Police Mishandled Fatal Crash Between American Driver and U.K. Teenager, Review Says
The review, a 118-page report published on Wednesday, said that the police should have arrested the American driver, Anne Sacoolas, at the scene and that officers later mishandled forensic evidence. It also found fault with a senior officer's social media posts and public remarks about the case, and with how officers interacted with the parents of the 19-year-old victim, Harry Dunn.
In publicizing the findings on Wednesday, the Northamptonshire Police, the force that was responsible for the case, apologized to Mr. Dunn's parents, Charlotte Charles and Tim Dunn.
'The picture which emerges is one of a force which has failed the family on a number of fronts,' Emma James, the Northamptonshire Police's head of protective services, said in a statement.
The fatal crash occurred as Ms. Sacoolas, a U.S. State Department employee whose husband worked for the American government at a British military base, was driving on the wrong side of the road near the village of Croughton, in central England, in August 2019. Mr. Dunn, whom her car struck, died later in a hospital.
The episode caused international friction when Ms. Sacoolas left Britain three weeks after the crash, claiming diplomatic immunity. Britain issued an extradition request for her return, but the U.S. government rejected it, arguing in a statement at the time that honoring it 'would render the invocation of diplomatic immunity a practical nullity and would set an extraordinarily troubling precedent.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MP inundated with racist abuse after online post
An MP says he has been "inundated with racist comments" after he questioned another MP's plans to start an organisation to "change the way Britain is governed". Huntingdon Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty retweeted independent Great Yarmouth MP Rupert Lowe's post on X announcing the launch of Restore Britain, asking why it cost £20 to join. Obese-Jecty said as a result he received online "racist comments, pictures comparing me to a monkey" and was told to "return to your ethnic homeland". The BBC has approached Lowe, who was previously a Reform UK MP, for comment. Obese-Jecty, a former Army officer who later worked in financial services, won the Cambridgeshire seat in last year's general election. Businessman Lowe, a former Southampton Football Club chairman, won his Norfolk seat last year, initially for Reform UK, but has been sitting as an independent since March. He launched Restore Britain on Monday, saying it was "a movement for those who believe that we need to fundamentally change the way Britain is governed". "This is not a political party, but a fundamentally different way of doing things," he said. People wishing to join the membership organisation were asked to pay a £20 annual subscription. Obese-Jecty said he had been "absolutely inundated with racist comments" after he questioned the fee. "I got called an Uncle Tom, which is a race traitor, I was told I should be deported back to my home country, [and] that foreigners should be banned from British politics," he said. "It went on and on and this is sadly par for the course from certain very online sections of our political commentary... it's something I notice is getting increasingly worse and I get targeted from all sides of the political spectrum." Obese-Jecty said he raised the comments directly with the Great Yarmouth MP when they met in the House of Commons' tearoom. He said he told Lowe: "I was very disappointed about the racist abuse I'd received from people who purport to be your supporters. "[Lowe] very much shrugged his shoulders at it and said, 'Well that's not down to me'." The Huntingdon MP said this was particularly disappointing as one of the surprises of his first year in Parliament was "the amount of collegiate work that goes on around the House of Commons". "It was disappointing that that cross-party bonhomie doesn't extend to everybody," he added. Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Ex-Reform MP Lowe will not face charges over alleged threats MP irked as Cromwell treated in cavalier fashion House of Commons
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ban on Palestine Action clears Parliament but faces legal challenge
A ban on Palestine Action as a terror group is poised to become law after peers backed the Government move at Westminster but faces a legal bid to block it. The House of Lords backed proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000 without a vote. A short time before, a so-called regret motion proposed by a Green Party peer criticising the measure was rejected by 144 votes to 16, majority 128. The ministerial order, which has already been approved by MPs, will make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. However, it is unclear when the ban, which needs final sign-off by the Home Secretary, will come into force as the group is mounting a court challenge to try to temporarily block the move with a hearing scheduled on Friday, pending further proceedings. The Government crackdown comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 causing £7 million worth of damage, in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Four people have been charged by counter-terrorism police in connection with the incident and were remanded in custody following a court appearance. Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said: 'I will always defend the right of British people to engage in legitimate and peaceful protest and to stand up for the causes in which they believe. 'But essential as these rights are, they do not provide a blank cheque for this particular group to seriously damage property or subject members of the public to fear and violence.' He added: 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action. 'By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support, degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name.' But ministers have faced criticism over the decision to outlaw Palestine Action, with opponents branding the move as 'draconian overreach' and comparing the group to the Suffragettes. The United Nations has also warned against the ban, with experts concerned at the 'unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as 'terrorist''. In the Lords, Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb opposed the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. Her regret motion argued the ban undermined civil liberties, constituted a misuse of anti-terror legislation, suppressed dissent against the UK's policy on Israel, and criminalised support for a protest group, causing 'a chilling effect on freedom of expression'. The legislation approved by the Lords also bans two white supremacist groups, Maniacs Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm Russian Imperial Legion. The Home Office describes the Maniacs Murder Cult as a neo-Nazi transnational and online organisation which has claimed a number of violent attacks around the world. The Russian Imperial Movement is an ethno-nationalist group which aims to create a new Russian imperial state. Its paramilitary unit fought alongside Russian forces in the invasion of Ukraine to advance its ideological cause. It also runs a paramilitary training programme to support attendees to carry out terror attacks, the Home Office added.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Watch: Labour's ‘total clusterf**k'
Play Video It wasn't supposed to be like this. Exactly a year ago the Labour government swept into office promising stability, competence and economic growth. So why, on the one year anniversary of their victory, does it feel like their dying days? This has been a pretty extraordinary week in British politics and it's a week that will leave its mark on the UK economy. Downing Street will hope to move on – that's how it works – their message calendar has had NHS written on today's date for months and it's the NHS they'll want to talk about – but none of us will forget what happened this week and no amount of government spin will gloss over it. The sight of the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, sobbing in the House of Commons while the Prime Minister – just inches away from her – was on his feet defending their policies while pointedly failing to defend her – will endure in our political memory. I take no pleasure in the obvious distress of Rachel Reeves, whether the cause was 'personal' as No 10 insists or related to her job and the wider crisis facing the government. I won't join in any effort to mock or criticise the fact that she cried – but the strain she's under and the impossibly contradictory political and economic agendas pulling at her cannot be ignored. The government's week from hell began with a humiliating u-turn on their plans for welfare reform. Now, criticising governments for u-turning or abandoning unpopular policies can be overblown but there's no exaggerating the absurdity of what happened in the House of Commons on Tuesday night. Ministers held up their welfare reform plans as vital for the public finances but in fact the savings planned were tiny – a mere £5bn off a welfare bill touching £300bn a year. But it was a signal – to the markets and the rest of us – that they would and could take tough decisions to make their spending plans add up. When it came down to it, they couldn't get it over the line. Just 90 minutes before the vote ministers announced they were slicing out the money-saving elements. Rebel Labour MPs had demonstrated that they hold enormous power over the Prime Minister. It was a humiliation for Starmer up there with all those bruising Brexit defeats inflicted on Theresa May. So much for stability and competence. It was, in the words of one Labour MP, 'a total clusterfuck.' And that's one of the softer reactions. And of course, it leaves the Chancellor with a £5bn headache – money she will now have to find in spending cuts or tax rises – or borrowing. A has just been proven, spending cuts are not getting through this crop of Labour MPs and borrowing isn't an option if the government wants to maintain any fiscal credibility and so – as we at have been warning since the end of last year – tax rises are coming. No wonder the Chancellor was apparently overheard in the Commons – moments before she was seen crying – saying 'I'm just under so much pressure.' She is indeed. Because her plan – Starmer's plan – in as much as they had one – has not worked. The tax burden is at a record high and the growth rate is barely registering. Employment is down. Job vacancies are down. Business confidence is down. There's a reason why I've been banging this drum pretty much week in, week out – it's not just sport. It all points to what one top asset manager described yesterday as a 'hell slide' where the economy doesn't grow so the government's spending plans don't add up so they hike taxes to fill the hole and so the economy suffers yet more pain. And watching all of this, taking it all in, are the bond markets. Ten year gilt yields are at the same level now as they were at the height of the Liz Truss crisis. In fact, they've climbed steadily since Labour were elected. Now there are a variety of reasons for this and it's not unique to the UK but our political and economic conditions are contributing to a nervousness among investors – a nervousness that the UK might not be quite as politically stable as it appeared this time last year. A nervousness that this government will not be able to pass tough spending decisions. And that nervousness tipped over into panic yesterday – briefly – when it looked as if the government was about to lose its Chancellor. Now there are plenty of voices calling for a new Chancellor, but I'm not one of them. Indeed I said in an episode two months ago that we had better hope Reeves remains in office because – and this is what spooked markets yesterday – the only reason for getting rid of her would be to scrap or rewrite the fiscal rules on borrowing and spending – the only thing currently keeping bond markets at bay. Bond traders yesterday feared for a post-Reeves world. I don't like what this government – what this Chancellor – has done to our economy but we are stuck with her, at least – perversely – we'd better hope we're stuck with her because if she goes Starmer will be saying that his economic agenda has failed and, as this week shows, it's his MPs that are calling the shots and they are calling for tax rises and no further cuts to public spending. If they win that argument, it won't just be the bond markets that panic. So, happy birthday to the government. One year old today. At the dawn of the last era of Labour rule, in 1997, the party's anthem was Things Can Only Get Better. Today, all we can hope for is that they don't get any worse. Sign in to access your portfolio
