Senator sounds alarm over secretive tax change discovered last minute in 'Big Beautiful Bill': 'It will create uncertainty and freeze the markets'
In mid-May, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" was introduced in the House of Representatives and has since meandered through both chambers of Congress, with lawmakers in the House and the Senate debating, amending, and re-drafting the sprawling legislation piece by piece.
On Monday, Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy tweeted about a then-newly introduced version of the bill, pledging to go "through it line by line" and to disclose the "hidden provisions [his team] found."
Murphy said it was "bad enough" that the bill initially cut incentives for wind and solar energy while adding a mysteriously added tax on those industries. In a follow-up tweet, he highlighted yet another provision aimed at dismantling the clean energy industry.
"A new tax break for coal companies! So the tax incentives for wind and solar are GONE, and the coal industry is getting NEW tax incentives," a shocked Murphy tweeted.
"It's official policy now to not just deny global warming exists - but to actively make it WORSE," he added. Murphy was referencing a "bizarre fossil fuel handout" for metallurgical coal — a specific kind of coal used in the production of steel, not for generating energy.
Not only were the changes "bizarre," they were mysterious, and Senate Republicans asserted they had no idea who added the solar one or when, per NBC News; it's unclear so far if they knew how the coal one originated. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski was one lawmaker perplexed by the provision, which she said was "just entirely punitive to the wind and solar industry."
According to the New York Times, even those who oppose renewable energy subsidies deemed the provision excessive, with one vocally disavowing an excise tax on renewable energy.
News of changes to the megabill broke overnight on a weekend, stunning clean energy advocates into action in the middle of the night. American Clean Power Association chief executive Jason Grunet told the Times that the additions to the bill "came as a complete shock."
The excise tax "is so carelessly written and haphazardly drafted that the concern is it will create uncertainty and freeze the markets," Grunet warned.
On July 1, after a "marathon overnight session," the megabill narrowly passed Tuesday in the Senate with a 51-50 tally, after which it headed back to the House for a vote.
Clean energy investments don't just affect households with solar panels, electric vehicle owners, or individuals directly involved with those industries — experts project that the absence of support for renewables will raise energy costs in the United States across the board.
Bipartisan objections and critiques from fossil fuel advocates further underscore how economically devastating the bill would be to the energy sector should the new provisions survive a House vote.
While the "cost of living" has dominated political discourse in recent months, the lasting environmental impact of this proposed legislation — partly due to a loss of subsidies — would be a devastating step backwards.
Should the government be paying us to upgrade our homes?
Definitely
Depends on how much it costs
Depends on what it's for
No way
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
A controversial provision aimed at selling off public land was spiked by the Senate Parliamentarian and ultimately removed from the bill following public outcry.
Public pressure works, and calling lawmakers to voice opposition to anti-clean energy provisions can go a long way — particularly given bipartisan reservations voiced by Senators. Those interested can visit House.gov to look up their representatives and how to reach them.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
McDonald's is adding a Spicy McMuffin to its breakfast lineup
You can find original article here Nrn. Subscribe to our free daily Nrn newsletter. McDonald's 50th anniversary celebration of its signature Egg McMuffin continues with the introduction of a Spicy McMuffin, available starting July 8 at participating restaurants for a limited time. The offering includes melted cheese, an egg, Canadian bacon, and Spicy Pepper Sauce served on a toasted and buttered English Muffin. The summer lineup also includes the Spicy Sausage McMuffin and the Spicy Sausage McMuffin with Egg. According to the company, the popular Egg McMuffin was created by Herb Peterson, a franchisee in Santa Barbara, Calif., who presented the concept to founder Ray Croc in 1971. The idea was to create a portable Eggs Benedict. Breakfast is a priority for McDonald's value platform, as its McValue menu, introduced in January, includes items like the Sausage McMuffin, Sausage Biscuit, Sausage Burrito, and Hash Browns, available for a "Buy One, Add One for $1" deal. During the company's fourth quarter earnings call earlier this year, chief financial officer Ian Borden said breakfast has been a strong daypart for the domestic business. 'It's an area where we're taking share,' he said. During the first quarter earnings call in late April, however, chief executive officer Chris Kempczinski said there has been a decline in frequency during the 'bellwether' breakfast daypart. 'Morning now is a place that you're seeing people are choosing either to skip breakfast or they're choosing to eat at home for breakfast. And I think that's more to explain what's going on in the U.S. versus any kind of segment shift,' he said. The Spicy McMuffin comes on the heels of two other menu launches for McDonald's, a new Blueberry & Crème Pie and a new premium burger called the Daily Double. These launches come as the chain has experienced two rare and consecutive quarters of same-store sales declines and traffic softness. Contact Alicia Kelso at Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin Bulls Should Be Wary of the Dollar Index's Death Cross: Technical Analysis
Bitcoin (BTC) bulls are optimistic that the U.S. dollar's broader sell-off will continue in the second half of the year, fueling the crypto bull run. However, one chart warrants caution when relying on bearish dollar predictions. That's the dollar index's weekly chart, which shows the 50-week simple moving average (SMA) is on track to cross below the 200-week SMA in the near term, forming the notorious death cross. While the ominous-sounding pattern is widely regarded as a long-term bearish signal, historically, it has proven to be a bear trap, consistently marking bottoms and bullish trend reversals in the US dollar. The chart below shows that DXY has chalked out four weekly chart death crosses since 2009, and each of those marked the end of downtrends (marked by vertical lines), setting the stage for sharp rallies. The last one occurred in January 2021, marking the bottom at around 90. The dollar caught the bid in the subsequent months, with the index eventually hitting a high of over 114.00 in September 2022. Note that price patterns do not always unfold as expected, meaning the impending death cross may not necessarily trap bears; however, being aware of its past tendency can help traders manage their positions more effectively. The dollar index, which tracks the greenback's value against major fiat currencies, tanked by 10.78% in the first half of the year, its worst performance since 1991.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elevance Health Insiders Sold US$6.9m Of Shares Suggesting Hesitancy
Over the past year, many Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE:ELV) insiders sold a significant stake in the company which may have piqued investors' interest. When evaluating insider transactions, knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more beneficial than knowing whether they are selling, as the latter can be open to many interpretations. However, if numerous insiders are selling, shareholders should investigate more. While insider transactions are not the most important thing when it comes to long-term investing, we would consider it foolish to ignore insider transactions altogether. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. In the last twelve months, the biggest single sale by an insider was when the Executive VP & President of Commercial Health Benefits, Charles Kendrick, sold US$3.2m worth of shares at a price of US$432 per share. That means that an insider was selling shares at around the current price of US$396. While insider selling is a negative, to us, it is more negative if the shares are sold at a lower price. Given that the sale took place at around current prices, it makes us a little cautious but is hardly a major concern. Elevance Health insiders didn't buy any shares over the last year. The chart below shows insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year. If you want to know exactly who sold, for how much, and when, simply click on the graph below! View our latest analysis for Elevance Health If you like to buy stocks that insiders are buying, rather than selling, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: Most of them are flying under the radar). Over the last three months, we've seen significant insider selling at Elevance Health. Specifically, Executive VP & CFO Mark Kaye ditched US$1.9m worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. In light of this it's hard to argue that all the insiders think that the shares are a bargain. For a common shareholder, it is worth checking how many shares are held by company insiders. A high insider ownership often makes company leadership more mindful of shareholder interests. Elevance Health insiders own 0.1% of the company, currently worth about US$103m based on the recent share price. This kind of significant ownership by insiders does generally increase the chance that the company is run in the interest of all shareholders. An insider hasn't bought Elevance Health stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. And there weren't any purchases to give us comfort, over the last year. The company boasts high insider ownership, but we're a little hesitant, given the history of share sales. So while it's helpful to know what insiders are doing in terms of buying or selling, it's also helpful to know the risks that a particular company is facing. To assist with this, we've discovered 1 warning sign that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Elevance Health. But note: Elevance Health may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
