logo
How will Arizona deal with Colorado River shortages? Cities need a 'Plan B,' expert says

How will Arizona deal with Colorado River shortages? Cities need a 'Plan B,' expert says

Yahoo06-06-2025
BOULDER, Colo. — Kathryn Sorensen likes to compare the options for finding water rights in central Arizona with shopping for clothes. Some options, such as tearing out turf, are like thrifting: cheap but a little picked over. Others, like desalination, are like buying a tiny designer handbag, expensive and ultimately limited in its capacity. And then there are other options, which might involve buying or borrowing other people's clothes, and those options involve politics.
Sorensen, director of Arizona State University's Kyl Center for Water Policy, spoke June 5 to an audience of water managers, scientists and tribal leaders at the 45th annual Colorado Law Conference on Natural Resources in Boulder, Colorado. She laid out how cities and developers are struggling for more limited water resources in the area of the Colorado River Basin most vulnerable to water cuts: central Arizona.
'If cuts become deep enough, and there's clearly a chance that will happen, I want to say in no uncertain terms, I am extraordinarily concerned that we will hit critical levels,' Sorensen said in an interview. 'There are cities that rely on that (water) directly, and we need to make sure that those cities have a Plan B.'
The Colorado River, which provides 40% of water for Phoenix, along with most of Arizona's largest cities, is experiencing low flows unprecedented in U.S. history. The federal government declared the first official shortage on the river in 2021. Maricopa, Pima and Pinal counties were the first to take serious cuts under an agreement struck decades ago to secure support for the Central Arizona Project Canal.
So far, those cuts have dried up farms in Pinal County, but most cities and tribes have stayed wet, in part because the Gila River Indian Community volunteered to conserve some of its water in Lake Mead.
That arrangement does not guarantee water after 2025, and the Colorado River Basin states are stalled in negotiations to define guidelines for how to manage shortage on a larger scale after 2026.
A drier future: Worsening climate outlooks raise the stakes for an agreement on the Colorado River
In the long term, scientists expect climate change to continue drying the river basin, leading to low flows. Just this year, flows into Lake Powell, used to measure the river's natural water supply, are expected to be roughly half of normal, and even that 'normal' is lower than it once was in the 20th century.
'Our current climate trajectory is beyond awful,' said Brad Udall, a water and climate research scientist at Colorado State University, speaking at the same event on June 5.
As new water-using developments and industries move into the Phoenix area, water managers are examining their options for how to avoid sharp consequences, Sorensen said. Cities like Buckeye could lose the majority of their Colorado River water.
Some cities have immediate back-ups to fill holes left by Colorado River shortages. Phoenix has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on a pipeline to bring water from the Salt and Verde rivers to parts of the city that rely entirely on the Colorado. Tucson can rely on groundwater in the short term to cover its losses, but those aquifers are limited in the long run and don't provide a lasting, sustainable solution. Sorensen worries about municipalities that don't have those kinds of options.
Water users in central Arizona are competing to find supplies that can provide them with assured water for a hundred years, a requirement in Arizona law, given diminished deliveries from the Colorado River, Sorensen said, and cities and developers are constantly scrambling to get entitlements to water to meet that requirement.
The first and cheapest option in stretching water supplies is conservation, Sorensen said. Since 1978, the portion of Phoenix single-family homes that use lush landscaping like lawns has plummeted from nearly 80% to around 20%, a result of intentionally increased water rates. Nonetheless, Sorensen said cities have already conserved a lot of water, and conserving more may see diminishing returns.
The next-easiest option is for cities to lease water from other entities in central Arizona. The Phoenix area hosts a busy informal market for water leases, where entities with water rent out it out to those in need. The Salt River Pima–Maricopa Indian Community, for instance, leased out all of its Colorado River water in 2021.
By contrast, Chandler leased half of its Colorado River water from other parties in that year, according to the Kyl Center (leases are not inherently more vulnerable to cuts in the short term, but need to be renewed or replaced in the long term). But, as Sorensen pointed out, leasing depends on how willing an entity, usually a tribe, is to lend its water for a long time.
'They are sovereign nations," she said. "It is their choice.'
Water for tech: 'A thirsty operation': TSMC plant arrives amid water doubts, but Phoenix isn't worried
Cities and other water users can also rely on long-term storage credits, meaning they get to pump groundwater that other entities have saved underground. That option is a favorite for data centers, Sorensen said, which sometimes must purchase some of their own water supplies instead of relying on municipalities. Still, that option is usually a 'last resort,' Sorensen said, as the water is nonrenewable, so once entities pump it they need to go out and find another long-term water source.
All of these options involve shuffling the amount of Colorado River water already being delivered to the Phoenix and Tucson areas, but what about other sources? Cities in central Arizona are looking there too. A coalition of local governments is looking to build new storage on the Salt and Verde rivers, which could bring more water to the Phoenix area, but that project may not be completed until 2040.
There is one option that may not require any infrastructure and could provide access to a massive chunk of Arizona's Colorado River water: leasing or buying agricultural water from the farms in the Colorado River Valley in the western part of the state. Together, the tribes of the Colorado River Valley and farmers in Yuma County hold rights to hundreds of thousands of acre feet of water that, unlike central Arizona's current water supply, is much safer from water cuts administered by the federal government.
The idea is controversial, politically fraught, and potentially so lucrative that it has drawn the attention of private equity firms.
'You see private equity purchasing farms for the purchase of selling that water,' Sorensen said.
Only one of these transfers has occurred to date, in which a private equity firm called Greenstone bought farmland in La Paz County and sold the farms' water entitlements to Queen Creek for $24 million in 2023. Local officials in western Arizona fumed about the sale, which dried almost 500 acres of farmland, worrying that it would lead to weaker local agricultural communities.
Since then, the Colorado River Indian Tribes, which hold Arizona's largest and highest-priority Colorado River entitlements, have received congressional approval to lease some of their water to off-reservation users, though they haven't moved to do so.
Rural shortages: It's not just big alfalfa farms. La Paz residents fear groundwater grab by big cities
In a May interview, CAP board president Terry Goddard said he had recently visited Yuma and wanted to open discussions about farmers there sharing water with central Arizona users. Goddard said cuts in central Arizona were getting down to the bone, and it was unacceptable to dry out the tribes and critical industries in the state's most populous region. So far, he said those discussions haven't happened.
Presenting a slide titled, 'The future of Ag to Urban Transfers,' Sorensen wondered aloud whether those arrangements would happen in the future, calling them a 'big maybe.'
Farms account for at least three quarters of human water consumption in the lower Colorado River Basin, according to Brian Richter, a researcher and president of Sustainable Water. As cities look to sustain themselves on a diminishing piece of the Colorado River, Phoenix-based water consultant and attorney Peter Culp said in another presentation, conversations about the river often pit the two sectors against one another.
Culp runs a nonprofit bank, Blue Commons, that provides low-interest loans to farmers and tribes to build water conservation infrastructure. The bank is designed to give farmers an alternative to selling their farms to private equity firms like Greenstone by making farming more financially feasible and providing financing that doesn't ultimately lead back to Wall Street investors.
Having grown up in a farming community, Culp said he sees the transfer of water and money from farms to cities as a symptom of a deeper, larger economic shift in the United States and the West.
'We have spent the last hundred years engaged in an extremely effective project of resource extraction and wealth extraction that has systematically moved wealth from the rural parts of this country … into a core,' Culp said. 'Rural America is not doing great, folks.'
Moving forward, Culp said farmers and cities can change their view on ag-to-urban water transfers as an opportunity for mutual benefit. Cities can invest in rural economies, and in return, farmers can conserve water and support cities.
Want more stories like this? Sign up for AZ Climate, The Republic's free weekly environment newsletter.
Though not responding to Culp's remarks, Sorensen viewed the movement in economic activity as more natural.
'People move towards economic opportunity, and some people may wish that were different," she said. "It's not, and it never has been."
Regardless of what happens, Sorensen said in her presentation, water is bound to get more expensive. Sorensen compared Arizona's water to Bitcoin:
'If you didn't buy it already, it's probably too late,' Sorensen said. 'But on the other hand, maybe it's like Bitcoin in that the price just keeps going up and up, and you've got to buy now.'
With values like that, the desalination of brackish groundwater of Pacific Ocean water in neighboring entities — the tiny designer purse in Sorensen's shopping metaphor — could become realistic, Sorensen said.
'The market is tough, especially in the face of Colorado River shortages, so (the tiny purse) might be what we have to turn to,' Sorensen said.
Austin Corona covers environmental issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to austin.corona@arizonarepublic.com.
Environmental coverage on azcentral.com and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Follow The Republic environmental reporting team at environment.azcentral.com and @azcenvironment on Facebook and Instagram.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Colorado River cuts push central Arizona to seek water alternatives
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sudan paramilitaries announce a parallel government, deepening the country's crisis
Sudan paramilitaries announce a parallel government, deepening the country's crisis

Los Angeles Times

time6 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Sudan paramilitaries announce a parallel government, deepening the country's crisis

CAIRO — A notorious paramilitary group and its allies in Sudan have formed a parallel government in areas under the group's control, which are mainly in the western region of Darfur where allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity are being investigated. The move, which was announced Saturday, is likely to deepen the crisis in Sudan, which plunged into chaos when tensions between the country's military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, exploded into fighting in 2023 in the capital, Khartoum, and elsewhere in the country. The RSF-led Tasis Alliance appointed Gen. Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, the commander of the paramilitary group, as head of the sovereign council in the rival administration. The 15-member council serves as head of the state, it declared. The RSF grew out of the notorious janjaweed militias, mobilized two decades ago by then-President Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir against populations that identify as Central or East African in Darfur. The janjaweed were accused of mass killings, rapes and other atrocities. In the current war, the RSF too has been accused of numerous atrocities. The Biden administration imposed sanctions on Dagalo, saying the RSF and its proxies were committing genocide, a charge the group has denied. Alliance spokesman Alaa al-Din Naqd announced the new administration in a video statement from the Darfur city of Nyala, which is controlled by the RSF and its allied janjaweed. Mohammed Hassan Taishi, a civilian politician who was a member of a military-civilian sovereign council that ruled Sudan after the 2019 overthrow of Bashir, was named prime minister in the RSF-controlled government. Rebel leader Abdelaziz al-Hilu, who commands the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North, or SPLM-N, which is active in the southern Kodrofan region, was appointed as Dagalo's deputy in the council. The SPLM-N is a breakaway faction of the SPLM, the ruling party of neighboring South Sudan. The announcement came five months after the RSF and its allies signed a charter in February in Kenya's capital, Nairobi, with the aim of establishing a parallel government in RSF-controlled areas. At the time, many countries, including the United States, rejected the RSF efforts and condemned the signing at the Nairobi conference of what the paramilitary group and its allies called a 'transitional constitution.' The Foreign Ministry of Sudan's internationally recognized government in Khartoum condemned the announcement of a parallel government. It issued a statement calling it a 'fake government' and urged the international community to not engage with the RSF-led administration. The RSF-led move was likely to deepen the division in Sudan. Yasir Arman, a rebel leader, said the move is likely to prolong the conflict and divide Sudan between two rival administrations — similar to neighboring Libya. Magdy writes for the Associated Press.

Sudan paramilitaries announce parallel government, deepening country's crisis

time17 hours ago

Sudan paramilitaries announce parallel government, deepening country's crisis

CAIRO -- A notorious paramilitary group and its allies in Sudan said they formed a parallel government in areas under the group's control, which are located mainly in the western region of Darfur where allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity are being investigated. The move, which was announced Saturday, was likely to deepen the crisis in Sudan, which plunged into chaos when tensions between the country's military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, exploded into fighting in April 2023 in the capital, Khartoum and elsewhere in the country. The RSF-led Tasis Alliance appointed Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, the commander of the paramilitary group, as head of the sovereign council in the new administration. The 15-member council serves as head of the state. The RSF grew out of the notorious Janjaweed militias, mobilized two decades ago by then-president Omar al-Bashir against populations that identify as Central or East African in Darfur. The Janjaweed were accused of mass killings, rapes and other atrocities. In the current war, the RSF has been accused of numerous atrocities. The Biden administration slapped Dagalo with sanctions, saying the RSF and its proxies were committing genocide. The RSF has denied committing genocide. The alliance spokesman Alaa al-Din Naqd announced the new administration in a video statement from the Darfur city of Nyala, which is controlled by the RFF and its allied Janjaweed. Mohammed Hassan al-Taishi, a civilian politician who was a member of a military-civilian sovereign council that ruled Sudan following the 2019 overthrow of al-Bashir, was named as prime minister in the RSF-controlled government. Rebel leader Abdelaziz al-Hilu, who commands the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) which is active in the southern Kodrofan region, was appointed as Dagalo's deputy in the council. The SPLM-N is a breakaway faction of the SPLM, the ruling party of neighboring South Sudan. The announcement came five months after the RSF and its allies signed a charter in February in Kenya's capital, Nairobi, with the aim of establishing a parallel government in RSF-controlled areas. At the time, many countries, including the U.S., rejected the RSF efforts and condemned the signing by the paramilitary group and its allies of what they called 'transitional constitution' in the Kenya-hosted conference. The foreign ministry of the internationally recognized government in Khartoum condemned the announcement in a statement. It called it a 'fake government' and urged the international community to not engage with the RSF-led administration. The RSF-led move was likely to deepen the division in Sudan. Yasir Arman, a rebel leader, said the move is likely to prolong the conflict and divide Sudan between two rival administrations — similar to neighboring Libya.

IDF to allow foreign countries to drop aid in Gaza Strip
IDF to allow foreign countries to drop aid in Gaza Strip

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

IDF to allow foreign countries to drop aid in Gaza Strip

Additionally, the World Central Kitchen organization has begun operating its kitchens inside Gaza again. The IDF announced that it will allow foreign countries to drop aid into the Gaza Strip starting on Friday, Army Radio reported, citing a senior military source. "When the UN wants to, it can. After criticism earlier this week, it suddenly transferred hundreds of trucks, despite claiming it was unable to do so until then," the source told Army Radio. "According to all IDF estimates, there has been no change in the amount of food entering the Gaza Strip in recent weeks, and Hamas's hunger campaign in Gaza is timed." Adding to these reports, Israel has approached the United Arab Emirates and Jordan, requesting that they immediately reinstate the airdrops in the area, as was done in earlier stages of the campaign. The government hopes that the Jordanians will lead the first airdrops, according to Israeli media. Hamas is using hunger in Gaza as a negotiation strategy The IDF acknowledged on Friday that while there is no starvation in Gaza, food security is at a dangerous, sensitive point and that it is working hard to keep food security balanced. The military noted that there were sensitive periods for food security during the 21-month war. However, when each period of food insecurity arose in Gaza, the IDF worked hard with humanitarian organizations and NGOs to address the issue. At this time, the IDF is attempting to persuade the UN and other aid organizations to dispatch approximately 900 aid trucks to distribution points. It should be noted that the aid trucks are on the Gaza side of the border and have been approved by the IDF. The military argued that the reason there is a current hunger crisis in Gaza is not because food security is worse now than at any other point during the war, but because Hamas is highlighting the issue now during ceasefire negotiations. During the talks, Hamas has been trying to eliminate the GHF in Gaza because the organization presents a major challenge to its political control of food in the enclave. Yonah Jeremy Bob and Corinne Baum contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store