Glastonbury controversy: Police investigate Kneecap and Bob Vylan sets
Controversial Belfast rappers Kneecap and their weekend slot made headlines in the lead-up to the festival, after several MPs, including Prime Minister Keir Starmer, called on Glastonbury to pull the band from the line-up, due to their defiant pro-Palestinian remarks and band member Mo Chara being charged with a terror offence.
Still, the band played and were supported by Glastonbury co-organiser Emily Eavis, who said that 'everyone is welcome.'
Her father, festival founder Michael Eavis, added: 'People that don't agree with the politics of the event can go somewhere else!'
Still, controversy was inevitable...
Kneecap cause a ruckus
As predicted, Kneecap delivered an incendiary set at Glastonbury, on the West Holts stage, to a huge crowd waving countless Palestinian flags.
The BBC, the festival's broadcaster partner, said in a statement just hours before the band took to the stage that their set wouldn't be streamed live and would instead be made available as an on-demand version after the end of the gig.
Previously, Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said she thought the BBC "should not be showing" Kneecap's performance at the festival: "The BBC should not be showing Kneecap propaganda. One Kneecap band member is currently on bail, charged under the Terrorism Act. As a publicly funded platform, the BBC should not be rewarding extremism.
The trio, DJ Próvaí, Mo Chara and Móglaí Bap, came on stage with screens showing their usual message: 'Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people, aided by the UK government. Free Palestine.' This message was galvanized during the set when the band said: 'There's no f*cking hiding it, Israel are war criminals.'
'Glastonbury, I'm a free man,' also declared Chara, referring to being given unconditional bail from his appearance on his terror charge.
'Mo Chara was in court this month,' said Bap. 'Was anyone there? Mo Chara's in court for a trumped up terrorism charge. It's not the first time there was a miscarriage of justice for an Irish person in the British justice system'.
Chara then mentioned Keir Starmer – who argued that it was 'not appropriate' for the band to be playing at Glastonbury: 'The Prime Minister of your country said he didn't want us to play, so f*ck Keir Starmer.'
They echoed this sentiment when introducing their fan favourite song 'Get Your Brits Out', with Chara telling the crowd: 'We f*cking love the English people, it's the English government we can't stand. F*ck Keir Starmer.'
The band ended their set by thanking Glastonbury festival for their support of the band and for Palestine, with Bap stating: 'One day it will be controversial for the people that didn't speak about Palestine,' with Chara agreeing: 'Remember those c*nts, we will remember them.'
However, their set was not the only controversial moment of this year's highly politicised edition... In fact, their lightning may have been stolen by an earlier act.
Bob Vylan: Controversy before Kneecap's set
Before the Kneecap set, rap-punk duo Bob Vylan also caused controversy by leading the crowd in chants of: "Free, free Palestine" and "Death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)."
The BBC said it issued a warning on screen about 'very strong and discriminatory language' during the live stream.
Still, that wasn't the end of it.
Une publication partagée par @celebrities4palestine
The Israeli Embassy to the UK said on social media that it was 'deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival," while the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said it will be formally complaining to the BBC over its "outrageous decision" to broadcast the performance.
In a statement, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: "There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech." The Prime Minister also reiterated his previous argument that Kneecap should have been removed from the line-up: "I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence. The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast."
Even Emily Eavis posted a response to Bob Vylan's performance.
"Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the Festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence," she wrote.
She added that while "as a festival, we stand against all forms of war and terrorism - we will always believe in - and actively campaign for - hope, unity, peace and love", adding a performer's comments "should never be seen as a tacit endorsement of their opinions and beliefs".
Eavis added: "With almost 4,000 performances at Glastonbury 2025, there will inevitably be artists and speakers appearing on our stages whose views we do not share."
Une publication partagée par Glastonbury Festival (@glastofest)
British Police said that they were assessing footage of the performance to decide whether any offences may have been committed.
Who are Bob Vylan?
Bob Vylan are a punk-rap duo known for their politically charged lyrics which tackle racism, homophobia, police brutality and far-right politics.
The two members keep their real names secret and are known as Bobby Vylan and Bobbie Vylan.
Formed in Ipswich in 2017, the band has released five albums – 'Vylan' (2017), 'Dread' (2019), 'We Live Here' (2020), 'Bob Vylan Presents The Price Of Life' (2022), and last year's 'Humble As The Sun'.
They have won several awards, including Best Alternative Act at the MOBOs in 2022.
Like Kneecap, the duo has been outspoken on the war in Gaza.
A UN report has found that Israel's military actions are consistent with genocide, and at least 56,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Gaza Health Ministry.
Israel has continually denied that their actions in Palestine can be equated to genocide and argued that it has not partaken in any war crimes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
West Bank: Israeli settlers continue to harass Palestinians, reportedly burn down house
The FRANCE 24 Observers team contacted a member of the family who owned the burnt-out house. The Palestinian in his fifties described the attack: The settlers came in the middle of the night, at 1.30 am. They broke into my house. There were seven of us in the house, we were woken up by the fire, and we saw two people running away, but we couldn't see them clearly. We called the fire brigade, but they took too long to come. The fire had plenty of time to spread. This isn't the first time; a few days ago, we were attacked and some of our belongings were stolen. I had already contacted the police and filed a complaint. The police took photos and left. They didn't arrest anyone or do anything. A video posted by several Palestinian activist and journalist accounts showed the extent of the destruction caused by the fire. Residents of the village told the Observers team that they saw two men set fire to the house and then leave for one of the settler outposts. While this information is not independently verifiable, other attacks by settlers in Susya have already been documented and verified. 'The settlement is on the site of our former village' According to a local activist called Hassan, around 350 Palestinians live in the village of Susya today. The colony is on the site of Susya, our former village. They established it after we moved there in 1986. They forcibly evicted us and allowed the settlers to move into our village. Today, we are located around 300 metres from our original village and, as a result, from the colony. The presence of the settlement on the site of the old village goes hand in hand with pressure on the agricultural land used by Palestinians, as demonstrated by the recent uprooting of 200 olive trees by Israeli settlers in Susya. This pressure also extends to the control of water points. The village of Susya has historically depended on collecting water from wells and rainfall. After October 7, the settlements took control of 95% of these wells and are preventing Palestinians from using them. And the remaining 5%, which are inside the village, are also off-limits. Their herds of cows and sheep go there, and they even bring their herds to destroy our olive trees and crops. According to the Israeli NGO B'Tselem, which defends human rights by documenting violations committed in the occupied territories, the current Palestinian village of Susya has existed since at least 1917. Located in Area C of the West Bank, Susya is under exclusive Israeli military and civilian control. B'Tselem points out that, under the pretext of the lack of building permits, which are virtually impossible for Palestinians to obtain in this area, the Israeli authorities refuse to recognise the village officially, regularly destroy its homes and infrastructure, and support the expansion of neighbouring Israeli settlements, in violation of international law. Hassan said: Most of these settlers from before October 7 are now integrated into the Israeli army. With their military uniforms, they prevent Palestinians from entering their own land. Settlers and soldiers complement each other in their aggression against the Palestinians. Well-known settlers Two of the settlers occupying these outposts are well known in the Masafer Yatta region. They are Shem Tov Lusky and his father, Gadi Lusky. While there is no indication that they are linked to the house fire on June 24, activists have identified them in several attacks. According to a local activist's X account, they attacked farm workers and the owner of a poultry farm in the town of Yatta, 6 kilometres north of Susya, on June 20. They were accompanied by a uniformed settler. Six Palestinians were reportedly injured and evacuated for medical treatment. One of the two settlers was also identified by the NGO B'tselem in another attack on August 4, 2024. The report explained that three masked settlers arrived by car at Khirbet Wadi a-Rakhim, where a Palestinian community lives, a few minutes from the village of Susya. The NGO said that the residents recognised Shem Tov Luski among them. Armed with clubs, the settlers insulted a family and claimed that the land belonged to them. A voice audible in the video, speaking English and recognised as that of Shem Tov Luski, threatens to rape one of the men in the family. On June 23, Israeli settlers repeatedly targeted villages around Ramallah. These attacks degenerated into violent clashes, prompting the intervention of the Israeli army. In a village north of Ramallah, four Palestinians were killed by army fire, including a 13-year-old teenager. According to the Palestinian ministry of health, 999 people, including 202 children, have been killed in the occupied West Bank since October 7, 2023.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Guimet museum in Paris sued for dropping Tibet from gallery name
Four pro-Tibetan groups in France have lodged a legal complaint against a popular Paris museum, accusing it of wanting to "erase the existence of Tibet", documents seen by AFP showed on Wednesday. The state-run Musée Guimet recently renamed its Nepal-Tibet gallery as "Himalayan world", which the groups say is "sowing confusion about Tibet's cultural distinctiveness with the political aim of erasing Tibet's existence". They also accuse it of removing references to "Tibetan art" in its collection, with the traditional Buddhist identity of the region an object of intense struggle between pro-Tibetan groups and Beijing. Lawyers representing the plaintiffs in France, Lily Ravon and William Bourdon, told AFP it was "hard not to see a political undertone and a deliberate choice by Guimet to align itself with Chinese lobbying efforts". Contacted by AFP, the museum denied any intention to "render a culture invisible, let alone deny Tibetan identity", and said the use of "Himalayan world" was meant to "highlight the richness of cultural interactions across this vast and complex region". Located in the upmarket 16th district, the Musée Guimet specialises in Asian art. Tibet is officially one of China's "autonomous regions", but Beijing has largely abandoned the phrase "Tibet Autonomous Region" in favour of "Xizang Autonomous Region" in its official non-Chinese-language communications. Beijing is extremely sensitive about the issue of Tibetan identity and anything seen as challenging its sovereignty over the strategic Himalayan plateau that borders India, Nepal and Bhutan. The French associations argue in their legal complaint that the changes at Guimet "lack any scientific or historical basis" and breach the museum's statutory mission to contribute to "education, training and research". France and China marked 60 years of diplomatic relations last year, when controversy about references to Tibet in Parisian art collections first emerged. Around 30 researchers published an open letter accusing Guimet and the nearby Quai Branly museum, which is dedicated to indigenous arts, of "bowing to China" by removing the word Tibet and of complying with its "demands ... to rewrite history".
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
One year after taking office, Keir Starmer faces growing weakness and dissent from his own MPs
Exactly one year after Labour's historic victory in the July 2024 general election, the authority of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has diminished and his decisions have come under scrutiny – even from within his own party. On Tuesday, July 1, his highly controversial disability benefits reform bill passed in the House of Commons, but only after a series of last-minute, humiliating concessions. Although Labour holds 403 out of 650 seats in the lower house at Westminster, the bill was adopted by only 335 votes, with dozens of Labour MPs refusing to back a measure that had been stripped of almost all its substance by Downing Street. In its original version, still staunchly defended just a week ago by Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Liz Kendall, the bill called for drastically tightening the eligibility criteria for the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), the main disability allowance in the United Kingdom. From November 2026, all those already eligible or wishing to become eligible would have to prove that they have at least four points awarded for their disability in order to receive or continue to receive the benefit. This means that a person unable to prepare meals or wash their lower body would no longer be eligible for PIP.
