CEO of major Charlotte chain snags $6.8M home, one of Mecklenburg County's priciest in May
ALSO READ: Bojangles first ever restaurant reopens, commemorates its Charlotte history
Bojangles CEO Jose Armario paid $6.85 million for an 8,800-square-foot home in south Charlotte's Carmel Estates West neighborhood, according to county real estate records. The white brick home was built in 2021. It has four bedrooms, with four full and three half bathrooms.
The home's 0.84-acre lot backs up to Carmel Country Club's golf course. Outdoor features include a pool, covered patio with a grilling area and dining and lounge spaces, and a detached cabana.
Four homes in Charlotte sold for more than $6 million last month.
The county's most expensive home sale overall in May clocked in at just shy of $7 million. That 0.64-acre property in Eastover sold for $6.97 million. Built in 1992, it houses more than 7,300 square feet, six bedrooms and six full and two half bathrooms.
Read more and see photos of the top-priced home sales in Mecklenburg County last month in CBJ's monthly roundup here.
VIDEO: Bojangles gifts healthcare workers sweet treat
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's long history of bashing jobs report numbers dates back to 2016: ANALYSIS
President Donald Trump's history of criticizing the Bureau of Labor Statistics' jobs report has surfaced in the wake of his decision to fire commissioner Erika McEntarfer on Friday. Trump's public frustrations with the economics and statistics agency appear to date back to his 2016 presidential campaign. "Don't believe those phony numbers," then-candidate Trump said in his New Hampshire victory speech during his first campaign for the White House. Last August, Trump claimed without evidence that former President Joe Biden's administration was "caught fraudulently manipulating" job statistics, when the agency publicly disclosed that the economy created fewer than 818,000 jobs between April of 2023 and March of 2024 than initial estimates suggested. "There's never been any revision like this," Trump said at a campaign rally in North Carolina on Aug. 21, 2024. "They wanted it to come out after the election, but somehow it got leaked," he claimed at the time. MORE: Trump fires BLS commissioner after weak jobs report and baseless claim of 'faked' stats Trump did not provide evidence that the information publicly disclosed by the agency was leaked. Then-Labor Secretary Julie Su in November 2024 defended the figures, and also suggested the numbers were impacted by Hurricane Helene's impact on the southeastern United States, and labor strikes. "The labor market remains very strong, and this shows what happens when you have a president and a vice president who are fighting for workers every single day," Su said at the time. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) uses several surveys for estimating employment levels in the U.S. and revisions are common. Every monthly Jobs Report has a blurb at the end that updates the figures from the previous two months based on new data. The revision that Trump was referencing was made public on Aug. 21, and updated with final figures in February 2025, according to the BLS website. The same downward revisions also took place during Trump's first term, under then-BLS commissioner William W. Beach. The agency determined 518,000 fewer jobs were created in March 2019 than it had initially reported. Alternatively, Trump had no complaints about the jobs report produced under McEntarfer -- a Biden appointee -- right before the 2024 election, which showed the U.S. gained 12,000 jobs in October. The then-candidate referenced the low numbers while criticizing the Biden-Harris administration at a rally in Milwaukee. "They did 12,000 jobs," Trump said to boos at the rally on Nov. 1. "It's hundreds of thousands of jobs less than it should be," he added. Trump was also quick to embrace the jobs reports as president -- when they were favorable. In March 2017 -- when the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that the economy added 235,000 jobs the prior month -- then-Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Trump had full faith in the positive report, despite calling it "phony" in the past. "I talked to the president prior to this and he said to quote him very clearly: 'They may have been phony in the past, but it's very real now,'" Spicer said to reporters at the time. Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer on Friday came after the report found the U.S. had added 73,000 jobs in July, according to data from the BLS. The figure marked a slowdown from 147,000 jobs added in the previous month. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2%, keeping it at near-historic lows, according to the report. The report provided new estimates for two previous months, significantly dropping the government's estimate of jobs added in May and June. The fresh data indicated a notable slowdown in hiring as Trump's tariffs took hold over recent months. Trump criticized McEntarfer over the revisions, saying without evidence that the revisions suggested jobs statistics had been "manipulated." ABC News has reached out to McEntarfer for a comment. MORE: Fed holds interest rates steady, defying Trump's pressure The Trump administration described the downward revisions as an unwelcome sign for the U.S. economy but did not dispute the data. "Obviously, they're not what we want to see," Stephen Miran, chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said on Friday morning. Asked by reporters as he departed the White House on Friday about the reason for McEntarfer's firing, Trump said he believes the economy is doing well and claimed the latest jobs numbers were "phony." "I believe the numbers were phony just like they were before the election, and there were other times," Trump said, pointing to a previous revision in the jobs numbers last year that he claimed, without evidence, was an attempt to benefit Democrats heading into the election. He said this despite using the numbers as a talking point in his campaign. "So you know what I did? I fired her. And you know what? I did the right thing," Trump said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Developer proposes a 'more-nuanced approach' to foreign investment in B.C. housing
After the federal and provincial governments rebuffed a call from several B.C. developers to allow foreign investment back in housing, another real estate leader is proposing a middle-ground: enable offshore investment, but 'with a handcuff' and an aim to produce rental homes. 'If we're inviting foreign money back into the market, I would recommend that it comes with a bit of a handcuff, and that would be a requirement to enter the rental pool for five years,' Townline Homes CEO Rick Ilich said Friday. Townline, he said, proposes allowing foreign buyers into the market, but 'under regulated conditions that require their units be rented out through a professionally managed rental program for the first five years of ownership or the first five years after project completion.' Ilich had declined to add his name to a recent letter that was signed by dozens of leading figures in B.C.'s real estate sector, lobbying Ottawa and Victoria for policy changes to encourage more foreign purchases of local homes to boost a struggling construction industry and ensure a steady future pipeline of housing. 'I don't want to say it was a mistake,' Ilich said of the request from his fellow developers. 'But it does misread public opinion.' The coalition's letter, which was sent Tuesday, asked the governments of B.C. and Canada to reconsider the federal temporary ban on foreign purchases of residential real estate and the provincial tax on foreign buyers. The coalition urged the federal government to look at Australia, which prohibits foreigners from buying existing homes, but allows them to buy new builds and presales. The federal Housing Department responded with a statement suggesting such changes were not in the cards. Provincial leaders were even more blunt, with Premier David Eby saying he's glad the old model of foreign-funded speculative development is dead. 'In fairness to the existing government, they took a position which is popular,' Ilich said Friday. 'But we are not going to hit the prescribed housing targets … if we don't get creative with finding other means of having capital enter the market, because there's simply not enough capital interested in real estate in Canada right now — so invite it back, but use it as a catalyst to expedite rental.' Ilich is working on a proposal he plans to present to provincial and federal government leaders. He provided with Postmedia a version of the letter, which says that while he and his colleagues at Townline understand the concerns and motivations behind the other developers' request earlier this week, they would advocate a 'more-nuanced' approach. 'Many factors drove housing prices beyond reach for both renters and owners — unrestricted access to our market by foreign investors was one of those contributing factors,' Townline's draft letter says. 'Today, the foreign buyer ban has swung the pendulum too far, at a time when the housing industry needs to attract diverse and broad forms of investment — both local and non-domestic — to meet our long-term housing needs.' Ilich argues that his proposed program could free up capital for developers to build more housing, increase rental supply for local residents, prevent empty homes, and 'discourage quick resale for profit.' Ilich chairs the Urban Developer Institute, but emphasized he is floating this idea on behalf of he and his company, not for the industry association. He proposes allowing foreigners to buy both presale condos and unsold condos currently under construction or recently completed. 'This is not about bailing out developers. It's about freeing up capital for a purpose, to produce housing,' he said. The coalition's Tuesday letter cited an estimate that only one per cent of Canadian homes were owned by non-residents. But the proportion of foreign ownership appears to be dramatically higher in certain segments of the market, according to a new analysis by Andy Yan, an associate professor of professional practice in urban studies at Simon Fraser University. A Statistics Canada report released this week showed that 4.8 per cent of all residential properties in British Columbia were owned by at least one non-resident of Canada, Yan said, but when looking only at newly built condos that rises to 14.8 per cent in Vancouver, 12.6 per cent in Burnaby, and 15.1 per cent in Richmond. It seems likely that those levels of foreign ownership could put upward pressure on prices, Yan said. 'The question for the federal government is whether it would like to continue on with a game that has created some winners and many losers, or actually create a housing system that houses all Canadians. … Do we want to extend and pretend? Or change and adapt?' It remains to be seen whether governments — and the voters who elect them — might be open to encouraging some type of foreign investment in real estate, with certain restrictions. While Eby's response to the coalition's letter earlier this week made clear he is not interested in 'going back' to the days of wild speculation and empty condos, he seemed to leave the door open to some kind of role for international investment. Citing the cautionary tale of a downtown Vancouver condo project that was fuelled by foreign money and is now facing receivership, Eby said 'that model is dead.' However, Eby also said: 'If foreign capital can help build housing for Canadians and British Columbians, great.' Asked Friday about Townline's proposal, a B.C. Housing Ministry spokesperson sent an emailed statement that said that the province recognizes the 'the urgent need to increase housing supply throughout B.C. so we can continue to see rents fall and vacancy rates rise.' 'While we will not return to previous policies and approaches that don't help people find the housing they need, we are open to exploring new opportunities that support the development of more rental homes — particularly those that meet long-term needs of the community,' the ministry said. 'We are also mindful of the federal government's ban on foreign home ownership, but we remain open to engaging with industry experts to find a balanced approach where we can leverage investments and deliver more homes for people.' dfumano@ Related 'That model is dead': B.C. Premier, housing minister rebuff developers' request for foreign real estate investment Duelling B.C. letters to Mark Carney on housing crisis expose clash over way forward
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
North Carolina Senate race sets up as a fight over who would be a champion for the middle class
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Democrats still in the dumps over last year's elections have found cause for optimism in North Carolina, where former Gov. Roy Cooper jumped into the race for that state's newly open seat with a vow to address voters' persistent concerns about making ends meet. Even Republicans quietly note that Cooper's candidacy makes their job of holding the seat more difficult and expensive. Cooper had raised $2.6 million for his campaign between his Monday launch and Tuesday, and more than $900,000 toward allied groups. Republicans, meanwhile, are hardly ceding the economic populist ground. In announcing his candidacy for the Senate on Thursday, Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley credited President Donald Trump with fulfilling campaign promises to working Americans and painted Cooper as a puppet of the left. Still, Cooper's opening message that he hears the worries of working families has given Democrats in North Carolina and beyond a sense that they can reclaim their place as the party that champions the middle class. They think it's a message that could help them pick up a Senate seat, and possibly more, in next year's midterm elections, which in recent years have typically favored the party out of power. 'I'm Roy Cooper. And I know that today, for too many Americans, the middle class feels like a distant dream,' the former governor said in a video announcing his candidacy. 'Meanwhile, the biggest corporations and the richest Americans have grabbed unimaginable wealth at your expense. It's time for that to change.' Cooper's plainspoken appeal may represent just the latest effort by Democrats to find their way back to power, but it has some thinking they've finally found their footing after last year's resounding losses. 'I think it would do us all a lot of good to take a close look at his example,' said Larry Grisolano, a Chicago-based Democratic media strategist and former adviser to President Barack Obama. Whatley, a former North Carolina GOP chairman and close President Donald Trump ally, used his Thursday announcement that he was entering the race to hail the president as the true champion of the middle class. He said Trump had already fulfilled promises to end taxes on tips and overtime and said Cooper was out of step with North Carolinians. 'Six months in, it's pretty clear to see, America is back,' Whatley said. 'A healthy, robust economy, safe kids and communities and a strong America. These are the North Carolina values that I will champion if elected.' Still, the decision by Cooper, who held statewide office for 24 years and has never lost an election, makes North Carolina a potential bright spot in a midterm election cycle when Democrats must net four seats to retake the majority — and when most of the 2026 Senate contests are in states Trump won comfortably last November. State Rep. Cynthia Ball threw up a hand in excitement when asked Monday at the North Carolina Legislative Building about Cooper's announcement. 'Everyone I've spoken to was really hoping that he was going to run,' said the Raleigh Democrat. Democratic legislators hope having Cooper's name at the top of the ballot will encourage higher turnout and help them in downballot races. While Republicans have controlled both General Assembly chambers since 2011, Democrats managed last fall to end the GOP's veto-proof majority, if only by a single seat. Republican strategists familiar with the national Senate landscape have said privately that Cooper poses a formidable threat. The Senate Leadership Fund, a GOP super PAC affiliated with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, wasted no time in challenging Cooper's portrayal of a common-sense advocate for working people. 'Roy Cooper masquerades as a moderate,' the narrator in the 30-second spot says. 'But he's just another radical, D.C. liberal in disguise.' Cooper, a former state legislator who served four terms as attorney general before he became governor, has never held an office in Washington. Still, Whatley was quick to link Cooper to national progressive figures such as New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, former Vice President Kamala Harris and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. Whatley accused Cooper of failing to address illegal immigration and of supporting liberal gender ideology. He echoed the themes raised in the Senate Leadership Fund ad, which noted Cooper's vetoes in the Republican-led legislature of measures popular with conservatives, such as banning gender-affirming health care for minors and requiring county sheriffs to cooperate with federal immigration officials. 'Roy Cooper may pretend to be different than the radical extremists,' Whatley said. 'But he is all-in on their agenda.' Cooper first won the governorship in 2016, while Trump was carrying the state in his first White House bid. Four years later, they both carried the state again. Cooper, who grew up in a small town roughly 50 miles or 80 kilometers east of Raleigh, has long declined requests that he seek federal office. He 'understands rural North Carolina,' veteran North Carolina strategist Thomas Mills said. 'And while he's not going to win it, he knows how to talk to those folks.' As with most Democrats, Cooper's winning coalition includes the state's largest cities and suburbs. But he has long made enough inroads in other areas to win. 'He actually listens to what voters are trying to tell us, instead of us trying to explain to them how they should think and feel,' said state Sen. Michael Garrett, a Greensboro Democrat. In his video announcement, Cooper tried to turn the populist appeal Trump made to voters on checkbook issues against the party in power, casting himself as the Washington outsider. Senior Cooper strategist Morgan Jackson said the message represents a shift and will take work to drive home with voters. 'Part of the challenge Democrats had in 2024 is we were not addressing directly the issues people were concerned about today,' Jackson said. 'We have to acknowledge what people are going through right now and what they are feeling, that he hears you and understands what you feel.' Pat Dennis, president of American Bridge 21st Century, a group that conducts research for an initiative called the Working Class Project, said Cooper struck a tone that other Democrats should try to match. 'His focus on affordability and his outsider status really hits a lot of the notes these folks are interested in,' Dennis said. 'I do think it's a model, especially his focus on affordability.' 'We can attack Republicans all day long, but unless we have candidates who can really embody that message, we're not going to be able to take back power.' ___ Beaumont reported from Des Moines, Iowa.