Scientists criticise cut in UK funding for global vaccination group
The Foreign Office billed the £1.25bn commitment over five years to the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (Gavi) as a major boost to the group's work as well as to the UK's status as a developer of vaccines. A series of aid agencies praised the decision.
It is a larger sum than had been feared by many in the aid world after the decision by UK government to cut its foreign aid commitment from 0.7% of national income to 0.5%, which will then fall to 0.3% in 2027.
However, the amount for 2026-29 is 24% lower than the £1.65bn pledged by Boris Johnson for 2021-25 to the Geneva-based public-private organisation, which has vaccinated more than a billion children in developing countries. When inflation is taken into account, it is a 40% cut.
The decision was condemned by two leading British vaccine scientists who had pushed for the UK to maintain its support for Gavi, especially in the light of massive US cuts to aid.
Dr Sandy Douglas, a senior vaccinologist at Oxford University's Jenner Institute, who led efforts to scale up production of the Covid-19 vaccine, told the Guardian: 'Many thousands of children who could have lived will instead die – it's hugely disappointing to see the UK government backsliding rather than driving progress on global poverty.'
A statement from the One Campaign, which works on healthier lives in Africa, said that while the £1.25bn sum would immunise 72 million children and prevent 1.1m deaths, this was 400,000 fewer lives than would have been the case under the same funding level as before.
Sir Andrew Pollard, who led the development of the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine, said a study this week in the Lancet showing that stalled or falling vaccine coverage worldwide meant 'we are losing ground in our battle against the vaccine-preventable life-threatening microbes that threaten human health'.
Pollard, who was speaking in a personal capacity, said: 'Gavi is the key agency in supporting global immunisation and strengthening health-system vaccine delivery – this is the time to redouble our efforts on immunisation and not reduce them. It matters for children living in those countries where Gavi supports vaccine rollout but it also matters to us, as control of global infectious disease is essential for our own health security.'
The decision was announced on the same day as the US health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, said Washington would not give any more money to Gavi until it had 're-earned the public trust' over vaccine safety.
Kennedy's comments were made in a video address that was to be shown at the ongoing Gavi pledging summit and was leaked to Politico. The US had been expected to at least cut its funding for the alliance, which under Joe Biden was about $300m (£220m) a year.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Earlier on Wednesday the Gates Foundation, traditionally one of Gavi's biggest donors alongside the UK, said it would commit $1.6bn (£1.17bn) over the next five years.
Announcing the UK funding, David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said: 'Gavi's global impact is undeniable. Over 1 billion children vaccinated, over 18 million lives saved, over $250bn injected into the global economy.
'I'm immensely proud of the role the UK has played in reaching these milestones. Our ongoing partnership with Gavi will give millions of children a better start, save lives and protect us all from the spread of deadly diseases.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
MI5 false evidence was a serious failing, Cooper says
The home secretary has said MI5 giving false evidence to multiple courts was a "serious failing", as she accepted a further investigation should take Cooper, who is responsible for the security service, made a written statement to Parliament a day after the High Court ruled MI5's explanations for its false evidence were deficient and said the government accepted the High Court's conclusion that a "further, robust and independent investigation" should take place.A panel of three senior judges, including the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Sue Carr, on Wednesday rejected two official inquiries into the false evidence. One inquiry was commissioned by Cooper and the other was carried out internally by two reviews took place after the BBC revealed MI5 had lied to three courts in a case concerning a neo-Nazi state agent who abused women. The flawed reviews cleared MI5 of deliberate High Court judgement said the new investigation should be carried out under the auspices of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner, Sir Brian Leveson, who has oversight of MI5's surveillance activities. His office, IPCO, was also provided with false evidence by MI5 in the Home Office has refused to answer questions about the position of MI5's third-in-command, the director general strategy, whose witness evidence was found by the High Court to have been neither fair or accurate and to have omitted critical information, which had to be forced out of MI5 by the did not mention the senior spy in her said she remained "deeply concerned" about what happened, and that "internal processes at MI5 must improve, starting with the implementation of all recommendations made so far in relation to this case". She added that she has asked the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, to conduct an internal review of how "evidence from MI5 should be prepared and presented in future"."I have asked my officials to review the wider issues raised by this case," she added. The case began in 2022 with an attempt to block the BBC from publishing a story about a neo-Nazi agent known as Agent X. He used his role to coerce and terrify his former girlfriend - known publicly as "Beth" - and had attacked her with a gave evidence to three courts, saying that it had never breached its core secrecy policy of neither confirming nor denying (NCND) that X was a state in February, the BBC was able to prove with notes and recordings of phone calls with MI5 that this was we first exposed the abuse by Agent X in 2022, Cooper – then shadow home secretary – said in a BBC interview that the report "showed very disturbing images of abuse, and domestic abuse is a horrible crime". "I think, given the seriousness of this, the Home Secretary needs to make sure there is an independent assessment of the handling of this case," she added. In a statement to parliament on Thursday, she said she was "unable to comment" on a case against MI5 brought by Beth, involving "accusations that Agent X committed acts of domestic abuse against their partner".But she added that the government was "clear that all organisations must have robust safeguarding policies under continuous review and must take any allegation of domestic abuse extremely seriously".
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
NHS app will be ‘indispensable part of life', vows Keir Starmer
Sir Keir Starmer promised patients 'a doctor in your pocket' as he made the NHS app the centrepiece of his plan to reform the failing health service. Putting a consumer revolution in health technology at the heart of Labour's pledge to rescue the NHS, the prime minister said the app would become 'an indispensable part of life for everyone'. Every patient in the country has been promised a unified medical record on the app within three years, which will become a part of the 'national critical infrastructure' in Britain, according to Wes Streeting, the health secretary, writing in The Times. • Wes Streeting: Patient records shake-up will improve our experience of the NHS A ten-year plan for the NHS published on Thursday set out a vision of a 'neighbourhood health service' where far more services are available in local clinics, with health chiefs seeking to raise private finance to build dozens of new health centres. The plan says the NHS is on 'an existential brink', on the path to failure and shrivelling into a 'poor service for poor people'. After a £30 billion boost at the spending review, NHS staff are warned that the answer to the health service's problems 'cannot simply be more money, especially when more money is a fiscal fantasy'. Condemning a system where extra cash has not improved results, the plan insists that only a radical reinvention of how the NHS works will save it, promising to rewire the allocation of a £200 billion NHS budget to pay organisations for better results, rather than care as usual. The new NHS app will offer 24/7 health advice and will constitute the 'front door' to the health service, providing 'seamless access for health professionals to the right information no matter where they are', Streeting said. He said the single patient record, which would be available on the app, would remove the 'constant admin' and 'trauma' caused by patients having to repeat themselves at every appointment. The single patient record, which will give each patient access to their medical data via an app, was a key suggestion from The Times Health Commission last year. It will be 'designed and treated' like a 'national critical infrastructure', the personal information it contains 'protected with the highest levels of security and robustly safeguarded', Streeting added. Starmer told an audience of frontline staff in east London: 'Look at your phones, look at your apps — because what you see on that screen is that entire industries have reorganised around apps. Retail, transport, finance, weather — you name it. Why can't we do that with health?' He said: 'We will transform the NHS app so it becomes an indispensable part of life for everyone. It will become, as technology develops, like having a doctor in your pocket, providing you with 24-hour advice, seven days a week.' Starmer said services on the app would include 'booking appointments at your convenience, ordering your prescriptions, guiding you to local charities or businesses that can improve your wellbeing'. This is promised from 2028, and the plan sets out far more ambitious goals of using the app to message staff involved in your care, offering video calls with consultants, AI advice on symptoms and personalised lifestyle advice and health coaching. The app is also being adapted to show hospital league tables so patients can shop around for the shortest waits or best care, while allowing them to self-refer for services such as mental health therapy and podiatry without the need to see a GP. Personalised genetic risk scores that highlight propensity to certain diseases are also promised. Smartwatches, glucose monitors and intelligent fabrics that monitor vital signs will also be able to feed data to the app for use in care and monitoring, the plan promises. Wearable devices will be given out free in poor areas with high health needs in an effort to prevent illness. 'Ambient AI' will summarise consultations to avoid the need for doctors to type up notes. • Political Sketch: Rachel Reeves smiles 'appily through surreal NHS strategy launch While the vision has been broadly welcomed across the health service, it has also attracted scepticism given the NHS dire record in large-scale IT programmes. Ministers say a £10 billion technology fund is part of the answer, stressing that Labour's fiscal rules mean that unlike in the past this cannot be raided to top up day-to-day budgets. Kamila Hawthorne, of the Royal College of GPs, said: 'Major AI developments still feel a long way off when many GPs are reporting that their basic IT systems are slow, inefficient and can't communicate with one another.' Sarah Woolnough, chief executive of the King's Fund think tank, added: 'There are more than 150 pages of a vision of how things could be different in the NHS by 2035, but nowhere near enough detail about how it will be implemented.' Others criticised a lack of a plan for social care and a decision to strip out tougher-edged public health measures such as a ban on alcohol advertising. Plans for mandatory health warnings on bottles are included, however.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rollout of eVisas ‘could drag 200,000 people into Windrush-style scandal'
Up to 200,000 people who have lived in the UK legally for decades are at risk of being caught up in a Windrush-style scandal because the Home Office does not know their whereabouts or have their details on government computer systems. There are fears that some in this group will face a serious risk of being left undocumented as the Home Office converts immigration records from paper to digital. The news has emerged at a time when the Home Office says it is taking back control of its immigration system. Many of those affected are older people and some are not digitally literate. Many came from countries across Africa and Asia in the 1970s and 80s and were granted indefinite leave to remain by the Home Office with an ink stamp or vignette (sticker) in their passports, or a piece of paper confirming their status. This physical proof of right to remain is known as a legacy document. However, the Home Office is now encouraging everyone eligible to create an online eVisa account to replace their legacy document. Officials say the system is working well for millions of people, but many users have reported technical problems including with linking their passport to their eVisa. But the organisation the3million, which campaigns for the rights of EU citizens in the UK and has monitored the government's eVisa rollout closely, believes the Home Office is unable to track this large group of people down so cannot urge them to obtain eVisas. It is possible some may have died or left the UK. They did not feature on the Home Office's previous immigration database – CID (Case Information Database) – nor on Atlas, CID's replacement. The best estimate of the number involved is 200,000, which comes from a Home Office internal assessment (pdf) in April 2022. The Guardian repeatedly asked the Home Office if it has records relating to those 200,000 people and if it knows how many are still alive and residing in the UK, but received no response. Naga Kandiah of MTC Solicitors has been working with some older people with legacy documents who are only now realising they need to go online and obtain eVisas. 'Individuals who were previously granted indefinite leave to remain or other long-term statuses via ink-stamped endorsements are increasingly being left behind,' he said. 'Despite holding lawful status, many are now at serious risk of being treated as undocumented, simply because their physical documents are not recognised or integrated into the Home Office's new digital eVisa platform. 'This vulnerable group often includes elderly, marginalised or digitally excluded individuals, many of whom have lived in the UK for 30 to 40 years or more. 'Without access to digital records or UK Visas and Immigration accounts, these individuals are effectively invisible within the current system, despite their lawful and settled status. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion 'As a result, many are being denied access to essential services and entitlements, including pensions, universal credit, NHS treatment and housing, simply because they cannot prove their status under the digital framework.' Even when older people with ink stamps or vignettes in their passports do try to engage with eVisas, many are reporting problems with the system. The Guardian reported on the case of Kathleen Harper last year, an American actor with an ink stamp in her passport granting her indefinite leave to remain. She struggled to access her eVisa and abandoned her attempt. But recently she was asked to provide proof of her identity and tried again to obtain an eVisa. Despite the Home Office putting experienced technical advisers on the case, they still hit walls, repeatedly getting a message on screen saying: 'Cannot start yet.' Harper said: 'It has taken at least eight phone calls and several hours of my time to get my passport connected to my eVisa. Is this a sane way of going about things?' Home Office sources said they had apologised to Harper for the confusion concerning her case and that her eVisa issue had now been resolved. Monique Hawkins of the3million said: 'We believe the transition to eVisas could cause potential problems for people with legacy documents – there's an urgent need for an independent review of the entire eVisa system and its rushed rollout.'
