the Senate's resolution of 17 November 2023; condemn the destruction of the education sector in Gaza and the massive scale of killing of teachers and university staff in the current war'.
The resolutions also express concern and opposition to any attempts to curtail academic freedom by labelling criticism of Israel or Zionist policies as antisemitism.
The alumni group said those who have been engaged in institutional discourse at UCT over the past year will have heard the objectives of academic freedom, funding and collegiality have been repeatedly emphasised by the Vice-Chancellor.
'We agree that all three are of critical importance to the university and its functioning. In our understanding, academic freedom is first and foremost protected by valuing truth over power, which in the present instance would suggest standing firm with UCT's academics in their legitimate stand against Israel's assault on Gaza. While the IDF resolution limits certain academic collaborations, this is an ordinary ethical consequence where academic freedom is abused to engage in human rights violations. Before 1994, our right to freedom in South Africa necessitated an academic boycott as a weapon against those in power."
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
They called on the university to publicly denounce the withdrawal of funding intended to 'coerce or distract' from UCT's commitment to ethical leadership and academic freedom.
UCT did not directly respond to the calls and instead referred to several statements on its position on Gaza.
In March, a motion for the Gaza resolutions and the university's opposition to the pending Western Cape High Court case be rescinded was tabled. The Council vote was tied.
'However, as a result of the Chair's casting vote, a further vote on the merits of the motion was permitted. By narrow majority, the motion was not carried,' the university council said at the time.
UCT spokesperson Elijah Moholola said UCT Alumni for Palestine was not a formally recognised or affiliated university structure, but rather a group of nine alumni and needed to address council to raise its concerns.
'The university also notes that the statement is incorrectly addressed to and requests a response from the executive. The university's Gaza resolutions were not passed by either the management nor the Vice-Chancellor, but by the UCT Council. Therefore, any concerns around the resolutions would have to be directed at Council, via the appropriate existing channels.
"UCT's position on the Gaza matter has been communicated on several occasions: first through a statement issued in December 2023; and then through Council's resolutions in June 2024; and through an updated statement issued in October 2024. UCT has also issued statements by Council in March 2025 and by the executive in May 2025 on the US federal funding matter,' said Moholola.
CAPE TIMES
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
6 hours ago
- eNCA
International media groups urge Israel to allow access to Gaza
GAZA - International news agencies Agence France-Presse (AFP), Associated Press (AP) and Reuters as well as the BBC on Thursday called on Israel to allow journalists in and out of Gaza, which is subject to a strict blockade. "We are desperately concerned for our journalists in Gaza, who are increasingly unable to feed themselves and their families," the media groups said in a joint statement. They added that "journalists endure many deprivations and hardships in war zones. We are deeply alarmed that the threat of starvation is now one of them." "We once again urge the Israeli authorities to allow journalists in and out of Gaza. It is essential that adequate food supplies reach the people there," they concluded. AFP | Thomas SAMSON With Gaza sealed off, many media groups around the world depend on photo, video and text coverage of the conflict provided by Palestinian reporters to international news agencies such as AFP. International criticism is growing over the plight of the more than two million Palestinian civilians in Gaza, where more than 100 aid and rights groups have warned that "mass starvation" is spreading. Since the war started following the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Palestinian militant group Hamas, a small number of journalists have been able to enter Gaza only with the Israeli army and under strict military censorship rules. Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said in early July that more than 200 journalists had been killed in Gaza since the war began. - Evacuations - AFP news agency has published accounts of life inside Gaza from its reporters this week. It has said it is concerned about "the appalling situation" they face due to a daily struggle to find food. "We have no energy left due to hunger and lack of food," said Omar al-Qattaa, a 35-year-old AFP photographer shortlisted for a Pulitzer Prize earlier this year. "Obtaining food in Gaza is extremely difficult. Even when it is available, prices are multiplied by 100," video journalist Youssef Hassouna said. AFP | - Israel says humanitarian aid is being allowed in and accuses Hamas of exploiting civilian suffering, including by stealing food handouts to sell at inflated prices or shooting at those awaiting aid. The World Health Organization's chief warned on Wednesday of widespread starvation in Gaza, saying food deliveries into the territory were "far below what is needed for the survival of the population". Witnesses and Gaza's civil defence agency have repeatedly accused Israeli forces of firing on aid seekers. The UN said the military had killed more than 1,000 Palestinians trying to get food since late May. AFP succeeded in evacuating eight staff members and their families from Gaza between January and April 2024, after months of effort. - 'Starving' - The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), a media freedom group, said in a statement on Wednesday that Israel was "starving Gazan journalists into silence". "They are not just reporters, they are frontline witnesses, abandoned as international media were pulled out and denied entry," CPJ regional director Sara Qudah was quoted as saying. AFP | Eyad BABA Many Palestinian journalists have spoken out or posted about their exhaustion, with Sally Thabet, a correspondent for Al-Kofiya satellite channel, fainting after a live broadcast this week, the CPJ said. Doha-based Al Jazeera, the most influential Arabic media group, also called for global action to protect Gaza's journalists on Tuesday. The channel, which has been banned in Israel, has had five of its reporters killed since the start of the conflict in what it says is a deliberate targeting campaign by Israel. In some cases, Israel has accused reporters of being "terror operatives", such as when it killed a Gaza-based Al Jazeera staff journalist and freelancer last year -- allegations condemned by the Qatari news network. AFP | Youssef HASSOUNA, AFPTV STRINGER
eNCA
12 hours ago
- eNCA
US lawmakers push for sanctions against ANC officials
JOHANNESBURG - The US may review its diplomatic relations with South Africa. The House Foreign Affairs Committee has approved the US-SA Bilateral Relations Review Act. It still has to be sent to the House and then Senate and be ratified by the President before it becomes law. This may still take a while with the House in recess until September. The bill also proposes sanctions on officials over alleged ties to adversaries like China, Russia, Iran and Hamas. AfriForum is welcoming the passing of the bill, while the ANC says it will not compromise its principles.
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Controversial US bill targeting ANC leaders likely to pass, says former ambassador
Former South African ambassador to Portugal, Dr Kingsley Makhubela, believes the controversial bill sanctioning ANC leaders will pass in the United States. Image: AFP A former South African ambassador and seasoned diplomat believes the controversial bill introduced in the United States Congress, seeking to review relations with South Africa and to impose sanctions on some leaders of the African National Congress, will pass. IOL reported on Wednesday that a bill which seeks to re-evaluate the bilateral relationship between the United States and South Africa, and identify government leaders who should be subject to sanctions, was passed by a US House Committee on Foreign Affairs this week. The US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 was introduced in April by Ronny Jackson, a congressman from Texas. The bill, to become a law, will need to be approved by the House and Senate before being signed by President Donald Trump. The bill accuses South Africa of undermining the United States' interests by maintaining close relationships with the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation, nations that are Pretoria's strong allies and key trading partners. Former South African ambassador to Portugal, Dr Kingsley Makhubela, on Thursday told Newzroom Afrika that the Democrats have the numbers, and they might even get support from some Republicans. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading "Quite honestly, this bill is likely to pass. If you look at the numbers, both in the House and in the Senate, currently, the House consists of about 435 members and the Republicans are having 219, and I think the Democrats have 217, so it is likely to pass. This time last year, when this bill was first discussed during the (Joe) Biden administration, 61 Democrats voted for the bill to go through, which has similarities with what we are seeing now. "The only thing that you see now is that there have been added issues on this bill. For instance, there are questions of the relations with Taiwan playing its role, the question of the tension that arose because of Rasool's (former South African ambassador to the United States Ebrahim Rasool) expulsion, it plays into this bill. So this bill is likely to pass," he said. Makhubela said the bill is also framed around the United States' national security, and Americans often close ranks across the political divide once concerns about their national security are raised. Dr Kingsley Makhubela Image: File Earlier, Ernst van Zyl, head of public relations at AfriForum, said the ANC's "years of reckless and extremist diplomatic actions and rhetoric" are now bearing bitter fruit. 'From AfriForum's side, I do not see why punishing corrupt politicians is going to destroy a country's economy. That is going to be left to the ANC to explain how those politicians who are pushing destructive laws, when they are punished for the human rights abuses or corruption. How is that going to destroy the South African economy or going to affect negatively the average man on the street?" Van Zyl also told broadcaster Newzroom Afrika. According to a report by IOL earlier this year, the bill mandates a comprehensive review to identify South African government officials and leaders of the African National Congress who may be subject to sanctions for their alleged support of American adversaries such as China, Russia, and Iran. Commenting on X about the committee's approval of the bill, Jackson said: 'South Africa made its choice when they abandoned America and our allies and sided with communists and terrorists. Today, my bill to fully review America's relationship with South Africa and give President Trump the tools necessary to hold their corrupt government accountable passed through committee. The days of allowing our so-called 'allies' to walk all over us are over!' The bill will now be debated and amended in the House of Representatives before a vote is held on it. The House of Representatives will then submit the approved bill to the Senate for final consideration. IOL News
