
Beyond the Hype: J.D. Power Customer Satisfaction Survey Confirms 5G Internet Might Be Here to Stay
Since its widespread launch in 2019, 5G home internet has become a staple in many urban homes and a viable solution for rural connectivity. While I generally tout a 'fiber-first' mindset when recommending cost-efficient, reliable high-speed internet options, 5G has often surpassed my expectations, and consumers seem to think so, too.
J.D. Power data from 2024 and 2025 suggests that customers prefer fixed wireless internet, specifically 5G or 4G LTE, over both fiber and cable internet. The report finds that even while adoption has grown to nearly 12 million subscribers, a 47% increase since last year, customer satisfaction has remained stable in the past two years.
J.D. Power Technology, Media & Telecom Intelligence Report June 2025
That's a significant achievement, even if subscribers are still in the 'honeymoon phase,' as Carl Lepper, senior director of the technology, media and telecommunications intelligence practice at J.D. Power, writes in the report.
'I think there's a bit of a halo effect,' Lepper told me. 'I do think there are a lot of people who were early adopters who loved it because it gave them an option they didn't have, and it gave them a price point they didn't have before.'
That echoes the thoughts of a former CNET colleague, Rick Broida, who tested T-Mobile's 5G home internet service in 2021 and concluded, 'Imperfection is a lot more tolerable when you're paying less than half what you were before.'
Locating local internet providers
As more consumers sign up for 5G internet, the fact that the 5G home internet services continue to receive high marks is impressive. The American Customer Satisfaction Index also affirms customer satisfaction with 5G, with scores for non-fiber providers trending upwards. In contrast, fiber scores remained stagnant, and for the first time, T-Mobile 5G Home Internet tied with AT&T Fiber for first place overall.
As an industry, broadband receives pretty low customer satisfaction scores overall, and it's not hard to see why. Everything from navigating confusing marketing lingo, dealing with sales-forward customer service and paying expensive monthly bills makes for a frustrating internet user experience. Plus, if you have an unreliable internet connection, it may not seem like you're getting the most out of your money. A recent CNET survey found that 63% of US adults are paying, on average, $195 more for their internet service than last year.
J.D. Power Technology, Media & Telecom Intelligence Report April 2024
As an internet solution for rural communities without the luxury of fiber internet or the infrastructure of cable networks, 5G is an increasingly appealing alternative, especially over DSL, slower fixed wireless internet and satellite internet. Recent FCC data shows that the nation's biggest 5G provider, T-Mobile, covers 64% of households nationwide, and a significant portion of its coverage is rural.
'Is it a better product than fiber? Absolutely not,' Lepper said. 'No one would say it is, but it's hitting all the other buttons just right.'
5G may not always be consistent, but it's getting better
J.D. Power uses several metrics to gauge customer satisfaction with broadband, the most notable being the level of trust an internet user has with an ISP.
Fixed wireless internet is generally more unreliable than fiber internet since it's more susceptible to congestion and requires proximity to a tower and good weather conditions. However, it has substantially improved over the years. Former CNET writer Eli Blumenthal switched from Spectrum to Verizon 5G and hands-on tested T-Mobile 5G and AT&T Internet Air. While Blumenthal didn't get consistent gigabit speeds with any provider, each connection handled the stress of heavy bandwidth tasks from multiple users just fine.
In that vein, I'll note that CNET router expert and broadband writer Joe Supan spent a week testing AT&T Internet Air in his apartment in Seattle and found the speeds sorely lagging -- they barely passed 10Mbps down. Still, while Supan's experience emphasizes the potential inconsistencies of 5G internet, AT&T Internet Air is a preferred alternative to AT&T's legacy DSL network and is much easier to install in rural communities than fiber.
Additionally, while fiber providers often emphasize lightning-fast speeds, that speed only gets you so far. Depending on your internet usage and the number of devices in your home, you probably don't need more than 100 or 300Mbps of download speed. Equipment upgrades from T-Mobile 5G Home Internet have allowed the provider to boost speed maximums to 415Mbps down.
That's quite an improvement from when T-Mobile 5G Home Internet first debuted in 2021. Broida was one of the earliest adopters of the service, and he saw max speeds of 132Mbps down and a low speed of 6.8Mbps, but those average speeds were still more than fine to get through the work day.
In fact, you probably won't be able to tell the difference between 300Mbps of download speed and 1,000Mbps of download speed. What you can pick up on, however, is latency, lag and congestion. The true measure of a good internet connection is it's overall reliability, and if this latest batch of high customer approval ratings for the service suggests anything, it's that 5G has some staying power.
What's next for 5G?
The promise and convenience of 5G lie in the fact that mobile network operators can use the same technology powering our phones to get us online at home. But that technology has some limitations, like the amount of licensed spectrum, for example.
'There is a finite amount of spectrum,' Alex Roytblat, vice president of worldwide regulatory affairs at the Wi-Fi Alliance, told me in a previous interview. 'It's like real estate.' Major 5G internet providers Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile 5G Home Internet use a mixture of frequency bands, such as millimeter-wave, low-band and midband 5G spectrums, to optimize customer experience. 'The higher in frequency you go, the more challenging it becomes to propagate the signal,' Roytblat said. 'The attenuation of the signal becomes greater as the frequency increases.'
Concerns of spectral efficiency, or the limits to what information we can transmit in a communication channel, are also at play in the effectiveness of 5G. In fact, due to 'network capacity,' T-Mobile 5G Home Internet has a waitlist of around 1 million people.
After covering the broadband industry for nearly two decades, Lepper is optimistic about how 5G technology will evolve in the hands of today's major mobile network operators. 'I'm always amazed how much control the industry has over the new technology, and what's next is already ready to go,' Lepper said. 'I think 5G has been extremely well-marketed.'
Telecoms like Huawei and Bell Canada have successfully tested new technology to improve spectral efficiency. In February, Verizon 5G achieved record-breaking upload speeds of 480Mbps, mainly due to the newly opened 6-GHz band. 'The MNOs [mobile network operators] of the world have such a strong network that is impressive now,' said Lepper. 'When it taps out, will they have the next thing ready to go? Absolutely.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
With a $3.8 Trillion Market Cap, Does Nvidia Really Still Have Room to Grow?
Nvidia is the largest publicly traded company in the market, but that doesn't mean it can't still produce strong returns. The business has more growth potential than you might think. Nvidia's capital allocation could drive returns over the long term. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the largest publicly traded company, with a market cap of about $3.8 trillion on Friday afternoon, and a stock price that's just below its all-time high. Nvidia's growth story has been nothing short of extraordinary. Revenue has grown by nearly 400% over the past two years as AI investment activity has exploded, and that's after an already extremely impressive multidecade history. If you don't already own Nvidia, is it too late to invest? With an estimated 95% share of its most important end markets and nearly $150 billion in revenue over the past four quarters, it's easy to understand why Nvidia's upside from here might appear limited. But I'd argue the opposite. Not only do I think Nvidia's revenue could get much larger from here, but the stock could produce market-beating returns for many years to come. Nvidia has four main business segments: data center, gaming, professional visualization, and automotive. The data center segment is by far the most important. In simple terms, AI-focused applications require a tremendous amount of data processing ability, and Nvidia's data center accelerator products are widely considered to be the gold standard. As mentioned, the company has a dominant (estimated) 95% market share. And the industry itself is growing rapidly. Over the past year, Nvidia's data center segment sales tripled, and the $120 billion global market for data center accelerators is expected to roughly double over the next five years. Data center capital spending -- mostly by large tech companies -- is expected to reach $1 trillion annually in just three years, compared to $500 billion today. In other words, if Nvidia simply maintains its dominant market share, the largest and most critical part of its business could double or more in size by 2030. The company's other segments have lots of room to grow as well. The automotive segment is a big opportunity, as advanced autonomous vehicle technology is still in the early stages of evolution, and Nvidia already has 20 of the top 30 EV manufacturers on its customer roster. In fact, GPUs for automotive applications is expected to be a $45 billion market by 2030, and Nvidia also develops software systems, safety systems, and more for automotive applications. Nvidia's free cash flow hasn't been anywhere near the current level for long, but now that the company is generating boatloads of cash, management is allocating it in shareholder-friendly ways. The company does pay a quarterly dividend, but it's a minuscule one (0.03% yield), at least for now. But buybacks are becoming an increasingly large focus of management. In the first quarter, Nvidia spent more than $14 billion on stock buybacks, which was more than half of the company's free cash flow. However, keep in mind that Nvidia's free cash flow grew by 75% year over year, and is expected to grow rapidly for at least the next few years, so it wouldn't be surprising to see buybacks expand along with it. Finally, Nvidia is not a cheap stock, trading at 48 times trailing 12-month earnings and about 34 times sales. But it isn't necessarily an expensive one. Nvidia's revenue growth (both past and projected) clearly justifies a higher P/E ratio. Analyst estimates call for 44% year-over-year earnings growth in the current fiscal year (ending January 2026) and another 34% in the following year. Plus, the combination of this growth rate and Nvidia's stellar margins (net margin over 50%) warrant an elevated price-to-sales multiple. In fact, by some popular metrics, such as the price/earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio, Nvidia stock looks rather attractive right now. The bottom line is that a combination of a growing market opportunity, shareholder-friendly capital allocation, and a reasonable valuation could allow Nvidia to continue to grow and produce excellent returns for years to come. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Matt Frankel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. With a $3.8 Trillion Market Cap, Does Nvidia Really Still Have Room to Grow? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 ways people build relationships with AI
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Stories about people building emotional connections with AI are appearing more often, but Anthropic just dropped some numbers claiming it's far from as common as it might seem. Scraping 4.5 million conversations from Claude, the company discovered that only 2.9 percent of users engage with it for emotional or personal support. Anthropic wanted to emphasize that while sentiment usually improves over the conversation, Claude is not a digital shrink. It rarely pushes back outside of safety concerns, meaning it won't give medical advice and will tell people not to self-harm. But those numbers might be more about the present than the future. Anthropic itself admits the landscape is changing fast, and what counts as "affective" use today may not be so rare tomorrow. As more people interact with chatbots like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini and more often, there will be more people bringing AI into their emotional lives. So, how exactly are people using AI for support right now? The current usage might also predict how people will use them in the future as AI gets more sophisticated and personal. Let's start with the idea of AI as a not-quite therapist. While no AI model today is a licensed therapist (and they all make that disclaimer loud and clear), people still engage with them as if they are. They type things like, "I'm feeling really anxious about work. Can you talk me through it?" or "I feel stuck. What questions should I ask myself?" Whether the responses that come back are helpful probably varies, but there are plenty of people who claim to have walked away from an AI therapist feeling at least a little calmer. That's not because the AI gave them a miracle cure, but because it gave them a place to let thoughts unspool without judgment. Sometimes, just practicing vulnerability is enough to start seeing benefits. Sometimes, though, the help people need is less structured. They don't want guidance so much as relief. Enter what could be called the emotional emergency exit. Imagine it's 1 AM and everything feels a little too much. You don't want to wake up your friend, and you definitely don't want to scroll more doom-laced headlines. So you open an AI app and type, "I'm overwhelmed." It will respond, probably with something calm and gentle. It might even guide you through a breathing exercise, say something kind, or offer a little bedtime story in a soothing tone. Some people use AI this way, like a pressure valve – a place to decompress where nothing is expected in return. One user admitted they talk to Claude before and after every social event, just to rehearse and then unwind. It's not therapy. It's not even a friend. But it's there. For now, the best-case scenario is a kind of hybrid. People use AI to prep, to vent, to imagine new possibilities. And then, ideally, they take that clarity back to the real world. Into conversations, into creativity, into their communities. But even if the AI isn't your therapist or your best friend, it might still be the one who listens when no one else does. Humans are indecisive creatures, and figuring out what to do about big decisions is tough, but some have found AI to be the solution to navigating those choices. The AI won't recall what you did last year or guilt you about your choices, which some people find refreshing. Ask it whether to move to a new city, end a long relationship, or splurge on something you can barely justify, and it will calmly lay out the pros and cons. You can even ask it to simulate two inner voices, the risk-taker and the cautious planner. Each can make their case, and you can feel better that you made an informed choice. That kind of detached clarity can be incredibly valuable, especially when your real-world sounding boards are too close to the issue or too emotionally invested. Social situations can cause plenty of anxiety, and it's easy for some to spiral into thinking about what could go wrong. AI can help them as a kind of social script coach. Say you want to say no but not cause a fight, or you are meeting some people you want to impress, but are worried about your first impression. AI can help draft a text to decline an invite or suggest ways to ease yourself into conversations with different people, and take on the role to let you rehearse full conversations, testing different phrasings to see what feels good. Accountability partners are a common way for people to help each other achieve their goals. Someone who will make sure you go to the gym, go to sleep at a reasonable hour, and even maintain a social life and reach out to friends. Habit-tracking apps can help if you don't have the right friend or friends to help you. But AI can be a quieter co-pilot for real self-improvement. You can tell it your goals and ask it to check in with you, remind you gently, or help reframe things when motivation dips. Someone trying to quit smoking might ask ChatGPT to help track cravings and write motivational pep talks. Or an AI chatbot might ensure you keep up your journaling with reminders and suggestions for ideas on what to write about. It's no surprise that people might start to feel some fondness (or annoyance) toward the digital voice telling them to get up early to work out or to invite people that they haven't seen in a while to meet up for a meal. Related to using AI for making decisions, some people look to AI when they're grappling with questions of ethics or integrity. These aren't always monumental moral dilemmas; plenty of everyday choices can weigh heavily. Is it okay to tell a white lie to protect someone's feelings? Should you report a mistake your coworker made, even if it was unintentional? What's the best way to tell your roommate they're not pulling their weight without damaging the relationship? AI can act as a neutral sounding board. It will suggest ethical ways to consider things like whether accepting a friend's wedding invite but secretly planning not to attend is better or worse than declining outright. The AI doesn't have to offer a definitive ruling. It can map out competing values and help define the user's principles and how they lead to an answer. In this way, AI serves less as a moral authority than as a flashlight in the fog. Right now, only a small fraction of interactions fall into that category. But what happens when these tools become even more deeply embedded in our lives? What happens when your AI assistant is whispering in your earbuds, popping up in your glasses, or helping schedule your day with reminders tailored not just to your time zone but to your temperament? Anthropic might not count all of these as effective use, but maybe they should. If you're reaching for an AI tool to feel understood, get clarity, or move through something difficult, that's not just information retrieval. That's connection, or at least the digital shadow of one. You and your friends can now share and remix your favorite conversations with the Claude AI chatbot Anthropic's new AI-written blog is more of a technical treat than a literary triumph A new AI feature can control your computer to follow your orders


Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Humanoid Robots Play Soccer Poorly in Chinese Exhibition Match
They looked like tipsy 7-year-olds stumbling about the soccer pitch. But the game that unfolded at an industrial zone in Beijing was a breakthrough for humanoid robots and the artificial intelligence that powered them through a 5-3 match on Saturday. Clad in black and purple jerseys with individual player numbers, diminutive humanoids faced off for two 10-minute halves, their movements controlled not by gesticulating coaches on the sidelines but by built-in algorithms.