logo
Microsoft Reports Mixed Progress Toward Ambitious 2030 Carbon Negative Goal

Microsoft Reports Mixed Progress Toward Ambitious 2030 Carbon Negative Goal

Newsweek29-05-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
In 2020, Microsoft set an ambitious climate goal to be carbon negative by 2030. Halfway into the decade, the company's latest sustainability report released Thursday shows the software giant has a long way to go to meet that goal but may be starting to bend its emissions curve downward.
The report shows the company's total 2024 greenhouse gas output of 15,543,000 metric tons is still about 23 percent higher than its 2020 baseline of comparison. But Microsoft's total annual emissions in 2024 are slightly lower for the first time since the artificial intelligence boom brought a surge in data centers, computing power and energy consumption. The 2024 emissions are roughly 1.4 million metric tons lower than in 2023, and the lowest annual emissions the company has reported since 2021.
Microsoft's climate goal to be carbon negative by 2030 means not only eliminating its total emissions but also supporting projects that draw carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.
"We're focused on the long-term goal of meeting our 2030 commitments," a Microsoft spokesperson told Newsweek via email. "The annual reporting process is an important check-in each year to see how we're doing, and it informs our decision-making as we keep working to meet those goals over the next five years."
The Microsoft logo in San Francisco, California, May 13, 2025.
The Microsoft logo in San Francisco, California, May 13, 2025.
Smith Collection/Gado/Getty
In a foreword to the report, Microsoft Corporation Vice Chair and President Brad Smith and Chief Sustainability Officer Melanie Nakagawa wrote that "our journey towards being carbon negative is a marathon, not a sprint."
They noted that while emissions have been going in the wrong direction since Microsoft made its climate commitments in 2020, the increase has been "modest" compared to the company's revenue growth and far higher energy consumption over that period.
Smith and Nakagawa wrote that the company remains "focused on sustained progress towards our 2030 goals."
Cloud computing and the explosion of generative AI and large language models have greatly increased energy consumption by the tech sector. If the regional power grid that supplies a data center or tech campus burns fossil fuels to generate electricity, that drives up the company's emissions due to energy use, known as Scope 2 emissions.
"We must also bring more carbon-free electricity onto the grids where we operate," Smith and Nakagawa wrote.
According to the report, Microsoft used power purchase agreements to contract 19 gigawatts of new renewable energy in 2024 in 16 countries. Microsoft also sought other carbon-free energy sources, including an agreement last September with Constellation Energy that aims to restart an idle reactor at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station in Pennsylvania.
A Microsoft spokesperson said the company is "on track to achieve our 2025 target of procuring enough renewable energy to cover 100 percent of our energy consumption."
Greenhouse gases that arise from the suppliers and the company's value chain, known as Scope 3 emissions, account for the bulk of Microsoft's CO2 output. According to the report, the company's Scope 3 emissions have grown 26 percent since 2020.
Microsoft requires its large-scale suppliers to commit to a transition to 100 percent carbon-free electricity for the goods and services they deliver. The report detailed innovative solutions to reduce emissions from the construction and operation of data centers.
Last week, Microsoft announced an agreement with a Massachusetts company called Sublime Systems, which has developed a low-carbon method for cement production. Traditional cement-making methods produce massive amounts of CO2, and the industry is a major global source of emissions.
Microsoft's purchase agreement for more than 622,000 tons of low-carbon cement will help the new company ramp up its output.
"Microsoft is stepping up as the first customer for our future megaton-scale plant, enabling us to more rapidly build and scale Sublime Cement as a global, enduring solution for clean construction." Sublime Systems CEO and Co-founder Leah Ellis said in a statement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World's Biggest Polluter Is in the US, Study Finds
World's Biggest Polluter Is in the US, Study Finds

Newsweek

time40 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

World's Biggest Polluter Is in the US, Study Finds

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. military has been identified as the largest single institutional emitter of greenhouse gases worldwide, according to a new study. Newsweek reached out to the Department of Defense (DOD) via email for comment. Why It Matters The study cited the scale of energy consumption required for maintaining military bases, global transport of personnel, equipment, weapons and frequent training drills as central contributors to the broader carbon footprint. The findings underscore the global climate implications of the U.S. military's operational scale. What To Know The study, led by Ryan Thombs of Penn State University and published in PLOS Climate on July 2, drew on publicly available data from the DOD spanning 1975 to 2022, linking reductions in military spending to significant decreases in energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Researchers found that a decrease in expenditures has a larger effect on slashing energy consumption than a rise in expenditures does on heightening energy usage. Additional analyses show that this is due to cuts in DOD energy consumption from facilities, vehicles and equipment, and jet fuel in particular. "We started this study not entirely sure what we were going to find," Thombs told Newsweek on Thursday. "There are published studies on the impacts of increasing militarization on environmental outcomes, but studying the effects of cutting military spending was an open question. "I think the finding that cutting expenditures had a larger impact than increasing expenditures was a little bit surprising but made sense, and it is also the thing that really stood out in our analyses." The seal of the U.S. Department of Defense is pictured at DAR Constitution Hall in Washington, D.C., on November 28, 2016. The seal of the U.S. Department of Defense is pictured at DAR Constitution Hall in Washington, D.C., on November 28, 2016. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images The study also shows that spending cuts to the U.S. military could have significant ramifications for energy consumption. "We show that large, sustained cuts to expenditures could produce annual energy savings similar to what the nation of Slovenia or the U.S. state of Delaware consumes annually by 2032," Thombs said. Andrew Jorgenson, sociology professor at the University of British Columbia and the study's co-author, told Newsweek on Thursday that the study advances the interdisciplinary science on the societal causes of climate change. While much prior research focuses on such factors as economic growth, corporations, population dynamics and technology, he said these new findings highlight the U.S. military's role "in causing anthropogenic climate change, given the enormous volume of fossil fuels it consumes." "Our findings ... underscores the necessity for considering the role of the U.S. military," Jorgenson said. "It also suggests a pathway for meaningful decarbonization and climate mitigation, albeit a very difficult one given the Trump administration's emphasis on increasing U.S. military spending and its attacks on climate science and climate policy, and the growing pressure for other nations throughout the world to increase their military spending as well." Pentagon's Carbon Footprint Surpasses Most Countries The U.S. military's carbon output as of 2022 exceeded that of nearly 140 national governments, according to The Conversation. An Army Climate Strategy report from 2019 identified the DOD as the top institutional petroleum consumer globally. In 2020, the U.S. Army's electricity usage alone generated 4.1 million tons of greenhouse gases—1 million tons greater than Switzerland's entire heat and electricity emissions in 2017. In February 2022, the Army released a strategy pledging net-zero emissions by 2050 and a goal to electrify its military vehicle fleet and shift bases to carbon-free electricity. Climate change has become much less of a priority during the current Trump administration. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in a statement on March 10, downplayed the role of climate change within the DOD, The Independent reported. "We do training and warfighting," Hegseth said, rejecting climate initiatives as outside the military's responsibility. His stance diverged from both Pentagon climate policy in previous administrations and the department's own research. Hegseth's comments drew criticism, especially as the military's annual emissions were reported to total approximately 51 million metric tons, largely from buildings and vehicles. What People Are Saying Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, on March 14: "The Pentagon ... announced that we are eliminating woke climate change programs and initiatives inconsistent with our core warfighting mission." What Happens Next Authors of the PLOS Climate study project that continued reductions in military spending through 2032 could result in dramatic annual energy savings.

Nvidia Just Made History -- And Wall Street's Still Buying
Nvidia Just Made History -- And Wall Street's Still Buying

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia Just Made History -- And Wall Street's Still Buying

Nvidia (NVDA, Financials) has done it; the company just passed Apple's peak and became the most valuable firm in market history US$3.92 trillion, and counting. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. Its chips power the AI boom; its stock powers portfolios. Shares rose another 2.2% Thursday to US$160.60; traders didn't blink they doubled down. Nvidia's climb has been wild; four years ago, it was worth US$500 billion. Today, it's bigger than all listed companies in the UK; bigger than Canada and Mexico's markets combined. And yet it doesn't feel frothy. The stock trades at 32 forward earnings; well below its five-year average. Profits are soaring; estimates keep rising. Microsoft (MSFT, FInancials) is next in line at US$3.7 trillion; Apple (AAPL, Financials) trails at US$3.19 trillion. Nvidia started with gaming; now it runs the AI universe. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Bill Gates Is Betting Two-Thirds Of His Foundation's Portfolio In These 3 Stocks
Bill Gates Is Betting Two-Thirds Of His Foundation's Portfolio In These 3 Stocks

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Bill Gates Is Betting Two-Thirds Of His Foundation's Portfolio In These 3 Stocks

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. The Gates Foundation Trust, founded by the billionaire Bill Gates, has a portfolio valued at $41.806 billion, which is concentrated in these three stocks as of the end of the first quarter of 2025. What Happened: The foundation has received donations from Gates and the Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett, since the year 2000 and 2006, respectively. Additionally, it reflects the approaches of both Gates and Buffett. According to its 13F filings, the three major stock holdings in the foundation's portfolio made up at least two-thirds or 66% of the fund's holdings as of the first quarter of the ongoing calendar year. Trending: GoSun's Breakthrough Rooftop EV Charger Already Has 2,000+ Units Reserved — Company Value (as of March 31) % Of Holdings (as of March 31) Number Of Shares Change From Dec. 31, 2024 (in %) Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT) $10.682 billion 26% 28457247 0% Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK) $9.145 billion 22% 17172435 -13% Waste Management Inc. (NYSE:WM) $7.462 billion 18% 32234344 0% Microsoft stock has driven the Gates Foundation's holdings to nearly $11 billion. This surge is largely due to Microsoft's dominant position in artificial intelligence, particularly through its Azure cloud platform and OpenAI investment. Gates has steadily contributed Microsoft stock to the foundation since its inception in 2000. Buffett has also donated the Class B shares to the Gates Foundation since 2006, maintaining voting control by converting his Class A shares. Despite a requirement for annual grant payouts, the foundation still holds 17.17 million Berkshire shares, valued at about $9.145 billion. The Gates Foundation Trust has held a stake in Waste Management since 2002, exemplifying Buffett's value investing principles. WM is a waste management, comprehensive waste, and environmental services company having a landfill portfolio at an operational It Matters: Microsoft has been under the analyst radar, as it has been receiving recent price target bumps and upgrades. Microsoft's strategic initiatives, including the integration of Copilot into Office, Dynamics, and Teams, are significantly deepening subscription revenues, explained Nigam Arora in his recent report. He added that Microsoft's cloud computing arm, Aruzre, remained a compelling growth driver, exhibiting double-digit growth that is currently outstripping competitors and maintaining healthy margins. Meanwhile, Wedbush analyst Dan Ives has said that the 'massive adoption wave' of AI-driven Azure services could propel Microsoft to become a $5 trillion company over the next 18 months. – Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $100. Photo courtesy: Alexandros Michailidis / This article Bill Gates Is Betting Two-Thirds Of His Foundation's Portfolio In These 3 Stocks originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store