
Punjab's land pooling policy challenged in High Court as activists flag environmental concern
A PIL was filed stating that this policy fails to comply with statutory safeguards, including social and environmental impact assessments, fair compensation, and rehabilitation of affected families.
The petition comes at a time when farmers and opposition parties are protesting against the implementation of this policy.
Social activists Naveender PK Singh and Samita Kaur are the petitioners in this case and have submitted to the High Court that the move to acquire such a large chunk of land would have widespread negative effects on the agrarian economy of Punjab, which is a major contributor to the food grain supply of the country. This petition has been moved by advocates Sahir Singh Virk and V.B. Godara.
During the hearing, the High Court was informed that the said policy is directly contrary to the spirit and mandate of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR Act), which is a central legislation.
The case was heard by the division bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
PIL in Andhra Pradesh HC seeks CBI and ED probe into white papers on YSRCP regime
VIJAYAWADA: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the High Court seeking a CBI and ED inquiry into the white papers released by the coalition government in the Assembly regarding financial losses allegedly caused by the previous administration. The petitioner urged the court to direct the filing of an FIR against former Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy and others. Mehek Maheshwari, a Delhi-based advocate, filed the PIL and requested the court to constitute a Special Investigation Team, monitored by retired or sitting Supreme Court judges, to oversee probes by the ED, CBI and Income Tax departments. He argued that this would help ensure transparency and prevent misuse of power during the investigation. The PIL also called for an impartial inquiry into the alleged accumulation of disproportionate assets by Jagan and his associates. The case came up for hearing before a bench comprising Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice Cheemalapati Ravi on Wednesday. Appearing online, Maheshwari requested an adjournment to present his arguments in person. The court asked him how many PILs he had filed so far. He responded that he had filed three to four petitions. The court posted the matter for hearing next week.


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Maharashtra revokes decision on EWS quota in pvt medical colleges
In another rollback by the Maharashtra government, the medical education department on Wednesday withdrew its decision to implement the 10 per cent Economically Weaker Section (EWS) quota in private medical colleges. The government stated that the reservation will only be applicable if the Central Government or respective Council increases the number of seats to compensate for the reservation impact on other category seats. The decision comes just a month after the state government revoked the three-language policy on June 29, following a major uproar. The order issued by the state's medical education department on Wednesday, with regards to EWS reservation clause in the information brochure of the state medical admission, stated, 'For MBBS/BDS/BAMS/BHMS and BUMS courses, this reservation will be applicable only if Central Government / respective council increased existing seats. For courses other than MBBS/BDS/BAMS/BHMS and BUMS courses, 10% EWS reservation will be applicable on available seats.' Principal secretary of medical education department, Dheeraj Kumar, said, 'After careful examination and various court orders, including those of Supreme Court and High Court, we have modified provisions as per last year.' This comes as a big relief to medical aspirants in the state and their parents who along with private medical colleges were up in arms against the implementation of 10 per cent EWS quota in private medical colleges, which came to light with release of the information brochure on July 23. According to them this was going to result in a drastic reduction in the number of seats which are under general merit, causing steep increase in cut-off marks for admission on those seats. It was highlighted by parents as well as colleges that it was unfair of state to implement 10 per cent EWS quota in private medical colleges without allowing proportionate boost in the total intake, a one time-measure followed by the central government when EWS reservation was applied in government medical colleges (GMCs). While the Association of Private Medical Colleges wrote to state against the reservation, several candidates and parents not only sent multiple letters requesting to withdraw the decision but also met with the state's medical education minister Hasan Mushrif on Tuesday, with their concerns. Welcoming the move, a parent representative, Sudha Shenoy said, 'The minister as well as principal secretary of the department not only gave us a patient hearing, the issue was resolved promptly within just a day after we presented our concerns.' Another parent representative, Brijesh Sutaria, said, 'It is now clear that the Government of Maharashtra will not implement EWS reservation in private medical colleges unless seat capacity is increased, a move that aligns with the Central Government's original 2019 approach. This step protects merit-based access while preserving the intent of social justice.'


Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
High court issues notice to Punjab on plea against land pooling policy
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Wednesday issued notice to the Punjab govt on a petition challenging the Land Pooling Policy-2025. Gurdeep Singh Gill, 72, a resident of Phagla village in Ludhiana district, has sought directions to quash the notification dated June 4, 2025, along with the Land Pooling Policy 2025, being ultra vires and an act of "colourable legislation", violating fundamental rights. Gill, who claimed to have turned unproductive land capable of producing multi-crops with a fully developed irrigation system, said the policy includes his land without following the mandatory procedure under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act (LARR Act) 2013. "There are also no enabling provisions under LARR 2013 to frame or implement such a land pooling policy. Instead, the competent statutory framework for such urban development and land pooling in Punjab is the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act 1995, which has been arbitrarily bypassed," the petition said, adding no social impact assessment report was either prepared or published according to provisions of law. Moreover, according to the petition, none of the gram panchayats or gram sabhas were approached or consulted by the state before bringing the policy. A division bench comprising Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal and Justice Deepak Manchanda issued the notice after taking cognisance of the petition. MSID:: 122998882 413 |