SNP's wish to ‘throw open our borders' would risk security
The Scottish Government is much more liberal than both the UK Labour Government and the Tories on immigration, repeatedly calling for more people to be allowed to come to Scotland, but Holyrood does not have the powers to make changes.
Ministers have pushed for a shift in the system on a number of occasions, going so far as to propose a separate Scottish visa in 2020 under Nicola Sturgeon – a pitch which was quickly rejected by the Conservative-led government of the time.
Mrs Badenoch wrote: 'We need a new, sustainable system that only admits a strict number of people who come here legally, do the right thing, and who contribute to society.
'That means we must introduce a strict numerical cap on legal migration, ensure there is zero-tolerance for foreign criminals, and pass the Deportation Bill to remove those who should not be here.
'The left-wing parties at Holyrood – not just the SNP, but also Labour and the Lib Dems – don't believe tougher action is necessary.
Scottish Conservative Party Conference is now in full swing.
Follow along to see how @RussellFindlay1 is bringing common sense to Scottish politics 🏴🇬🇧#SCC25 pic.twitter.com/Qob5M9Eagy
— Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 13, 2025
'On immigration, those parties have policies student politicians would be ashamed of.
'The SNP's stance, in particular, is not remotely serious.
'If they ever got their way, they would put our citizens' security at risk. It's the nationalists' view that we should just throw open our borders, without any checks or limitations on who comes into the country.'
The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Spectator
Kate Forbes showed real bravery
There is a certain worldly cynicism aroused by the announcement that a politician is stepping down to spend more time with their family. It was for a long time the refuge of MPs who had earned themselves an entry in the News of the World, the Who's Who of romeos, rogues and reprobates, for their activities with ladies – or young gentlemen – of the night. Less commonly, it was regarded as an admission that someone could not hack it or was frustrated by their slow progress up the greasy pole. After all, no one wants to quit politics. Contra the cynics, Kate Forbes. Scotland's deputy first minister will stand down from Holyrood at next May's elections, having somehow crammed a whole political life into ten tempestuous years. In that time, she has been a backbencher, public finance minister, finance secretary, leadership candidate, backbencher again, and finally deputy first minister and economy secretary. In her letter to first minister John Swinney, she acknowledges that 'quite rightly this job entails long days far from home' but 'I do not wish to seek re-election and miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Forbes married her husband Alasdair, a widower, in 2021 and became stepmum to his three daughters. The following year the couple had a daughter, who is turning three. (Some men go to war, others jump out of planes, but living with five women is true bravery.) Forbes was never meant to get where she did. Upon her election to the Scottish parliament in 2016, her religious views were known and they marked her as an apostate in an era of secular progressivism. A member of the Free Presbyterian Church, Forbes's religion is not an identity category but a living faith. She believes in it all: birth, death, resurrection and salvation. The happy-clappy bits and the fire and brimstone alike. There was little chance of her progressing beyond the outer ministry in the modern, uber-liberal SNP, and she had to settle for a junior ministerial post in the Scottish government's finance department. Unfortunately for the party leadership, events overtook. The night before the 2020 budget speech, finance secretary Derek Mackay was forced to quit after a newspaper learned of his text messages to a 16 year old. Forbes, who had been allowed no real input into the budget, was thrust onto the floor of Holyrood to deliver – and be interrogated on – a speech she had only been handed hours before. She did so with such confidence and composure that even the SNP's most loyal critics commended her. That performance made her promotion to the cabinet finance post inevitable, though some more glumly considered it unavoidable. By the time Nicola Sturgeon resigned in February 2023, Forbes had established herself as a moderate, pro-business Nationalist who wanted the Scottish government to focus on prosperity rather than gender ideology, an agenda she opposed. Yet the prospect of the party moving to the centre, and especially of it being led by an evangelical Christian, prompted the SNP establishment to throw its weight behind Humza Yousaf, who was well-meaning but plainly not up to running a devolved government. In a straight fight, he would have been no match for Forbes, but instead the leadership contest was shaped by her internal enemies and the media into an inquisition on her religious beliefs. Journalists well-laden with secular prejudices delighted in making her answer for those verses of Scripture which scandalise modern sensibilities. To her credit as a Christian, but disastrously for a politician, she refused to lie or be evasive about her beliefs. When they asked her views on abortion, she told the truth. When they enquired as to her thinking about gay marriage, she did the same again. When they tried to corner her on trans rights, she was honest and took the punishment that came with it. Compelled to bear witness, she did so with her head held high, fighting the good fight and keeping the faith. It is one of the most personally admirable and politically suicidal decisions I have ever seen. In the end, she lost, though only narrowly, and was vindicated when her opponent swiftly proved as unequal to the challenges of office as she had warned. He inflicted so much damage with a programme of Continuity Sturgeon progressivism that, just 14 months later, his successor was drafting in Forbes as deputy head of the government to repair relations with the business sector, steer economic policy back to growth, and serve as the symbol of a new pragmatism. Despite our fundamental disagreements, I rate Forbes as a politician and a public official and said so regularly on Coffee House and elsewhere. This did nothing for her reputation among Nationalists. In fact, I know that it was used against her, and I'm sorry for that. Some regarded with bemusement, others horror, the sight of a gay Catholic Unionist simping for a Wee Free separatist, but the simping was not for Forbes so much as for the fleeting possibility that a leader of her calibre could get her hands on the controls. In a way, I should be relieved that she was sabotaged by the liberal bigots in her own party. If she had been half the first minister I reckon she might have been, she could have broadened the SNP's electoral coalition to the point at which independence became the consensus view across the electorate. She was a very dangerous woman for a time there, and might be again if she were to return after her children have grown up. The cynics will reassert themselves in the coming days, pronouncing that Forbes has seen the writing on the wall, that the SNP is finished, that she is hinting at her lack of faith in Swinney, that she had risen as high as she would be allowed to in a party thoroughly in the grips of identity politics progressives. Or, and I will tread lightly here, perhaps she truly values motherhood above career, one of the few remaining mortal sins in a non-judgemental age. Her fellow Nationalist Gail Ross did the same in 2021, admitting that five days a week away from her son was just too much. Not coincidentally, she too was a Highlands MSP, where constituencies rival small countries for square mileage. Labour's Jenny Marra, a considerable talent, walked away after ten years darting up and down the vast North East Scotland region. Family had to come first. Anglo culture is hardly alone in associating labour with fortitude and moral uprightness, but it is noticeably unforgiving of those who opt out in favour of raising children. Try to balance work and family but say you find it impossible, and you can expect to be chastised for failing at something so many parents do. The resentment is not for admitting you cannot manage but for forcing others to reconsider how well they are managing. I have sat in many a newsroom well into the evening, hearing bedtime stories read over the phone by loving parents who were wanted at home, and wanted to be there, but who were working late to give their children the best start in life. I'm not a parent, and maybe it's not my place to comment, but I know too many people whose fathers and mothers worked those hours, provided abundantly for their offspring, but now have no relationship with them. Their material needs were more than met but at the expense of other, deeper needs. No doubt Kate Forbes has made the right decision for her family but I can't help but wonder how many more families would have benefited from her making it to Bute House. Yes, she's hopelessly wrong about the constitution, but there's more to politics than policy. There's talent and character and leadership. We will have to settle for much less.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Jersey's government reveals 25-year investment plan to fight culture of 'short-termism'
Jersey 's government has revealed plans to set aside around £80 million a year to invest in capital infrastructure. Ministers want to set up a dedicated fund, ringfencing money for planned projects over the next 25 years. They include building thousands more homes, a new college in the centre of St Helier, improved road and water infrastructure and upgraded sports facilities. If approved, the money would be siphoned off from next year and given legal protection against being spent elsewhere. Jersey's Chief Minister, Deputy Lyndon Farnham, adds: "Sometimes ministers have taken money from the capital expenditure where it is not immediately noticed. Doing that for years has led to a situation where some of our infrastructure is starting to show its age. "There's been no coordinated approach, there's not been one consolidated plan that looks right across the public sector to make sure we have a structured, properly-funded capital plan. "We also need to create a platform to rebuild hope and confidence." Highlands College would be refurbished and relocated under the plans, with an accessible, purpose-built campus for Further and Higher Education. Principal Jo Terry-Marchant says: "It's really important for Jersey. More modern, fit-for-purpose facilities will allow us to widen access and opportunity to all age groups. "What is refreshing about this is that they are looking at the interconnected nature of different priorities across the island ... We have needed this for probably more than a decade." Paul Wylie, Chief Officer of the Cabinet Office, adds: "We know Highlands College campus needs renovating, so we're exploring putting it in the town centre. "That brings young people into the town centre and it frees up amazing sites at the top of the hill for family housing." The public is not expected to pay for the projects with extra taxes. Instead, from next year, the Government's annual capital allocation - approximately £80 million - will be ringfenced in the new Jersey Capital Investment Fund. Where needed, money may also be reallocated from other areas or borrowed to support major infrastructure projects. Mr Wylie also believes a change of approach is needed for the island's housing. He explains: "Our partners in Andium Homes and States of Jersey Development Company will be prioritising family-size homes of three or four bedrooms, as opposed to flats as in the past." However, backbench politicians are already questioning whether the Government will have enough funds to pay for everything that is planned. Deputy Max Andrews says: "The money has to come from somewhere ... I can understand the reason behind the decision to bring forward this new fund, but with the number of properties the Government owns, we're talking about hundreds of millions of pounds of investment. "If we were spending our money more wisely, we wouldn't be in this position in the first place." Business leaders are also asking for more clarity on the plans for investment. Jersey's Chamber of Commerce President, Lee Madden, explains: "Ambition must be matched by delivery. Our members are asking the same questions the public will be: how will this be paid for, and will it be delivered on time?" Meanwhile, Jersey's Hospitality Association have thrown their support behind the plan, stating: "This is a long-overdue step in recognising that sustainable economic growth, particularly in the visitor economy, cannot happen without Government first delivering the essential infrastructure that enables it. "But words on a page are not delivery. While we strongly support this document's content and its direction, the success of this vision will depend entirely on competent, accountable leadership." The States will vote on whether to greenlight the Government's proposals later this year.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Failed attempt to house asylum seekers on former Lincoln airbase cost at least £48m
Home Office accounts have revealed £48m was wasted on a plan to house asylum seekers on a former Lincoln airbase. In March 2023, it was announced RAF Scampton was to house 2,000 migrants as part of proposals by the previous Conservative government to reduce the reliance on hotels. The scheme was met with widespread anger and disbelief in the local area. Plans were scrapped in September as part of an election pledge by the new Labour administration. Nobody was ever housed at the site – the former home of the Dambusters – despite millions being poured into the project. The level of losses have recently been published in the Home Office's accounts for the last year. It also showed costs could have ballooned as high as £180m if the project had been pursued for another three years. The government has previously admitted that a total of around £60m was spent on the site, of which £48.5m has been recorded as a loss. Lincoln MP Hamish Falconer told ITV News: "I'm honestly furious. I've been opposed to this plan since the very beginning. We always said this wasn't going to work for lots of obvious reasons. "I saw the site, just about a month ago, and I could not believe - with fury - all the NHS spending that has gone on in Scampton for a plan that was never going to work. That money should have gone on Lincoln County Hospital. "What we want to see is the site used for proper commercial purposes. It should be bringing in jobs. It should be reflecting the heritage of RAF Scampton. "Obviously, there is an issue in relation to asylum seekers that needs to be dealt with, but RAF Scampton should be for different purposes and that's what I've always said." Sarah Carter, from Save Our Scampton, said: "We're nearly a year down the line and we're still none the wiser what's going to happen here. "All that money wasted, and they're still wasting it. It's just haemorrhaging money, and we want an end to this so we can stop spending the money and so we know what's going to be happening." Backed by West Lindsey District Council, Scampton Holdings wants to develop the site. They're keen to push ahead with its regeneration plans to create a hub for heritage, aviation, defence and space. In a report shared with ITV News - the company said the project would bring in £5m every year to the local visitor economy, support more than 750 jobs, and generate an estimated £25m. Sally Grindrod-Smith is heavily involved in the West Lindsey District Council's plans for the regeneration with Scampton Holdings. She said: "I hear on a daily basis how frustrated the community are. You can see the site is deteriorating rapidly and there's real concerns over whether we'll be able to bring this back into use. "We've worked hard to make sure there are still investors interested, and our development partners are ready to go. "The council are committed, and we're ready to go once the home office get ready to sell the site." A Home Office spokesperson said: 'A review carried out in September 2024 determined that, due to decisions taken by the previous government, the costs associated with the Scampton site had surged well beyond initial estimates and no longer delivered value for money for taxpayers. 'The cost of exiting this site was minimal compared to the projected minimum £180 million required to keep it running until March 2027.'
