
The Good Life: Can Certain Audio Frequencies Help you Focus?
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Welcome to the Good Life!
In this week's edition, we're talking how an auditory illusion could potentially make you more productive, rethinking the way we eat, Americans' growing concerns about retirement and more!
Tap here to get this newsletter delivered to your inbox.
Hz to Help: Can Audio Frequencies Make You Productive?
By Cameron Schoppa
I use an internet browser called Opera, and the other day I got an interesting pop-up: Download Opera Air. It was promoted as "the world's first browser with mindfulness at its core," promising a "focused, balanced, and stress-free web."
I thought, sure—why not. I've been diagnosed with ADHD before, I could use all the help I can get when it comes to focus.
The browser's main feature? A tab that implements ambient music mixed with certain audio frequencies. That caught my attention. I used the feature and I kind of started to believe there were some magical focusing powers being pushed into my brain.
But then I noticed a mobile app in my Instagram feed pushing the same concept just a few days later—using sound frequencies to boost productivity—which got me questioning: Can frequencies really improve focus and productivity?
After some research, the answer seems to be: potentially yes. And these tones might even be able to help in more ways than expected.
While the scientific evidence is mixed, one commonly discussed method is the use of binaural beats. These are auditory illusions that occur when you listen to two slightly different frequencies—one in each ear—through headphones. In return, your brain perceives a third tone.
So what does that have to do with productivity? According to some, binaural beats can lead to something called brainwave entrainment—essentially using sensory stimulations to affect brain's electrical activity. This could help calm a cluttered mind, which many of us experience in our day-to-day lives.
Frequencies between 14 and 30 Hz are believed to enhance beta brainwave activity, which is associated with focus and productivity. A commonly cited 40 Hz tone is linked to gamma brainwave activity, which some claim supports memory, attention and mental clarity.
But that's not all. We've long known that white/pink noise can aid sleep, but some evidence suggests certain binaural beats—using theta (4–7 Hz) or delta (<4 Hz) waves—may promote deep sleep or meditative states. One preliminary study found that listening to 6 Hz theta binaural beats for 10 minutes daily over a few weeks may "enhance certain aspects of cognitive function."
So, let's get to the most important part of this 'binaural beats journey.' Do these tones actually work?
It depends.
Music incorporating rapid amplitude modulations, especially within the beta frequency range (~14–30 Hz), was found to improve attention, particularly in those with ADHD.
But here comes a potential problem with this. Some trials suggest these strategies may have the opposite effect—potentially impairing cognitive performance rather than enhancing it. A study from 2023 found that regular use of binaural beats actually decreased performance on fluid intelligence tests, scoring lower than those exposed to silence or control sounds.
On its face, it seems like a life hack; a cheat code to enhance your everyday life. But experts actually suggest treading lightly against viewing this method as a cure-all.
"While I can appreciate the fact that a lot of the strategies that are most strongly supported by research take time and consistent effort (two things people might be frustrated with if they want immediate alleviation from their symptoms) before substantial results are seen," Jessica McCarthy, PsyD, said in a comment to health and wellness website VeryWellMind, "a sole and passive strategy such as this one will not yield the results that people are looking for."
There's plenty of research still left to be done. But If you're curious and want to give this strategy a try, here are some tips to get started:
Use stereo headphones
Don't turn up the volume very loud, lower volume is better.
Set a timer. 15–30 minutes is generally recommended for a session.
And of course, be in a quiet room while doing this.
At the end of the day, despite the debate, if it works for you—maybe that's what matters most.
marilyna/Getty Images
Rethinking What We Eat
By: Alex Backus
You've probably seen the videos: Americans in Europe indulging in croissants, cheese, pasta, wine—yet somehow feeling lighter, less bloated, and even healthier.
That was the case for Kayleigh Donahue.
The 27-year-old grew up in Rhode Island and experienced a remarkable transformation in her health and lifestyle upon moving to Ireland.
"For some reason, the weight started falling off of me. I ended up losing close to 50 pounds within the first six months of living in Ireland," she told Newsweek. "I was shocked by this because I didn't feel like I drastically changed my eating."
Donahue credits both the higher food quality and a different mindset around eating, where better products are more accessible and affordable.
"I felt so much healthier," she said. "My skin was glowing and I lost the weight I was struggling with my whole life."
Pictures from the viral video posted by Kayleigh that showed the difference in her appearance after a year living in Europe.
Pictures from the viral video posted by Kayleigh that showed the difference in her appearance after a year living in Europe.
@kayshaynee/TikTok
Back in the U.S., the contrast is stark.
American food has become increasingly processed and expensive—and our medical system often defaults to prescriptions instead of prevention and holistic solutions. One-minute ads showing a smiling man or woman spinning in circles thanks to (insert prescription drug here) are the norm. That doesn't happen in Europe.
The issue goes beyond "just" food, but let's refocus there. While making meaningful changes to a nation's entire food supply is a mammoth undertaking, it starts small. This is one area where we've seen common ground when it comes to RFK Jr.'s Make American Healthy Again agenda. A YouGov survey found most Americans agree with Kennedy on at least one health or nutrition-related issue.
The agenda includes fake additives and the Trump administration announced a plan to phase these eight synthetic food dyes out of the nation's food supply by the end of 2026. Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved three new natural color additives as part of a push to eliminate synthetic dyes from the food supply.
"For too long, our food system has relied on synthetic, petroleum-based dyes that offer no nutritional value and pose unnecessary health risks," Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. "We're removing these dyes and approving safe, natural alternatives—to protect families and support healthier choices."
KarinaBost
These dyes include galdieria extract blue, derived from red algae, and calcium phosphate, a white coloring.
What's being phased out? Red 3, Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2, Green 3, Citrus Red 2 and Orange B. You've likely seen these in the ingredient list of various processed foods, like cereal, candy and desserts. Some have been linked to hyperactivity, allergic reactions and cancer risks in animal studies.
Fixing America's food system will take more than cutting synthetic dyes, but it's a step in the right direction. Clean, healthy food shouldn't be a luxury, or something you have to fly to Europe to find.
CLOSE X
I started experiencing symptoms of endometriosis when I was just 12 years old. And after 15 years of being ignored, I was finally diagnosed last year, at 27.
Now, I have had collapsed lungs and lost parts of my bowels. I've had to have six organs removed due to hemorrhaging from endometriosis: at 26, I had to have my gallbladder removed as well as part of my cystic duct. At 27, I had my uterus, cervix, both fallopian tubes, and parts of my bowels removed.
When I was little, there were so many things I dreamed of being. Most little kids say they want to be an astronaut, a princess, a firefighter. Mine was always being a mom.
Read the full story >>
In other news...
Retirement concerns: As Americans confront the realities of longer life expectancies, a new study finds only 29 percent of adults want to live to see their 100th birthday. Most cited fears about financial instability and deteriorating health in old age. Read the story.
As Americans confront the realities of longer life expectancies, a new study finds only 29 percent of adults want to live to see their 100th birthday. Most cited fears about financial instability and deteriorating health in old age. Read the story. Psychopaths are more attractive, study: Researchers found that individuals with high levels of the so-called "dark triad" traits—narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism—were consistently rated as more trustworthy. Why? The answer lies in looks. Read more.
This is a preview of The Good Life—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Business News
9 hours ago
- Time Business News
ADHD Treatment Success Rate: Strattera vs Adderall
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder affecting both children and adults. It is characterized by persistent patterns of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. Managing ADHD typically involves a combination of behavioral therapy, lifestyle changes, and medication. Two of the most commonly prescribed medications are Strattera vs adderall. While both aim to improve focus and reduce hyperactivity, they differ significantly in their mechanisms, side effects, and success rates. Understanding the success rate of each medication is essential for determining the best treatment approach for individuals with ADHD. When it comes to treating anxiety and depression, understanding how medications differ is essential. Two commonly prescribed SSRIs are Lexapro vs zoloft, each offering unique benefits depending on the individual's symptoms and response. While both help regulate serotonin levels in the brain, Lexapro is often preferred for its simplicity in dosing, whereas Zoloft may be more suitable for those dealing with panic disorder or OCD. Consulting with a healthcare provider can ensure the best fit based on medical history, side effects, and treatment goals. Personalized treatment is key to achieving long-term mental wellness and stability. Strattera is a non-stimulant medication that works by increasing the levels of norepinephrine in the brain. This neurotransmitter plays a role in regulating attention, impulse control, and activity levels. Strattera is often prescribed to individuals who do not respond well to stimulant medications or those who are at risk of substance misuse. Unlike stimulants, Strattera does not have an immediate effect. It usually takes several weeks for noticeable improvement in symptoms. Because it works gradually and has a different mechanism of action, it is sometimes preferred for individuals with coexisting conditions like anxiety. Adderall is a stimulant medication that increases the levels of dopamine and norepinephrine in the brain. It is widely recognized for its rapid onset of action, often improving attention and focus within 30 to 60 minutes of ingestion. Adderall is available in both immediate-release and extended-release forms, making it a flexible option for many patients. The stimulant nature of Adderall means it is typically more effective in managing core ADHD symptoms quickly. However, it also has a higher potential for abuse and side effects such as increased heart rate, insomnia, and anxiety. When evaluating success rates, it is important to consider both symptom improvement and patient tolerability. Clinical studies show that Adderall has a higher immediate response rate than Strattera. Approximately 70% to 80% of patients using Adderall report significant improvement in symptoms. In contrast, Strattera demonstrates success in about 50% to 60% of cases. However, these numbers vary based on individual differences, including age, severity of symptoms, and presence of comorbid conditions. Long-term effectiveness also plays a role in determining treatment success. Adderall's efficacy tends to remain stable over time, especially when dosage is carefully managed. However, some patients may develop tolerance, requiring dosage adjustments. Strattera, while slower to take effect, offers sustained symptom control for many patients over the long term. It is not associated with tolerance or dependence, making it a suitable option for extended use. For patients who experience side effects or diminishing response with Adderall, transitioning to Strattera may provide stable, long-term symptom management. Side effects are a critical factor in medication success. Adderall is known for causing appetite loss, insomnia, anxiety, and increased heart rate. For some, these side effects are intolerable and lead to discontinuation. In contrast, Strattera's side effects include nausea, fatigue, and dizziness, but it generally has a lower risk of causing anxiety or sleep problems. In practice, patients who are sensitive to stimulants may have a higher success rate with Strattera due to better tolerability, even if the symptom improvement is more gradual. The age of the patient also influences how well a medication works. In children, Adderall is frequently the first-line treatment due to its high efficacy and fast results. In adolescents and adults, both medications are used, but the choice often depends on individual lifestyle and health profile. Adults with ADHD who have a history of substance use or anxiety disorders may find Strattera to be a safer and more stable option. Therefore, age and personal medical history are essential considerations in choosing the right treatment. No single medication works for everyone with ADHD, and treatment success often requires a personalized approach. Physicians usually start with the most effective medication and monitor the patient closely. If the first medication does not work or causes side effects, they may switch to another. In many cases, patients may try both Adderall and Strattera at different times to determine which one offers better control with fewer side effects. Combining medication with behavioral therapy also significantly increases the overall success rate of ADHD treatment. In summary, Adderall tends to have a higher success rate for immediate symptom relief in ADHD, with around 70% to 80% of users experiencing improvement. Strattera has a moderate success rate of about 50% to 60%, but it offers a non-stimulant alternative with a lower risk of side effects and no potential for abuse. While Adderall may be more effective for rapid control, Strattera provides a safer long-term option for many individuals. Ultimately, the best medication depends on the individual's symptoms, medical history, and personal response. Working closely with a healthcare provider ensures the highest chance of treatment success. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Epoch Times
12 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Most Americans Won't Get COVID-19 Booster This Fall, Survey Says
A majority of Americans said they will likely not receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine this fall, according to a poll released Friday. A survey from the health care organization KFF found that 59 percent of respondents said they either will not or likely will not receive the booster dose. Around 37 percent said they would 'definitely not' receive the shot, while 23 percent said they would 'probably not get' the shot.


The Hill
12 hours ago
- The Hill
Tesla found partly liable for fatal autopilot crash
A federal jury on Friday found Elon Musk's Tesla partially liable for a fatal 2019 crash involving the electric vehicle maker's autopilot system. The Miami jury determined Tesla was 33 percent responsible for the crash and ordered the company to pay several million dollars in damages. The family of Naibel Benavides sued the EV maker over the crash that resulted in the 22-year-old's death, alleging the company's autopilot system had 'defective and unsafe characteristics' that it failed to warn consumers about. 'Tesla's lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology, putting everyday Americans like Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo in harm's way,' Brett Schreiber, lead attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives,' he continued. In the 2019 crash, the driver of the car, George McGee, had activated Tesla's autopilot function and taken his eyes off the road to look at his phone when the system failed to register an upcoming intersection. The car drove through the intersection and struck a parked car, killing Benavides and injuring her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. The jury awarded $59 million in compensatory damages to Benavides' family and $70 million to Angulo, while hitting Tesla with $200 million in punitive damages. Tesla said in a statement that it plans to appeal the decision 'given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.' 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' the EV maker said. 'Even though this jury found that the driver was overwhelmingly responsible for this tragic accident in 2019, the evidence has always shown that this driver was solely at fault because he was speeding, with his foot on the accelerator – which overrode Autopilot – as he rummaged for his dropped phone without his eyes on the road,' it added. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash.'