Occupied Territories Bill ‘blatant anti-Semitism', says influential US senator
US Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Senator Jim Risch said the Occupied Territories Bill 'will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering' for the State.
Writing on X, the veteran Republican senator who represents Idaho, said: 'Ireland, while often a valuable US partner, is on a hateful, antisemitic path that will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering.
Ireland, while often a valuable U.S. partner, is on a hateful, antisemitic path that will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering. If this legislation is implemented, America will have to seriously reconsider its deep and ongoing economic ties. We will always stand up to…
— Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman (@SenateForeign)
'If this legislation is implemented, America will have to seriously reconsider its deep and ongoing economic ties. We will always stand up to blatant antisemitism.'
READ MORE
Senator Risch linked to an article in the Jerusalem Post, which stated that the Republic is the first country in Europe to introduce legislation to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Senator Risch previously raised the issue of the State's relationship with Israel in his role as committee chairman.
Speaking at the confirmation hearings for US president Donald Trump's new ambassador to the Republic, Ed Walsh, in May, Senator Risch said it was 'heartbreaking to see the mistake that the Irish are making regarding the Jewish state and Hamas'.
'It's heartbreaking with zero recognition of what Hamas did on October 7th. I truly hope, Mr Walsh, that this is going to be a tough needle to thread when you got a close ally making a mistake, but you have got to thread that needle.'
Senator Risch told Mr Walsh to convey a message to the Republic that the State is 'very much out of step with the United States as far as their relationship with those countries in the Middle East'.
Mr Walsh said he was looking at getting a detailed brief on the issues relating to this.
'President Trump has been very clear that Ireland is an ally and there is no room for anti-Semitism across the world,' said Mr Walsh, who was confirmed as ambassador this week.
'It will be a big part of my conversations with them. I hear you. I do understand the issue.'
Reacting to Senator Risch's X post, former Republic of Ireland ambassador to the United States Daniel Mulhall said he was sceptical that the Occupied Territories Bill can work, 'but I do not see it as an expression of anti-Semitism. Its roots lie in a genuine sympathy for the plight of Palestinians rather than in any antipathy towards Israelis.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
US threatens EU with 17% tariff on food exports
The US has threatened to hit EU agricultural exports with 17 per cent tariffs in a twist to its trade conflict with Brussels, three people briefed on the discussions said. Such tariffs would hit everything from Kerrygold butter to Belgian chocolate and olive oil from the Continent, all of which are big sellers in the US. The eleventh-hour move, which EU officials characterised as an escalation of the transatlantic dispute, came ahead of a July 9th deadline to agree a deal between the two trading giants. US president Donald Trump imposed a 20 per cent 'reciprocal' tariff in April but reduced it to 10 per cent until July 9th to allow for talks. Until recent days, EU officials had been expecting that talks with the US would hold duties at the baseline rate. It was unclear if the 17 per cent on foodstuffs would be in addition to the other tariffs announced by Mr Trump or instead of them. Mr Trump has demanded that Brussels give American companies wide-ranging exemptions from regulations and cut its trade surplus with the US, but EU officials have rejected Washington's latest proposals on any such exemptions and food tariffs. [ Is Big Pharma lobby shielding Ireland from the worst of US tariffs? Opens in new window ] The EU is trying to secure its own carveouts for some products. One Brussels official said aircraft parts and spirits are among goods for which the bloc is seeking exclusions. They said that the two sides were working on a five-page draft 'agreement in principle', but this has very little agreed-upon text in it. Ursula von der Leyen , the European Commission president, said on Thursday that she hoped for an agreement in principle that would allow the sides to keep talking pending a final deal. However, Washington is pushing countries to agree binding deals by Mr Trump's deadline. Maroš Šefčovič, the EU trade commissioner, was warned of the proposed 17 per cent duties on agri-food on Thursday during meetings in Washington. The 27 member state ambassadors were informed on Friday. The value of EU agri-food exports to the US, including products such as wine, totalled €48 billion last year. Mr Šefčovič has repeatedly characterised the changing of EU regulations to suit the US as a red line. However, the EU is also on a deregulatory drive, weakening some environmental laws. EU countries are divided between accepting some higher tariffs in return for a period of certainty and those who wish to retaliate to put pressure on the US to compromise. Friedrich Merz, chancellor of Germany, the EU's biggest and most export-dependent economy, has been pressing the commission, which runs trade policy, to settle for a quick deal. He is anxious for exemptions from Mr Trump's sectoral tariffs of 25 per cent on vehicles and 50 per cent on steel. However, several ambassadors intervened in Friday's meeting to press for stronger action against Washington, said two people briefed on the meeting. Two EU diplomats said they had been told that the US had sketched out three scenarios for July 9th: Countries with an 'agreement in principle' would keep the 10 per cent tariffs, with possible further tariff relief at a later stage; for countries that failed to reach such an agreement, the tariffs would return to the level announced in April until a deal was struck; higher tariffs would be applied to countries that the US believes are not negotiating in good faith. As the EU prepares its possible retaliation for US duties on its products, member states have already approved counter-tariffs on €21 billion of annual US exports from July 14th. The commission is assembling a package of €95 billion more, including on aircraft and food. A commission representative said: 'The EU position has been clear from the outset: we favour a negotiated solution with the US, and this remains our priority ... At the same time, we are preparing for the possibility that no satisfactory agreement is reached.' The White House has yet to respond to a request for comment. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
After the Train: Irishwomen united – a book to be passed down the generations, with future cultural insurgency in mind
After the Train: Irishwomen United and a Network of Change Author : Evelyn Conlon and Rebecca Pelan editors ISBN-13 : 978-1068502309 Publisher : UCD Press Guideline Price : €30 From 1975 to 1977, Irishwomen United (IWU) – and the culture of change it generated – radically fed into the emancipation of Irish society that led to 2018's referendum to lift the constitutional abortion ban. In their deeds and words, IWU threw off much of the misogynistic, theocratic, social and mind control that was so oppressively exerted from 1922 with the formation of the postcolonial Irish 'Free' State. 'Lest they forget,' and as a blueprint for ongoing social justice transformation, After the Train has been durably designed and produced to weather many decades of reading and rereading: to be passed from hand to hand, and down the generations, with future cultural insurgency in mind. The 'train' of the title refers to the Irish Women's Liberation Movement 1971 stunt of bringing contraceptives from Belfast to Dublin's Connolly Station; a spark of civil disobedience which the IWU took up again in 1976 with its aptly named CAP (Contraception Action Programme). CAP openly and illegally distributed contraception, enacting the principle that women's control of their own fertility is the bedrock of female equality. Reading how inferior women's social and legal status was in Ireland in the early 1970s compared to now demonstrates the far-reaching impact of IWU and its cultural offshoots. Contributor Anne Speed writes: 'A wife was officially the property of her husband; rape was legal in marriage; contraceptives were banned since 1935; divorce was unconstitutional; a woman could not sit on juries; by law, children's allowances were paid to the husband, and it was legal to pay women less than men for the same job.' READ MORE IWU seized the narrative through the development of feminist publishing; set up organisations to tackle rape, the abortion ban and the plight of single mothers; and lobbied powerfully to affect equality through law reform and the trade union movement. [ From the archive: A history of Irish women in 50 objects Opens in new window ] Here's reader testimony to the revolutionary power of this skilfully edited collection: as the mother of a disabled adult son, I'm at the coalface of human rights travesties that have barely begun to be recognised as such by wider Irish society. My desire for disabled people's self-determination, inclusion and equality, and my understanding of how these might be achieved, feel turbocharged with After the Train on my shelf and in my heart.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Will the Government really put McDonald's ahead of children in poverty?
With billions flowing into the Government's coffers from our corporation tax bonanza, there were some big winners from last year's pre-election budget. Among the biggest were the children of wealthy parents. While CSO statistics show that an average person receives about €100,000 in gifts or inheritances from their parents over a lifetime, Budget 2025 announced a €25,000 tax cut for the tiny fraction who receive more than €400,000. Such giveaways contrast sharply with below-inflation increases to most social welfare payments over recent years. This has left core rates of payments worth less today than they were in January 2020: a remarkable situation given the strength of economic growth and the tens of billions in new spending announced. These real-terms cuts have contributed to stagnating incomes for the poorest households as well as stubbornly persistent levels of child poverty. READ MORE Research published by the ESRI in partnership with Community Foundation Ireland has shown that 250,000 children live in households below the poverty line after accounting for housing costs: more than one in five children. A wealth of evidence shows this has enormous economic and social costs , with a lack of adequate resources compromising the ability of children to grow and thrive, even in adulthood. The importance of reducing child poverty has been recognised by successive governments, with ambitious targets set out in various plans, strategies and roadmaps since 1997. However, we have seen no real progress for the best part of two decades. Shockingly, the share of children below the poverty line after housing costs is no lower than during the worst years of the financial crisis. The reason child poverty persists is that whenever the opportunity comes to translate words into action there is always some higher priority. This year that higher priority looks to be the hospitality sector, which has engaged in a sustained, well-funded lobbying campaign for even more preferential VAT treatment than it currently enjoys. VAT is currently levied on accommodation, catering and restaurant services at a reduced rate of 13.5 per cent, compared with the standard rate of 23 per cent. Estimates by Revenue suggest this amounts to a tax relief of almost €2 billion per year. Cutting the rate further to 9 per cent would cost more than €800 million more a year, sucking up most of the space available for new measures in the forthcoming budget. This is despite the fact the sector is – by any objective measure – doing well. CSO data shows that hospitality employment was 7 per cent higher in the first quarter of 2025 than a year earlier, while figures from the Companies Registration Office show there were 11 new companies incorporated for every liquidation in the sector. Even if the sector were struggling, a VAT cut makes little economic sense. Rather than supporting struggling small restaurants or cafes, the biggest beneficiaries would be large operators with the highest turnover. On what grounds can a multimillion-euro tax cut for outlets such as McDonald's possibly be justified? Yet the Tánaiste's recent elevation of this expensive and economically illiterate tax cut to a 'solemn commitment' would seem to place it ahead of all other promises in the programme for government. This includes a pledge to 'lift more children out of poverty, giving them the futures they deserve'. Doing so would have immense benefits, but unavoidably requires spending money. The most effective way of spending this money is to introduce a second-tier of child benefit. This would leave the current universal child benefit payment as it stands but give an additional amount to lower-income families with children, replacing the inadequate patchwork of existing supports. Recent estimates from the ESRI suggest such a reform would reduce child poverty by more than a quarter. This amounts to lifting more than 50,000 children out of poverty at a cost of €772 million. While substantial, this cost is about a quarter of achieving the same reduction by increasing the universal child benefit payment. Strikingly, it is also less than that of the planned cut to VAT for the hospitality sector. This is the reason a second tier of child benefit has been called for since 2007 by a range of expert bodies, including the last government's Commission on Taxation and Welfare (which I was part of). A second tier of child benefit would mirror reforms implemented in the UK over the 2000s by then chancellor Gordon Brown. Writing in these pages last year, he described the approach as a 'progressive universalism' that ensures 'a floor of basic social rights for all, but with more support for those who need it most'. When Brown gave a keynote address to the Irish Government's inaugural Child Poverty Summit last year, he was introduced by then taoiseach Simon Harris, who declared that 'ending child poverty is a defining challenge for any leader' . After 20 years without progress in reducing – let alone ending – child poverty, it is a challenge our leaders are failing. Whether that failure defines their legacies depends on the decisions they take in the coming budgets. Dr Barra Roantree is director of the MSc in economic policy at Trinity College Dublin
