logo
Grief Counseling With Kermit

Grief Counseling With Kermit

Yahoo4 hours ago
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
Jim Henson's Creature Shop has sat, for the past 16 years, on the fourth floor of an office building in Long Island City, New York, behind a metal door that looks like any other. When I opened it one gray morning after the holidays, I was greeted by a plastic Christmas tree hung with fake fish skeletons and desiccated banana peels, Oscar leering nearby from his can, and a brown, fuzzy blob sitting on a table. At first I thought it might be a complete Muppet, until I saw, a few yards beyond, a matching brown, fuzzy, headless body. As the archivist Karen Falk began to lead me on a tour of the workshop—drawers of googly eyes, noses, and 'special facial hair'; filing cabinets for 'fur' and 'slippery sleezy'; a stack of banker's boxes, one marked 'Grover,' another 'Boober'—I looked back, briefly, to catch the bulbous nose and round eyes of Junior Gorg from Fraggle Rock staring at me, or perhaps at his own body, waiting to be reunited.
'There are only three Snuffleupagi in the world,' Falk told me, gesturing toward a puppet near the entrance that she said was kind of an extra, deployed when Snuffleupagus needs a family member on set next to him. I reached out to give Snuffy's relation a little pet—his soft brown fur, curly and dense like a poodle's, was overlain with orange feathers—and scribbled a note: 'remarkably lifelike.' For a what? I later asked myself. For a giant woolly mammoth cum anteater puppet? But the space made it easy to slip across the human-Muppet divide and into Henson's world, where the realness of the puppets is sacrosanct. When I asked to take a picture of the decapitated Junior Gorg, just for my notes, Falk looked at me as if I'd asked to check under Miss Piggy's dress. 'We don't allow photos of things like that, Muppets without heads,' she tutted, and ushered me to another part of the workshop, where a handful of archival boxes had been set aside for me.
After a great loss, some people find themselves communing with nature, at the seaside or deep in a forest. Others turn to spirituality, toward a temple or church. Me? I'd come to grieve with the Muppets.
My father, Marshall, amassed many accolades over the course of his career—a gold record for playing bluegrass banjo on the Deliverance soundtrack; an Oscar for co-writing the script of Annie Hall; a Tony nomination for Best Book for the musical Jersey Boys, which won Best Musical in 2006 (and an Olivier Award, too)—but way cooler to me, as a kid, was the fact that for a brief stint, long before I was born, he'd been part of Henson's crew.
For much of my life, I knew little about the specifics. I do remember one time being feverish and crying for a Kermit doll after a doctor's appointment, even though, despite Dad's involvement in the show, I can't remember ever watching any Muppets, or even Sesame Street, at home. The local toy store was all sold out, so Dad called in a favor, and we headed to the old Muppet offices on the Upper East Side to pick one up. While we were waiting, I watched, slack-jawed, as puppet makers working on a new creation pulled googly eyes out of thin drawers, one after another, a fever dream come to life and branded in my memory like a surrealist madeleine. After that, the Muppets all but receded from my life.
[Read: The secret life of grief]
That changed after my father got sick last year, when my daily life became not just a logistical mire—managing therapy appointments, speaking with doctors—but also one of constant dread: about which Dad I'd find when I walked into his room each day, his personality somehow refracted, as if I were looking at it through a prism; about whether a middle-of-the-night phone call might signify an Earth-tilting inflection point; about how devastating it was going to be to navigate the world without the beloved father I'd always looked up to.
At the end of each day, like any well-adjusted individual faced with looming, profound change, I chose to run screaming as far away from reality as I could, which is how I ended up in the arms of the 1970s Muppets. I had no grand plan. I simply gravitated toward their fluffiness and goofiness as an antidote to grief. I sensed—rightly, it turned out—that they'd help keep me afloat.
Dad and Henson first connected through Al Gottesman, Henson's longtime lawyer. Their mutual affinity makes total sense to me, even a generation later. They were born three years apart and grew up delighting in Kukla, Fran and Ollie, and Walt Kelly's Pogo comic strip. They shared an off-kilter sense of humor and a reverence for the silly. Although I can't remember ever seeing Dad with a puppet on his hand, when I was growing up he would put on elaborate bedtime shows for my sister and me, starring our menagerie of stuffed animals. Using a pair of needle-nose pliers from his tool case—a bulky, black-leather valise full of primary-colored screwdrivers I liked to play with, a relic from his days attending Brooklyn Technical High School to appease his practical immigrant father—he made pince-nez out of a paper clip for my plush dachshund, Ollirina, a feisty Southern grande dame who propelled herself around by farting (my contribution); he then had her perform miraculous acts of levitation. Dad's tried-and-true finale: shooting my Ping-Pong-ball-sized plush hedgehog through a toilet-paper-roll cannon as I drumrolled on my lap. Looking back on this now that I'm a parent of three young children, I marvel that he could summon this level of creativity after dinnertime.
For a few months in the mid-'70s, Dad helped Henson write a failed Broadway Muppets revue, and what would become the pilot of The Muppet Show, called 'Sex and Violence With the Muppets'—Henson's attempt to establish the Muppets as not just for kids. Dad is listed as head writer on the script, in which Nigel, Sam the Eagle, and a few other Muppets put together a 'Seven Deadly Sins' pageant to determine which sin is the most deadly. Although the final show evolved from the pilot—Kermit replaced Nigel as the emcee; a human guest star was added—you can see from the script that its style was already developed, as was its tone: equal parts outlandish and sophisticated, countercultural, never talking down to the audience. Sloth arrives, of course, during the closing credits, too late to participate. One stage direction reads, simply, 'Chaos in progress.' The script established the framework with which Henson would go on to parody a vaudeville show from all angles—the divas (Piggy), the technical malfunctions (Crazy Harry, blowing up sets left and right), the well-meaning guy trying to hold the whole ball of crazy together (Kermit).
My father's contributions are impossible to disentangle from the general Muppetness of the script—collaborations work, he always told me, because they are collaborative—save for one: Despite being Brooklyn born and bred, with not a Nordic bone in his body, he is, by many accounts, the source of the Swedish Chef's accent and nonsense lexicon, the one typified by 'Hurdy, gurdy, gurdy, bork bork bork!' The character had originated with Henson in the '60s. Back then, he'd been German. For reasons lost to Muppetdom, at some point the character moved northwest, to a place with more centralized health care. And he needed an accent to match.
I loved listening to Dad parody foreign languages. He liked to throw off telemarketers by answering the phone as a hard-of-hearing woman from some indeterminate Latin American country, or as an eccentric Central European man, characterized by a sibilant, Peter Sellers–as–Strangelove delivery that would typically escalate into a shriek and send the person on the other end skedaddling to their next call. So I was not surprised to learn that, decades earlier, Dad had apparently reduced the Henson puppeteer Frank Oz to tears by mimicking languages during brainstorming sessions. He later made an ersatz-Swedish tape for Henson to listen to on his commute into the city from his home in Bedford. 'He would drive to work trying to make a chicken sandwich in mock Swedish or make a turkey casserole in mock Swedish,' Henson's son Brian told Jim's biographer, remembering having heard my dad's tape. 'It was the most ridiculous thing you had ever seen, and people at traffic lights used to stop and sort of look at him a little crazy.'
All of this I learned from books, from interviews with Muppet staffers, and by emailing Falk, the Henson archivist. But the bulk of my embedding in Muppetdom over the past year involved watching The Muppet Show with my husband and three kids on weekend evenings, our world cocooned between the real, live present and a completely nonsensical 1970s. I'd slice up some apples and we'd cackle together as Rita Moreno flung a noodly Muppet man around set in a particularly violent tango; as Zero Mostel, only mildly indignant that a Muppet was eating him during his cold open, helped wash down his own arm with a little water; as Gene Kelly taught Kermit to tap-dance on the piano.
[Read: The father-daughter routine that transformed our family life]
Given what I'd learned, was it a cosmic sign that my youngest, just 3 years old, started to develop an obsession with the Swedish Chef? He took to running around the apartment, crowing his bastardized version of the Chef's already bastardized Swedish and then, mimicking his new Nordic hero, flinging into the air whatever he had handy. Sometimes it was a stuffed animal; other times it was hard objects, which would necessitate a stern lecture (after my husband and I had taken cover) about the dangers of throwing things up, because they tend to come down, even if the Chef's flapjacks do not. After my son got a Swedish Chef action-figure set that included a small chicken and a handful of cooking tools, he would sit on the ground, brow furrowed in concentration, making the cleaver-wielding chef hop after the chicken—or sometimes, in keeping with Muppet sensibility, vice versa.
My daughters became obsessed with 'Pigs in Space,' a recurring Muppet sketch parodying Star Trek and other space operas of the 1960s and '70s. They erupted in cheers whenever the USS Swinetrek flew across the screen, indicating that the sketch was back again. The setup is that three pigs are flying through the cosmos—Captain Link Hogthrob, Dr. Julius Strangepork, and Miss Piggy as first mate—and … nothing really happens. John Cleese shows up as a pirate and tries to make a call from a payphone on the ship, while his parrot, who is in love with him, gripes that Cleese is neglecting her and should take her to dinner with all his doubloons. The ship is invaded by two alien beings, who turn out to be the Swedish Chef and his chicken, and after they leave, the pigs get bored. When the USS Swinetrek nears the end of the universe, where its crew will finally discover the meaning and purpose of life, the dinner bell rings, and the pigs get sidetracked. Miss Piggy is routinely degraded, asked by the boars to do the laundry or make more swill, though the audience understands that she's smarter and tougher than her male co-stars.
According to Oz, Miss Piggy's puppeteer, her toughness was hard-won. In multiple interviews, he has spoken about his need to understand the complete biographies of the characters he portrayed, even if viewers don't share that need. In Oz's mind, Miss Piggy was born on a farm, loved her father very much, and was grief-stricken when he died in a tractor accident. As her mother's subsequent suitors turned their attention to Miss Piggy, a single path forward emerged: to leave. She was later forced to do some things she wasn't proud of as she clawed her way to diva-dom, including appearing in a bacon commercial.
Does any of that come through the screen as she floats around in outer space? I suppose that, for some viewers, it does—that having a deep understanding of Miss Piggy's character somehow enabled Oz and the other puppeteers to present her simulated world as real enough that the audience would jump into it with her, feetfirst, willingly suspending disbelief.
Or maybe that's not why it works. 'It's just so weird,' my third grader said to me one night, with a snort. 'Like, why are there even pigs in space?'
I didn't experience what others warned me I might, after the months of decline that led to Dad's death late last year: picking up the phone to call him and forgetting that there would be no one on the other end, looking up from the sidewalk at the window where he worked for decades, expecting to see the light on and being knocked sideways that it was dark. I never forgot. I never expected the light to be on. But occasionally, I'd find myself dropping from one reality straight through to another, something most likely aided by my living just eight blocks from where I grew up. My neighborhood is saturated with memories spanning my whole life.
Passing a street corner, I would suddenly reverse-age four decades and see Dad's belt buckle sliding along my tricycle's handlebars, because I was so hot and sweaty and tired that I simply couldn't pedal one more inch, and he was pulling me around that corner, home. I'd be running the Lower Loop in Central Park, where we used to take our daily afternoon walks, and I'd pass a busker playing the fiddle and have to stop, hands on knees, to catch my breath, remembering the Flatt and Scruggs Dad played through his computer speakers. These temporal shifts through eras were uncontrolled, unexpected, all-encompassing. My scrim between reality and memory, truth and simulation, had become porous, faulty. Like the Swedish Chef, who starts making a turtle soup only to find that the turtle has woken up and is trying to escape, my reality was pitched, slightly, on its axis.
The first time one of these temporal shifts through eras, one of these free falls from today back to childhood, happened was a few nights after the burial. My husband, kids, and I gathered, the children freshly showered and damp-haired, and put on the Muppets, as we'd done, at that point, for months. The episode featured Señor Wences, the ventriloquist whose main act involved Johnny, a boy made from Wences's hand, on which he stuck two googly eyes, and on top of which he draped a ridiculous orange wig. His other star performers were a bespectacled chicken named Cecilia (Wences: 'Second name?'; Cecilia: 'Chicken') and Pedro, a surly talking head (literally just a head, not an MSNBC type) who, after a train accident that decapitated the poor puppet, spent his life, disembodied, in a box.
The episode's conceit was that Kermit has decided to do something new: a puppet show! 'It's a complete change of pace, folks,' he said to cheers. 'Yes, it's a real first!' Toward the end, Wences held up an egg and asked Cecilia Chicken to identify it. As she replied, softly and directly, 'My son' (rhymes with moan), a memory of childhood weekend breakfasts welled up from deep in my subconscious, collapsing time just as the puppets on-screen were collapsing their simulation. I saw the kitchen table, the oval wooden one my father had waxed by hand until it shone. I felt its slight stickiness beneath my hands. And by the stove was Dad, apron halved and tied around his waist, holding up an egg reverently, sighing, lovingly pronouncing it 'my son!' in Salamancan-inflected English, then cracking it, with a flourish, into a cast-iron skillet.
He used to do that with eggs.
I'd completely forgotten. For a moment, I stayed there at the kitchen table, giggling. I stayed with the feeling of being closer to my children's age than middle age; closer to those evenings spent cross-legged and damp-haired myself, watching my dad turn stuffed animals into performers; closer still to a moment years before my birth, when, across town at the Henson studios, in a healthy body with long legs kicked up on the desk in front of him, my dad held a bulky tape recorder to his mouth, paused, then started up for the first time in ersatz Swedish, the beginning of a thread that would reach out, decades later, and tether him to me.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In Defense of The Devil Wears Prada 2 Outfits—Fashion Tastemakers Weigh In
In Defense of The Devil Wears Prada 2 Outfits—Fashion Tastemakers Weigh In

Elle

timean hour ago

  • Elle

In Defense of The Devil Wears Prada 2 Outfits—Fashion Tastemakers Weigh In

The modern media landscape has undoubtedly changed since the original The Devil Wears Prada nearly 20 years ago. The film was set among the 'old guard' of fashion and media—one that feels faraway now with the change that the internet has wrought. And thanks to social media, paparazzi, and filming on the streets of New York City, online debate about a movie's style can start as soon as filming does, whether you like it or not. The Devil Wears Prada 2, which sees the return of Anne Hathaway, Meryl Streep, Emily Blunt, and Stanley Tucci, began shooting earlier this month. Though the May 1, 2026 release is nearly a year away, our feeds have already been inundated with looks. Perhaps the flood of photos is meant to gauge public reactions to the fashion—Ryan Murphy recently defended early photos of Sarah Pidgeon as Carolyn Bessette Kennedy released from the set of American Love Story, pointing out that they were test shots (Pidgeon's icy blonde hair has since been softened to include some CBK-esque brunette roots). Regardless of intent, each street scene brings on a whole new round of style discourse: the good, the bad, the ugly, and the 'do people in fashion actually dress like that?' First things first: any blockbuster fashion-centric production is going to capitalize on a sense of fantasy. This is something that the film's reported costume designer Molly Rogers learned while working under the legendary Patricia Field. (Field costumed the original movie, for which she received an Oscar nomination, as well as Sex and the City; though she did not return to And Just Like That, which is now co-styled by Rogers). Is it realistic that Andy Sachs spent close to $30,000 on a fresh-off-the-runway Gabriela Hearst dress, Fendi carry-all, and Jemma Wynne jewelry? No. But would her character (who has presumably achieved success in media since the last time we saw her) likely splurge on a designer bag and pair it with a colorful and relaxed maxidress to board the Hampton Jitney? Yes. The same goes for Emily Blunt's Dior and custom Wiederhoeft corseted look, though if the rumors about her character's billionaire boyfriend are true, then it's likely a little bit more on the nose. The high-low nature of many of the looks also reflects the way many real insiders dress. Fashion might have changed a lot in the last two decades, but 2006 Andy wasn't running around as a second assistant freely pulling whatever she wanted from the sample closet, either. And in 2025, wardrobe stipends and borrowing clothing still exist, albeit on a less grand scale. People loved that the first film glorified the corporate glamazons who ruled Runway, or as Andy once called them, 'clackers,' referring to their stiletto heels on the lobby's marble floors. The sequel seems to be taking a more contextually toned-down approach to style, even if it is to the dismay of die-hard fans. Interestingly enough, many of the movie's looks so far have resonated with media and media-adjacent young professionals. Sophie Wood, director of strategy at the influencer marketing agency Fohr, finds it refreshing that many of the costumes don't seem like an algorithm-driven caricature of how people think an editor dresses like in 2025, even if Pauline Chalamet's Margiela Tabis are currently ultra-on-trend. Wood loves the Gabriela Hearst mosaic-print dress and compares it to the personal style she sees in her own New York City-based workplace on a daily basis: 'We're not beholden to business attire. So people are able to get really eclectic with what they wear to the office.' Despite depictions in media, fashion editors and industry professionals are not a one-size-fits-all carbon copy of the runways. This is why when we see Andy mixing Chanel with AGOLDE or Valentino with Levi's, there's a sense of realism to these outfits—and hey, maybe she's even discovered the Ssense sale like the rest of us. The casual mixing of high and low feels appropriate to many who are familiar with the realities of the day-to-day of the fashion industry. Plus, the true marker of good style is being able to shop anywhere. Fashion content creator and PhD student Vivian Li echoes Wood, finding that because of social media, modern-day style is heavily associated with aesthetic and polish and not function or fit. When volunteering backstage at shows during New York Fashion Week, getting street-style photographed in a 'full look' was the last thing on her mind. 'People in fashion aren't necessarily using all of their brain power to 'throw a fit' everyday when they probably have a million deadlines by 10 A.M.' she jokingly explains, adding that someone like Andy is 'working, not performing.' For Li, a standout outfit was the all-white Phoebe Philo and Nili Lotan ensemble, paired with Prada heels, which felt appropriately offset by Andy's beat-up vintage Coach satchel and messy hair. The balance of designer labels and curated undone-ness is very 'The Row' but also feels like a natural compromise to the high-fashion Andy of the first film who, as Li notes, likely over-accessorized as a way to signal her head-first plunge into an industry she previously knew nothing about. Though much of the plot is still under wraps, there are sure to be more photos from set, and with that, countless more looks to ID and dissect. But when it comes to what editors and industry professionals are actually wearing in-office? Says ELLE's deputy news and strategy editor Alyssa Bailey, 'I find it really exciting and refreshing that real-life fashion editors wear labels of all price points and still look amazing. I thought as a teenager I needed to be like Andy and wear head-to-toe designer to make it in this industry.' This Andy looks a little bit closer to the real thing.

Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver Fighting in ‘Marriage Story' Is Being Used by the USDA to Scare Off Wolves and Save Cattle: ‘They Need to Know Humans Are Bad'
Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver Fighting in ‘Marriage Story' Is Being Used by the USDA to Scare Off Wolves and Save Cattle: ‘They Need to Know Humans Are Bad'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver Fighting in ‘Marriage Story' Is Being Used by the USDA to Scare Off Wolves and Save Cattle: ‘They Need to Know Humans Are Bad'

A new report from The Wall Street Journal reveals that audio of Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver screaming at each other in Noah Baumbach's 'Marriage Story' is being used by the United States Department of Agriculture to scare off wolves from killing cattle and scaring livestock on farms across the America. The fight scene is the most emotionally volatile moment in Baumbach's 2019 drama, which earned both Johansson and Driver Oscar nominations. Per the WSJ: 'Riding to the rescue are drone cowhands, whose quadcopters have thermal cameras that can reveal any wolf lurking in the darkness and bathe it in a spotlight. A loudspeaker broadcasts alarming sounds like fireworks, gunshots and people arguing. One recording is of the fight between Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver in the movie 'Marriage Story.'' More from Variety Jessica Chastain, Adam Driver to Star in Apple Series 'The Dealer' Cannes Film Festival Starts to Take Shape: Spike Lee, Wes Anderson, Kristen Stewart, Jim Jarmusch, Ari Aster, Richard Linklater Vying for Competition Slots Adam Driver Off-Broadway Play 'Hold on to Me Darling' Recoups $1.8 Million Investment (EXCLUSIVE) 'I need the wolves to respond and know that, hey, humans are bad,' a USDA district supervisor in Oregon told the publication. 'Wolf hazing,' as the practice is called, also uses loud music like AC/DC's 'Thunderstruck' to scare off deadly wolves. The USDA has relied on drones because gray wolves had long been on the federal government's list of endangered species. The process seems to be working. As the WSJ reported: 'Drones were deployed in the Klamath Basin of southern Oregon after 11 cows were killed by wolves there in a 20-day period. Over the next 85 days when drones were on patrol, only two were killed.' 'Marriage Story' stars Johansson and Driver as a couple going through a bitter divorce and custody battle over their son. The movie earned critical acclaim after premiering at the 2019 Venice Film Festival. Variety's Owen Gleiberman named 'Marriage Story' the second best movie of 2019. 'Adam Driver and Scarlett Johansson, in spectacular performances that work together with searing intimacy, enact the anger, pride, despair, and passion of a couple who tear their relationship apart, and their souls too, even as they both struggle to remain whole inside,' Gleiberman wrote. ''Marriage Story' tells the story of divorce in our time, and in doing so it earns a place next to those harrowing and heartrending texts of separation, 'Kramer vs. Kramer' and 'Scenes from a Marriage.'' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025

Amazon CEO ‘Cannot Wait' to Start Denis Villeneuve's James Bond Movie
Amazon CEO ‘Cannot Wait' to Start Denis Villeneuve's James Bond Movie

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon CEO ‘Cannot Wait' to Start Denis Villeneuve's James Bond Movie

Amazon can already hear the strains of John Barry's iconic theme paired with that gun barrel shot — the one to which Sean Connery, George Lazenby, Roger Moore, Timothy Dalton, Pierce Brosnan, and Daniel Craig have all leant their figures. CEO Andy Jassey said on a July 31 call (which highlighted his company's better-than-expected Q3 earning) that 'James Bond is in the hands of one of today's greatest filmmakers,' and adding, 'We cannot wait to get started on 007's next adventure.' Jassey is referring to none other than Denis Villeneuve, who was announced in June as the next director to take on the franchise — which already has 25 official releases in its canon. Villeneuve will have the unique position of being the first steward to not be collaborating with the Broccoli family, which has overseen every Bond movie since 'Dr. No' in 1962. More from IndieWire Noah Baumbach Had a 'Quiet Crisis' After 'White Noise' Didn't Take Off 'Highest 2 Lowest' Trailer: Spike Lee's Latest Joint Is an Entertaining Homage to Akira Kurosawa How exactly Amazon MGM Studios will handle Bond has been a subject of debate — including in a think piece from IndieWire's own Christian Blauvelt — but signing on Villeneuve, whose 'Dune' series and 'Arrival' earned a bevy of Oscar nominations, seems to indicate a commitment to properly stewarding the next 007 incarnation. In June, Villeneuve — who will start work on 'Bond 26' after he finishes up 'Dune: Messiah' — described himself as a major Bond-head, releasing the statement: 'Some of my earliest movie-going memories are connected to 007. I grew up watching James Bond films with my father, ever since 'Dr. No' with Sean Connery. I'm a die-hard Bond fan. To me, he's sacred territory. I intend to honor the tradition and open the path for many new missions to come. This is a massive responsibility, but also, incredibly exciting for me and a huge honor. Amy, David, and I are absolutely thrilled to bring him back to the screen. Thank you to Amazon MGM Studios for their trust.' Major speculation has proliferated online as to whom might take on the iconic role next, with most of that discourse centering around the rumored involvement of Tom Holland. 'Listen, there's speculation at the minute,' Holland told Gordon Ramsay on the chef's YouTube series. 'We'll keep it to a minimum for now… we'll get there one day.' Holland has taken a significant break from on-screen roles in order to recharge. He has not been seen on movie screens since the 2022 release of 'Uncharted,' and on TV screens since the 2023 Apple TV+ miniseries 'The Crowded Room.' 'I feel really blessed to be at a point in my career where I can take time off, reset, and come back ready to go,' he told British GQ. 'You can't be in every movie, and you can't do your best work when you're burnt out. What I've learnt is that it's important to set boundaries – to be mindful about overworking. I've got a slightly busy year next year, and then I'll probably take a bit more time off in 2027. We'll see.' Holland has a busy summer 2026 on the way, however, with next July bringing both 'The Odyssey' and 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day,' which he teased on Instagram on August 2. On July 31, IndieWire reported that 'Peaky Blinders' creator Steven Knight would pen the screenplay for 'Bond 26,' which does not yet have a release date or title. Best of IndieWire Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See 'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie Nicolas Winding Refn's Favorite Films: 37 Movies the Director Wants You to See Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store