In search of Labour's ‘working people' – the paradox at the heart of Keir Starmer's first year in power
The document mentioned 'working people' a total of 21 times. It was clear this demographic had been identified as the key target beneficiary of 'securonomics', otherwise referred to as 'the plan for change'.
But there is a paradox at the heart of the proposal to deliver 'change' to 'working people' – one that helps explain the chaos of Labour's first year in government. By obsessively pitting this demographic against 'non-working people', Labour is in fact not promising any real change at all.
Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.
One of the key premises of Labour's securonomics is that growth must precede any significant investment. 'Working people's' priorities are therefore presented as being in line with that of a fiscally responsible state.
In the autumn budget, there was a pledge to 'fix the foundations of the economy and deliver change by protecting working people'. To do this, the chancellor needed to fix a 'black hole' of £22 billion in government finances.
The refusal to lift the two-child benefit cap, alongside 'reforming the state to ensure […] welfare spending is targeted towards those that need it the most', was framed as 'putting more money in working people's pockets'. There has, meanwhile, been a continued emphasis on encouraging those on benefits back to work.
Want more politics coverage from academic experts? Every week, we bring you informed analysis of developments in government and fact check the claims being made.Sign up for our weekly , delivered every Friday.
Besides the clear deepening of inequality wrought by similar reforms in the past, welfare cuts make no sense on an economic or societal level. They undermine the economy, and the consequences put additional pressure on already underfunded social services.
As highlighted by the Office of Budgetary Responsibility (OBR), such cuts fail to deliver the promised behavioural change to force people into work. People instead become more focused on day-to-day survival.
Despite the government's last ditch climbdown to save its flagship welfare reform policy its cuts are still forecast to push more than 150,000 people into poverty
Such reforms carried out in the name of 'working people' perpetuate a pernicious myth of us v them. Not only are people in work also affected by these cuts but people's lives – including their jobs, income, family situations, and health – shift regularly, making the 'strivers v skivers' divide both simplistic and inaccurate.
Even 'secure borders' and 'smashing the criminal gangs' were positioned as 'grown up politics back in the service of working people'. This association of working people with anti-immigrant attitudes links to a broader homogenisation of 'working people' as both 'patriotic' and in search of 'security'. 'Fixing the foundations' has been depicted in several social media posts as a patriotic act via use of the Union Jack.
Meanwhile, stage-managed photoshoots of Starmer in factories with people wearing hard hats and hi-visibility jackets give a clear impression of the types of manufacturing jobs the government believes 'working people' carry out. This gives an impressions that belies the reality of modern Britain – and an economy that is dominated by the service sector,, not manufacturing or building.
While Starmer framed his 'plan for change' as a break with previous administrations, his 'working people' narrative betrays this claim as anything but.
The idea that the deserving 'working people' are different and separate from people who don't (or can't) work has been deployed by government after government to justify austerity and cuts to services. It has always been useful to separate the 'scroungers from the strivers' and there is no sign of Labour changing course.
The term 'working people' also builds on a previous trope of the 'hard-working family'.
While initially coined by New Labour, this term has roots in Margaret Thatcher's idea of the family, rather than the state, as the locus of welfare. It was not for the state to take care of you but your own kin.
Like 'working people' now, 'hard-working families' were those who played by the rules and knuckled down to earn a living. Previous Conservative administrations have depicted 'hard-working families' as burdened by the unemployed, the poor, the sick and disabled and immigrants.
Add to this, the signalling continues to imply that the 'authentic' working class of Britain are solely white – sometimes also male – and typically older, manual labourers, who are assumed to hold socially conservative views. This is another divide-and-rule trope which neglects the reality of the multiracial and multiethnic composition of the working classes.
In light of all this, any real 'change' promised in Labour's manifesto has been betrayed by a continuity with tired and damaging tropes of deserving and undeserving people. This is contributing to the sense, a year in, that this Labour government is merely repeating past government failures rather than striking out in a new direction.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
George Newth works for University of Bath and is a member of the Green Party
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is BP p.l.c. (BP) a Good Option for Passive Income Investment?
BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) is included among the 12 Best Oil and Gas Dividend Stocks to Buy Now. An oil rig surrounded by the expanse of sea, the pumping operations in progress. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) expects the total of its dividends and share buybacks over time to be around 30% to 40% of operating cash flow. The company is targeting an increase of at least 4% per year in its ordinary dividend and announced a dividend of $0.08 per share in April. As of the writing of this piece, BP boasts an impressive annual dividend yield of 6.13%. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) also announced $750 million of share repurchases at the end of the first quarter of 2025, and the $1.75 billion share buyback program it announced with the fourth quarter results was completed on April 25, 2025. To help improve its profitability, BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) has revealed that it is working on a $4 billion – $5 billion cost reduction program. The company delivered $800 million of structural cost reductions and $300 million of absolute reductions last year. Moreover, it was already $500 million lower in terms of absolute cost base in Q1 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) is a British multinational company recognized worldwide for quality gasoline, transport fuels, chemicals, and alternative sources of energy such as wind and biofuels. While we acknowledge the potential of BP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Best Nuclear Energy Stocks to Buy Right Now and The 5 Energy Stocks Billionaires are Quietly Piling Into. Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer clashes with senior MP over welfare reform
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer clashed with one of his senior MPs over welfare reform as she said she felt 'ashamed' of the 'poor' legislation the Government had put forward. Work and pensions committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams said the welfare bill was 'far removed' from Labour values as she questioned the Prime Minister at the Liaison Committee. She asked Sir Keir what he would like to say to the disabled people who experienced 'fear and anxiety' before the Government made concessions on its bill. 'Well, it's very important that they feel secure and supported, and that is at the heart of what we are doing in the changes we are making to welfare and related areas,' he said. Sir Keir said he did not accept that it would take several years before labour market changes allow more disabled people to be employed following Sir Charlie Mayfield's review, due in the autumn. Mrs Abrahams asked what he would do to mitigate against a potential 50,000 newly disabled people being pushed into poverty. Sir Keir said: 'I don't accept that everything is going to take years. Some changes do take years, but not all changes take years, and we have to do work in the interim to give that support to those with disabilities.' Mrs Abrahams said she felt 'ashamed' of the 'poor' welfare legislation the Government put forward. 'This was poor legislation. It was designed to save money for the Treasury by cutting support to sick and disabled people. 'It was so far removed from Labour values of fairness and social justice, let alone compassion and common decency. 'I have to say I felt ashamed.' After a year in office, Sir Keir was asked what he wanted the UK to look like at the end of his first term in No 10. He said: 'I want people to feel better off and there has to be a central focus on living standards. 'I want them to feel – as they will – that the health service is working much better, is there for them and their families in a way that it hasn't been for many years. 'And I want them to feel safe and secure, both in their immediate neighbourhood and as a country, both our borders and national security and defence. 'So, they're the three things that I'm focused on more than anything else.' Sir Keir's drive to improve the NHS could be derailed if resident doctors in England go ahead with strike action, which is due to begin on Friday. The Tory government faced waves of strike action in the NHS, which contributed to care backlogs. The Prime Minister has put international co-operation, including a promised one-in, one-out deal to return small boat migrants to France, at the heart of measures to control the borders. But arrivals are running at record levels for this point in a year, with the latest Home Office showing 23,534 people had crossed in small boats so far in 2025. The Liaison Committee, a panel made up of senior MPs who chair the various Commons select committees, was focusing on measures to tackle poverty. The Prime Minister, who is under pressure from within his own party to scrap the two-child benefits cap, said: 'People will not feel better-off or safe and secure if we haven't tackled poverty.' He said there were four 'limbs' to the Government's strategy: increasing incomes, decreasing costs, strengthening local support, including measures to get people into work and boosting financial resilience. 'I'm very proud of the fact that the last Labour government drove down poverty and I'm determined this Government is going to as well,' Sir Keir said.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From Arena to Lumia: Is the UK asset finance industry turning the tide on fraud?
The collapse of Arena Television in late 2021 remains one of the most sobering episodes in recent UK asset finance history. Arena Television's absconded directors and lessors' missing millions What appeared to be a thriving broadcast business was, in reality, a meticulously orchestrated fraud. Dozens of lenders, more than 50, by some counts, were exposed to a web of falsified documents, phantom equipment, and duplicated finance agreements. The aftermath was devastating and made painfully clear that the industry lacked a way to see the full picture. In the wake of Arena, the industry faced a reckoning. How had so many institutions, with supposedly strong risk mitigation frameworks, failed to detect what was ultimately a shared vulnerability? The answer: a systemic lack of visibility. Traditional tools, credit reference agencies, internal fraud checks, Companies House data, couldn't provide a cross-lender view of live agreements. The result was a perfect storm for coordinated fraud. Had the asset finance industry's long-standing reluctance to share information been exploited by Arena's absconded directors? It certainly seemed that way. Fraud prevention after Arena Television: will anything change? Out of that crisis came Acquis Lumia, launched in 2022 by Acquis Data Services, a division of Acquis Insurance Management Ltd. Lumia offered the industry what it never had before: a collaborative platform where asset finance providers share key data points from active agreements, anonymised and aggregated into a central register. It's a simple but powerful concept, compare new applications against a wider market dataset to spot red flags in real time. Under the Acquis Lumia platform, each participating lender submits a monthly file containing seven key data fields for every active asset finance agreement. The data includes the agreement number, a unique identifier for each finance deal, and the lessor ID, which indicates the submitting lender. It also captures the start and expiry dates of the agreement, providing insight into the duration and overlap of borrowing arrangements. To identify the borrower, the company registration number is submitted, along with the lessee company name, which is anonymised before being stored in the central register. Finally, the net book value of the asset, its current value on the lender's books is recorded, giving a financial reference point for the agreement. And now, with Grenke announced as Lumia's 40th member, the platform's growth is difficult to ignore. It includes major banks like Lombard, BNP Paribas, and HSBC Equipment Finance, as well as independents like Liberty Leasing. The pace of adoption points to a sector that no longer sees collaboration as a compromise, but as a necessity. There are signs it may be working. According to GBG data, cited in the Cifas Fraudscape 2025 report, identity fraud in the asset finance sector has dropped more than 80% in the past year alone, from 7,837 cases in 2023 to just 1,560 in 2024. It's the sharpest decline of any sector. The report cites 'targeted anti-fraud measures' as a key factor. Could Lumia be among them? It's a compelling possibility. To be clear, Lumia isn't a silver bullet. The fraud landscape continues to evolve, with increasingly sophisticated threats targeting even the most robust lenders. Also, Acquis is not alone in seeking an industry-wide solution in the UK. But Lumia does represent a fundamental shift, from isolated risk management to shared intelligence. With Grenke now on board and the platform reaching its 40-member milestone, this moment feels like a turning point. Is it confirmation that the fraudsters are losing ground? More likely, it is that it is too soon to tell. But for the first time in years, the asset finance sector has a tool built not just to react to fraud, but to anticipate it. And that might just make all the difference. "From Arena to Lumia: Is the UK asset finance industry turning the tide on fraud?" was originally created and published by Leasing Life, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
