
Labour's surrender to Reform's narrative means Farage has already won
The government agreed to soften proposed disability benefit cuts and delay harsher assessments under pressure from its own MPs.
The bill, set to return to the House of Commons on Wednesday for further scrutiny, reflects an ideological shift so sharp it would have been unthinkable for a centre-left party just five years ago.
But this is not just a welfare reform bill - it is a symptom of something far deeper.
Labour is no longer simply fending off challenges from the populist right. It is actively absorbing its talking points and even adopting its policies.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'Dickensian cuts'
Labour MP Rachael Maskell, who led the backbench revolt over the bill, voiced her opposition in stark terms: "These Dickensian cuts belong to a different era and a different party - they are far from what this Labour Party is for."
Yet the language used to sell the welfare bill - about cracking down on benefit fraud, getting people "back to work", and tackling a system "ripe for abuse" - mirrors Reform UK's own narrative.
Reform leader Nigel Farage recently declared the disability system "nonsense", claiming people are "taking the mickey" and exploiting short virtual consultations to gain financial support.
That a Labour government is not just echoing but keen to enforce Reform UK's ideas tells us more about the country's political direction than any opinion poll could
That a Labour government is not just echoing but keen to enforce these ideas tells us more about the country's political direction than any opinion poll could.
It should set off alarm bells for what it signals about the future of British politics.
Even with just five MPs and no time in government, Reform UK is already shaping policy.
The far right does not need to win seats if it can normalise the narrative it has been peddling - othering and demonising those living on the margins of society.
And right now, it seems to be succeeding.
A June 2025 poll from UK survey firm Ipsos' relaunched Political Monitor found that Reform UK is now leading in national voting intention with 34 percent - a full nine points ahead of Labour.
That is the highest figure Ipsos has ever recorded for them, and the lowest for Labour since October 2019. The Conservatives, once Labour's chief rival, have slumped to a record low of 15 percent.
This is not just a blip - it signals a tectonic shift.
Shifting the centre
For now, Farage does not need to win a majority to influence national policy. Just as pressure from his earlier outfit, Ukip, led to Brexit, Reform UK's current momentum is shifting the political centre of gravity rightward - especially on welfare and immigration.
That is why Labour is now pushing reforms that disproportionately affect the very people who have traditionally formed its base: the working class, ethnic minorities, the disabled. In a bid to appeal to potential Reform voters, Starmer's Labour is reshaping its image.
Starmer's fear is not unfounded.
Reform UK hit the ruling Labour Party hard as recently as May this year, sweeping local councils from Kent to County Durham.
According to the Ipsos data, Labour has retained only 54 percent of its 2024 voters, losing a notable 12 percent directly to Reform UK. The Conservatives have fared even worse, retaining just 48 percent - with a massive 37 percent defecting to Reform. Even more telling is that nearly one in four non-voters in 2024 now say they would back Reform UK.
The populist right is becoming the political home for Britain's alienated - and Labour is chasing them. Instead of neutralising Reform, it is legitimising it.
Take Starmer's decision to abandon Labour's flagship £28bn ($38.2bn) green investment pledge. The party now plans to spend just £23.7bn ($32.4bn) over five years - a move that brings it closer in line with Reform UK's climate rollback agenda.
And while Labour MPs are rebelling, with dozens voicing concern over the welfare bill alone, their warnings are unlikely to reverse the broader trend: a party drifting rightward, willing to trade its identity to keep Reform UK's support base from growing.
Now Labour's immigration rhetoric has taken a populist turn.
In May, Starmer warned that Britain "risked becoming an island of strangers" unless immigration was curtailed.
His statement sparked comparisons to Enoch Powell's infamous "rivers of blood" speech, with London Mayor Sadiq Khan warning that Starmer was treading dangerously close to the far-right framing of the conversation.
Once again, Reform UK has not needed to win power to win the argument because Labour seems to be doing its bidding.
Capitulation
This is how populism wins: not through ballots alone, but through capitulation - by overhauling the political narrative, setting the tone of the debate and making previously radical views feel like common sense.
The implications are enormous. Labour appears willing to sacrifice its core principles to appease swing voters leaning toward Reform. The party leadership has made its direction clear: it is better to risk betraying its values than to risk bleeding votes to the right.
How Starmer careened from honourable left to racist right Read More »
Meanwhile, Britain faces urgent challenges, including housing shortages, a crisis-stricken NHS, record levels of inequality, and record-high food bank use.
Yet the national conversation is focused on cutting benefits, stopping the migrants, and scaling back green targets - all at the heart of Reform UK's agenda.
Labour is no longer leading the national conversation. It is reacting to the noise that Reform is creating.
It will be a tragedy if Britain continues to sleepwalk into this ideological convergence.
The question now is whether the public - and Labour itself - will realise this before it is too late. If the country's only alternative to right-wing populism is a party busy enacting it, then the far right has already won.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Katz says Israel plans to move 600,000 Gazans to 'humanitarian' city on Rafah's ruins
Truce talks make headway but divisions remain between Israel and Hamas Israeli army strikes Yemen ports after ship attack in Red Sea US envoy 'unbelievably satisfied' with Lebanon's response to plan to disarm Hezbollah Israeli army captures Iran-linked 'terrorist' cell in Syria At least 57,523 Palestinians killed and 136,617 wounded since Gaza war began


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran receives Chinese surface-to-air-missile batteries after Israel ceasefire deal
Iran has taken possession of Chinese surface-to-air missile batteries as Tehran rapidly moves to rebuild defensives destroyed by Israel during their recent 12-day conflict, sources have told Middle East Eye. The deliveries of Chinese surface-to-air missile batteries occurred after a de-facto truce was struck between Iran and Israel on 24 June, an Arab official familiar with the intelligence told MEE. Another Arab official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive intelligence, said that the US's Arab allies were aware of Tehran's efforts to "back up and reinforce" its air defences and that the White House had been informed of Iran's progress. The officials did not say how many surface-to-air missiles, or SAMs, Iran had received from China since the end of the fighting. However, one of the Arab officials said that Iran was paying for the SAMs with oil shipments. China is the largest importer of Iranian oil, and the US Energy Information Administration suggested in a report in May that nearly 90 percent of Iran's crude and condensate exports flow to Beijing. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters For several years, China has imported record amounts of Iranian oil despite US sanctions, using countries such as Malaysia as a transshipment hub to mask the crude's origin. "The Iranians engage in creative ways of trading," the second Arab official told MEE. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump are expected to discuss Iran and its nuclear programme when they meet on Monday. MEE reached out to the White House for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. Deepening relationship The shipments mark a deepening of Beijing's relationship with Tehran and come as some in the West noted that China and Russia appeared to keep a distance from Iran amid Israel's unprecedented attacks. Israel achieved air superiority over Iran's skies during the conflict, destroying ballistic missile launch pads and assassinating Iranian generals and scientists. Despite this, the government endured the strikes. It was also able to continue firing ballistic missiles at Israel, decimating several sensitive sites in Tel Aviv and Haifa before a ceasefire took hold. By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump is pushing Tehran to go nuclear Read More » In the late 1980s, Iran received HY-2 Silkworm cruise missiles from China via North Korea when it was at war with Iraq. The Islamic Republic used the missiles to attack Kuwait and strike a US-flagged oil tanker during the so-called tanker wars. In 2010, there were reports that Iran received HQ9 anti-aircraft missiles from China. Iran is believed to use Russia's S-300, which is capable of engaging aircraft and UAVs in addition to providing some cruise and ballistic missile defence capability, as well as older Chinese systems and locally produced batteries such as the Khordad series and the Bavar-373. These systems are believed to have a limited ability to shoot down the US F-35 stealth warplane that Israel operates. China already sells its HQ-9 and HQ-16 air defence systems to Pakistan. Egypt is also understood to have China's HQ-9 system, according to reports.


Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian says Israel tried to assassinate him
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian told US conservative broadcaster Tucker Carlson in an interview released on Monday that Israel attempted to assassinate him. While most of the interview was fairly straightforward, with Pezeshkian giving unsurprising responses to the former Fox News commentator's questions, Pezeshkian did say that he was not "afraid of sacrificing" his soul for Iran. "They did try, yes. They acted accordingly, but they failed," he told Carlson in response to a question on whether he believed Israel had tried to kill him. Pezeshkian did not specify when the assassination attempt took place, saying only that it was during "a meeting". 'I was in a meeting... they tried to bombard the area in which we were holding that meeting," he continued. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'I am not afraid of sacrificing my soul in defence of my country... None of the government officials are afraid of losing their lives in the line of defence. But will… more bloodshed and killing bring peace and tranquillity and stability to the region?' he added. Multiple times throughout the interview, conducted in both English and Farsi, Pezeshkian said that Iran wants peace, not war, and that the Islamic Republic was still willing to engage in talks with the United States. 'We have never been after' a nuclear bomb Pezeshkian said Iran had never sought to build a nuclear bomb. 'The truth is that we have never been after developing a nuclear bomb - not in the past, not presently, or in the future - because this is wrong and is in contrast to the religious decree issued by the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran,' he said. 'It is religiously forbidden for us to go after a nuclear bomb, and this was always corroborated, thanks to our cooperation with IAEA because they were always there to verify this'. When asked by Carlson about how much uranium Iran was enriching, Pezeshkian did not directly answer but said Iran was 'ready to hold talks over it' and have supervision. He reminded Carlson that Iran had been 'sitting at the negotiating table' with the US when Israel 'destroyed' diplomatic negotiations by launching unprovoked attacks on 13 June. No trust Pezeshkian said Iran had "no problem" restarting nuclear talks with the US, but said they had lost trust in the country, given what had happened over the last few weeks. "We see no problem in re-entering the negotiations," he told Carlson. "There is a condition... for restarting the talks. How are we going to trust the United States again? How can we know for sure that in the middle of the talks, the Israeli regime will not be given the permission again to attack us? 'My proposal is that the US administration should refrain from getting involved in a war that is not America's war. It is Netanyahu's war. He has its own agenda…and that is having forever wars, wars that go on and on and on'. Pezeshkian said that his end goal was peace, and he believed that Iran could 'easily resolve our differences and conflicts with the US through dialogue and talks'. 'We have always been after peace. It is been my heartfelt opinion that we need to live in peace and harmony during this short and limited time granted to us by god almighty to live in peace and tranquility with everybody'. He said that Iran had not waged war on anybody in the last 200 years, but only had wars imposed on it, referring to the recent conflict with Israel and the war with Iraq in the 1980s. Trump could 'guide' Mena Regarding Trump, he said he believed the US president could 'guide' the region and the world to peace and was powerful enough to put Israel in its place, adding that if he did not, another war would only spread more instability in the Middle East, which was not in the interests of the US government. When asked by Carlson if he believed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was passing information to Israel, Pezeshkian said there was a "lack of trust". 'There is lack of trust as a result of the last report by IAEA and the type of the reports. The way they prepared the reports somehow gave an excuse to the Israeli regime to prepare the ground for [the] unlawful and unauthorised attack against our nuclear facilities. Even after that, the IAEA failed to condemn these attacks or try to [in] any way to stop them'. 'There is real fear': How Israel's attack on Iran enabled an assault on press freedoms Read More » Pezeshkian told Carlson that Iran would not draw on military support from allies Russia and China, saying, 'In God we trust. We are capable of defending ourselves and standing on our own two feet'. Carlson acknowledged he would be criticised for interviewing the Iranian president. In a video over the weekend, he defended the move, saying, "American citizens have the constitutional right, and the God-given right, to all the information they can gather about matters that affect them,' including 'hearing from the people they're fighting'. The interview follows the US's military attacks on Iran's nuclear sites at the end of June. President Donald Trump's decision to support Israel's war on Iran sparked widespread criticism, including from his own "Make America Great Again" base, who are opposed to another "forever war" in the Middle East. In recent weeks, Carlson has been an outspoken critic of the Trump administration's decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. In an interview of Senator Ted Cruz that went viral prior to the US first attacking Iran on 13 June, Carlson accused Cruz of not knowing "anything" about the country.