logo
Thousands of Smokers To Be Hit With 200% Tax Hike On July 1: What To Know

Thousands of Smokers To Be Hit With 200% Tax Hike On July 1: What To Know

Newsweek9 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Indiana's cigarette tax is set to triple on July 1, rising from around $1 to $3 per pack, affecting thousands of smokers in the state.
Lawmakers approved the measure earlier in 2025 in an effort to address a $2 billion budget deficit, despite vocal opposition from hundreds of Indiana businesses, according to the local news outlet IndyStar.
Newsweek contacted the office of Indiana Governor Mike Braun for comment.
Why It Matters
The dramatic rise in Indiana's cigarette tax, by around 200 percent, puts the state ahead of its neighbors in tobacco pricing, with only Illinois coming close.
State leaders projected the change will generate $800 million over two years for Indiana's Medicaid program, addressing a budget shortfall, according to IndyStar.
Proponents, including the American Cancer Society and the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, hailed the measure as a critical public health and fiscal move.
However, convenience store operators and industry representatives cautioned that the surge will impose new financial burdens on lower-income smokers and potentially shift business out of state, risking closures and cuts in jobs.
File photo: a man lights a cigarette.
File photo: a man lights a cigarette.
Owen Humphreys/Press Association via AP
What To Know
The tax will take effect on July 1, 2025, ramping up the state's cigarette tax to $2.995 per pack, while taxes on cigars, e-cigarettes, and other tobacco products will also rise.
Indiana's move follows years of proposals that previously stalled in the state Senate, before passing this year with support from lawmakers and Governor Braun.
The state's new cigarette tax will surpass that of many of its neighbors starting Tuesday; however, it will still fall short of the tax paid in many other U.S. states.
New York, Connecticut, Maryland, and Rhode Island all have cigarette taxes higher than $3.5, according to the American Lung Association, with New York's as high as $5.35.
The law will likely have varying impacts on different Americans in the state, Phillip DeCicca, a professor of health economics at Ball State University, Indiana, told Newsweek.
"Those who choose to quit smoking, or not start, will likely experience health benefits, but those who continue to smoke will see their real incomes reduced - these tend to be lower-income individuals," he said.
DeCicca said that if Indianans start to purchase their cigarettes across the border, in Kentucky, for example, "such behavior would mitigate any potential health benefits."
"It seems likely that substituting to vaping, and other forms of nicotine delivery, will be more prevalent, especially among younger smokers," he added.
What People Are Saying
Phillip DeCicca, a professor of health economics at Ball State University, Indiana, told Newsweek: "On the positive side, it is likely that higher cigarette taxes will lead to less smoking, which is very likely to be beneficial in terms of health. Reductions can come from existing smokers or youth who may not start smoking cigarettes due to the higher taxes. Today, the real question is whether higher cigarette taxes also lead smokers to turn to vaping, though this would still very likely represent 'harm reduction' since the available evidence is that vaping is less harmful than cigarette smoking overall.
"On the negative side, we know that most smokers do not quit or cut back much when cigarette taxes increase due to their addictive nature. Smokers tend to have lower incomes than non-smokers so this means that cigarette taxes are highly 'regressive'. In other words, they are taxes that are paid to a greater degree by less well-off people as opposed to, say, a progressive income tax, like the federal income tax."
Jonathan Gruber, a professor of economics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told Newsweek: "70 years after the health damages of smoking first came to public attention, more than 1 in 10 Americans smoke, and it remains the largest preventable cause of death in our country. There is a large body of economic evidence that shows that higher taxes will reduce smoking – particularly among the young and the poor. The downside is that the poor will pay more for cigarettes, stretching their budgets, but that is largely offset by the fact that they will smoke less. If the revenues are used to fund smoking cessation efforts among the poor, which have shown to be effective, this is a great policy opportunity."
Indiana Senator Pro Tempore Rodric Bray said in April, according to IndyStar: "Along with revenue comes a really pretty good public policy that was going to help persuade people to either not start smoking or stop smoking at the same time.
"We used to think that when you were relatively flush with cash, that's a challenging budget to craft, and maybe harder than when you're short with cash. I'm not sure that I feel that anymore. Trying to come up with a way to fund the budget with a $2 billion shortfall in the official forecast is, frankly, one of the more challenging things I think we've ever done."
What Happens Next
As of July 1, the new tax will take effect.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Another GOP senator warns Medicaid cuts could boomerang on Republicans
Another GOP senator warns Medicaid cuts could boomerang on Republicans

The Hill

time7 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Another GOP senator warns Medicaid cuts could boomerang on Republicans

West Virginia Sen. Jim Justice (R) says he is a 'no' on the amendment proposed by Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) to stop able-bodied adults without dependent children from receiving the 9-to-1 federal Medicaid matching share, a proposal that would reduce federal Medicaid spending by an additional $313 billion on top of what's already in the GOP megabill. Justice said he's worried about political repercussions if Republicans go much further in cutting Medicaid spending — revealing that Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) isn't the only Republican senator worried that Medicaid cuts could boomerang politically on the party. 'We got in a situation where really our hospitals were really worried,' he said. 'A lot of folks here don't know what a rural hospital really is, but I do know. And I know that in West Virginia, if we don't watch out, you could very well lose a bunch of rural hospitals.' 'It just seems like we've taken it as far as I'm comfortable taking it,' he said of Medicaid spending cuts. 'And now we're taking it to another level,' he said of Scott's proposal to bar new enrollees into Medicaid in states that expanded the program from getting the generous 90-percent federal match. 'Here's the thing I'm the most concerned about and that is I am hung up on keeping our majorities,' he said. 'At the end of all this, there is a name or a family, you know. And if you don't watch out, you're going to alienate them, and when you alienate them, we're going to go right back to the minority,' he warned. The Senate will vote on the amendment as part of its vote-a-rama, which is in its 12th hour. Scott has expressed confidence that his amendment will pass, but Justice's decision to vote 'no' strikes a significant blow to its chances of being adopted to President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Exclusive — India Hopes for Imminent US Trade Deal, Minister Tells Newsweek
Exclusive — India Hopes for Imminent US Trade Deal, Minister Tells Newsweek

Newsweek

time12 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Exclusive — India Hopes for Imminent US Trade Deal, Minister Tells Newsweek

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. India is hopeful of reaching a trade deal with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration very soon, Indian foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar told Newsweek in an interview. Trump has set a July 9 deadline for imposing reciprocal tariffs, but trade talks have run into obstacles including discussions over duties on farm goods, steel and car parts. Trump has voiced optimism for a deal with India, an increasingly important diplomatic partner as well as being the world's most populous country and a Top Five global economy. "We are in the middle, hopefully more than the middle, of a very intricate trade negotiation. Obviously, my hope would be that we bring it to a successful conclusion, I cannot guarantee, because there's another party to that discussion, but no question," Jaishankar said at Newsweek's office. "I believe it's possible, and I think we'll have to watch this space for the next few days," he said. Left to right, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian minister of external affairs, and Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO, speak onstage during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center... Left to right, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian minister of external affairs, and Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO, speak onstage during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center on June 30 in New York City. Morefor Newsweek White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a news briefing on Monday that "they are finalizing these agreements." Trump has had a friendly relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Jaishankar also underlined the importance of the ties between the countries within the Quad of countries that serve as a counterweight to China in Asia and the Pacific. The other members are Japan and Australia. "You have four countries, in a way, four corners of the Indo-Pacific who are actually to have decided that they have a shared interest in creating a stable or more prosperous Indo-Pacific and are willing to work in a very practical basis," he said, adding that India wanted to stay on good terms with neighboring China. "We have very strong convergences with the United States. At the same time, we are China's largest neighbor," he said. Jaishankar was speaking nearly two months after the most serious conflict in decades between India and nuclear rival Pakistan, with India striking what it called terrorist targets across the border after an attack on civilians in Kashmir left 26 people dead. Rejects Pakistan Talks He rejected an offer of talks with Pakistan on anything except ending terrorism and said India would strike again if needed. "We are now moving to a policy of no impunity. We will not accept that the terrorists are proxies and somehow, therefore, the state is not culpable. I mean, we think it's very clear the Pakistani state is up to its eyeballs in this one," Jaishankar said at Newsweek's office in New York. "I think we will strike at terrorists. We will protect. We will exercise the right to defend our people. And I think that message has been made pretty clear." Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed his readiness for peace talks last week, saying they could address a wide range of disputes between the countries. Pakistan denies supporting cross-border terrorists. "We are willing to hold talks on terror, but if there is an expectation that we will talk about other things while they continue their terrorism, I think that's, you know, that's not realistic," Jaishankar said. "Terrorism cannot be a diplomatic tactic of putting a neighbor under pressure, and saying, oh, OK, come and talk to me. You cannot be a good neighbor and be a terrorist at the same time. So, they have to end that terrorism." A view of the audience during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center on June 30 in New York City. A view of the audience during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center on June 30 in New York Newsweek India struck targets in Pakistan it said it had identified as terrorist bases on May 7 in response to the killing of 26 civilians in an attack on tourists at Pahalgam in Kashmir in April. Pakistan had denied any hand in the killings or other attacks in divided Kashmir, which it contests with India. Pakistan struck back at India with cross-border shelling and warned that it could resort to nuclear weapons if it felt its existence was threatened. "We are not going to yield to nuclear blackmail that you know there could be escalation, and therefore we should not do anything," Jaishankar said. Iran Offer The flare-up between India and Pakistan has been overshadowed globally by the war between Israel and Iran, with the United States also joining strikes against Tehran's nuclear program. Jaishankar offered India's help to bring a resolution to the crisis, highlighting its good relations with all parties and the important relationships the world's most populous country had through trade and migrant workers with the countries of the Middle East. "We have actually very good relations with both countries, both with Israel and Iran. I mean, we would be, quite honestly, one of the few who have the ability to talk to both of them very openly, very candidly. We have tried to do that for some years now," he said. "We know the complexity of this, of this issue, it's not something which is easily amenable to a solution. So, the long answer is, we are willing to do our part, if there's any way we can be of any help to either country to others, to the IAEA, to the United States." Left to right, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian minister of external affairs, and Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO, speak onstage during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center... Left to right, Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, Indian minister of external affairs, and Dev Pragad, Newsweek CEO, speak onstage during a Newsweek Exclusive Fireside Chat With Indian Minister Of External Affairs, at 1 World Trade Center on June 30 in New York City. Morefor Newsweek Geopolitical Shifts Jaishankar said the United States is bringing about a global change with a shift away from alliances and in which countries pursue their own interests more individualistically. "The change in America's stance is very fundamental to the world order," he said. "I would say, you are, you are seeing the emergence of a post-alliance thinking, it's not that the alliances are going to go away tomorrow, but the alliances are not going to be the fulcrum around which world politics revolves. "You have the rise of China. You have the rise of India. You have Russia … So yes, I think we are heading for a much more individualistic world, in a way, where countries will pursue their interests more vigorously, not necessarily as collectively as before."

Gas prices at 4-year low under Trump admin
Gas prices at 4-year low under Trump admin

American Military News

time14 minutes ago

  • American Military News

Gas prices at 4-year low under Trump admin

Following President Donald Trump's military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities and his announcement of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, gas prices have dropped to a four-year low. As of Friday, the national average price for a gallon of gasoline was $3.20, according to Fox Business. The outlet noted that oil prices remain at the same level they were at prior to a temporary spike in prices amid concerns that conflict between Iran and Israel could disrupt the supply of oil in the Middle East. According to CNBC, Patrick De Haan, the head of GasBuddy's petroleum analysis, recently suggested that Americans could see the lowest gas prices in years over the upcoming summer months. De Haan also indicated that the national average price of gas could drop under $3 per gallon by September. 'It's going to be the cheapest summer since 2021, when the economy was heavily influenced by Covid,' De Haan told the outlet. According to Fox Business, oil temporarily spiked to $78 per barrel following Trump's military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in June; however, the outlet noted that the temporary spike in oil prices quickly dropped just two days after the U.S. military strikes. READ MORE: Gas prices soar to eight-month high Addressing the temporary spike in oil prices, De Haan said, 'Obviously the Middle East situation is an exception, but now that this is, seemingly for now, in de-escalation, gas prices should resume their slow decline over the course of the summer.' De Haan explained that gas prices are close to the lowest level observed over the last two decades when prices are adjusted for inflation. De Haan added, 'Americans are actually spending far less of their income on energy than they have in quite some time.' According to Fox Business, Lipow Oil Associates President Andy Lipow explained oil prices are expected to remain at their current level due to an abundant supply of oil and increased production from OPEC+. Lipow suggested that gas prices could drop between three and five cents over the week ahead of the July 4 holiday weekend. Phil Flynn, an energy market analyst, told Fox News that the reduction of geopolitical concerns following the destruction of Iran's nuclear program has 'shown up in the gas prices.' The energy market analyst also highlighted the Trump administration's favorable energy regulations, saying, 'This is going to be a big win for consumers as inflation continues to come down.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store