
Most Americans Were Never Interested in Meghan Markle Podcasting
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Meghan Markle's struggle to break through with her business podcast Confessions of a Female Founder may in part be explained by polling conducted at the time she first signed with Spotify.
The Duchess of Sussex has now chalked up two podcasts: Archetypes, about sexist slurs, and Confessions of a Female Founder, which featured interviews about prominent women who run companies.
The first made waves when she dished about the royal family in the early episodes but sunk in the charts in later shows when she steered clear of the palace soap opera.
Meghan Markle listens to a broadcast through headphones during a visit to Reprezent 107.3FM community radio station in Brixton, south west London, on January 9, 2018.
Meghan Markle listens to a broadcast through headphones during a visit to Reprezent 107.3FM community radio station in Brixton, south west London, on January 9, 2018.
DOMINIC LIPINSKI/AFP via Getty Images
The second had nothing do with the monarchy and struggled to make an impact beyond the first episode.
That may in reality be no surprise as polling as far back as 2020 suggests Americans may simply never have been particularly interested in Prince Harry and Meghan podcasting.
Why It Matters
Meghan launched a flurry of new projects in 2025 but had a rough ride among critics for both her Netflix cooking show and Confessions, which were both tied to her own business As Ever, which launched in April.
Now the first phase of those ventures is over, she will have a chance to take stock and consider what is working well and what could do with a revamp.
What to Know
Polling agency YouGov asked 5,400 U.S. adults in December 2020 how much interest they would have in listening to Harry and Meghan's podcasts.
Just 8 percent said they were "very interested" while 53 percent said they were "not at all interested."
And 16 percent were "not very interested" while 15 percent were "somewhat interested."
This adds up to a total of 69 percent falling on the side of disinterest compared to 23 percent who expressed interest.
At the time, they had just signed their Spotify deal but no specific shows had been publicly revealed and in the end it would be a year-and-a-half before Archetypes dropped.
It was, though, also a time when they had not been giving interviews and therefore media appetite to hear what they had to say was far higher than now.
The Oprah Winfrey interview, for example, was still months away and was not even known about in December 2020.
In that respect, Harry and Meghan's reputations in America were still mostly uncontroversial bar a run-in with Donald Trump after they commented on the presidential election he lost to Joe Biden.
Some might, therefore, by tempted to conclude that Meghan should not take the lukewarm response to her podcast to heart and simply focus on other more successful projects.
What Happens Next
Meghan's As Ever online shop has sold out all three of its product runs in mere minutes but more produce is expected to drop this summer, specifically a sparkling wine.
Season 2 of her Netflix show With Love, Meghan is also due out in the fall, while the Netflix deal itself is due to run out in September.
As yet, a new deal has not been signed and The Sun and People both reported Netflix does not intend to renew it.
Time will tell whether some continuation of the partnership gets renegotiated or not.
Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page.
Do you have a question about King Charles III and Queen Camilla, Prince William and Princess Kate, Meghan and Prince Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@newsweek.com. We'd love to hear from you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Federal Reserve governor Kugler resigns, creating vacancy for Trump
Adriana Kugler announced she will be leaving as Federal Reserve governor on Aug. 8. Photo by Federal Reserve Aug. 2 (UPI) -- One of the seven members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Adriana Kugler, announced she is stepping down next week, creating an opening for President Donald Trump to fill. Her term was set to expire in January but Kugler said Friday she will depart in seven days. President Joe Biden appointed Kugler, a 55-year-old labor economist, in September 2023. Governors' terms are for 14 years, and Kugler filled an opening. "The Federal Reserve does important work to help foster a healthy economy and it has been a privilege to work towards that goal on behalf of all Americans for nearly two years," Kugler said in her resignation letter to Trump. "I am proud to have tackled this role with integrity, a strong commitment to serving the public, and with a data-driven approach strongly based on my expertise in labor markets and inflation." Kugler said she plans to return to teaching public policy at Georgetown University in the fall. She was a vice provost for faculty at Georgetown and earned her Ph.D. in economics at the University of California at Berkeley. "I am especially honored to have served during a critical time in achieving our dual mandate of bringing down prices and keeping a strong and resilient labor market," she wrote in the letter. Kugler did not vote on Wednesday when the central bank's Federal Open Market Committee kept the benchmark interest rate unchanged at a range of 4.25% to 4.5% for a fifth consecutive meeting. Two of the 11 committee members who did vote dissented, backing Trump's desire to lower rates. The 12-member committee includes the seven governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and four remaining 11 Reserve Bank presidents who serve one-year terms on a rotating basis. "We just found out that I have an open spot on the Federal Reserve Board. I'm very happy about that," Trump said late Friday before boarding Marine One. He later posted on Truth Social that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell "should resign, just like Adriana Kugler, a Biden Appointee, resigned. She knew he was doing the wrong thing on Interest Rates. He should resign, also!" The replacement may ultimately replace Powell, whose term ends in May, though he can remain as a governor until 2028. The president appoints each of the board members and designates one to serve as chair for four years. Trump appointed Powell during his first presidency in 2018. Biden appointed him to another term as chairman. "Trump's influence on interest rates will now be felt earlier and more strongly," Derek Tang, an economist at LHMeyer, an economic consulting firm, told The Washington Post. Contenders to lead the Fed are National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and Fed governor Christopher Waller, each with distinct strengths, The Washington Post reported. Trump has said he wants Scott Bessent to remain as Treasury secretary. Trump has sought to replace Powell, calling him on Truth Social "a stubborn MORON" and "too late" on lowering interest rates. But he can only be fired "for cause," such as malfeasance, neglect of duty or inefficiency, rather than disagreeing with policies. Experts say his removal could disrupt the financial markets.


Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
‘KPop Demon Hunters' and ‘Expedition 33' Are Having a Moment
Have you watched KPop Demon Hunters on Netflix or played Clair Obscur: Expedition 33? Chances are the answer is 'yes,' and if not, you've certainly heard of them: both were released earlier this year to fairly glowing reviews (if not outright critical acclaim) and performed very well commercially. The latter, a turn-based RPG from newcomer Sandfall Interactive, will likely pick up some awards at year's end, while Netflix is planning to go all in on KPop. Along with talks of sequels and an ever-growing wave of merchandise, the streamer submitted the mid-movie song 'Golden' for Academy Award consideration. Both may also wind up jumping to live-action; Expedition had a movie announced months before the game's release, while Netflix is reportedly mulling over a remake with human actors. There's at least one movie, game, or show that becomes the talk of the town each year, but the way KPop and Expedition have been moving feels more significant than most. Both of them certainly build on the foundation set by their predecessors; musically, K-pop has been a popular genre for years, but it's possible general audiences didn't fully know just how much until now. Even if folks didn't watch KPop Demon Hunters, they've sure heard the music, which has risen in the charts in the weeks after release and beat real groups like BTS and Blackpink. (In a fun nod to the film, the two bands, Huntrix and the Saja Boys, became the highest-charting female and male K-pop groups for U.S. Spotify while competing against each other.) Several prominent artists in the genre have reacted to or covered the film's music, which has also become a viral sensation in Korea. Even before that point, viewers had KPop fever the moment the credits rolled and immediately demanded Netflix greenlight a sequel and shared their ideas for a TV spinoff. View this post on InstagramMeanwhile, Expedition 33 was built on the back of decades' worth of turn-based RPGs made in Japan, from heavy hitters like Final Fantasy and Persona to modern cult classics Blue Dragon and Lost Odyssey. Whether you knew the influences or not, that didn't stop the game from feeling like a breath of fresh air (well, paint) at a time when the industry could've used some good news in between the next rounds of layoffs and cancellation-focused news. It's also a game that did its job too well: between bad faith actors and a general need to deify Sandfall for making a strong debut title, the RPG has become overwhelmed by discussions about what its success could and should mean for the industry—and, more pointedly, the ever-evolving Final Fantasy franchise, whose mainline installments have taken more of a real-time combat focus—that subsequently smothered any real talks about its mechanics or late-game narrative swerves. Sandfall's kept its head down and focused on updating the game (and probably its next project next), so it's hard to know how much of this has gone to their heads, for better and worse. For folks hoping for some originality, KPop Demon Hunters and Expedition 33 couldn't have come at a better time. The 2020s have seen franchises start to buckle under continuous sequels and expanded universe games, prompting many to go back to their old ways, if not reboot entirely. So many headlines have focused on what's being rebooted or remade, what's coming back for another go years or decades after the fact. Original works feel more rare than they have in some time, even despite the odds becoming increasingly stacked against them. It's always been a crap shoot as to what originals will land with audiences and to what degree, as seen with the split between how they took to 2023's Elemental versus Elio this past summer. But when one seems like it's got the juice, there's hope that it can build up the proper momentum and find an audience so it becomes a true great. Or failing that, it can always be a stepping stone towards later projects from its creators and gain more attention down the line. Netflix will get to fulfill several of its KPop-related ambitions, and if Sandfall ever makes an Expedition sequel, players will be all over it. But the most interesting thing about them is seeing the shadow they'll have both cast years after the fact and what new creations come to follow in its footsteps. And if what comes next looks, sounds, and plays as great as what inspired them or finds their own voice, it'll all have been worth it. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.


Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Rolex, Lululemon and why the luxury market might collapse
Luxury brands would seem to be one of the first things people would sacrifice in times of economic uncertainty. That hasn't happened, at least widely, because the top earners in the United States have generally done better over the past few years than struggling Americans. Yes, some high-earners are worried about losing their jobs, but many are enjoying the prospects of long-term tax breaks and other benefits. Listen to every episode of TheStreet Smarts podcast. In some cases, though, it does seem like the entire luxury market is balanced pretty precariously. That could lead to it toppling over, and dragging down a lot of brands that aren't exactly essentials. You want a Burberry scarf or Lululemon Yoga pants, you don't them. There are lots of cheape products that do the same thing, but that leads to the issue of dupes - knockoffs of famous names designed to be a pretty direct copy. That's something TheStreet's Cody Kline writes about often She joined her cousin Daniel Kline and Alisha do Santos on TheStreet Smarts podcast to discuss the issue. Transcript: Daniel Kline: I am Dan Kline. You are listening to the second-ever edition of Street Smarts, the podcast from the street. We're gonna talk about a couple of things today. And we're gonna stick in sort of the purchasing space at first. Cody, a lot of your articles are about luxury brands that maybe I've heard of, but I certainly don't own. And as we sort of all agreed last week that this is a difficult economy where even people who are doing well are a little bit cautious. What are you seeing? Like, are you seeing these brands where people are pulling back? Or, you know, I was just in Alaska and one of the people I was with was looking at a watch that cost more than my car. And like, he didn't seem that reticent to buy it. Like, you know, I'm a pretty cautious guy. Like, you know, I was looking at like the swatch section and he was looking at like used Rolexes. So are people getting more cautious or is it different for the, you know, the so-called 1%? Cody Kline: No, I feel like if you asked me this last quarter, I think you would've had a little bit of a different answer because the numbers have shown that yes, it seems like there's a little bit of drops, drop in sales, drop in profits for these companies. But actually this week, a whole bunch of slew of earnings are about to be released. So I'm excited to see how it goes. But so far I do have two that I was actually kind of surprised on. You know, for example, in the U.S., Burberry was up 4%. But it was down in China. That's kind of weird to me, honestly. I was not expecting it. Daniel Kline: And the thing- Explain Burberry to me. Because I only know Burberry because there's a pro wrestler who wears a scarf that's Burberry. But is Burberry's entire thing just that pattern? Like, is that the whole thing? Cody Kline: No, no, no. They have a ton of other styles. It's not only the pattern, but that's just their iconic pattern. That's how it kind of started. So like, and they'll do different colors, but that brown, I'm assuming you're talking about the brown. That's like the iconic pattern. But no, they have like, I have a jacket that's black, for example. It's not the check. So it started out with scarves. Related: Costco quietly drops favorite member perk So that was one thing which I found interesting. And they're kind of going through a really big transformation right now to try to be modern, but also heritage, which is very hard to do, like modern heritage. That kind of sounds like an oxymoron. But I think they can do it. I'm a big Burberry fan. I have a jacket. I have a scarf that I've had probably for a decade. And they're in great shape. So I'm pro Burberry coming back and being modern and heritage, whatever that means. Daniel Kline: But that leads into the big topic. Cause we've talked a lot about dupes. I did not know what a dupe was until like two months ago. Cause a dupe is sort of like a legal copycat. Like it's making something that's very reminiscent of a name brand that doesn't cross the line. So it's a, it's Mackie Moose. Like it's, you know, it's a, but it's not going to like, you know, the sketchy market in NASA and buying a Molex watch. Like it's, it's legal. So like, like a sort of a dupe would be like Target has a yoga brand that's reminiscent of Lululemon, but it costs a lot less. So I've never understood. I've done a lot of yoga, but I've never worn yoga pants. They don't look good on me. So tell me a little bit about why you're buying Lululemon and do you buy, you know, a knockoff that's a decent quality that's again, not legally a knockoff just sort of a tribute to. Cody Kline: So I'm going to get real passionate about this because I have just completed a real life test over I don't know how many years. I would say literally about 10 years ago I bought three pairs of black Lululemon Align leggings. I love them. I still wear them to this day. They are barely showing wear and tear and they, I can put them on and they're nice and they fit me well. They hug me right. And they're great. A couple of years ago, I my friend told me about this dupe on Amazon and there's a few now there's a few brands but I was like, all right, I'm going to try this dupe. So I bought these leggings. And this was at the time when the Align leggings didn't come with pockets. They do now they have pockets but this brand had leggings with pockets. And I was like, oh, I'm going to try these. So at first I tried them on. They put, I was like, wow, like these are awesome. Like I'm never buying Lululemon again. Like I, you know, so I would say not even after a year they completely lost their shape. They do not. I'm literally pulling up my leggings. If I wear those you should not have to ever pull up leggings. Like even when you lose weight there's never a time where leggings should be falling down. And that's exactly what happened with these dupes. So I end up personally to me you're going to end up spending more money. It's like, if you just get dupes it's like the guy with the boots. I know there's like an analogy where, you know a guy buys a really expensive pair of boots and he has them for 10 years or someone buys a cheap pair of boots and he has to buy a pair every year and ends up spending more anyways. This is totally true with dupes. Daniel Kline: Yeah, I'm going to jump in here because while I am not a fashion plate by any means I am wearing an Under Armour shirt. And this same version of a shirt if I buy like the JCPenney like air wicking shirt it looks pilly and bad in like six months. And it's not like I'm doing anything. I'm hosting shows and typing most of my day. And then the other thing I would argue for is spending money on bathing suits. If you're a man, it's women spend money on bathing suits because they have to because there's sizes, there's choice. There's a lot. As a man, you're just wearing shorts, but if you buy the shorts at Target versus buying like Fair Harbor or a nice brand, the amount of uncomfortable chafing is gigantic. So spending, not to mention the elastic lasts longer. You know, so spending that $64 versus that $18 is really a good buy. There is one exception and Alicia as a parent I'll let you weigh in on this as well. Anything I know I'm going to lose I buy the cheapest version possible. More Retail: Supermarket inflation: Beef prices soar as egg prices fallLevi's shares plan to beat tariffs, keep holiday prices downAmazon's quiet pricing twist on tariffs stuns shoppers Like when it comes to like travel bags and things like that it's either like something I got from a cruise line for free. Sunglasses, I always have one good pair that I keep for like on-air stuff. The rest are just like sunglasses that came in a box of cereal or that a cruise line handed me because I know I'm going to lose them. Alisha, with young kids, do you buy them name brands or are you buying, you know, question jeans instead of Guess jeans? I don't think they make Question Jeans anymore. There used to be jeans that were like knockoffs of Guess. I don't even know if Guess is a big brand. I don't think that was the name, but it was fairly. Cody Kline: That's funny though. It should have been the name. Alisha Dos Santos: I don't buy my kids name brand stuff barely at all. Only actually Costco is actually where we get a lot of things because they do actually offer better brands than you can get on Amazon that maybe are going to hold up well but they're offered at an affordable price. So we do a lot of Costco shopping. We also thrift with the kids clothes. I kind of teach my daughter that she doesn't have to have the name brand. She doesn't have to have the brand new that she can find more unique items maybe at the thrift store. Daniel Kline: My son loves the thrift store because he'll find those big-name brands. I can't get past the idea. Maybe a jacket or something. I don't want something touching my skin that someone else owned like that. Cody, do you thrift at all? Cody Kline: So it's actually, I actually just started kind of recently because I really like these jeans that they're a bit more expensive. And for me, I'm short. I have to get things shortened and blah, blah, blah. I have been buying a few things on Poshmark and it's been actually been great. So it's a way to get name brands for way less. But like Alicia, I will say if I had a kid, they're gonna grow. Like there's no point in buying it for life. There's a whole Reddit, by the way, a whole Reddit thread on buying things for life. Great rabbit hole to go down, but don't do it right now. But yeah, if I had kids, I'm not gonna be buying them stuff that they're gonna grow out in. Like, unless I know I'm planning to have like six kids, I'll buy it for the first one and then the six kids will have that for the, but other than that, I agree, go to Costco. I mean, this is for adults that are, they're grown, not changing. Daniel Kline: I buy myself Costco too. Dos Santos: I will have, go ahead, go ahead, Dan. Daniel Kline: Well, I'll speak to the virtues of Costco. I don't live near Costco, but I'm a huge fan of them. But then, you wander around Costco and you end up leaving with like, oh, I bought a suit. Well, when do I ever wear a suit? Oh, hey, I bought a Teddy bear. Like the ability at Costco to buy something because it's a good value, but it actually has no presence in your life is really tricky. Related: Nearly 50-year-old sneaker brand closes over 100 retail stores The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.