Nagpur's CAP: A 25-Year Journey Of Transformation
2
3
Nagpur: As Nagpur's
Common Admission Process
(CAP) for Class 11 completes its 25th year, the merger with new statewide admission portal marks its journey of complete transformation.
It all started in 2000, when senior academics led by Baban Taywade pushed for CAP to ease out admission woes for students.
Till then students would flock to individual colleges, buy everyone's prospectus and fill multiple forms.
The veterans back then envisioned that there should be a single form filled for
admissions in Nagpur
, and that's how CAP started.
When it made its debut, Nagpur's CAP initially covered only science and commerce streams due to limited interest in arts. Participation of colleges was voluntary, but the education department's persistent efforts gradually brought all city colleges on board.
However, the journey was far from smooth. In 2005, CAP was entirely scrapped due to disagreements among colleges, only to be revived in 2006. By 2012, the commerce stream opted out, leaving only science in the admission pool.
Nagpur's CAP also lagged in digital adoption. Until 2017, it operated partially offline, with form submissions done manually while merit lists and admissions were online.
That year, then-education secretary Nand Kumar enforced a fully online system and mandated participation from all streams and colleges, aligning Nagpur with modern standards.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Tunisia: New Small Electric Car For Seniors. Prices Might Surprise You.
Electric Cars | Search Ads
This shift laid the groundwork for the current pan-Maharashtra CAP, which now allows students from remote areas to secure seats in top colleges based on merit. As Nagpur's CAP integrates into the state's unified platform, it reflects a remarkable transition from a fragmented, optional process to a streamlined, inclusive system, revolutionising access to education across Maharashtra.
TIMELINE
2000 - CAP started for nagpur city colleges. Science, commerce and art streams included
2001 - Arts dropped due to poor response
2005 - Entire CAP system put on hold due to internal differences between colleges
2006 - CAP resumes for science and commerce
2012 - Commerce stream dropped from CAP
2013 - Various colleges call for scrapping CAP
2014 - Proposal to restart CAP for all streams
2017 –
Nagpur CAP
shifts completely online, from earlier partial offline mode
2025 – Nagpur CAP merges with state's common online platform
Nagpur: As Nagpur's Common Admission Process (CAP) for Class 11 completes its 25th year, the merger with new statewide admission portal marks its journey of complete transformation.
It all started in 2000, when senior academics led by Baban Taywade pushed for CAP to ease out admission woes for students. Till then students would flock to individual colleges, buy everyone's prospectus and fill multiple forms. The veterans back then envisioned that there should be a single form filled for admissions in Nagpur, and that's how CAP started.
When it made its debut, Nagpur's CAP initially covered only science and commerce streams due to limited interest in arts.
Participation of colleges was voluntary, but the education department's persistent efforts gradually brought all city colleges on board. However, the journey was far from smooth. In 2005, CAP was entirely scrapped due to disagreements among colleges, only to be revived in 2006. By 2012, the commerce stream opted out, leaving only science in the admission pool.
Nagpur's CAP also lagged in digital adoption. Until 2017, it operated partially offline, with form submissions done manually while merit lists and admissions were online.
That year, then-education secretary Nand Kumar enforced a fully online system and mandated participation from all streams and colleges, aligning Nagpur with modern standards. This shift laid the groundwork for the current pan-Maharashtra CAP, which now allows students from remote areas to secure seats in top colleges based on merit. As Nagpur's CAP integrates into the state's unified platform, it reflects a remarkable transition from a fragmented, optional process to a streamlined, inclusive system, revolutionising access to education across Maharashtra.
TIMELINE
2000 - CAP started for nagpur city colleges. Science, commerce and art streams included
2001 - Arts dropped due to poor response
2005 - Entire CAP system put on hold due to internal differences between colleges
2006 - CAP resumes for science and commerce
2012 - Commerce stream dropped from CAP
2013 - Various colleges call for scrapping CAP
2014 - Proposal to restart CAP for all streams
2017 – Nagpur CAP shifts completely online, from earlier partial offline mode
2025 – Nagpur CAP merges with state's common online platform
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's tariff reset: From Canada to Laos, even dealmakers face higher costs as legal fight brews; US allies & rivals hit with steep import taxes
US President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariff regime, set to take effect August 7, has triggered a wave of economic disruption across the globe, from low-income nations like Laos and Algeria to wealthy trade partners such as Canada and Switzerland. Under the new policy, countries face steep new import duties unless they agree to revised trade terms with the US. Trump has framed the plan as a campaign for "fairness" under the slogan of "Liberation Day," invoking a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency and bypass Congress. But legal and economic blowback is mounting, with US courts weighing challenges and allies questioning Washington's reliability, AP reported. 'Everybody's a loser': Experts flag fallout "In many respects, everybody's a loser here," said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at New York Law School. "The U.S. consumer's a big loser," added Alan Wolff, a former WTO deputy director-general and trade official. Even countries that struck deals to reduce their tariff exposure are still facing steeper import duties than before. The UK agreed to raise tariffs on its exports to the US from 1.3% to 10%, despite the US running a trade surplus with it for nearly two decades. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo The EU and Japan accepted 15% tariffs, lower than the threatened rates but still significantly higher than last year's levels. Steep tariffs for those resisting Trump's demands Nations that refused to negotiate fared far worse. Laos and Algeria, despite low per capita incomes, now face tariffs of 40% and 30% respectively. Brazil was slapped with a 50% levy, reportedly over its treatment of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Canada drew a 35% tariff, tied in part to its position on Palestinian statehood. Even Switzerland, which did not reach an agreement, was hit with a 39% import tax, exceeding the originally announced 31%. "The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington to make a deal," said Wolff, now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Legal battle escalates as costs rise for US consumers Five US businesses and 12 states have filed lawsuits against the new tariffs, arguing that Trump overstepped his authority. In May, the US Court of International Trade sided with plaintiffs, blocking the tariffs, though collections continue during the appeal process. Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that US businesses and consumers are absorbing most of the cost. Companies including Walmart, Nike, Best Buy and Procter & Gamble have all raised prices in response. "This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those with lower incomes," said Appleton. "Your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to go up." According to Yale University's Budget Lab, the average US tariff has jumped from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3%, the highest since 1934. The lab estimates this will cost the average US household $2,400 annually. Winners still end up paying more Even countries that reached deals to avoid Trump's harshest penalties are still absorbing high tariffs. Taiwan saw its rate lowered from 32% to 20%, and Angola's from 32% to 15% — but both were paying less than 2% before the new policy. Lesotho, one of the poorest nations affected, saw its tariff reduced from 50% to 15%, though economists say the damage may already be done. "He [Trump] wants to do it because he found an undervalued franchise -- not because the market says you need to do a deal," said Wolff, referring to Trump's transactional approach to global trade. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Palestine statehood: More countries back two-state solution - what's keeping the dream a dream?
Palestinians carry sacks of flour taken from a humanitarian aid convoy en route to Gaza City, in the outskirts of Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza Strip. (Pic credit: AP) First France, then the United Kingdom, and now Canada: three of America's closest Western allies have recently voiced support for the idea of a Palestinian state, adding significant political heft to a movement already endorsed by more than 140 countries. On paper, it sounds like a diplomatic shift. In reality, the goal of Palestinian statehood may be further away than ever. Why now? The recent declarations by France, Britain, and Canada stem from several motives: Frustration with Israel's actions, especially in Gaza, where images of starving Palestinians have outraged many in the West. Domestic political pressure, as citizens and lawmakers demand their governments take a stand. A desire to reinvigorate peace efforts long stalled in the region. Meanwhile, Palestinians have welcomed these moves as a major boost for their cause, but Israel has rejected them outright, calling recognition of a Palestinian state tantamount to "rewarding terrorism." Where does the US stand? These announcements have left the US looking increasingly isolated in its steadfast support for Israel. US President Trump, who has aspirations for a Middle East peace legacy, has grown frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — especially over starvation in Gaza, which Netanyahu denies. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pirates Climb Aboard Cargo Ship - Watch What The Captain Did Next Tips and Tricks Undo Trump wants Saudi Arabia to normalise ties with Israel as part of expanding the Abraham Accords, but Riyadh has made it clear: there will be no normalisation without an irreversible path to Palestinian statehood. What's stopping it? A lot. Here's why the dream of a Palestinian state remains just that — a dream: 1. No partner in power Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flat-out rejects a two-state solution. He has described the idea of a Palestinian state as a "launch pad to annihilate Israel." Even if Netanyahu were to waver, hardline ministers in his coalition have threatened to collapse the government over any hint of compromise. 2. Palestinian leadership vacuum On the Palestinian side, things aren't any more stable. The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, is seen as weak and out of touch. Meanwhile, Hamas, which controls Gaza, is internationally designated as a terrorist group. So even if a state were created, who would run it? Who could actually deliver peace? 3. The geography just doesn't work anymore The borders discussed in the 1990s Oslo Accords, based on 1967 lines with minor land swaps, are now more fantasy than framework. Massive Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank has carved up Palestinian territory into disconnected fragments. A contiguous, functioning Palestinian state under these conditions is nearly impossible. Can Israel accept a Palestinian state? The short answer: Not under Netanyahu's government. Netanyahu has declared that a Palestinian state would serve as a 'launch pad to annihilate Israel.' Even more extreme members of his coalition openly oppose any Palestinian sovereignty and have threatened to collapse the government if Netanyahu shows signs of compromise. Some cabinet members have even suggested starving Palestinians in Gaza rather than negotiating. What does it all mean? Recognition by France, the UK, and Canada is largely symbolic without Israel's agreement. In fact, it could even entrench Netanyahu further, allowing him to rally his base against what he will frame as unfair outside pressure. But at the same time, Israel's growing international isolation — especially among its traditional Western allies — could build pressure on leaders like Trump to reconsider their unwavering support, potentially reshaping the diplomatic landscape. The harsh reality Despite global calls, a Palestinian state faces more roadblocks now than in past decades. If anything, the conflict and entrenched positions have made it harder to imagine such a state ever existing — let alone thriving. The dream of Palestinian statehood continues to inspire hope — and trigger fierce debates. But right now, it's a dream suspended in diplomatic limbo, with no clear path, no consensus, and no timeline. The louder the world speaks, the more distant the solution seems.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Myanmar junta air strike on ruby mine hub kills 13
Representative image YANGON: A Myanmar junta air strike on a rebel-occupied ruby mining hub killed 13 people on Saturday, according to a resident and a spokesperson for an armed opposition group. Civil war has consumed Myanmar since the military seized power in a 2021 coup, sparking resistance from pro-democracy guerrillas who found common cause with long-active ethnic armed groups. Their scattered forces initially struggled to make headway, but a combined offensive starting in late 2023 seized swathes of territory, including the town of Mogok -- the centre of the ruby trade. Myanmar is rich in precious stones and rare earth elements coveted by all factions and sold off, mostly to neighbouring China, to boost war chests. A junta spokesperson could not be reached for comment. However, a local who declined to be named for security reasons said the strike took place around 08:15 am (0145 GMT), killing seven instantly, with six dying later of their wounds. He said among the dead were a Buddhist monk collecting alms and a father and son who were riding the same motorbike. "A car passing through the area was hit, too," he added. "Seven people were wounded, including the driver." A spokeswoman for the Ta'ang National Liberation Army, which has occupied Mogok since last summer, matched that death toll, but gave a figure of 14 wounded. "It was in the morning time when the airstrike hit a public area," said spokeswoman Lway Yay Oo. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like We Have No Words For Dog The Bounty Hunter's Transformation Cash Roadster Undo "There were a lot of people walking in the street, therefore a lot of people were killed." The military was initially backfooted by the rebels' combined offensive, but has enacted conscription to boost its ranks. Its troops recently retook several key settlements in central Myanmar, including the gold mining hub of Thabeikkyin, which it seized late last month after a year-long battle. The junta on Thursday ended the state of emergency it had declared after toppling the government of Aung San Suu Kyi more than four years ago, and has touted elections in December as an off-ramp for the conflict. However, with Suu Kyi still jailed, opposition groups, including ousted lawmakers, are boycotting the poll. A UN expert in June described the exercise as a "fraud" designed to legitimise the junta's continued rule.
