China evacuates 1,600 from Iran and hundreds from Israel, warns of border congestion
Evacuation efforts are continuing and China has maintained communication with Iran, Israel, Egypt and Oman, spokesperson Guo Jiakun told a regular press conference while calling for immediate measures to cool down tensions as soon as possible.
China urges parties to the conflict, especially Israel, to immediately cease fire, Guo said.
Israel struck a key Iranian nuclear site on Thursday and Iranian missiles hit an Israeli hospital, as the conflict showed no signs of a detente nearly a week after Israel first launched what it called "pre-emptive strikes" against Iran.
The Chinese embassy in Iran renewed calls for citizens to leave the country via land routes, while also warning people about longer immigration processing time as congestion has formed at two border checkpoints - Astara heading into Azerbaijan and Bajgiran into Turkmenistan.
Those border crossing points are 490km (304 miles) and 910km away from Tehran, respectively.
Chinese people can also leave Iran via Turkey, Armenia and Iraq, the embassy advised.
Earlier on Thursday, China's embassy in Israel said it will begin evacuating people in batches from Friday, taking those who want to leave to the Taba Border Crossing into Egypt via bus, about 360 km from Tel Aviv.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
Iran War Rekindles U.S. Proposals To Give Israel Strategic Air Power
A B-2 Stealth Bomber lands at the Palmdale Aircraft Integration Center of Excellence in Palmdale, ... More California on July 17, 2014, as the US Air Force and manufacturer Northrop Grumman celebrated the 25th anniversary of the B-2 Stealth Bomber's first flight. Northrop Grumman is the prime contractor for the US Air Force's B-2 stealth bomber, a key component in the nation's long range strike arsenal and one of the most survivable aircraft in the world. AFP PHOTO/Frederic J. BROWN (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP) (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images) The Twelve-Day War between Israel and Iran in June concluded shortly after the United States intervened by bombing Iranian nuclear sites with 30,000-pound bunker busters dropped by strategic B-2 Spirit stealth bombers. The U.S. intervention—the first-ever time America's military fought alongside Israel in a war—was necessitated mainly by Israel's complete lack of such bombers and munitions. The war has led to fresh calls in Washington to equip Israel with these capabilities. Introduced by U.S. Representatives Josh Gottheimer (Democrat-New Jersey) and Mike Lawler (Republican-New York) on Wednesday, the bipartisan Bunker Buster Act aims to authorize President Trump 'to support Israel's defense by providing the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), or 'bunker buster' bomb, and the aircraft required to deploy it – to take out Iran's underground nuclear infrastructure.' 'Equipping Israel with this capability directly strengthens American national security by eliminating Iran's pathway to a nuclear weapon,' the bill added. While it did not explicitly mention the B-2, 'the aircraft required to deploy' the GBU-57A/B MOP unquestionably refers to the U.S. Air Force's sole strategic stealth bomber since that's the only aircraft presently certified to carry it. Israel doesn't have any heavy bombers, stealthy or otherwise, capable of carrying such gigantic bombs. Its only manned stealth aircraft is the F-35 Lightning II strike fighter, which, of course, is far too small to carry the MOP in its internal bay or on any external hardpoints. (Israel's lack of any heavy bombers even led analysts to question the feasibility of Israel dropping a GBU-57s out of the back of its turboprop C-130 Hercules transport planes!) The Bunker Buster Act isn't the first proposal to furnish Israel with strategic air power—Gottheimer already proposed it twice in the last three years—and probably won't be the last if it doesn't pass. In a June 19 editorial, Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to the United States from 2009 to 2013, recalled that he repeatedly requested Washington sell Israel at least one B-52 Stratofortress bomber, confident that it dismiss out of hand any request for its much newer B-2 or B-1 Lancers. 'By selling us even one B-52, I told White House officials, the United States would be sending an unequivocal message to the Iranian regime regarding America's commitment to preventing Iran from producing nuclear bombs,' Oren wrote. In the piece, he recounted twice requesting the B-52 in 2013 and for a third time in 2018 to no avail. It's worth recalling that the U.S. never exported any of its three strategic bombers, meaning that even a sale of the vintage B-52 would have proven unprecedented. An April 2014 Wall Street Journal editorial similarly advocated that the U.S. should supply surplus B-52s to Israel, although called for a dozen rather than just one, along with MOPs. The latter case was derided shortly thereafter as 'a silly little proposal with approximately zero chance of actually being implemented.' Such criticism of proposals to supply Israel with the B-52 highlighted that iconic bomber's lumbering speed and complete lack of any stealthiness, which would have left it highly vulnerable to Iranian air defenses and even Iran's aged air force. Nevertheless, Israel's 12 days of airstrikes rendered much of Iran's air defense capabilities wholly ineffective. Furthermore, the Israeli Air Force helped clear a path for the U.S. Air Force B-2 strike on June 22, Operation Midnight Hammer, by targeting air defenses across southern Iran in the preceding 48 hours. While using a B-52 for such a mission would have proven much more risky than using the B-2, Israel could undoubtedly have conducted an operation like Midnight Hammer independently had it possessed B-2s. It may have even proven capable of striking those nuclear sites with B-52s, given the extent to which it degraded Iranian air defenses. After all, it already excelled at suppressing enemy air defenses with its fighter jets. Israeli fourth-generation fighters even operated in Iranian airspace without any losses throughout the war. Logistical and technical considerations aside, the supply of B-2s and MOPs to Israel could be promoted politically as a way of avoiding America becoming entangled in another Israel-Iran War. In his editorial, published three days before Midnight Hammer, Oren also argued that had Washington granted his B-52 request, 'Israel would not be in a position of wondering whether the United States will perform the task for us.' 'We would mitigate the claims, now being made by both the left and the right in the United States, that Israel is dragging America into another endless Middle Eastern war,' he added. As stated above, Operation Midnight Hammer was the first time the United States directly entered a war on the side of Israel. Typically, it has supplied or sold Israel the means and munitions to fight its conflict by itself. An apt example of this was Operation Nickel Grass during the October 1973 Arab-Israeli War, when the Nixon administration airlifted large quantities of hardware, including fighters and tanks, to directly replenish heavy Israeli losses as the war was still raging. U.S. pilots flew fighter jets directly to Israel and gave them to their Israeli counterparts but did not directly participate in any combat. After the U.S. successfully convinced Israel not to retaliate to Iraq's Scud missile attacks during the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Washington rewarded it with supplies of surplus F-15 and F-16 fighter jets along with AH-64 and UH-60A helicopters. If the Bunker Buster Act ultimately passes—and again, that's a big if—a U.S. provision of B-2s and MOPs could indicate Washington has reverted to that long-established pre-June 22 status quo. In other words, while the Israel-Iran War may not have been a one-off, direct U.S. military involvement in support of an Israeli offensive could well have been precisely that.
Engadget
37 minutes ago
- Engadget
The Morning After: Big, Beautiful Fallout
The so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' has passed with plenty of nasty treats for the US technology and manufacturing industries. As well as swinging the sword at basic environmental protection measures, the bill sticks its thumb in the eye of the EV industry. Tim Stevens takes you on a tour of the most salient changes, like the imminent end of the EV tax credit. Joining that on the bonfire is the used EV incentive, as well as the rebates for the purchase of commercial EVs. Similarly, for all of this administration's talk of bringing manufacturing back to the US, the bill is a middle finger for domestic solar companies. The US is the only credible manufacturing rival to China in solar panels, but the bill cuts these businesses off at the knees. I spoke to people inside the US solar industry who know that, despite whatever tariffs are implemented, this bill opens the door to a flood of cheap, Chinese-made solar panels to usurp their US rivals. An earlier version of the bill also contained moves that could only be described as weirdly vindictive. It previously proposed an annual EV tax of $250 (and $100 for hybrid owners) as well as a general levy on all wind and solar projects. Why? A cynic might suggest it was due to the bill being drafted to benefit fossil fuel companies at the expense of literally everyone else. Anyway, hopefully you can enjoy the holiday and won't need to spend it panic-buying an EV and US-made solar panels. Although that's not actually a bad way to spend a long weekend. — Dan Cooper Get Engadget's newsletter delivered direct to your inbox. Subscribe right here! You can snag two months of Paramount+ for just $2, allowing you to take advantage of the new season of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds . The deal applies to both the Essential and Premium plan, so you can easily have a little run of ad-free Star Trek as a treat. And, if you don't like the idea of binging Strange New Worlds , you can always watch Star Trek: Lower Decks instead. Continue Reading. Microsoft has announced it will cut 9,000 jobs from its global workforce, with much of that focus on its gaming division. Engadget's Jessica Conditt got the inside scoop from employees at Halo Studios, who reveal all is not well at what should be one of Microsoft's crown jewels. Sadly, the company was already gutted back in 2023, and the lukewarm reception of its work since then is a sign of how badly things are going. Continue Reading. Igor Bonifacic for Engadget Translating a work of art is a delicate task requiring nuanced knowledge of both the culture and the languages you're translating from and to. Unless you're Anime-favoring streaming service Crunchyroll, which just dumped subtitle files into ChatGPT and hoped for the best. As well as a general sloppiness, Engadget's Igor Bonifacic found instances of lines beginning with 'ChatGPT said:' at the start of a line. Crunchyroll said the subtitles were the result of the unauthorized action of a "third-party vendor," and it is working to rectify the error right now. Continue Reading. Neil Druckmann, head of Naughty Dog and co-creator of The Last of US and its TV adaptation, is stepping down from the HBO series. He said he's shifting his focus back to video games full time to work on the studio's next big title, Intergalactic: The Heretic Prophet . The Last of Us Part II co-writer Halley Gross is also stepping down at the same time, and that got our staff TLoU superfan Nathan Ingraham's antennae twitching. He feels the video game industry, currently suffering body blow after body blow, needs Druckmann (and Gross) far more than the TV world does. Continue Reading. Nothing has launched its third-generation flagship, the $799 Nothing Phone 3, complete with a new eye-catching gimmick. Whereas previous models had the Glyph Interface, a series of flashing lights on the rear cover, the 3 gets a tiny dot-matrix display called the Glyph Matrix. Wanna find out if it's going to be worth your cash? Check out Mat Smith's detailed hands-on. Continue Reading.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Man Sues Trump Admin To Keep 70 Million-Year-Old Tyrannosaurus Skull
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Texas man is suing the Trump administration over its attempts to seize his 70 million-year-old Tyrannosaurus bataar skull. Robert M. Lavinsky bought the ancient fossil from a Gem & Mineral and Fossil Show dealer in 2005. It is now stored in Texas. However, he has been under investigation since 2014 by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), both of which allege the skull is stolen property. Lavinsky is suing the agencies, with a complaint filed on Wednesday stating: "The Government's demand for forfeiture of Plaintiff's personal property constitutes a concrete and particularized injury." DHS and attorneys for Lavinsky have been contacted via email outside business hours for comment. The skull and jawbone of a Tyrannosaurus bataar skeleton is displayed during a ceremony of its repatriation to Mongolia, in New York, Monday, May 6, 2013. This is not the skull owned by Robert Lavinsky.... The skull and jawbone of a Tyrannosaurus bataar skeleton is displayed during a ceremony of its repatriation to Mongolia, in New York, Monday, May 6, 2013. This is not the skull owned by Robert Lavinsky. More Richard Drew/AP Photo Why It Matters The Trump administration, particularly DHS, is already being sued by several groups of Attorneys General, citizens, and people who have been detained by ICE as part of the government's hardline immigration agenda. This is another lawsuit to add to its extensive legal schedule. Unlike other cases against the federal government, however, this suit is not related to specific Trump administration policies, as it relates to DHS activity that was initiated during the Obama era. What To Know According to Lavinsky's court filing, an investigation into the skull began in 2014, two years after the government launched an inquiry into the store owners who sold Lavinsky the bataar skull. The skull originated from Mongolia, and according to the US government, "under U.S. law, generally, paleontological artifacts of Mongolian origin are considered to be stolen property and vertebrate paleontological artifacts of Chinese origin are considered to be stolen property." The government then said Lavinsky had broken the law by requesting the skull be imported into the U.S., and said it would "initiate legal action to compel the production of and/or seizure and forfeiture of" the item, says the filing. Lavinsky and his legal team argue he did not import the skull, but rather bought it when it was already in the United States. This new suit arose because the government froze Lavinsky's ownership rights over the skull in 2014. In 2017, James Godwin, the owner of the store that sold Lavinsky the skull, sued the government, saying it had gone beyond its statute of limitations in the case of the skull. Per Lavinsky's filing: "The Court found that the Government discovered facts showing Dr. Godwin's Bataar skull existed in the United States and was in Dr. Godwin's possession when it received the July 2012 Production [of records exchanged between Godwin and the government regarding the skull.]" The filing went on to say: "Notably, the Court adopted the 'known or should have known' standard for the running of 5-year statute of limitations under 19 U.S.C. § 1621 for civil forfeiture claims... The Government failed to timely file its request for forfeiture." Despite this ruling, Lavinsky's ownership rights remain in question. He says he wants to donate the skull to Wyoming Dinosaur Center & Dig Sites in Thermopolis, but is unable to do so because he worries that if he tried to donate the skull the government would seize it. What People Are Saying Robert Lavinsky's Filing states: "Plaintiff Dr. Robert M. Lavinsky requests that the Court declare that the Government is barred by the statute of limitations to pursue any forfeiture claims of Dr. Lavinsky's Bataar Skull and declare that Dr. Lavinsky has unencumbered ownership and clear title of the Bataar Skull, and for all such other and further relief, at law and in equity, to which he must be justly entitled." What Happens Next Lavinsky has requested a declaratory injunction from the government, for them to state that he is the owner of the skull so that he can donate it to the center in Wyoming.
