logo
Why Ram had to revive its legendary Hemi V-8 engine

Why Ram had to revive its legendary Hemi V-8 engine

CNBC3 days ago
American pickup truck buyers are having some trouble adjusting to a new age of tightening emissions requirements and electrification.
Stellantis — the parent company of brands like Ram Trucks, Jeep and Dodge — has been hit especially hard.
The company briefly removed its popular gas-powered Hemi V-8 engine from much of its lineup, including from the Dodge Challenger and Charger, and the Ram 1500 half-ton pickup. Ram fans revolted.
In an effort to revive the brand, recently installed CEO Antonio Filosa rehired company veteran Tim Kuniskis to run Ram. Kuniskis is also overseeing all the North American brands, including the reformed in-house performance shop Street and Racing Technology, or SRT.
One of Kuniskis's first moves has been bringing the V-8 back to the 1500 pickup truck.
Ram Truck sales had dropped every quarter since the company switched the engine in the 1500 to an inline-six-cylinder called the Hurricane.
The Jeep and Ram brands are especially important to Stellantis. RBC Capital has estimated that about 50% of the automaker's profits come from those two brands.
Kuniskis said dropping the Hemi would lose Ram at least 30,000 truck sales every year.
"With loyalty running in 75% to 80% in the truck segment, you don't want to lose any of those customers," he said.
Ed Kim, President and chief analyst at AutoPacific, a company that surveys car owners, said he had driven a vehicle with the new Hurricane engine.
"It's a very nice engine," Kim said. "It's very refined. It's very smooth. On paper it's better in every way — well, better in many ways."
But the Hemi had a certain brand name and reputation among Ram owners the Hurricane could not replace, he said.
"Everybody, even if you don't know what Hemi is, you know, the term," Kuniskis said. "'Oh, it's got a Hemi.'"
The decision to go "greener" — or use smaller engines and invest in electric vehicles — kicked into high gear when the Euro-American Fiat-Chrysler merged with France's Groupe PSA in 2019. PSA CEO Carlos Tavares took the helm of the newly formed Stellantis.
Some of those changes alienated fans.
"The wrong people were trying to guide America, American enthusiasts, in a direction they did not want to go and still don't want to go," said Mike Gresham, director of recruiting for Central Texas Mopars, a car club dedicated to cars in what is commonly considered the Chrysler or Mopar family of brands — Jeep, Dodge, Chrysler, and Ram, along with defunct brands like Plymouth.
"Americans associate truck performance with V-8 engines and Ram in particular," Kim said. "The Ram customer in particular, really, really, really loves the idea of having that big American V-8 under the hood."
Kuniskis expects about 40% of Ram buyers sooner or later to settle on the Hemi engine.
That's a lot higher than the Ford-150 V-8 take rate of about 25%, but slightly lower than General Motors — which Kuniskis attributed to the fact that, apart from a diesel, GM offers a choice of two V-8s or a four-cylinder.
Ford F-150 buyers can swap in a V-8 for free on most versions of the truck. Ram buyers have to pay an extra $1,200 unless they get the high-end Limited or Longhorn trims.
Kuniskis said he thinks a lot of people will choose the Hemi anyway.
"Hemi is not really just a V-8. It's kind of a brand in and of itself. It's become a thing," he said.
Watch the video to learn more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why so many companies are trying to become banks
Why so many companies are trying to become banks

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why so many companies are trying to become banks

Several companies, including General Motors (GM), Stellantis (STLA), and Circle (CRCL), are starting to apply for US banking charters, a move that actual banks are not happy about. Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter David Hollerith joins Market Catalysts with Julie Hyman to report the details. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Several companies that are not in the banking business are suddenly applying for new US banking charters, including General Motors, the Lantis and Circle. They aren't looking to become full service banks though. Joining me now to explain, banking reporter David Haller. So what's going on? Why are these companies doing this? Yeah, well, so, uh, the most obvious answer is with the Trump administration, which has signaled and begun begun making kind of a broader deregulatory push in financial services. Um, there have been a lot more, uh, charter applications. And the interesting thing is that, uh, non-bank companies wanting to get bank charters isn't exactly a new thing, but, you know, all these new charters kind of signals that they see a higher chance of getting approval, um, with the Trump administration now in power. And the other side of this too is we just had this stable coin bill that passed. And so a lot of the crypto firms, um, that issue stable coins will now be regulated by, uh, the OCC, a federal bank regulator. So they are kind of seeing this as also like a way to get credibility, check the box with the bill. And also too banks will now begin to, um, issue stable coins. We are imagining. That's what some banks have have signaled. We'll kind of see how that plays out. And if these firms want to compete against them, there's sort of a credibility edge that they kind of need to with institutional clients to have a bank charter. So, um, kind of two separate, uh, themes here with like commercial companies trying to do it. It's interesting to see to see the all of those melding of the lines between the the organizations. But okay, so what what does a bank charter do for a company? For example, like a General Motors, what would it be able to do with a bank charter? Yeah, so that's the other thing is that we're mainly seeing these new companies apply for two kind of, I guess you would call them novel bank charters. They're not looking to become full-service banks. So what they want to do is they want to either go for the FDIC's Industrial Loan Charter, which is kind of what these automakers are looking at. And then also all the stable coin companies are looking at the National Trust Bank Charter. So they're not trying to do, um, effectively the same level regulation that, um, bigger banks have to do. And so a lot of the banking industry is actually kind of upset about this. Interesting. Why are they upset about this? Just more competition? Yeah, it's more competition and in some ways they feel like, uh, this is an attempt by, you know, non-bank companies to sort of, uh, do a little bit of regulatory arbitrage. Um, and so we kind of have to see how that plays out. And obviously just by having these, uh, more novel charters, it's not really a bad thing in itself, at least, um, they've argued. Um, but, you know, we have to see if whether or not they can still kind of do the same things as other banks. And so that's kind of been the whole trend here. And it's kind of around more competition in general, which could be good for consumers obviously. And we'll see if the regulators successfully regulate this stuff too, I guess, is another part of the question. Anyway, really interesting story, Dave. Thank you so much for bringing it to us. Appreciate it. Related Videos Mag 7 earnings: Why Alphabet is the 'bigger story' — not Tesla Travel stock earnings: What to watch for Markets are 'getting close' to being priced to perfection Navitas skyrockets, Dollar Tree upgraded, Sarepta & FDA Sign in to access your portfolio

US tariffs, laws push Jeep owner Stellantis into 2.3-bn-euro first-half net loss
US tariffs, laws push Jeep owner Stellantis into 2.3-bn-euro first-half net loss

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

US tariffs, laws push Jeep owner Stellantis into 2.3-bn-euro first-half net loss

Jeep owner Stellantis said on Monday it suffered a massive loss in the first half of the year, when it felt the first impact of new US tariffs and took a massive charge following a change in US laws. The 2.3-billion-euro ($2.7-billion) net loss in the first half of the year came as sales in North America continued to slump, down 25 percent by volume in the second quarter year-on-year. The carmaker, whose stable of brands also includes Peugeot, Citroen and Fiat, said first-half net revenues dropped 12.6 percent to 74.3 billion euros, according to the preliminary and unaudited results. Sales of vehicles fell by six percent in the second quarter year-on-year, after having dropped nine percent in the first three months of 2025. Stellantis said "the early effects of US tariffs" had a 300-million-euro negative impact and disrupted its plans to respond to its struggling performance in North America. Automakers have struggled to respond to a new US tariff of 25-percent on imported cars that are not largely made within North America. Stellantis fell into a net loss when it took a 3.3-billion-euro charge, which it said was "primarily related to programme cancellation costs and platform impairments, net impact of the recent legislation eliminating the CAFE penalty rate and restructuring". US President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending legislation, approved earlier this month, removed the penalties for not respecting the so-called CAFE fuel economy targets, meaning automakers can produce and sell more higher polluting cars in the United States. Stellantis suspended its financial guidance in April due to the heightened uncertainty generated by US tariffs. The company said it was in the early stage of taking action to improve performance and profitability, with new products expected to deliver a larger impact in the second half of 2025. Shares in Stellantis fell more than two percent as trading got underway on the Paris stock exchange. Stellantis said it would release audited first half results on July 29 as scheduled. eg-fmp/rl/gil Sign in to access your portfolio

Russia sticking to its war demands amid Trump sanctions threat
Russia sticking to its war demands amid Trump sanctions threat

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Russia sticking to its war demands amid Trump sanctions threat

The Kremlin is sticking to its war demands, even as President Trump makes new threats of sanctions if Russian President Vladimir Putin does not agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine in less than 50 days. 'Russia is ready to move swiftly. The most important thing for us is to achieve our goals. Our goals are clear, obvious, they have not changed. But the process does not depend on us alone,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said in an interview published by Russian state news agency TASS. Trump warned on July 14 that Russia had 50 days to agree to a deal, or the president said he was prepared to levy 100 percent economic sanctions targeting nations that do business with Russia. The threat came on the same day Trump announced a deal with NATO to provide weapons to Ukraine. The president has in recent weeks expressed increasing frustration with Putin as Moscow continues to fire missiles into Ukraine despite the White House's push for a ceasefire. The White House doubled down on its position in a statement responding to Peskov's recent comments. 'The brutal Russia-Ukraine War was brought on by Joe Biden's incompetence, and it has gone on for far too long,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. 'President Trump wants to stop the killing, which is why he is selling American-made weapons to NATO members and threatening Putin with biting tariffs and sanctions if he does not agree to a ceasefire,' Kelly added. Peskov also said on Monday that Putin is planning to travel to Beijing in September and didn't rule out the possibility of a meeting with Trump — should the president decide to join. The White House has not indicated any plans for Trump to travel to China at that time. 'We are preparing for a trip to Beijing,' Peskov said, according to TASS. 'It is indeed on the agenda of the head of state. But we have not heard that President Trump is going to Beijing as well.' 'If it so happens that he will also be there, it can't be ruled out that a question will come up about whether it will be reasonable to hold a meeting,' Peskov continued. The Russian president plans to travel to Beijing to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China is planning a parade on Sept. 3, one day after Trump's 50-day deadline would be due to expire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store