'As it is, we are alleged of encroaching upon parliamentary & executive functions': SC amid remarks on judiciary
NEW DELHI: The
Supreme Court
on Monday expressed concern over being accused of overstepping its constitutional limits, as it heard a petition to invoke
Article 355
in West Bengal, citing the recent violence in Murshidabad over protests against the
Waqf Amendment Act
, which was recently passed in the Parliament.
These remarks from the top court came against the backdrop of sharp criticism by BJP MPs over its observations on the Waqf Act, which have stirred political debate.
Justice B R Gavai
, heading the bench alongside
Justice Augustine George Masih
, said, 'As it is, we are alleged of encroaching upon the parliamentary and executive functions,' responding to a request for directions to the Centre under Article 355 of the Constitution.
The observation came during a mention by Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, who urged the court to take up a new application seeking invoking Article 355 , which refers to President's Rule, in West Bengal in light of the violence.
Jain, who had filed a 2021 PIL after
post-election violence
in the state, said the fresh plea highlighted new incidents.
'In tomorrow's list item 42 pertains to imposition of President Rule in the state of West Bengal. That petition is filed by me. In that petition, I have filed an IA (application) for directions and impleadment bringing out certain more incidents of violence which have happened in the state of West Bengal,' Jain submitted.
Citing Article 355, which mandates the Union to protect states from external aggression and internal disturbance, Jain said a report on the ground situation should be sought.
He added, 'When the matter will come up, I will demonstrate how the violence happened.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court rejects Haryana plea, says cops can't serve summons via WhatsApp
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has rejected the Haryana government's application to be allowed to serve police summons electronically via WhatsApp, and reiterated its direction to the police to serve physical notices to individuals required for investigation. A WhatsApp icon is displayed on an iPhone, Nov. 15, 2018 (AP FILE) 'We are unable to convince ourselves that electronic communication is a valid mode of service of notice under Section 35 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, since its conscious omission is a clear manifestation of the legislative intent,' a bench of justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh said. The order was passed on July 16, but uploaded to the top court's website on Wednesday. The state had approached the top court challenging the January 21 order passed by the top court in Satinder Kumar Antil v CBI, where the court sought to address gaps in safeguarding the rights of accused facing investigation under various crimes. The bench emphasised that any breach of a notice issued by police under Section 41A of the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires a person to join an investigation, has serious consequences, as it could lead to arrest and deprive individuals of their personal liberty. The court arrived at this finding with the assistance given by senior advocate Siddharth Luthra as amicus curiae. Haryana argued that while electronic means were prescribed under BNSS for issuing court notices and summoning witnesses, the same should also be applied to Section 35, as essentially what is required of the individual is to participate in the investigation and not to be arrested. However, Luthra stated that a notice served through WhatsApp or other electronic communication modes is not contemplated as a mode of service under Section 35 of the BNSS. He referred to provisions of BNSS that pertain to electronic means, but they are specifically excluded from the process of investigating a case. The bench noted these submissions and said, ' Introducing a procedure into Section 35 of the BNSS, 2023, that has not been specifically provided for by the legislature, would be violative of its intent.' The court further stated, 'The protection of one's liberty is a crucial aspect of the right to life guaranteed to each and every individual, under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The procedure encapsulated in Section 35(6) of the BNSS, 2023, seeks to secure this fundamental right from encroachment by the relevant authority, and therefore, any attempt to interpret the provision as a mere procedural one would amount to rewriting the provision itself.' It concluded that service of a notice under Section 35 of the BNSS, 2023 needs to be carried out in a manner that protects this substantive right, as non-compliance with the notice can have a drastic effect on the liberty of an individual. The January 21 order held that service of the section 41-A notices through WhatsApp or other modes of electronic communication, cannot be considered or recognised as an alternative or substitute to the mode of service recognised and prescribed under the CrPC or BNSS. Haryana had referred to a proviso under Section 64(2) of BNSS, which permits the service of court summons through electronic mode. Similarly, Haryana pointed out that Section 71 allowed electronic mode for calling witnesses. But the court underlined a distinction. 'The proviso to Section 64(2) of the BNSS, 2023 provides a discretion of also serving summons by electronic communication, only when they bear the image of the court's seal.' On the comparison drawn with Section 71 of the BNSS, the decision noted that the same has no immediate bearing on the liberty of an individual in case of any non-compliance. However, breach of notice under Section 35 of the BNSS, would have an immediate bearing on the liberty,' the court said.
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
CM is on a two-day visit to state: Hope people from Gujarat start visiting J&K again, says Omar Abdullah
Jammu & Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah arrived in Ahmedabad on Tuesday for his two-day visit to the state. On his arrival, Abdullah said that he has come to Gujarat to take part in a tourism event with a hope that a big proportion of tourists from Gujarat will start visiting J&K again. Abdullah's visit comes months after at least 26 people were killed, including tourists from Gujarat, and several others injured in a terrorist attack in south Kashmir's Pahalgam in April. Interacting with media persons, Abdullah said, 'If you look at the past 30-35 years since tourism restarted in J&K, there are three most important places from where people prefer to visit Kashmir; Gujarat, Maharashtra and West Bengal. There is a two-day event of tourism in Gandhinagar and me and my fellows have come to speak on behalf of J&K with a hope that the big proportion of visitors from Gujarat restart coming (to J&K).' In reply to a question on Operation Sindoor, Abdullah said, 'There are many things regarding which the Union government will have to give answers. A few days back, Lieutenant Governor of J&K (Manoj Sinha) accepted that there was both intelligence and security failure in Pahalgam. If there is intelligence and security failure, then somebody is guilty for that. On the one hand, we have taken the action that was to be taken against terrorists. The three terrorists who are responsible for the Pahalgam incident have been eliminated. But, so far, there is no action taken for the intelligence and security failure there. People would like to hear about that.' In reply to another question on elimination of two more terrorists in J&K on Wednesday, the J&K CM said, 'This will go on. But you have to ask those who told you in 2019 that after abrogation of (Article) 370, terrorism will end in J&K. Today, almost six years have passed since (Article) 370 was abrogated. Even today, terrorists are being eliminated. So, there is a difference between the time when it was said then and current reality.' After his arrival, Abdullah also paid a courtesy visit to Gujarat CM Bhupendra Patel. During his stay in Gujarat, as per an official release from Gujarat government, Abdullah is also scheduled to visit the Statue of Unity.
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Sena (UBT) to approach SC over allegations of corruption, election fraud
With the state government led by Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis openly admitting that 26.34 lakh ineligible beneficiaries have taken benefit of the Ladki Bahin Yojana, the Shiv Sena (UBT) on Wednesday said it will approach the Supreme Court to have the 2024 assembly election process cancelled while the Congress and the Aam Aadmi Party said the Enforcement Directorate and the Election Commission of India should investigate the way the elections were conducted. On Tuesday, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said,'Our Women and Child Welfare Minister has clearly stated that there are 26 lakh accounts which do not fit in the criteria of Ladki Bahin Yojana. There are men and even those who are taking advantage of other schemes. All these accounts have not been suspended. All these accounts will be verified. If these accounts are confirmed to be ineligible, then we will cancel them,' the Chief Minister said on Tuesday after the cabinet meeting. Last week, Minister for Women and Child Welfare Aditi Tatkare said,'We have temporarily suspended accounts of 26.34 lakh beneficiaries from June 2025. The eligibility of the suspended beneficiaries will be verified by officials of the respective district collectorates.' Reacting to the state government's admission of 26.34 lakh ineligible accounts, Sanjay Raut, spokesperson for the Shiv Sena (UBT) said, 'This is nothing but a big election fraud. The women voters were bribed to vote for the Mahayuti. The entire 2024 election process in Maharashtra should be cancelled. According to the Representative of People Act, 1951, this amounts to a corrupt practice. And therefore the Election Commission of India should not sit quiet when democratic norms have been violated. It should investigate how voters were bribed through Rs 1500 a month benefit. This is like offering them cash for every vote.' Raut said besides the ECI, the Enforcement Directorate is not moving into action quickly. 'When it comes to opposition leaders and allegations against them, it quickly targets them through raids. In this case, when the government itself has admitted that it paid money to voters before the elections, why is the ED not taking action. It should make those who started the scheme accused in the case,' he said. Raut said the Sena (UBT) was planning to approach the Supreme Court in this matter. 'Since there is an open admission of election fraud, we are planning to approach the Supreme Court. We are fully hopeful that the SC will take decisive action on our appeal,' he said. Atul Londhe, chief spokesperson of the Maharashtra Congress said, 'This is election fraud. Now where is the Enforcement Directorate? Why is the Election Commission of India watching as a spectator? Everything is in public domain, the government itself has brought to fore how 26.34 ineligible voters exercised their franchise. It is obvious that the government benefitted through this bribe offering. The question is, will the ED act on this election fraud or continue to shut its eyes and ears?' AAP spokesperson Mukund Kirdat said, 'Undoubtedly, Maharashtra has seen the biggest election fraud hitherto. The government indiscriminately distributed cash so that the women voters and their family members vote it back to power. The government was jittery as the Lok Sabha election results showed that voters wanted a change of rule in Maharashtra. And therefore it resorted to offering cash benefits to the voters.' Babu Nair, general secretary of Maharashtra Congress said, ''The Ladki Bahin Yojana was launched just three months before the 2024 elections. In those three months more than 2 crore women were given Rs 4500 cash benefits. It was clear during the election time that the government was indulging in corrupt practice. Yet the Election Commission of India kept quiet.' Nair said women who were earning over a lakh monthly salary, who owned cars and those who were paying income tax also benefitted under the Ladki Bahin Yojana. 'Because of the Ladki Bahin Yojana, funds availability for welfare of the poor has been affected. The Ministers themselves have admitted this situation.' Manoj More has been working with the Indian Express since 1992. For the first 16 years, he worked on the desk, edited stories, made pages, wrote special stories and handled The Indian Express edition. In 31 years of his career, he has regularly written stories on a range of topics, primarily on civic issues like state of roads, choked drains, garbage problems, inadequate transport facilities and the like. He has also written aggressively on local gondaism. He has primarily written civic stories from Pimpri-Chinchwad, Khadki, Maval and some parts of Pune. He has also covered stories from Kolhapur, Satara, Solapur, Sangli, Ahmednagar and Latur. He has had maximum impact stories from Pimpri-Chinchwad industrial city which he has covered extensively for the last three decades. Manoj More has written over 20,000 stories. 10,000 of which are byline stories. Most of the stories pertain to civic issues and political ones. The biggest achievement of his career is getting a nearly two kilometre road done on Pune-Mumbai highway in Khadki in 2006. He wrote stories on the state of roads since 1997. In 10 years, nearly 200 two-wheeler riders had died in accidents due to the pathetic state of the road. The local cantonment board could not get the road redone as it lacked funds. The then PMC commissioner Pravin Pardeshi took the initiative, went out of his way and made the Khadki road by spending Rs 23 crore from JNNURM Funds. In the next 10 years after the road was made by the PMC, less than 10 citizens had died, effectively saving more than 100 lives. Manoj More's campaign against tree cutting on Pune-Mumbai highway in 1999 and Pune-Nashik highway in 2004 saved 2000 trees. During Covid, over 50 doctors were asked to pay Rs 30 lakh each for getting a job with PCMC. The PCMC administration alerted Manoj More who did a story on the subject, asking then corporators how much money they story worked as doctors got the job without paying a single paisa. Manoj More has also covered the "Latur drought" situation in 2015 when a "Latur water train" created quite a buzz in Maharashtra. He also covered the Malin tragedy where over 150 villagers had died. Manoj More is on Facebook with 4.9k followers (Manoj More), on twitter manojmore91982 ... Read More
