logo
Food security experts warn Gaza is at critical risk of famine if Israel doesn't end its blockade

Food security experts warn Gaza is at critical risk of famine if Israel doesn't end its blockade

The Hindu13-05-2025
The Gaza Strip will likely fall into famine if Israel doesn't lift its blockade and stop its military campaign, food security experts said in a stark warning on Monday (May 12, 2025).
Nearly half a million Palestinians are facing possible starvation, living in 'catastrophic' levels of hunger, and 1 million others can barely get enough food, according to findings by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a leading international authority on the severity of hunger crises.
The group said 'there is a high risk' of outright famine if circumstances don't change.
Israel has banned all food, shelter, medicine and any other goods from entering the Palestinian territory for the past 10 weeks, even as it carries out waves of airstrikes and ground operations. Gaza's population of around 2.3 million people relies almost entirely on outside aid to survive, because Israel's 19-month-old military campaign has wiped away most capacity to produce food inside the territory.
Israel's Foreign Ministry rejected the findings, saying the IPC's previous forecasts had proven unfounded and that the group undercounted the amount of aid that entered Gaza during a ceasefire earlier this year.
Food supplies are emptying out dramatically. Communal kitchens handing out cooked meals are virtually the only remaining source of food for most people in Gaza now, but they too are rapidly shutting down for lack of stocks.
Thousands of Palestinians crowd daily outside the public kitchens, pushing and jostling with their pots to receive lentils or pasta.
'We end up waiting in line for four, five hours, in the sun. It is exhausting,' said Riham Sheikh el-Eid, waiting at a kitchen in the southern city of Khan Younis on Sunday (May 11, 2025). 'At the end, we walk away with nothing. It is not enough for everybody.'
'Israel is starving Gaza in an attempt to destroy Hamas'
'The lack of a famine declaration doesn't mean people aren't already starving, and a declaration shouldn't be a precondition for ending the suffering,' said Chris Newton, an analyst for the International Crisis Group focusing on starvation as a weapon of war.
'The Israeli government is starving Gaza as part of its attempt to destroy Hamas and transform the strip,' he said.
The Israeli military says enough aid entered Gaza during a two-month ceasefire that Israel shattered in mid-March when it relaunched its military campaign.
Israel says the blockade aims to pressure Hamas to release the hostages it still holds. It says it won't let aid back in until a new system giving it control over distribution is in place, accusing Hamas of siphoning off supplies.
'Entire population of Gaza facing high levels of hunger'
Monday's (May 12, 2025) report said that 'any slight gains made during the ceasefire have been reversed. Nearly the entire population of Gaza now faces high levels of hunger,' it said, 'driven by conflict, the collapse of infrastructure, destruction of agriculture, and blockades of aid'.
Mahmoud Alsaqqa, food security and livelihoods coordinator for Oxfam, called on governments to press Israel to allow 'unimpeded humanitarian access.'
'Silence in the face of this man-made starvation is complicity,' he said.
Israel has vowed to destroy Hamas after the group's Oct. 7, 2023, surprise attack on Israel, in which militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostage, most of whom have been released in ceasefire agreements or other deals.
Israel's offensive has killed over 52,000 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, whose count does not distinguish between civilians or combatants.
How is famine declared?
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, first set up in 2004 during the famine in Somalia, groups more than a dozen U.N. agencies, aid groups, governments and other bodies.
It has only declared famine a few times — in Somalia in 2011, and South Sudan in 2017 and 2020, and last year in parts of Sudan's western Darfur region.
It rates an area as in famine when at least two of three things occur: 20% of households have an extreme lack of food, or are essentially starving; at least 30% of children six months to five years suffer from acute malnutrition or wasting, meaning they're too thin for their height; and at least two people or four children under five per every 10,000 are dying daily due to starvation or the interaction of malnutrition and disease.
'Catastrophic' hunger in Gaza
The assessment on Monday (May 12, 2025) found that the first threshold was met in Gaza, saying 477,000 people — or 22% of the population — are classified as in 'catastrophic' hunger, the highest level, for the period from May 11 to the end of September.
It said more than 1 million people are at 'emergency' levels of hunger, the second highest level, meaning they have 'very high gaps" in food and high acute malnutrition.
The other thresholds were not met. The data was gathered in April and up to May 6. Food security experts say it takes time for people to start dying from starvation.
The report said if the blockade and military campaign continues, 'the vast majority' in Gaza will not have access to food or water, civil unrest will worsen, health services will 'fully collapse,' disease will spread, and levels of malnutrition and death will cross the thresholds into famine.
It had also warned of 'imminent' famine in northern Gaza in March 2024, but the following month, Israel allowed an influx of aid under U.S. pressure after an Israeli strike killed seven aid workers.
Aid groups now say the situation is the most dire of the entire war. The U.N. humanitarian office, known as OCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs), said Friday (May 9, 2025) that the number of children seeking treatment at clinics for malnutrition has doubled since February, even as supplies to treat them are quickly running out.
Aid groups have shut down food distribution for lack of stocks. Many foods have disappeared from the markets and what's left has spiraled in price and is unaffordable to most. Farmland is mostly destroyed or inaccessible. Water distribution is grinding to a halt, largely because of lack of fuel.
Beth Bechdol, deputy director of the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization, said 'more than 75% of Gaza's farmland had been damaged or destroyed, and two-thirds of the wells used for irrigation were no longer operating'.
The destruction, she said, is 'driving these large numbers of people closer towards the famine numbers that we think are possible.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amicus counters government stand, says it violates right to autonomy
Amicus counters government stand, says it violates right to autonomy

Time of India

time22 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Amicus counters government stand, says it violates right to autonomy

NEW DELHI: Opposing the government's firm stand not to lower the age of consent below 18 years, amicus curiae and senior advocate Indira Jaising told Supreme Court that it criminalised "consensual sexual activity between children in the age group of 16-18 years, and violated their right to autonomy". Presenting a counter to Centre's stand in the case, Jaising said the age of consent was static at 16 years for 80 years and "neither any rational reason was given justifying the increase to 18 years nor was there any data to suggest that the age of consent required any increase". "Until enactment of Pocso Act , there was no law dealing with sexual offences against children. The newly enacted Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, in Section 63, has kept a legislative scheme similar to the one in Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013, that amended IPC to increase the age of consent to 18 years," she said. Jaising said increase in age of consent violated right of autonomy of children in 16-18 age group, who could give mature consent to sexual activity given the fact that they had attained puberty and, consequentially, sexual awareness. However, she put in an important caveat. "This brief does not suggest that anyone above the age of 18 who has sex with another below the age of 18 be decriminalised," she said. "Scientific research indicates that adolescents are attaining puberty sooner than they did several years ago and puberty as we know, is the age of awakening of sexual awareness. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo It is the age during which there is a natural attraction between the sexes and development of sexual relationships of choice," Jaising said, adding, "Hence, to criminalise such an activity rather than addressing the issue of sex education, is arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the best interests of children as defined in law. " Jaising requested SC to "declare that any consensual sexual activity between children of the ages of 16-18 constitutes an exception to penal provisions of the statute as being 'close in age', non-abusive and non-exploitative". Increasing the age of consent has led to branding hundreds of children in the 16-18 age group as criminals, she said, adding, "Data also indicates that most complaints to police are filed by parents of the girl, often against her own wishes and for extraneous reasons such as inter-religious relationships or inter-caste relationships. "Consensual sexual relations between adolescents in the 16-18 age bracket need not necessarily result in marriage, but on the contrary, criminalising such sexual behaviour will result in children eloping and getting married to avoid being prosecuted by Pocso." She suggested to the court that the law as it stands requires to be read down to include a 'close in age' exception when the sexual activity is consensual.

Age of consent for sex cannot be less than 18 years, Centre tells SC
Age of consent for sex cannot be less than 18 years, Centre tells SC

Time of India

time22 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Age of consent for sex cannot be less than 18 years, Centre tells SC

NEW DELHI: Union government has told Supreme Court that the age of consent for sex cannot be lowered from 18 years, as it is meant to protect minors from sexual abuse, often by relatives, but conceded that judicial discretion can be exercised on a case-by-case basis in instances of adolescent romantic and physical relationships. "The statutory age of consent fixed at 18 years must be strictly and uniformly enforced. Any departure from this standard, even in the name of reform or adolescent autonomy, would amount to rolling back decades of progress in child protection law, and undermine the deterrent character of laws like Pocso Act , 2012, and BNS," it said. Centre said the constitutional framework unequivocally supported the legal presumption that a person below 18 years of age was incapable of giving valid and informed consent to sexual activity. "Loosening age-based protections could open avenues for abuse (rape) under the guise of consensual (sexual) activity," it said. In a comprehensive written submission settled by additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati, the Centre detailed how the age of consent increased from 10 years in Indian Penal Code, 1860; to 12 years under the Age of Consent Act, 1891; 14 years in an amendment to IPC in 1925 and Sharda Act (Child Marriage Restraint law) of 1929; to 16 years in a 1940 amendment to IPC and 18 years in 1978 through amendment to Child Marriage Restraint Act which has remained in force till date. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo "The age of consent under Indian law, fixed at 18 years, represents a carefully considered legislative choice aimed at creating a non-negotiable protective framework for children. This flows from the inherent protection provided to children envisaged under the Constitution of India," govt said. It added that the judiciary, on a case-by-case basis, could exercise discretion, including the close-in-age exception for those nearing 18 years and engaged in adolescence romance. "The legislative framework governing child sexual offences, particularly under Pocso Act, 2012, is premised not only on the vulnerability of the child due to age, but also on the recognition that a majority of such offences are committed by persons within the child's immediate environment of trust, including family members, neighbours, caregivers and teachers. Such perpetrators have a strong influence on the authority and agency of the minors," Centre said. It said data collated by National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) and NGOs like Save the Children and HAQ Centre for Child Rights, indicated that over 50% of sexual offences against children were perpetrated by persons known to the child or those who were trusted by the minors. Lowering the age of consent from 18 years, under the guise of adolescent romance, would be legally unsound and provide a defence to the abusers, who exploit the minor's emotional dependence or silence, govt said. "A child's inability to report or resist is exacerbated when the perpetrator is a parent or close family member. In such cases, presenting 'consent' as a defence only victimises the child, shifts the blame onto them, and undermines the very object of Pocso Act to protect children from exploitation regardless of whether they were 'willing," it said. Govt said the existing age of consent (18 years) must not be tinkered with by the court as it was specified in several legislations to "protect the bodily integrity of children and uphold the constitutional and statutory safeguards accorded to them".

"Your Party": Ex-Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn Forms New UK Political Party
"Your Party": Ex-Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn Forms New UK Political Party

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

"Your Party": Ex-Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn Forms New UK Political Party

Former leftist Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn announced Thursday he was forming a new political party alongside another ex-member of Britain's ruling party, as the UK's political landscape continues to splinter. Corbyn, who lost two elections as Labour leader in 2017 and 2019, and fellow independent MP Zarah Sultana referred to the new left-wing outfit as "Your Party", but later said its name still had to be decided. "It's time for a new kind of political party. One that is rooted in our communities, trade unions and social movements," they said in a joint statement. In their announcement, they called for a "mass redistribution of wealth and power" and said they would "keep demanding an end to all arms sales to Israel". They also committed to a "free and independent Palestine". Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has pulled Labour to the centre since succeeding Corbyn as leader, faces growing calls within his party to recognise a Palestinian state. Corbyn, 76, stepped down as Labour leader after overseeing its worst result in decades, when it was trounced in the 2019 general election by the Conservatives, then led by Boris Johnson. Labour under Starmer suspended him in 2020 after he refused to fully accept the findings of a rights watchdog's probe into claims that anti-Semitism had become rampant within Labour's ranks under his leadership. The Equality and Human Rights Commission ruled the party had broken equality law when Corbyn was in charge. Corbyn said anti-Semitism had been "dramatically overstated for political reasons". Last year Corbyn announced he would stand as an independent in the July 2024 general election after Labour failed to put him forward as a candidate. He was expelled from the party but still went on to win comfortably his Islington North seat in London, which he has represented for more than 40 years. Sultana, an MP since 2019, was suspended by Labour last year after she and several other members of parliament voted to scrap a controversial cap on child benefits. Challenging Two-Party Dominance While it remains to be seen whether the new movement will take off, its formation appears to confirm a trend in British politics towards a multi-party system. British politics has long been dominated by Labour and the Conservatives, but three other parties are challenging that order. The centre-left Liberal Democrats won 72 seats in the 650-seat parliament in July 2024, while Nigel Farage's anti-immigrant Reform UK party won about 14 percent of the vote. It picked up five seats, an unprecedented breakthrough for a hard-right party in Britain. Farage's Eurosceptics swept dozens of council and mayoral seats in local elections in May and are leading national opinion polls, although the next general election is not expected until 2029. While Reform are picking up support on the right, Labour is also losing votes to the Greens on the left. Starmer, a former chief state prosecutor who is seen as too right-wing for some left-wingers in his party, recently suspended four lawmakers who rebelled over his attempts at reforming welfare. They currently sit as independents and Westminster watchers will be keeping a close eye on whether they are tempted to join Corbyn's new party. "I do think there is space for a left-wing populist party in the UK with a charismatic leader that could pose an enormous threat to Labour and the other parties, but it's going to take a lot to convince me that Jeremy Corbyn can be it," Chris Hopkins, political research director at polling firm Savanta, told AFP.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store