&w=3840&q=100)
Bhutan's Bitcoin boom: Himalayan nation amasses $1.3 bn crypto fortune
Bhutan, the peace-loving Himalayan nation, is generally associated with picturesque landscapes and a carbon-negative footprint. However, the South Asian nation now proudly boasts bitcoins worth $1.3 billion, an amount totalling 40 per cent of the country's gross domestic product.
Cryptocurrency platform Arkham reports that this is the third-largest such stockpile held by governments around the world.
When did Bhutan's crypto journey begin?
The journey began in 2020 when Bhutan, where cheap electricity is abundant, began discreetly establishing bitcoin mines.
The secluded Buddhist nation was eyeing to harness its hydropower.
Crypto experts note that larger nations aim to lead in cryptocurrencies, akin to New York and London's dominance in traditional finance, while smaller countries view it as an economic opportunity.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
For instance, in 2021, El Salvador made a bold move by adopting bitcoin as legal tender, though its use remained limited.
Challenges and risks for Bhutan
Bhutan may have long dominated the 'national happiness index,' but the Land of the Thunder Dragon—named for its dramatic thunderstorms—has faced economic challenges, relying heavily on hydropower, agriculture, and tourism.
The Covid-19 pandemic severely impacted tourism, and over the past five years, 10 per cent of its population has emigrated for better job prospects.
It's rare for a sovereign nation to operate its own crypto-mining operations, but Bhutan's access to cheap electricity makes it ideal.
Bitcoin mining
Bitcoin mining involves solving increasingly complex mathematical puzzles to unlock new coins.
While early enthusiasts mined using home computers, modern large-scale operations demand servers consuming vast energy.
Miners have flocked to places like Kazakhstan for affordable power.
Wall Street quoted Ujjwal Deep Dahal, chief executive of Bhutan's sovereign-wealth fund, as saying that Bitcoin acts as a 'battery' for the country.
Bitcoin 'acts as a battery for us, using up excess summer power,' he said.
Prime Minister Tshering Tobgay stated that Bhutan's bitcoin reserves have more than offset the decline in hydropower exports, which usually account for about 40 per cent of the government's budget.
The increased electricity consumption by bitcoin mines has reduced hydropower exports. In 2023, the government sold $100 million of its bitcoin holdings to fund civil servant pay raises for two years.
'That increase has been financed totally with bitcoins,' Tobgay said. If you just sold electricity, 'you wouldn't get anywhere near the amount that's required.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Whopping $82.3 billion cost? Donald Trump's tariffs may hit US employers in a big way, says JPMorganChase Institute analysis
US employers could be facing a $82.3 billion bill thanks to US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff regime, a new report has revealed. This could be a deep financial toll on American businesses, potentially triggering price hikes, layoffs, hiring freezes or lower profit margins. The report, Exposure to tariffs for midsize firms by metro area, published by the JPMorganChase Institute, is among the first to quantify the immediate impact on mid-sized American companies with annual revenues between $10 million and $1 billion, according to an AP report. These firms, employing roughly one-third of the country's private-sector workforce, are majorly dependent on imports from countries like China, India and Thailand, with retail and wholesale sectors seen as especially vulnerable to the import taxes. The findings directly challenge Trump's claims that the burden of tariffs would fall on foreign manufacturers, not US firms. While inflation has so far remained stable, retail giants such as Amazon, Costco and Walmart had anticipated disruption by stockpiling goods before tariffs took effect. The timing of the analysis is crucial, coming almost a week ahead of the July 9 deadline, set by Trump to finalise tariff rates on imports from dozens of countries. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo The deadline came after financial markets were rattled by his April announcements, prompting him to schedule a 90-day negotiating period. Had the April 2 tariffs stayed in place, the same group of firms would have faced a steeper hit of $187.6 billion. Based on the current rates, the average cost per employee would be around $2,080 amounting to 3.1% of a typical company's annual payroll. This also includes employees from firms that do not rely on import goods. 'Our estimation explicitly considers direct costs, defined as costs to firms that physically import goods and pay the import tariffs, and is based on goods trade amounts from 2022, the latest year for which all data are available,' the report said. Higher costs may push for alternate approaches After the import tariffs come into effect the importer may switch to manage these costs through a variety of approaches. These might include raising sales prices or switching to a different supplier subjected to lower or no tariffs. However, it might also not be a feasible option as alternative suppliers may charge higher prices and in some cases, alternate suppliers might not even exist. What comes after the 90-day pause As the 90-day period comes to an end, only the United Kingdom has signed a trade framework so far. India and Vietnam have also said that they are also close to locking in a deal with the US. There is a growing concern that tariffs might push inflation. Goldman Sachs forecasted that US companies are likely to pass along 60% of their tariff costs to consumers. A separate survey by the Atlanta Federal Reserve also suggested that around half of the costs from 10% to 25% tariffs could be shifted to customers without affecting consumer demand. The JPMorganChase report also noted that the tariffs may present an opportunity for domestic manufacturers to strengthen their supply chains. However, given the already narrow margins in retail and wholesale, many companies may have little choice but to pass on additional costs to the customers. 'Everything's going well' When asked on Tuesday about the status of ongoing trade talks, Trump offered a brief reply. 'Everything's going well,' he said. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent defended the administration's strategy, claiming long-serving government officials have been impressed with the progress. 'People who have been at Treasury, at Commerce, at USTR for 20 years are saying that these are deals like they've never seen before,' Bessent told Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends on Tuesday. The Trump administration is also expected to begin mapping out its broader trade deal plans next week. In the meantime, Trump linked the success of the tariff policy to funding a newly passed multitrillion-dollar tax cuts package, which Republicans pushed through the Senate on Tuesday. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is Arun Subramanian, the judge overseeing Sean Diddy Combs' trial?
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Sean "Diddy" Combs was recently acquitted of serious charges including sex trafficking and racketeering but was convicted of a prostitution-related offense. While spared a potential life sentence, Combs still faces up to 10 years in prison. Following the mixed verdict, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian , who is presiding over the case, is now considering whether to grant Combs who is Judge Arun Subramanian—the man at the center of one of the year's most high-profile trials?Arun Subramanian made history in 2022 when he became the first South Asian judge to be appointed to the Southern District of New York. Nominated by President Joe Biden, Subramanian's background is as impressive as it is in 1979 in Pittsburgh to Indian immigrant parents, Subramanian was raised with strong family values—something he emphasized during his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. He is known not only for his legal brilliance but also for his humility and sense of his appointment to the bench, Subramanian built a distinguished legal career. He clerked for some of the most respected judges in the country, including:Judge Dennis Jacobs, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitJudge Gerard E. Lynch, Southern District of New YorkThe late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgThese experiences helped shape his legal philosophy and meticulous attention to holds a bachelor's degree in Computer Science and English from Case Western Reserve University, and earned his Juris Doctor from Columbia Law School, where he was named both a James Kent and Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. He also served as Executive Articles Editor for the Columbia Law a civil attorney, Subramanian played a key role in high-impact litigation. According to his former firm, he helped recover over $1 billion for victims of fraud and corporate abuse. His work wasn't limited to financial victories; he also took on meaningful pro bono his serious responsibilities, Judge Subramanian is known for his approachable demeanor. According to TMZ, he brought a calm and relaxed presence during jury selection in the Diddy trial, helping put potential jurors at ease. He's been spotted walking with earphones in, suggesting a man who balances focus with calm.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Quad remains resilient. But everyone wants to be friends with China again
Quad took a significant step in its long journey to shed ambiguity and reveal its true purpose on Tuesday in Washington DC. The US, India, Japan, and Australia signed on to a joint statement that was more pointed and critical of Chinese actions in the maritime domain than in the past. Quad also categorically called out China's economic coercion, price manipulation, supply-chain disruptions, and use of non-market principles to concentrate production in critical minerals. In classic diplo-speak, the statement did all of this using the passive voice without attributing actions to the agent. Trump, to lend retrospective coherence to a badly thought out tariff policy, made it all about China in April. (REUTERS) To be sure, each edition of Quad has witnessed the introduction of a more critical nuance against Beijing and an additional layer of tech, economic, or security cooperation with the subtext of countering China. But this week's Quad meeting was much sharper in its focus. It also narrowed down cooperation to maritime security, economic security, critical and emerging technologies, and humanitarian assistance. The advantage of this sharp approach is that the fluff is out, and all sides are discussing real actionable items. The disadvantage is there is drastic dilution of the agenda and many valuable items of cooperation may get lost. But the Quad statement is significant because a strong diplomatic rebuke of China has become rare. Indeed, the big geopolitical picture of the moment is that China is on the geopolitical comeback trail after five years. The onset of Covid-19 in early 2020 woke the world to the dangers of opaque systems that can suppress information with globally devastating consequences. China's weaponisation of its overwhelming advantage in manufacturing awoke the world to the need for diversified supply chains. China's inroads into eastern Ladakh alerted New Delhi to the dangers of a belligerent neighbour that was willing to violate Indian sovereignty. China's continuous aggression in the East China Sea, South China Sea, and around Taiwan made the region aware of Beijing's territorial and maritime ambitions. China's predatory economics made Global South nations conscious of the downsides of Chinese development and investment flows. China's stunning technological, military, and economic strides awoke the US to its 'peer-level competitor'. Under the first Donald Trump administration, the Joe Biden administration, and under a set of Indo-Pacific leaders worried about Beijing, there was a concerted approach to take on this Chinese machine. American export controls on chips were meant to slow down China's progress. The US began building stronger countervailing coalitions in the Indo-Pacific. It encouraged plurilaterals, trilaterals, and strengthened bilaterals to shape the environment around China. The US married strategic and defence imperatives with business opportunities and innovated with new tech partnerships. It expanded its developmental, climate, and security footprint in neglected regions such as the Pacific Islands. This period saw China's internal vulnerabilities get more pronounced. Beijing's Covid-19 crackdown boomeranged. Its real estate and infrastructure-fuelled boom created a crisis. Its domestic consumption paled in comparison to its production excess. Its demographic policies generated social fissures and policy pressures. It seemed relatively friendless in the region. And theories about how China had peaked gathered traction. That 2020-2024 era of rising global estrangement with China is over. 2025 may well be the year when everyone wants to become friends with China again. The effort to construct a bridge between Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific theatres has faltered. Even as Russia and China work more closely together, the US is now doing little to bridge the gap between Nato and Indo-Pacific allies and is instead pressuring both simultaneously to step up on defence. The Australian, South Korean, and Japanese heads of government decided to stay away from the Nato summit in The Hague. European countries, both collectively and separately, are seeking to cut deals with China. To many in Europe, a closer working relationship with China seems safer than putting their eggs in the unpredictable American basket. America itself is sending signals of wanting a deal with China. Trump, to lend retrospective coherence to a badly thought out tariff policy, made it all about China in April. As soon as markets responded negatively and inflationary concerns became real, he did a deal by mid-May. When the deal showed cracks and China imposed restrictions on exports of rare earths, the US showed a willingness to lift restrictions on exports and visas. Nikkei now reports that Trump is exploring a visit to China with a major business delegation. China's dependencies are real, Beijing is far more keen to do a deal than it publicly lets on, and no one is discounting either the structural rivalry or US advantages. But, in this entire episode, China has shown it has cards too and held its own to a large extent, while American vulnerabilities have become visible. And then you have China's neighbours. Despite Japan's fundamental security contradiction with China, Trump has made life so difficult for Tokyo that it cancelled a 2+2 ministerial dialogue with the US and is engaged in a public acrimonious fight on auto tariffs — any such rift plays to China's advantage. South Korea's new government is all about a more balanced approach to foreign policy compared to its pro-US conservative predecessor. Australia is struck by the Pentagon's review of the AUKUS pact and Trump hasn't even met Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. And India is sending public signals of rapprochement with China — despite China being the force behind Pakistan's military response during Operation Sindoor, India's own border tensions, the trade asymmetry that emanates from Chinese manufacturing dominance, and Beijing's efforts to construct a hostile architecture in South Asia. New Delhi's political troubles with the US due to Trump's false claims on peacemaking, mediation, and trade could only have made China happy. And in smaller countries in the region, American instruments of influence in the form of foreign aid, foreign trade, and liberal visa policy have all but gone, leaving the ground open for more Chinese presence. Neither was China about to collapse or get isolated in the past four years, nor is it about to take over the world now. But there is a shift that suits Beijing. As the next Quad chair, India's challenge is framing a credible and strong agenda that takes into account this adverse diplomatic environment. Prashant Jha is a political analyst. The views expressed are personal.
