logo
Fired federal workers lobby for help on Capitol Hill – is anyone listening?

Fired federal workers lobby for help on Capitol Hill – is anyone listening?

The Guardian6 hours ago

The Tuesday Group was feeling something familiar as its members milled around a bank of elevators in the bustling basement of a Senate office building: rejection.
They had often been told no over the past months – when the government moved to fire them with Donald Trump's blessing, when judges rejected challenges to that decision and when the lawmakers who they have taken to tracking down on Capitol Hill once a week when Congress is in session would turn a deaf ear to their pleas.
More than 59,000 federal workers have lost their jobs since Trump took office, according to government data, but those in power have not changed their tune.
This Tuesday morning, it was staffers of Maine's Republican senator Susan Collins who had told them no, even after they staged an impromptu sit-in in her office for the better part of a half hour. So they proceeded five floors down to the basement of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, hoping that some senator – any senator – would give them a moment of their time.
Then the elevator doors opened and who should come out but Collins. 'Senator Collins!' someone in the group yelled. Another tried to introduce themselves: 'I'm a fired federal worker.' But the senator began waving her hands in front of her in an unmistakable sign of: I don't have time for this.
'Thank you,' Collins said, as she made her way down the hall.
'It's somewhat typical,' observed Whitt Masters, a former USAID contractor who has been unemployed since the end of March, when the company employing him decided to file for bankruptcy after its client began to shut down.
'You know, I don't expect every senator to stop and speak with us. I wish she'd been a bit more approachable, especially since we had spent some time in her office earlier today.'
What's been dubbed the Tuesday Group has come around the Capitol since mid-February, as Trump and Elon Musk's campaign to thin out the federal workforce began to bite. Some who show up have been fired, others are on paid leave while a judge considers whether it is legal to fire them, and those who work for USAID expect to officially lose their jobs next Tuesday, when the agency shuts down.
Democrats often welcome them, but when it comes to the Republicans who control Congress – and are weighing legislation to codify some cuts and make deeper ones in the next fiscal year – the reception has been uneven. They've been ignored, blown off and belittled – all things they would experience last Tuesday, their 17th visit to the Hill.
Their encounter with Collins fruitless, the group formed something of a gauntlet at the intersection of a hallway leading between office buildings and to the Senate subway, a place where lawmakers were sure to pass on a scorcher of a day.
They would call out to any face they recognized, but the group of 10 was nothing a determined senator couldn't handle. Montana Republican Tim Sheehy speed-walked by with a reporter and cameraman in pursuit; Washington Democrat Patty Murray pounded past in sneakers; and Arkansas Republican John Boozman ambled through alone, displaying no sign that he knew the group was even there.
'Would you like to hear how we are impacting your constituents?' asked Stephie Duliepre, who was fired from her Science for Development fellowship program at USAID, when Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn came around the corner. The senator pushed on, the answer apparently being no.
John Hoeven, a Republican from North Dakota, exited a stairwell that deposited him right in the middle of the group. He appeared to recognize them – on a previous visit, attendees said that Hoeven had discussed his support for folding a major USAID food assistance program into the state department. 'I see you're still working on it,' he quipped, before heading off.
The Democrats they encountered uttered words of encouragement, and a few stopped to talk. 'Don't give up,' Dick Durbin of Illinois said when he encountered the group. 'I'm with you,' Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin called out.
South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham attempted the silent treatment as he came past, but Amelia Hertzberg, who was on administrative leave from her job in the Environmental Protection Agency, was not having it. She followed him down the hall, and started prancing around to get his attention.
'You have a bright future,' Hertzberg recalls the senator saying. 'Well, I was going to have a bright future, and then I was fired,' she replied.
The group spotted Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican and prominent Trump ally. 'Senator Hawley, these are fired federal workers. Do you have a second to talk to them?' asked Melissa Byrne, a community organizer who had put together the group.
'No,' he replied.
The group was aghast, but they'd been treated worse. When Mack Schroeder encountered Indiana Republican Jim Banks one Tuesday and introduced himself as having been fired from the Department of Health and Human Services, the senator replied, 'You probably deserved it,' before calling him 'a clown'.
That was in April. The incident made the news, Banks refused to apologize, and the Tuesday Group kept showing up.
'I've spoken to the media and been on the radio. I've called my senators, my representatives, and it feels a little bit like shouting into a void,' said Hertzberg, who has made about 12 visits to the Capitol now.
'So it feels good to go into senator's offices and be there and take up space for a while and make them see, or their staff see that there is a person behind all this.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US government could ban Bob Vylan over Glastonbury ‘death to IDF' chant
US government could ban Bob Vylan over Glastonbury ‘death to IDF' chant

Telegraph

time22 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

US government could ban Bob Vylan over Glastonbury ‘death to IDF' chant

British rap duo Bob Vylan could be banned from the US after the group's frontman called for the death of all Israeli soldiers in a Glastonbury performance broadcast live by the BBC. The US State Department is 'already looking at revoking' the group's visa ahead of their twenty-city tour through the country, a senior official told the Daily Wire. 'As a reminder, under the Trump Administration, the US government will not issue visas to any foreigner who supports terrorists,' the senior official said. Bobby Vylan, whose real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster, repeatedly chanted 'death, death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]' in his Glastonbury performance on Saturday. 'Free, Free Palestine,' the rapper chanted with the crowd at the music festival. 'But have you heard this one though? Death, death to the IDF! Death, death to the IDF!' After repeating the chant several times, Vylan then shouted out another anti-Semitic chant: 'Hell yeah, from the river to the sea, Palestine must be, will be, inshallah, it will be free.' StopAntisemitism, a watchdog organisation based in New York, called for Vylan to have his visa revoked ahead of upcoming concerts across the United States. The group is scheduled to play in New York City, Boston, Los Angeles, and Nashville for its 'Inertia Tour' in October and November. They were previously forced to cancel shows in 2023 owing to 'visa issues' but managed to tour a year later. 'The antisemite must have his visa denied/rescinded – his hate is not welcome here,' the StopAntisemitism wrote. Section 3B(bb) of the Immigration and Nationality Act said visas can be denied if applicants are part of 'a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity'. Another section of the act that could be examined by the State Department centres around applicants potentially causing 'serious adverse foreign policy consequences' for the United States. Leo Terrell, the chairman of the department of justice's anti-Semitism taskforce, said his 'first call' on Monday would be to Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, to ensure Vylan cannot enter the country. 'These abhorrent chants, which included calls for the death of members of the Israeli Defense Forces, are abhorrent and have no place in any civil society,' Mr Terrell said in a statement. 'We understand that Mr Vylan is planning to travel to the United States as part of the Inertia Tour. In response, Mr. Terrell's Task Force will be reaching out to the US Department of State on Monday to determine what measures are available to address the situation and to prevent the promotion of violent antisemitic rhetoric in the United States.' Avon and Somerset Police in the United Kingdom said they were investigating the performance and said they would determine 'whether any offenses may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation'. The incident has drawn comparisons with the case of Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months last year for inciting racial hatred after publishing a racist social media post. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'It seems very clear that this man was directly inciting violence. He should receive the same treatment under the law as others, such as Lucy Connolly. 'He should be arrested and prosecuted immediately. A failure to do so would be a clear example of two-tier justice under Sir Keir Starmer and his attorney general, Lord Hermer.' Connolly posted a message last year amid public outrage in the wake of the Southport attack, in which Axel Rudakubana stabbed three young girls to death. Sir Keir Starmer condemned Robinson-Foster's 'appalling hate speech' and warned that the BBC had questions to answer. The Prime Minister told The Telegraph that the corporation urgently 'needed to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast'. The corporation is under growing scrutiny over why the performance was streamed unedited in the first place and why, when the offensive chants began, it failed to cut the feed or bleep any offensive language. Vylan responded to the controversy in an Instagram post on Sunday saying that it is important to 'encourage and inspire future generations to pick up the torch that was passed to us.' 'Let us display to them loudly and visibly the right thing to do when we want and need change,' he wrote. 'Let them see us marching on the streets, campaigning on the ground level, organising online and shouting about it on any and every stage that we are offered.'

The Future of AI: Sam Altman's Controversial Roadmap Explained
The Future of AI: Sam Altman's Controversial Roadmap Explained

Geeky Gadgets

time22 minutes ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

The Future of AI: Sam Altman's Controversial Roadmap Explained

What if the future of humanity was being quietly rewritten, not in a distant lab, but in the mind of one visionary? Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, has just unveiled a bold roadmap for artificial intelligence that could redefine everything we know about technology, society, and even ourselves. His concept of a 'gentle singularity' challenges the apocalyptic narratives often tied to AI, offering instead a measured, fantastic evolution. Imagine a world where AI doesn't just assist but fundamentally reshapes how we think, work, and live—an era where machines surpass human intelligence yet remain aligned with our values. Altman's vision is as ambitious as it is controversial, sparking debates about whether we're ready for the profound changes on the horizon. In this insider perspective, AI Grid explore the milestones Altman has laid out, from AI systems solving real-world problems by 2026 to speculative breakthroughs like brain-computer interfaces by 2035. You'll gain insight into the ethical dilemmas, societal shifts, and technological marvels that could define the next decade. But Altman's vision isn't without its critics—some question the feasibility of his timeline, while others warn of the risks tied to AI's rapid acceleration. Whether you view his predictions as inspiring or unsettling, one thing is certain: the future of AI is closer than you think, and it's unfolding in ways that demand our attention. Sam Altman's AI Vision TL;DR Key Takeaways : Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, envisions a 'gentle singularity,' where AI evolves gradually, focusing on advancements in artificial general intelligence (AGI), superintelligence, and robotics, with an emphasis on ethical and responsible development. Key AI milestones include AI agents performing complex tasks by 2025, autonomous robots by 2027, and speculative advancements like brain-computer interfaces and space colonization by 2035. Challenges in AI development include the alignment problem, making sure AI systems align with human values, and addressing risks through robust safety measures and ethical oversight. Critics question the feasibility of Altman's ambitious timelines, warn against technological hype, and express concerns over OpenAI's shift toward a profit-driven model and potential monopolistic control. AI's societal implications include transforming labor markets, governance, and human-AI integration, while raising ethical concerns about regulation, bias, fairness, and power dynamics. What Is the Singularity? The singularity, as defined by Altman, represents the point at which AI surpasses human intelligence and begins to improve itself autonomously. He suggests that humanity is already entering what he calls a 'gentle singularity,' a gradual and incremental phase of AI evolution. This phase is characterized by steady advancements rather than abrupt, disruptive changes. OpenAI has shifted its focus from AGI to superintelligence—AI systems capable of outperforming humans in reasoning, memory, and knowledge. This shift reflects the organization's belief in AI's potential to fundamentally reshape society and redefine human capabilities. Altman's concept of the singularity emphasizes the fantastic potential of AI while acknowledging the need for a measured and ethical approach. By framing this evolution as 'gentle,' he underscores the importance of managing the transition responsibly to mitigate risks and maximize benefits. Key Milestones in AI Development Altman has outlined a timeline of anticipated breakthroughs, providing a glimpse into the future trajectory of AI. These milestones highlight the rapid pace of innovation and the potential for AI to transform various industries and aspects of daily life. 2025: AI agents capable of performing complex cognitive tasks, such as writing code, generating creative content, and assisting in decision-making processes. AI agents capable of performing complex cognitive tasks, such as writing code, generating creative content, and assisting in decision-making processes. 2026: Systems designed to produce novel insights and solve intricate real-world problems, ranging from scientific research to urban planning. Systems designed to produce novel insights and solve intricate real-world problems, ranging from scientific research to urban planning. 2027: Autonomous robots capable of executing practical tasks, with the potential to transform industries like manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare. Autonomous robots capable of executing practical tasks, with the potential to transform industries like manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare. 2030s: A decade marked by advancements in intelligence, energy efficiency, and innovation, leading to increased productivity and economic growth. A decade marked by advancements in intelligence, energy efficiency, and innovation, leading to increased productivity and economic growth. 2035: Speculative developments in areas such as space colonization, brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), and deeper integration between humans and AI systems. These milestones reflect Altman's confidence in AI's rapid acceleration. However, they also invite scrutiny regarding their feasibility and the broader implications for society. While the timeline is ambitious, it serves as a framework for understanding the potential trajectory of AI development. Sam Altman Just Revealed The Future Of AI Dive deeper into Artificial Intelligence (AI) with other articles and guides we have written below. Challenges in AI Development The journey toward advanced AI is not without significant challenges. One of the most critical issues is the alignment problem—making sure that AI systems act in ways that align with human values and intentions. Altman has emphasized the importance of robust safety measures and ethical oversight to address this concern. He advocates for a proactive approach to managing risks, including the development of frameworks to guide AI behavior and decision-making. Critics, however, caution against overly optimistic timelines and warn of the potential for public disillusionment if breakthroughs fail to materialize as predicted. OpenAI itself has faced scrutiny over its transparency and governance. Some observers question whether the organization has strayed from its original mission of openness and public benefit, particularly as it adopts a more profit-driven model. The alignment problem is further complicated by the inherent unpredictability of AI systems as they become more advanced. Making sure that these systems remain safe, reliable, and aligned with human interests will require ongoing research, collaboration, and vigilance. Criticism and Debate Altman's vision has ignited debate among AI researchers, ethicists, and industry leaders. Critics argue that his predictions may overestimate AI's current capabilities and rely too heavily on speculative assumptions about its future potential. Prominent figures, such as Gary Marcus, have expressed concerns about the dangers of technological hype, drawing parallels to past instances where ambitious forecasts failed to deliver. Additionally, OpenAI's shift toward a profit-oriented model has raised questions about its ability to address ethical challenges effectively. Critics worry that prioritizing commercial interests could undermine efforts to ensure equitable access to AI's benefits and mitigate potential risks. The concentration of power among a few organizations, including OpenAI, has also been a point of contention, with some warning of the societal risks posed by monopolistic control over fantastic technologies. Despite these criticisms, Altman's vision continues to inspire discussions about the future of AI and its role in shaping the world. The debates surrounding his predictions highlight the need for a balanced approach that considers both the opportunities and risks associated with AI development. Societal Implications The societal implications of AI, as envisioned by Altman, are profound and far-reaching. From transforming labor markets to reshaping governance, AI has the potential to redefine human interactions with technology and influence nearly every aspect of modern life. However, these changes bring ethical dilemmas and practical challenges that must be addressed to ensure a positive outcome. Regulation: Developing fair and effective regulatory frameworks to govern AI systems and prevent misuse. Developing fair and effective regulatory frameworks to govern AI systems and prevent misuse. Bias and Fairness: Addressing biases embedded in AI algorithms to promote equity and inclusivity. Addressing biases embedded in AI algorithms to promote equity and inclusivity. Power Dynamics: Preventing the concentration of power among a few organizations and making sure widespread access to AI's benefits. Altman has also highlighted the potential for human-AI integration through technologies like brain-computer interfaces. These innovations could enhance collaboration between humans and machines, allowing new forms of creativity and problem-solving. However, they also raise concerns about privacy, autonomy, and the ethical implications of merging biological and artificial intelligence. As AI continues to evolve, its societal impact will depend on how these challenges are addressed. The decisions made today will shape the trajectory of AI development and its role in the future of humanity. Media Credit: TheAIGRID Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy

GB News expansion aims to bring Brits ‘closer to US politics'
GB News expansion aims to bring Brits ‘closer to US politics'

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

GB News expansion aims to bring Brits ‘closer to US politics'

GB News is expanding its operations into the United States with the launch of a new live nightly programme. The two-hour show, hosted by Bev Turner, is scheduled to begin in September and will broadcast from a studio close to the White House in Washington DC. As part of this transatlantic venture, GB News will establish a new bureau in Washington DC and make its content freely available to American audiences. The programme aims to bring British audiences closer to US political news, offering headline-making exclusives, interviews, and in-depth analysis of the Trump presidency. GB News emphasises this expansion as a significant investment in live, free coverage, intending to bridge the gap between British and American politics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store