logo
The GAA slammed over DJ Carey decision on All-Ireland final day

The GAA slammed over DJ Carey decision on All-Ireland final day

The GAA's decision to honour DJ Carey ahead of Sunday's All-Ireland hurling final has been questioned by fans.
The former Kilkenny player's name was called out as the All-Ireland-winning Cats team from 2000 were honoured at Croke Park ahead of the decider between Tipperary and Cork.
Jeers rang out around the stadium as Carey, who was not in attendance, was honoured alongside his former teammates.
The Croke Park stadium announcer said of the nine-time All-Star winner: "Full forward DJ Carey from the Young Irelands. He scored 1-4 on the day, claiming his third All-Ireland of five in total and he would end the year with the eighth of his nine All-Star awards. DJ is not with us today."
A large number of people took to social media to vent their frustration over the GAA's decision to honour the 54-year-old.
One person wrote on X: "As a man who has lost both parents to cancer & I know the pain it brings on them & the family, but for the GAA even to put this c***, DJ Carey into their thoughts on this day is a kick in the bollox to all the cancer sufferers & survivors of this horrible disease & to all the people who he's scammed out of hundreds of thousands of pounds for his own gain."
Another said: "Should of never had his name mentioned. He is no hero. Only a living disgrace."
Someone else commented: "Sad that such an outstanding player would ruin his legacy to do what he done. To think children used to look up to him in awe at his skills on the hurling field."
One other person stated: "They shouldn't have mentioned him at all!"
Carey was named man of the match in Kilkenny's 2000 final victory over Offaly, scoring 1-4 as they triumphed with a scoreline of 5-15 to 1-14.
The five-time All-Ireland champion recently pleaded guilty to 10 counts of defrauding several individuals by falsely claiming he had cancer.
The 10 charges Carey confessed to involved a total of 13 victims, including Denis O'Brien, Owen and Ann Conway, Mark and Sharon Kelly, Aidan Mulligan, Tony Griffin and Christy Browne, Thomas Butler, Jeffrey Howes, Noel Tynan and Edwin Carey.
Carey first donned the Kilkenny jersey in 1988 and continued to play until 2006. He is undeniably one of hurling's all-time greats, boasting 10 Leinster Senior Championship medals, five All-Ireland titles, four league titles and a Player of the Year award in 2000.
He also amassed nine All-Star awards throughout his career, second only to Henry Shefflin who has 11.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bohemians football club faces breach of contract lawsuit
Bohemians football club faces breach of contract lawsuit

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Bohemians football club faces breach of contract lawsuit

Leading League of Ireland football club Bohemians faces legal action from a company seeking to recover around €100,000 for alleged breach of contract. Digital ticket services specialist, Future Ticketing Ltd, filed proceedings in the High Court this week against The Bohemian Football Club Company. It is understood that the Tullamore, Co Offaly-based business is seeking to recover around €100,000 that it alleges resulted from a breach of contract by Bohemians. Future Ticketing says it provided services to Bohemians from 2016 through contracts that the two companies renewed several times, including in 2023, when the relationship ended. READ MORE The figure sought by the ticketing company includes fees for its services and a penalty for Bohemians ending the contract, it is understood. Future Ticketing provides technology to sports organisations and other event businesses that allow them to sell tickets directly to customers through their websites and mobile apps rather than going through an agent. The company works with more than 50 professional football clubs, including other well-known SSE Airtricity League of Ireland sides St Patrick's Athletic, Shelbourne FC and Drogheda United. It recently renewed a deal with Northern Ireland Football League club Glentoran FC. The Irish company also numbers Scottish and English clubs among its clients. Future Ticketing also works with racecourses in Ireland and Britain, including leading national hunt tracks, Punchestown and Cheltenham. Dalymount Park, Dublin-based Bohemians is one of the State's best known football clubs. In advance of its Friday fixture against Drogheda United, it was ranked second in the SSE Airtricity League of Ireland Premier Division, with 42 points, seven behind league leaders Shamrock Rovers. In an unrelated case, the Workplace Relations Commission recently awarded former Bohemians player and coach David Henderson the maximum compensation of €26,000 against the club. The commission found that Bohemians had unfairly dismissed him from his €250 a week job as head of recruitment in November 2024. The club maintained that it had to cut spending as it had lost money in 2023 and was likely to do so again last year. Accounts filed by The Bohemian Football Club, which is a company limited by guarantee, show that it had €2.2 million in assets at the end of 2023. The accounts note that it had 'an operating deficit of €245,000″ that year and projected a loss for 2024. It employs around 40 people. Bohemians is not yet due to file accounts for last year. Neither Future Ticketing nor Bohemians had commented by the time of going to press.

Garda staff body doubts damaging allegations about roads policing will be substantiated
Garda staff body doubts damaging allegations about roads policing will be substantiated

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Garda staff body doubts damaging allegations about roads policing will be substantiated

The biggest staff body in An Garda Síochána has questioned the accuracy of claims made about the performance of roads policing gardaí . The Garda Representative Association (GRA) accused Garda Commissioner Drew Harris and the Policing and Community Safety Authority (PCSA) of 'drip-feeding' damaging allegations to the media about gardaí which it doubted would ever be substantiated. The GRA, which represents more than 11,000 rank and file members in the 14,300-strong force, attacked Mr Harris's management style, claiming it has 'dramatically impacted on the morale and motivation' of all gardaí. It accused Mr Harris, who is due to retire in less than a month , of being 'disrespectful' to gardaí, abdicating his responsibilities as commissioner, valuing the input of consultants more than Garda supervisors and lacking confidence in his own managers. READ MORE The Association of Garda Sergeants and Inspectors (AGSI), which represents Garda middle management, said it was 'deeply concerned' at the conclusions reached about the standard of roads policing in the new report by Crowe consultants. It said it remained 'resolutely committed' to its 'core mission of keeping people safe' and improving policing performance. However, AGSI added that it was 'disappointed' at the manner in which elements of the Crowe report emerged in the public domain at a public meeting of the PCSA. It pointed out it had not yet been provided with the report, reflecting a 'broader dysfunctionality' around consultation in the Garda force. [ Garda roads policing numbers hit historic low Opens in new window ] Outgoing Garda Commissioner Drew Harris spoke to the media ahead of his retirement and last meeting at the PCSA on Thursday. Photograph: Sam Boal/ Collins Photos AGSI, which has enjoyed better relations with Mr Harris than the GRA, addressed the core findings of the Crowe report, expressing its concern and saying it had confidence that improvements could be made to roads policing performance. However, the GRA referenced the report's damning findings about roads policing only in the context of doubting them. GRA general secretary Ronan Slevin said by commissioning consultants to review roads policing, Mr Harris was guilty of 'inaction' and using a management style that sabotaged morale. He also questioned claims made by Mr Harris and Ms Byrne at Thursday's PCSA meeting about the contents of the Crowe report. 'The initial feedback from our members who interacted with Crowe is at odds with the drip fed comments from the (PCSA) and the commissioner,' he said. He added that gardaí 'now anxiously await' the Crowe report's publication 'and question whether any findings will substantiate the damaging allegations made against our members'. AGSI said the report appeared to be 'highly critical' of how the Garda 'under Commissioner Harris' leadership, has overseen and supported' personnel in roads policing. However, it recognised that such reports could become 'valuable tools' and believed progress would be made once the report was published and fully understood. Crowe, a consultancy firm, was commissioned by Garda headquarters to carry an independent review of roads policing. That occurred after anonymous correspondence, apparently from a Garda member, was sent to Garda management expressing concern about roads policing. The report would be published once it was checked to ensure nobody referenced could be identified, the commissioner said. Photograph: Artur Widak/ NurPhoto via Getty Images PCSA chair Elaine Byrne said Mr Harris had 'acted on' the whistleblower claims by commissioning the Crowe report. She said that action 'very much reflects a cultural change' in the Garda where 'uncomfortable truths' had been 'confronted' rather than hidden. She hoped that approach would continue after Mr Harris retired next month. Ms Byrne said the Crowe report was 'shocking' because 'there are members in roads policing who seem very much disinterested in their job'. Some gardaí displayed a 'blatant disregard' for their jobs and were 'openly hostile' about doing their work, she said. The report, she added, also showed some Garda managers were too fearful to intervene when they identified poor performance, which was very concerning. Mr Harris also said he was 'shocked' by the report, describing it as 'sobering to say the least'. He said some gardaí were 'brazen' about their disinterest in their jobs, even while their work was being reviewed by examiners who travelled with them in Garda cars. The report would be published once it was checked to ensure nobody referenced could be identified, the commissioner added.

Call centre worker loses unfair dimissal case over abusive language on open phone line
Call centre worker loses unfair dimissal case over abusive language on open phone line

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Call centre worker loses unfair dimissal case over abusive language on open phone line

A telephonist who was 'marched out' of a call centre after being sacked for using 'abusive and foul language' over an open phone line in the mistaken belief she had put the customer on hold has lost a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. Bosses at Infosys BPM Ltd concluded the worker, Colleen Lonergan, jeopardised a 'valuable' client contract and committed gross misconduct when she was heard to remark 'what a f***ing b***h' by the customer last year, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) heard. In a decision just published, the employment tribunal has rejected a series of statutory complaints against the firm by Ms Lonergan, including claims under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 and the Employment Equality Act 1998. Ms Lonergan told the WRC the phrase was intended to 'describe the situation rather than the customer', the tribunal noted. READ MORE 'The problem is that the customer heard it and took it to be a direct reference to her,' a WRC adjudicator wrote. It happened during a 'particularly difficult' call on in June last year, when Ms Lonergan said she had been 'on the phone for an hour and 45 minutes without help', the tribunal noted. Ms Lonergan's evidence was that she 'thought the call was on hold'. Adjudication officer Penelope McGrath wrote in her decision that, by the time the case came before her, the tape of the call that had been reviewed in a company investigation had been wiped. 'There does not seem to be any doubt that the complainant used the word 'b***h' while on the call,' the adjudicator wrote. She noted the sworn evidence of the company investigator, a junior operations manager, that the phrase used was: 'What a f***ing b***h.' 'I understand that the tape was played in the course of the investigation and disciplinary process and that there was, at that time, no dispute that the language which was used was unacceptable,' Ms McGrath wrote. The adjudicator wrote that it was to Ms Lonergan's credit that she 'owned her mistake immediately' and raised it with the team leader. Ms Lonergan was allowed to keep working for a number of days while a disciplinary process took its course in early July 2024, but was 'marched out of the building' upon her dismissal in what the adjudicator considered to be 'regrettable' circumstances. Ms Lonergan, had also advanced a complaint of workplace discrimination against her former employer, referenced absences from work owing to health trouble on one occasion, and 'a breakdown crying at work over home issues and bad calls from customers' on another. 'I was continually harassed about taking too long coming back from toilet and breaks even though I was struggling with my various health issues,' Ms Lonergan wrote in a letter to the WRC. 'It's my belief that when I made the mistake on the call… the company took full opportunity to terminate my employment because of my ongoing health issues,' she added. The company's position was that there was 'no substance whatsoever to these allegations', the WRC noted. Addressing the disability discrimination element of the claim, the adjudicator wrote that she did not form the impression that Ms Lonergan's team leader had to 'chivvy' her along from bathroom and smoke breaks any 'more or less' than other staff. 'I note there were never any disciplinary issues around timekeeping and must assume that the team leader was simply doing her job,' Ms McGrath wrote. 'The respondent's position is that the claimant's behaviour in calling a customer a 'f***ing b***h' on a recorded call was completely unacceptable in the workplace, constitutes gross misconduct and warranted dismissal,' its representative Muireann McEnery submitted. Referencing this in her decision on the unfair dismissal claim, Ms McGrath wrote: 'I approve the respondent position as set out in the submission received.' She dismissed both the unfair dismissal and the disability discrimination complaints, along with further claims by Ms Lonergan under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997, the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994, and the Payment of Wages Act 1991 and the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store