
Irregular migrant crossings into EU drop 20% in 2025:Frontex
The number of irregular migrant crossings into the European Union dropped by 20 percent in the first five months of the year, the EU's border agency said Wednesday.
Warsaw-based Frontex said that a total of 63,700 crossings were detected this year, adding that the main nationalities were Afghan, Bangladeshi and Malian.
The biggest decreases in irregular crossings were seen in the Western Balkans (minus 56 percent), the western African route (minus 35 percent) and the eastern Mediterranean (minus 30 percent).
There was also a seven percent decrease in migrant crossings from Belarus into Poland and the Baltics to 5,062 crossings, Frontex said.
But it pointed to a slight increase of seven percent in the number of migrants crossing the central Mediterranean towards Italy.
Frontex also said that the number of migrants attempting to cross into Britain via the Channel increased by 17 percent to 25,540 compared to the first five months of 2024.
"Smuggling networks operating in the area are adapting, using simultaneous departures to increase the number of successful crossings," it said.
Irregular migration has become a political flashpoint across Europe, as seen most recently in the Polish presidential election on June 1 which was won by a nationalist promising to crack down on immigration.
Irregular border crossings detected into the European Union were down 38 percent to 239,000 last year after an almost 10-year peak in 2023, according to EU border agency Frontex.
But, led by hawks including Italy and Denmark, EU leaders called in October for urgent new legislation to increase and speed up returns and for the commission to assess "innovative" ways to counter irregular migration.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
US allies want to redraw trade map, sans US
Trucks crossing into the US via a border bridge in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico (Picture credit: NYT) Trade chaos is forcing America's allies closer together, and further from the US. And as that happens, the European Union is trying to position itself at the centre of a new global trade map. The bloc learned this weekend that Washington would subject it to 30% tariffs starting Aug 1. Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the EU executive branch, responded with a pledge to keep negotiating. She also made it clear that, while the EU would delay any retaliation until early Aug, it would continue to draw up plans to hit back with force. But that was not the entire strategy. Europe, like many of the US' trading partners, is also looking for more reliable friends. "We're living in turbulent times, and when economic uncertainty meets geopolitical volatility, partners like us must come closer together," von der Leyen said on Sunday in Brussels at a news conference alongside the Indonesian president, Prabowo Subianto. Just as President Trump threatens to put hefty tariffs on many countries, including Indonesia, the EU is working to relax trade barriers and deepen economic relations. "In hard times, some turn inward, toward isolation and fragmentation," von der Leyen said. Then, in a message implicitly extended to world leaders who have been jolted by Trump's tariffs, she added, "You are always welcome here, and you can count on Europe." It is a split screen that is becoming typical. On one side, the US sows uncertainty as it blows up weeks of painstaking negotiations and escalates tariff threats. On the other, the 27-nation EU and other American trading partners are forging closer ties, laying the groundwork for a global trading system that revolves less and less around an increasingly fickle US. It will be hard to move away from the US, and Prabowo predicted that America would always be a world leader. But many American trading partners now feel that they are left with little choice but to diversify. Trump has announced 30% tariffs on EU and Mexico. Canada's rate is 35%. The likes of Thailand (35%), Bangladesh (35%) and Brazil (50%), along with dozens of other US trading partners, appear to be headed for a similar fate. Trump has backed down from threatened tariffs before, and he has indicated a willingness to negotiate these tariffs down before their Aug 1 effective date - and the EU and other economies are poised to continue with negotiations. But the atmosphere is increasingly hostile. Hitting back would be just a first step; drawing closer to outside allies may prove even more meaningful in the long run. Since Trump's push to reorder the trading system kicked off in Feb, the EU has been hustling to strike new trade agreements and deepen existing ones. Canada and the EU have pulled together. Britain and the EU have had a rapprochement, five years after Britain officially exited the union. The bloc is working toward closer trading relationships with India and South Africa, and with countries across South America and Asia. Nor is the EU the only global power adopting such a strategy. Canada is also drawing closer to Southeast Asia, while Brazil and Mexico are working to deepen their ties. Officials have even floated the idea of building trading structures that exclude the US and China, which is widely blamed for supporting its factories to the point that they overproduce and flood global markets with cheap goods. Von der Leyen recently suggested that Europe could pursue a new collaboration between the bloc and a trading group of 11 countries that includes Japan, Vietnam and Australia, but that notably did not include the US or China. One key question, analysts said, is whether America's allies will go a step further. Instead of simply collaborating more with one another and leaving the US out, could they actually gang up to counter the US? Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
40 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China's biotech surge shifts global drug innovation, stirs US tension
By Amber Tong, Jinshan Hong and Spe Chen The biotechnology industry is experiencing a tectonic shift, driven by Chinese drugmakers who have come a long way from their copycat days to challenge Western dominance on innovation. The number of novel drugs in China — for cancer, weight-loss and more — entering into development ballooned to over 1,250 last year, far surpassing the European Union and nearly catching up to the US's count of about 1,440, an exclusive Bloomberg News analysis showed. And the drug candidates from the land once notorious for cheap knock-offs and quality issues are increasingly clearing high bars to win recognition from both drug regulators and Western pharmaceutical giants. The findings, gleaned from an analysis of a database maintained by pharma intelligence solutions provider Norstella, show a fundamental shift in medical innovation's center of gravity. With President Donald Trump already threatening tariffs on the pharmaceutical sector, China's biotech advances — the scale of which is slowly coming into view — risk becoming another realm of superpower rivalry like artificial intelligence and electric vehicles. 'The scale itself is not something we've seen before,' said Helen Chen, managing partner at LEK Consulting in Shanghai, who has advised healthcare companies on their China strategy since 2003. 'The products are here, they're attractive and they're fast.' This shift has occurred at an unprecedented pace. When China began to overhaul its drug regulatory system in 2015, the country had just 160 compounds to contribute to the global pipeline of innovative drugs, or less than 6% of the total, behind Japan and the UK. The reforms helped streamline reviews, enforced data quality standards and improved transparency. The government's 'Made in China 2025' plan to elevate manufacturing in 10 priority sectors also helped spur a flurry of investments in biotechnology. Altogether, they unleashed a boom led by foreign-educated and -trained scientists and entrepreneurs. 'Not only is it now almost at parity with the US but it has that growth trajectory,' said Daniel Chancellor, vice president of thought leadership at Norstella. 'It wouldn't be sensationalist to suggest that China will overtake the US in the next few years purely in terms of numbers of drugs that it's bringing through into its pipeline.' Bloomberg News ' data analysis focuses on innovative drugs, excluding generic combinations, reformulations and biosimilars. Numbers aside, the more stunning leap is in the quality of Chinese biotech innovation. While there's constant debate in the pharmaceutical industry on whether Chinese firms are capable of producing not just effective but needle-shifting new therapies, there's growing recognition on multiple fronts. The world's strictest regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, increasingly view Chinese drugs as generally promising enough to justify devoting extra resources to speed up their review, handing them coveted industry designations such as priority review, breakthrough therapy designation or fast track status. The country is now slightly ahead of the EU in earning such expedited reviews as of 2024, the data shows, a remarkable edge over a region that previously produced drugs like Wegovy. One of the early exemplars of Chinese innovation is a cell therapy that has shown promise to potentially cure a deadly blood cancer. First developed in China by Legend Biotech Corp, it is now marketed by Johnson & Johnson — having won a few expedited review designations along the way — and considered superior to a competing US-originated therapy. Still, the absolute number of China-originated drugs winning these designations trail their US counterparts by a large margin. Risk-aversion remains a factor holding back Chinese pharmaceutical innovation: So far, top companies tend to focus on making better versions of existing therapies or new iterations of older ideas, and few are pioneering novel treatment approaches that have never been tried before — an endeavor that comes with a high risk of failure and is still led by the US, Europe and, to a lesser extent, Japan. Nevertheless, the biggest Chinese breakthroughs are increasingly being snapped up by pharmaceutical giants for record sums, a sign that the perennial competition for the next blockbuster drug is also shifting East. A novel cancer drug from Akeso Inc., which came out more effective than Merck & Co Inc.'s Keytruda in a Chinese study last year, has been likened to China biotech's DeepSeek moment, spawning a new wave of global interest. The promise of topping Keytruda, the world's top-selling drug, also swelled the valuation of Summit Therapeutics Inc, which in 2022 paid $500 million upfront for the development and marketing rights in the US and other regions. Other multinational players like Merck, AstraZeneca Plc and Roche Holding AG have also scooped up Chinese assets. In May, Pfizer Inc. set a new record as it announced a $1.2 billion upfront deal with 3SBio Inc. for a cancer drug similar to Akeso's. These deals are increasing in both value and frequency, according to biopharma deal database DealForma, signaling confidence that China-originated drugs are competitive internationally and can bring in substantial revenue. The volume of potential candidates coming out of China means multinational companies, who have a constant need to add new products to the mix, can 'cast their net wider than ever before,' Norstella's Chancellor said. A key advantage that has fueled the rise of Chinese biotech firms is their ability to conduct research cheaper and faster at every step of the way, from lab experiments and animal testing to human trials. Creating a new drug from scratch is notoriously time-consuming and expensive, and China's massive patient pool and centralized hospital network have become a significant accelerator. An analysis of the time taken for drugs to conduct various testing stages shows that doctors in China can recruit for trials much faster — for early trials for cancer and obesity drugs, they can complete patient enrollment in half the time compared to the US. The difference in costs means Chinese companies can afford to run multiple trials simultaneously to find a winner, or quickly launch new projects once a scientific idea is validated by other groups. Since 2021, China has become the top location for clinical research, initiating the largest number of new trials globally, according to GlobalData. 'They can leapfrog competitors in other countries,' said Andy Liu, head of China at Novotech Health Holdings, which helps companies run clinical trials. To be sure, clinical data in China is just a start. US regulators have made it clear that China-only trial results, no matter how positive, are not sufficient to support drug approvals. Chinese biotechs with ambition to sell their drugs overseas must prove that their treatment benefits can be replicated in non-Chinese patients, through complex and slower-moving global studies. It may still be a few years before a critical mass of drugs sourced from China wins US and EU approvals — the gold standard for high-quality treatments — and become widely used in the Western world, but many in the industry believe that's inevitable. China's innovators comprise both cutting-edge biotech startups founded by foreign-educated entrepreneurs, and old-guard Chinese pharmaceutical companies like Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., which used to be one of the country's biggest generic drugmakers. The company poured billions of dollars into shifting to innovative research and development after Beijing's campaign to lower generic drug prices made that sector less profitable. It's now the world's top-ranked pharmaceutical company for the number of new innovative drugs added to the research pipeline in the period of 2020-2024. Of the 50 companies that generated the highest number of innovative drug candidates between 2020 and 2024, 20 of them were Chinese, compared to five in the five years before. 'As we move forward, the fact that there's high quality innovation in China in terms of biotech will no longer be a novelty,' said Ali Pashazadeh, founder and managing director of healthcare advisory firm Treehill Partners in London. 'It'll just be an accepted part of the norm.' At a time when China and the US are engaged in renewed geopolitical spats, the growth of China's biotech ecosystem is causing alarm among some American politicians and business leaders. A congressional commission warned that the US risks losing its leadership position in yet another industry critical to national security. 'Biotech is one of the forefronts of the US-China tech rivalry,' said Jack Burnham, research analyst at the think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies. In addition to economic implications and possible military applications of biotech, China's leverage on innovative therapies may be weaponized in a future conflict, he said, if Americans become dependent on those medicines. The perception of threat has spurred calls for the US government to stymie China's biotech growth — through restrictions such as export controls on scientific equipment and barriers to investment — and boost the domestic biotech sector, including by changing the regulatory environment to emulate countries where clinical trials are run more quickly. Robert F. Kennedy, the US Secretary of Health and Human Services, recently pledged to 'Make American Biotech Accelerate.' Despite the risks of the newly combative relationship between the world's two biggest economies, Chinese drugmakers like Akeso have set their sights on bringing their therapies to developed Western markets. 'The pharma industry is the best industry in the world,' Akeso Chief Executive Officer Michelle Xia said in an April interview. 'At the end of the day, what we do benefits patients in China, in the US and all around the world.'


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Spending ZERO DOLLARS, EU Paying: Trump On Ukraine Weapon Funding Amit Patriot Missile Supply
Days after approving the supply of weapons to Ukraine via NATO, US President Donald Trump has said that America is no longer paying for the ammunition. Trump asserted that the European Union is now footing the bill, and it will be a business for the United States. Earlier, Trump had said that NATO would reimburse the cost of US weapons being sent to Ukraine. 'NATO, EU To Bear Cost' 'We are spending ZERO DOLLARS. The European Union is paying for it. We're not paying ANYTHING. It'll be business for us," said Trump, as per News18. Earlier, after approving the supply of weapons to Ukraine via NATO, Trump said, "We're sending weapons to NATO, and NATO is paying for those weapons, 100%. So what we're doing is the weapons that are going out are going to NATO, and then NATO is going to be giving those weapons (to Ukraine), and NATO is paying for those weapons." Patriot Missiles To Ukraine President Trump on Sunday announced that the United States will send Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine. Trump said that these missiles are necessary to defend Ukraine. "Putin really surprised a lot of people. He talks nice and then bombs everybody in the evening," said Trump. The US President said that the European Union would reimburse the cost of these missiles. Notably, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has repeatedly asked NATO and the US to strengthen Ukraine's air defence system against Russia. Trump On Putin Notably, Trump has been unhappy with Putin for not negotiating a ceasefire with Ukraine. The US President has become increasingly frustrated with Putin, as the Russian leader has resisted his efforts to broker a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. Two rounds of indirect ceasefire talks between Ukraine and Russia, brokered by Trump, have failed to produce any results. After several phone calls with Putin since taking office, Trump now seems to be reassessing both his stance and approach toward Putin and Russia.