Miffed with WCL after India's withdrawal, Pakistan pull out of future editions of tournament
"The championship's handling of events appeared to be under invisible pressures," the PCB noted.
"The apology issued later seemed motivated by a specific form of nationalism, making it difficult for us to continue our participation," it added.
The decision was taken during a Board of Governors meeting, chaired by PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi. According to The Nation, the board pointed to "double standards and politically motivated actions."
One of the most contentious issues raised by the board was the decision to award points to a team that had voluntarily forfeited a match, a move the PCB claimed as "highly questionable" and against the spirit of fair competition.
The board further criticised the press release put out by WCL organisers after the India-Pakistan match was called off. It termed the communication "politically charged and prejudiced."
The PCB said it would not take part in any event where the values of neutrality and fair play are undermined. The board made it clear that it will not be associated with tournaments that allow external agendas to dictate the course of the game.
Earlier, the EaseMyTrip Co-founder Nishant Pitti has clarified that it will not be associated with any India-Pakistan match in the World Championship of Legends (WCL). The company clarified its stance, stating that despite entering into a 5-year sponsorship agreement with WCL two years ago, it will not associate with or participate in any match involving Pakistan.
Pitti took to his X account to express support for the Indian team, while explaining the company's position.
"India vs Pakistan - WCL Semi-Final. We applaud Team India @India_Champions for their outstanding performance in the World Championship of Legends. You've made the nation proud. However, the upcoming semi-final against Pakistan is not just another game. Terror and cricket cannot go hand in hand," Pitti said in his post.
He further added, "@EaseMyTrip, we stand with India. We cannot support any event that attempts to normalise relations with a country that promotes terrorism. The people of India have spoken and we hear them. EaseMyTrip will not be associated with the India vs Pakistan match in WCL. Some things are bigger than sport. Nation first, business later. Always. Jai Hind."
Relations between India and Pakistan have deteriorated sharply following the deadly April 22 terror attack at Pahalgam in the Indian-administered Kashmir.
India blamed Pakistan for the attack — an allegation strongly rejected by the Pakistan government — which killed 26 civilians.
What followed was a four-day military conflict between the two nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours in May before a ceasefire was announced.
Meanwhile, South Africa Champions (197/1 in 16.5 overs) won the final on Saturday with a comprehensive nine-wicket victory over Pakistan Champions (195/5 in 20 overs).
Ab de Villiers (120 not out off 60 balls, 12 fours and 6 sixes) was the hero for South Africa Champions who chased down the target of 195 with 19 balls and eight wickets in hand.
For Pakistan, Sharjeel Khan had top-scored with 76 off 44 balls.
Earlier, the South Africans beat Australia Champions in the semifinal, while Pakistan advanced to the final after India forfeited their semifinal.
This was the second edition of the tournament, with India Champions winning the inaugural event last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
an hour ago
- Khaleej Times
'7 years, no house': UAE investors claim heavy debts after Bangalore project stalls
When JE, a Dubai-based mother of two, paid Rs 6 million (around Dh251,000) in 2018 for a flat in Ozone Urbana, she imagined annual visits to Bengaluru, a peaceful retirement, and a secure home for her children. Instead, seven years later, she's staring at an empty plot, rising debt, and a fading dream. 'There's no house. Nothing has moved at the site in years,' she said. 'But I still have to pay the bank over Rs 13 million (Dh544,000) for something that doesn't even exist,' she told Khaleej Times. JE is one of several Indian expats in the UAE who say they were misled by Bengaluru-based Ozone Group into buying homes in a massive integrated township that was never delivered. Among them is Errol John Noronha, a former Dubai resident and president of the Ozone Urbana Buyer Welfare Association, which represents affected buyers, including many from the UAE. Noronha, who was visiting Dubai, spoke to Khaleej Times o n Monday. 'The stories in our group are heartbreaking. People have lost their savings, taken loans they can't repay, and are now stuck with nothing to show for it,' Noronha said. 'The builder failed us, yes. But where were the banks, the regulators? Everyone just looked the other way.' Raids on developer sparks hope Now, after years of delay and frustration, a recent crackdown may have finally offered a rare glimmer of hope. On August 1, the Enforcement Directorate (ED), India's financial crime watchdog, conducted raids at 10 locations linked to Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Pvt Ltd and its key executives, including promoter Satyamoorthi Vasudevan, in Bengaluru and Mumbai. The action, taken under India's anti-money laundering law, follows dozens of complaints alleging cheating, criminal conspiracy, and fund diversion. Authorities say they seized documents showing that money collected from homebuyers for the Ozone Urbana project was diverted to unrelated group entities and individuals. The developer is also accused of selling at least 65 flats to multiple buyers. The 1,800-unit township project, spread across 185 acres near Bengaluru Airport, was launched in 2012 and billed as one of the city's largest integrated residential developments. Completion was promised by 2018. Today, buyers say less than half of the construction is complete. However, Satyamoorthi Vasudevan, managing director of the Ozone Group, disputed this. In an emailed response to Khaleej Times, he said the project is closer to 80 per cent complete and that delays have been misreported or misunderstood. 'All funds have been channelled solely towards construction and development,' Vasudevan said. 'There has been no diversion of funds — only misinterpretation or misreporting of project progress.' He confirmed that the Enforcement Directorate is currently reviewing the company's accounts. 'As a responsible organisation, we are fully cooperating with the authorities by providing all required documentation and information,' he said. On the remaining construction and delivery timelines, Vasudevan said the company is ready to deliver completed units but is navigating regulatory and administrative hurdles, including pending RERA approvals, banking procedures, and statutory clearances. 'Once these are resolved, we will be able to move swiftly toward final completion and handover,' he said. Regarding UAE-based and overseas buyers, Vasudevan acknowledged that some have raised concerns. 'We are actively engaging with them to find satisfactory resolutions,' he said. For buyers seeking refunds, the company is working on a structured mechanism. For those awaiting possession, efforts are being made to accelerate construction and deliver homes in a 'transparent and accountable manner.' Rebuilding trust, he said, remains a top priority. Vasudevan also addressed the allegations of double-selling, calling them a 'misinterpretation' of the company's earlier buyback scheme — a structured investment model offering assured returns or repurchase after a defined term. 'Some individuals with vested interests have attempted to manipulate this model to create confusion and extract undue financial advantage,' he said. The company, he added, is actively addressing this issue to protect genuine investors and prevent future misuse. Buyers tell a different story Despite the company's assurances, many UAE-based buyers say their experiences tell a different story. Sharjah-based private pilot Sunil Sequeira, who booked a three-bedroom apartment in 2018 for Rs 10 million (approximately Dh420,000), said he was sold a dream under a subvention scheme, a financing model where the buyer takes out a home loan, but the developer agrees to pay the EMIs (equated monthly installments) and PMIs (pre-EMI interest payments) until possession. He took a loan through India Bulls, now rebranded as Saman Capital. 'They came to my house in Dubai with slick presentations, floor plans, and big promises,' he told Khaleej Times. 'We were told this was a landmark project near the airport that would redefine luxury. The scheme sounded safe; they said they'd pay my EMIs until handover, and I believed them.' According to Sequeira, the developer initially kept up the payments but later stopped without warning. 'That's when the bank came after me. I ended up with an arrest warrant for defaulting on a loan for a house that doesn't exist.' 'I ended up with an arrest warrant for defaulting on a loan for a house that doesn't exist.' Sunil Sequeira, Sharjah The Ozone Urbana website still describes the project as 'a holistic journey of life' with 'apartments, duplexes and penthouses surrounded by lush greenery.' For many, the reality is very different. Moiz Abdulhussain, an early investor from Mumbai, booked an apartment in 2016 under a buyback scheme that promised him double the booking amount at handover. 'I paid Rs 750,000 (Dh31,500) upfront and took a Rs 5.7 million (Dh239,000) loan. The bank has already released Rs 3.6 million (Dh151,000) to the builder. The site is still flat ground.' For years, he says, the developer cited Covid-19 delays and regulatory approvals. 'They made it sound routine. Then in 2018, I joined a WhatsApp group of buyers and realised the truth. I was blindsided. But what about the banks? Why release funds when there was barely any structural work on site?' Moiz has since secured a RERA order asking the developer to pay him Rs 8 million (Dh335,000). 'It's on paper. No one's enforcing it.' According to the welfare association, many buyers were told the builder would cover EMIs until possession. 'But once the payments stopped and construction stalled, the banks came knocking, like in Sunil's case,' said Noronha. Buyers allege that banks released large sums to the developer without proper agreements or any disbursement linked to actual progress on site. Some say they never received construction deeds at all. 'The banks didn't wait for construction milestones. They just disbursed the money, and now we have to suffer.' A police complaint filed by the welfare association pegs the alleged fraud at Rs 33 billion (Dh1.38 billion). Of this, Rs 15 billion (Dh628 million) was reportedly raised through unauthorised loans taken in buyers' names, while Rs 18 billion (Dh754 million) was collected directly from them. Living in limbo According to homebuyers, nearly 200 families have moved into partially completed towers despite the chaos. Many blocks reportedly do not have occupancy certificates, permanent electricity, or water connections. Earlier this year, the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (KRERA) named Ozone Group and its affiliates as the state's biggest defaulters, with 201 complaints and over Rs 1.78 billion (Dh74.8 million) in unpaid dues. Access denied Several overseas homebuyers said they were unaware of the scale of defaults because they couldn't access the KRERA website. The concern isn't unfounded. When Khaleej Times attempted to access the site from Dubai, it failed to load. We also asked contacts in the UK, US, and Singapore to try; none could open it. In contrast, RERA websites of other Indian states were accessible without any issue. Buyers said this lack of access kept non-resident investors in the dark about the project's status. The crisis at Ozone isn't limited to Bengaluru. In Chennai, the Metrozone project launched in 2008 remains unfinished. In Mumbai and Goa too, complaints are mounting. The pattern is familiar: grand promises, large sums collected, construction delayed, and buyers left scrambling. Back in Dubai, JE still hopes something might change.
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
India hits back at Trump's threat over Russian oil purchases
India's ruling party and main opposition condemned on Tuesday a threat by U.S. President Donald Trump to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, in a show of political unity as a trade rift deepens with Washington. Trump had already in July announced 25% tariffs on Indian imports, and U.S. officials have cited a range of geopolitical issues standing in the way of a U.S.-India trade accord. Manish Tewari, a member of parliament and leader of the opposition Congress, said Trump's "disparaging remarks hurt the dignity and self-respect of Indians". "The time has come to call out this constant bullying and hectoring," he added. BJP Vice President Baijayant Jay Panda quoted Henry Kissinger - the most powerful U.S. diplomat of the Cold War era - in a post on X: "To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal." India's Foreign Ministry said the country was being unfairly singled out over its purchases of Russian oil, and highlighted continued trade between Moscow and both the United States and the European Union, despite the war in Ukraine. "It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia," it said in a statement issued late on Monday. "It is unjustified to single out India," the ministry said. It said the EU conducted 67.5 billion euros ($78.02 billion) in trade with Russia in 2024, including record imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) reaching 16.5 million metric tons. The United States, the statement said, continues to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in its nuclear power industry, palladium, fertilisers and chemicals. It did not give a source for the export information. The U.S. embassy and the EU's delegation in New Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both the United States and EU have sharply scaled back their trade ties with Russia since it launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In 2021, Russia was the EU's fifth-largest trading partner, with goods exchange worth 258 billion euros, according to the EU executive European Commission. SUDDEN RIFT India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. It has faced pressure from the West to distance itself from Moscow since Russia invaded Ukraine. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding ties with Russia and economic needs. India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is likely to travel to Russia this week on a scheduled visit, two government sources said. Foreign Minister S Jaishankar is expected to visit in the coming weeks. The sudden rift between India and the U.S. has been deepening since July 31, when Trump announced the 25% tariff on goods being shipped to the U.S. and for the first time threatened unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil. Trump has said that from Friday he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end the war with Ukraine. The trade tensions have caused concern about the potential impact on India's economy. The equity benchmark BSE Sensex .BSESN closed down 0.38%, while the rupee dropped 0.17% versus the dollar.
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
India's tax department investigating Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse, sources say
India's tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated tax laws by booking profits via its Singapore entities on its derivative trades in the Indian market, three sources briefed on the matter said. Searches at the U.S. trading firm's India offices by the income tax department have been underway since last week, sources have said. A government source who was briefed on the matter later said that Jane Street staff were not cooperating. The tax authorities' enquiries follow a temporary ban by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the market regulator, which publicly alleged that the firm manipulated stock indexes through its derivatives positions. Jane Street has denied the SEBI allegations, but has not made any public comments so far on the tax investigation. The firm did not respond to a Reuters request sent to its U.S. headquarters for comment on Monday on the latest developments. India's income tax department did not respond to Reuters request for comment. Tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) by using the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Singapore to evade taxes on large profits it made on Indian derivative trades, all three sources said. The sources declined to be named because they were not authorised to speak to the media. The DTAA is designed to prevent residents from being taxed twice, while the GAAR gives a country the power to deny a particular tax benefit if it is being used solely for tax avoidance. The Indian tax authorities are looking into whether Jane Street booked larger profits on its derivatives positions in the Indian market via its Singapore entities as a way to reduce the tax burden, all three sources briefed on the matter added. SEBI's July 4 ban order showed that Jane Street made more than $4 billion trading in India from January 2023 to May 2025. Jane Street's two India entities - JSI Investments and JSI2 Investments - made a profit of 39.35 billion Indian rupees ($448.23 million), Jane Street Singapore made a profit of 256 billion rupees ($2.92 billion) and its Hong Kong entity, Jane Street Asia Trading, made a profit of 69.30 billion Indian rupees ($789.39 million), the order showed. If the tax department's probe shows the tax rules have been breached, Jane Street could be issued with a tax demand, the third source said. Tax authorities are trying to access Jane Street's accounts, which are maintained overseas, they added. The second source said SEBI had provided the tax department with the profit and loss details of four Jane Street group entities the regulator had named in its orders.
