logo
Trump Fired Education Experts, Including Me, From White House Board

Trump Fired Education Experts, Including Me, From White House Board

A federal judge has blocked the Trump Administration's attempts to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education. Lawsuits have been filed against the Administration for slashing the staff and budget of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the federal education department's research arm. Massive cancelations of education-related research grants also are being contested in the courts.
Given all this, I fully anticipated that the Trump Administration would eventually get around to firing the National Board for Education Sciences (NBES). It finally happened four months into President Donald Trump's second term when he removed 13 Biden appointees from the National Board for Education Sciences on May 23.
'On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as a member of the National Board for Education Sciences is terminated, effective immediately,' the email read. 'Thank you for your service.'
As just one of the Americans who received this two-sentence message, I wonder if the sender or anyone else in the Trump Administration even knows who we are or what our service entailed.
President Joe Biden appointed 13 of us to this bipartisan White House Board in October 2022. We were selected because of our deep expertise on education research, evaluation, and development. Members included three past presidents of the American Educational Research Association, National Academy of Education inductees (including the Academy's current president who chaired NBES), a dean of two academic schools at a Historically Black University, and a mayor who worked for two decades as a teacher and school administrator and served five terms in the New Hampshire House of Representatives.
We committed to spending four years in the unpaid role because we all want the best for our democracy, we value the production and use of research, and we understand how high-quality studies and evidence-informed tools can improve educational opportunities, experiences, and outcomes for all students. Nothing about what we were asked to do qualifies as any version of wokeness or extremism. We approached our work as experts, not as politically-polarizing activists who somehow sought to advance anti-American agendas.
The voting NBES members met with and served alongside nine ex-officio members: Director of IES, Director of the National Science Foundation, Director of the Census, Commissioner of Labor Statistics, Director of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and commissioners of the four National Education Centers. It was a brilliant group of people who were united by our deep appreciation for rigorous, useful research.
During the second year of George W. Bush's presidency, Congress established NBES as part of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002. We were responsible for advising the IES Director on policies and procedures, collaboratively establishing priorities for the Institute's roughly $900 million annual budget, soliciting and providing input from educators and researchers, and strengthening peer review for grant-funded research projects, plus several other responsibilities related to scientific inquiry and innovation.
The IES website specifies another role for NBES: 'Advise the Director on opportunities for the participation in, and the advancement of, women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in education research, statistics, and evaluation activities of the Institute.'
Without knowing or even asking what this entailed, it is possible that the Trump Administration presumed this to be a hotbed of DEI activities that privileged wokeness over merit and somehow discriminated against white men who applied for IES research grants. I never participated in nor witnessed this. There is no evidence of such wrongdoing.
Being invited by a U.S. president to serve on a White House board was a significant honor; I will forever appreciate the faith that the Biden-Harris Administration placed in me as a citizen and scholar. I do not wear termination by the Trump Administration from my position as a badge of honor. It is disgraceful.
Again, I anticipated that the Trump Administration would terminate my position prior to the conclusion of my four-year term. And I also anticipate that eliminating the federal education department, defunding IES, and ousting its law-abiding NBES partners will weaken the production and quality of education-focused studies and evaluation activities.
Consequently, students with disabilities will be even more underserved. Inequities between rich and poor, as well as white and racially diverse learners will widen. Solutions to antisemitism, Islamophobia, racism, homophobia, transphobia, and sexism in schools will be stifled. Also, new educational disparities will emerge but will not be systematically tracked, communicated, studied, and addressed. Congress and educational leaders will have even less access to trustworthy, high-quality research on what works, what undermines excellence and innovation, and where the U.S. is falling short in fulfilling its educational promises to students and taxpaying families.
Terminating NBES members is yet another example of the Trump Administration's attack on research, researchers, and research universities. Yanking hundreds of millions in federal research grants from Harvard and Columbia, two of the world's highest-impact producers of science and innovation, is indeed an assault on research itself. These actions are anti-American, as they will surely place our nation further behind others that pursue solutions to educational inequities, climate change, disease and health disparities, poverty, and other vexing problems.
I accepted Biden's invitation to serve on NBES because I wanted better for our country and the people educated in its schools, colleges, and universities. I also said yes because I value research. Inasmuch as I despise our undeserved and unjustified dismissal, I have greater grief for IES leaders and staff who lost their paid full-time jobs— its national statistics unit reportedly has just three remaining employees, down from around 100 before Trump began his second term.
These hardworking, law-abiding professionals are far more negatively affected by the Administration's actions than are other NBES members and me. We will be fine.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. envoy receives the Lebanese government's response to Hezbollah disarmament proposal
U.S. envoy receives the Lebanese government's response to Hezbollah disarmament proposal

San Francisco Chronicle​

time37 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

U.S. envoy receives the Lebanese government's response to Hezbollah disarmament proposal

BEIRUT (AP) — A U.S. envoy said Monday he was satisfied with the Lebanese government's response to a proposal to disarm the militant Hezbollah group, adding that Washington is ready to help the small crisis-hit nation emerge from its long-running political and economic crisis. The U.S. envoy to Lebanon, Tom Barrack, spoke to journalists after meeting President Joseph Aoun, saying he will study the government's seven-page response. Barrack said the American and Lebanese sides are committed 'to get a resolution.' 'What the government gave us was something spectacular in a very short period of time and a very complicated manner,' Barrack said during his 20-minute news conference at the presidential palace southeast of Beirut. His meetings in Lebanon came amid fears that Hezbollah's refusal to immediately disarm would renew war between Israel after a shaky ceasefire agreement went into effect in November. Last month, Barrack gave Lebanese officials a proposal that aims to disarm Hezbollah and move on with some economic reforms to try get Lebanon out of its nearly 6-year economic crisis, the worst in its modern history. The economic meltdown is rooted in decades of corruption and mismanagement by Lebanon's political class. Barrack said Lebanon should change in the same way as Syria has following the fall in December of Syrian President Bashar Assad,who was replaced by a new leadership that is moving ahead with major economic reforms. Barrack said President Donald Trump and the U.S. are ready to help Lebanon change and 'if you don't want change, it's no problem." The rest of the region is moving at high speed," he said. Hezbollah's weapons have been one of the principal sticking points since Israel withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000, ending an 18-year occupation. The two sides fought a destructive war in 2006 that ended in a draw. The latest Israel-Hezbollah war began a day after the Hamas Oct. 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel and intensified in September, leaving the Iran-backed group badly bruised and much of its political and military leadership dead. Since a U.S.-brokered ceasefire went into effect in November, Hezbollah has almost ended all its military presence along the border with Israel, which is insisting that the group disarms all over Lebanon. Aoun said Sunday that the number of Lebanese troops along the border with Israel will increase to 10,000, adding that only Lebanese soldiers and U.N. peacekeepers will be armed on the Lebanese side of the border. On Sunday night, hours before Barrack arrived in Beirut, Israel's air force carried out strikes on southern and eastern Lebanon, wounding nine people, according to state media. The Israeli army said the airstrikes hit Hezbollah's infrastructure, arms depots and missile launchers. Earlier Sunday, Hezbollah leader Naim Kassem reiterated the militant group's refusal to lay down its weapons before Israel withdraws from all of southern Lebanon and stops its airstrikes. The Hezbollah-Israel war left over 4,000 people dead in Lebanon and caused destruction estimated at $11 billion. In Israel, 127 people, including 80 soldiers, were killed during the war. Since the November ceasefire, Israel has carried out hundreds of airstrikes on different parts of Lebanon, killing about 250 people and injuring over 600. Israel is also still holding five strategic posts inside Lebanon that it refused to withdraw from earlier this year.

Israel and Hamas are inching toward a new ceasefire deal for Gaza. This is how it might look
Israel and Hamas are inching toward a new ceasefire deal for Gaza. This is how it might look

San Francisco Chronicle​

time38 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Israel and Hamas are inching toward a new ceasefire deal for Gaza. This is how it might look

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in Washington Monday to meet U.S. President Donald Trump, who has been pushing for a ceasefire that might lead to an end to the 21-month war in Gaza. Israel and Hamas are considering a new U.S.-backed ceasefire proposal that would pause the war, free Israeli hostages and send much-needed aid flooding into Gaza. It also aims to open broader talks about ending the conflict. Negotiations have repeatedly stalled over Hamas' demands for an end to the war and complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, while Israel wants Hamas to surrender and disarm before it ends the war. Here is a look at how the truce might look, according to that draft: — The truce would last 60 days. — 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 would be released in phases throughout the truce. — Palestinian prisoners held by Israel will be released in exchange for the hostages, although precise numbers were not detailed. — Humanitarian aid entering Gaza would be ramped up significantly and would be distributed by the United Nations. The proposal makes no mention of the U.S.- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. — Israeli forces would withdraw to a buffer zone along Gaza's borders with Israel and Egypt. Israel has seized large swaths of the territory since ending a previous ceasefire in March. — On the first day of the truce, the sides are expected to begin negotiations toward an end to the war, but no timeline is mentioned. — The mediators — the U.S., Egypt and Qatar — will serve as guarantors to make sure the sides negotiate in good faith. — While there is no guarantee the war would end, the proposal states that Trump insists the talks during the truce 'would lead to a permanent resolution of the conflict.'

Tesla CEO vs. Trump: Elon Musk's Political Gambit Sparks ‘Train Wreck' Remark
Tesla CEO vs. Trump: Elon Musk's Political Gambit Sparks ‘Train Wreck' Remark

Business Insider

time43 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Tesla CEO vs. Trump: Elon Musk's Political Gambit Sparks ‘Train Wreck' Remark

Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk has reignited political drama—this time not over markets, but politics. Over the weekend, Musk officially launched a new U.S. political party called the 'America Party,' saying it was needed to break the current 'one-party system' and restore 'freedom' to Americans. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. The announcement didn't go unnoticed. President Donald Trump sharply criticized Musk's move, calling him a 'train wreck' and claiming he had gone 'completely off the rails' in recent weeks. Trump also took aim at the viability of third parties in U.S. politics, calling the idea 'ridiculous' and a source of 'confusion.' Musk Breaks with Trump in Political Power Play The feud marks a sharp turn in their relationship. Musk had previously donated over $250 million to Trump's campaign and briefly served as an adviser in the White House, leading a cost-cutting initiative known as 'Doge.' But tensions rose after Musk criticized Trump's recently signed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' warning that it would add $3 trillion to the national debt and 'bankrupt' the country. Musk Launches Party, Raises New Risks While Musk hasn't confirmed any personal political run, he hinted that the America Party may focus on select congressional races in 2026, sparking speculation about its potential to draw votes away from Republicans in key districts. Adding to the drama, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that Musk's political involvement might worry Tesla and SpaceX's boards. Musk fired back, calling Bessent a 'Soros stooge' due to his past ties with Soros Fund Management, where he helped manage large investments under financier George Soros. With politics entering Musk's already packed portfolio, both Wall Street and Washington are watching closely, especially as Tesla gears up for its Q2 earnings later this month. What Is the Prediction for Tesla Stock? When it comes to Elon Musk's companies, most of them are privately held. However, retail investors can invest in his most popular company, Tesla. Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on TSLA stock based on 14 Buys, 12 Holds, and nine Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average TSLA price target of $293.09 per share implies 7.06% downside risk.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store