'Aztec Batman: Clashes of Empires': How to watch new Batman movie trailer
Luckily, though, you don't have to wait to get your fix of the Dark Knight: Warner Bros. Entertainment officially unveiled the first trailer for the animated film, "Aztec Batman: Clash of Empires."
The DC animation takes a unique approach to the story of Bruce Wayne, placing the characters in the Aztec Empire on the brink of Spanish colonization.
As shown in the trailer, the son of an Aztec ruler takes on the role of a bat-themed warrior to fight Spanish conquistadors following the death of his father. It also teases a new spin on classic villains like the Joker, Two-Face and Poison Ivy, who have been altered to fit the era of the movie.
Where to watch the new Batman movie trailer
You can get a first look at "Aztec Batman: Clash of the Empires" by watching Warner Bros. Entertainment's official teaser on X.
The film is slated to hit streaming services on Sept. 9, 2025, so keep an eye out for any additional trailers that may come out for another look prior to its release.
This article originally appeared on NorthJersey.com: New Batman movie trailer: How to Watch 'Aztec Batman: Clashes of Empires' preview
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
After ‘Suicide Squad,' WB Is Making Another Live-Service DC Game
Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League WB may be producing some solid movies and TV shows as of late, despite all its corporate and branding drama, but video games? It's in a weird place. After the huge success of the single-player Hogwarts Legacy and the utter disaster that was the live-service Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, the demand from David Zaslav at the top was…more live-service games. And here we are, with WB gearing up for another DC one, it seems. This news comes from a job listing (via Tech4Gamers) that lists a new executive producer job at WB Montreal hiring for an unannounced game. They are to 'lead the development of a high-quality AAA game based on one of the iconic IPs from the vast Warner Bros. and DC Comics catalog.' Okay, that's good! But they also have to 'oversee post-launch content and live service strategy, ensuring ongoing player engagement.' Oh no. It is not easy to forget what a disaster Rocksteady's Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League was, which debuted with poor scores, poor sales and poor retention for its live-service aspects. After Marvel's Avengers had tried and failed to make a live-service superhero game, Suicide Squad was an even worse attempt and reportedly lost WB $200 million. Suicide Squad There is supposed to be a more traditional Arkham game in the works from Rocksteady now, according to past reports, but WB does not seem like it's going to be able to give up the chase to try and jam DC superheroes into a live game. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder In 2025, it is hard enough to sustain a live-service game, especially one based on producing significant, ongoing PvE content. But it's even harder with a superhero concept, as evidenced by these failures. Marvel's Avengers had to awkwardly insert bizarre loot like finding drops of Black Widow belts or Hulk rib cages. They also quickly realized that the pace of delivering new heroes and content was wildly harder than they thought, and they fell behind without ever catching up. To its credit, Suicide Squad did produce its year of content in a timely manner before throwing in the towel but it…wasn't good. A similar problem existed with loot, as the game attempted to make all its characters use guns including ones where it made no sense like Captain Boomerang and King Shark. It also had a story everyone hated based around the uncomfortable concept of killing off the Justice League (though in the follow-up content no one played, it was revealed those were actually all clones, and the real JLA survived. Except uh, Wonder Woman. RIP). There are no indications about what kind of game this would be. James Gunn has previously said he wants the DCU to have attached video games, which seemed incredibly ambitious given development timelines. It's not impossible this could be the plan, however, as WB desperately wants to get the DCU off the ground, and a good live-service game could bolster that. Making a good live-service superhero game, however, is going to be next to impossible, a lesson WB very much should have learned. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
‘Superman' Just Beat ‘Man Of Steel' At The Box Office, With A Few Catches
Superman/Man of Steel The saga of Superman's box office run continues with different spins saying it's good or bad, depending on the narrative the observer wants to create. Now? Superman has hit a milestone that's sure to rile up the DCU versus DCEU crowd, it has now grossed more than Man of Steel at the domestic box office. Man of Steel earned $291 million domestically back in 2013, and as of today, Superman has passed that total There are some caveats here. Some important ones, I'd argue. First, of course, you can play the inflation game, and inflation has been…bad over the last decade. $291 million back in 2013 would equal $407 million today, and I mean, I don't think it's wholly wrong to consider that, even though many box office charts ignore that the vast majority of the time. Second, there's the rather important story that Superman is drawing a poor international audience in the context of the wider industry, and also if we want to keep going with these Man of Steel comparisons. Joining that $291 million was $379 million, for a total of $670 million with international receipts 56% of the total for Man of Steel. Meanwhile, Superman hitting the $500 million mark includes just 42% international revenue, $214 million. And given that this ratio is likely to continue, it seems pretty unlikely that Superman is going to top Man of Steel's $670 million overall. Superman James Gunn has cited that Superman is not a 'known commodity' in some places (not sure that works with the Man of Steel data) but also: 'It also affects things that we have a certain amount of anti-American sentiment around the world right now. It isn't really helping us.' That statement was widely criticized, but here in 2025, I'm not sure that's wrong, especially with a hero that has traditionally been about 'truth, justice and the American way.' The actual film portrays Superman as going directly against the US government and its war-based policies abroad, but the movie isn't getting much credit for that. I am no friend to Snyder die-hards but realistically, I don't think that Superman will hit Man of Steel totals even before inflation. That said, Superman hs been way better received than Man of Steel by both critics and audiences, and we also have to consider the era we're in. Superhero box office has generally declined past an era closer to 2018-2019 when you had mediocre movies like Aquaman and Captain Marvel even putting up billion dollar hauls. Years back, I think this would have earned more. I think Superman will do 'good enough' for this new era of DC, but I'm not sure it's all roses and confetti either. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Superman gets a big, blue reboot that supercharges a beleaguered genre
When fear, anger, and cynicism feel like the default, a superhero movie that presents its splash-page havoc with guileless warmth and zero irony is a rare and precious thing. Sam Raimi's Spider-Man swung into theaters in 2002, setting a gold standard for superhero movies while thrilling post-9/11 audiences burdened by imminent war. Now, like a bolt from the blue comes James Gunn's Superman, a rowdy and vivid film that knocks the doldrums out of the beleaguered superhero genre with the kind of two-fisted brio any self-respecting comic hero deserves—and it arrives not a moment too soon. After leaving Marvel Studios (as its post-Endgame implosion continues), Gunn has revitalized the DC Universe in the wake of the evaporated prospects of Aquaman And The Lost Kingdom, Shazam! Fury Of The Gods, and Black Adam. Superman, the first installment in this new era, is set in a resonant, lived-in, and inviting world, while still delivering the franchise set-up goods that Warner Bros. is undoubtedly banking on. It sits on the same shelf as Spider-Man (without, perhaps, the dizzying heights of Spider-Man 2), a joyful and consistently exciting adventure of the Saturday morning variety that shares the keenly felt emotions of Gunn's Guardians Of The Galaxy, a film he made when his freak-flag sensibilities could still fly under the radar of studio expectations. With Superman, Gunn steps into an untested phase of his career, operating under closer scrutiny and much bigger stakes. And yet, this unlikely apotheosis from the Troma-trained enfant terrible hasn't blunted Gunn's directorial edge. If anything, his subject has only steeled his resolve as a provocateur and champion of the oddball. After Christopher Reeve's lauded tenure, the dour Superman Returns, and Zack Snyder's bleak revisionism, Superman has been in desperate need of a storyteller who embraces the outsider perspective that has been central to the character for nearly a century. Gunn reasserts DC's strange visitor from a doomed planet in a front-and-center immigrant narrative that interrogates 'the American Way' as it exists today. His hero takes a firm stance on the side of the marginalized in open defiance of those who step over them for personal gain—or, in the case of the film's billionaire villain, Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult), to satisfy a vendetta against the Other that's as narrow-minded as it is petty. In this Other, Superman finds its center: David Corenswet, a Juilliard-trained actor (like Reeve before him) who until now was largely known for boosting supporting roles in films like Pearl and Twisters. With his striking, searching blue eyes and large build, Corenswet contrasts Hoult's belligerent Luthor with a provincial warmth both quintessentially dopey yet oddly new. (Only this Superman could sell an endearing clunker like 'What the hey, dude?') And Gunn keeps his star busy. If Superman isn't mitigating Luthor's 5-D death traps, he's clumsily grappling with the realpolitik of the fictional warring nations Boravia and Jarhanpur, staying sanguine about his rambunctious foster dog, Krypto, and navigating a tenuous situationship with Lois Lane (a brassy Rachel Brosnahan). Whether Corenswet is locked in a sub-dimensional prison cell with the weepy Metamorpho (Anthony Carrigan) or fielding a tense on-the-record interview with the Daily Planet's top investigative reporter, he plants Superman's feet squarely in the side of right over might. This righteousness comes at a cost. Compared to the character's more traditional depictions, Gunn's Superman is more physically and emotionally vulnerable; more than Kryptonite or even Luthor, Superman's biggest threat is doubt. He wrestles with what it means to do the right thing in a world increasingly suspicious of do-gooders, and his moral compass, while true, can wobble. Gunn leverages these emotionally tricky moments well by countering Superman's epiphanies with all sorts of peril. Inevitably, someone flashes a chunk of Kryptonite, which turns his knees to jelly and his skin into Frank Quitely-esque cottage cheese. In his very first moments, he's plummeting to earth, coughing up blood, and looking like he just caught one hell of a beating. From the jump, Gunn makes one thing clear: This is a Superman we can't take for granted. Luckily for him, Superman maintains a strong but largely peripheral supporting bench: Nathan Fillion's aggressively unpleasant Green Lantern, Guy Gardner; Isabela Merced's screeching Hawkgirl; and Edi Gathegi's Mr. Terrific, easily the film's standout, a smooth 'been there, hacked that' techie primed to lead his own ensemble. This influx of characters, few of whom carry meaningful subplots beyond comic relief or a flashy action setpiece—Brosnahan's Lois rightfully gets the most to do, though Skyler Gisondo's Jimmy Olsen brings a smarmy energy to the cub reporter—can pull focus from the lead. It's here where Superman operates less like a solo story and more like a crowded team-up. The film's narrative threads converge gradually, the film in a constant state of building toward its third act. In these stretches, Superman all but disappears, leaving a vacuum in a would-be franchise still actively establishing its identity. Yet Gunn eventually finds his footing and Superman returns to the fray, delivering heat vision reprisals and truth and justice platitudes to Luthor's hostile forces (he leads a sycophantic science outfit that resembles DOGE gone berserk). Superman's bromides can feel old-fashioned and will certainly be viewed as cornball by the deeper cynics out there. But there's something resolutely sincere and bracing about this Man Of Steel's farmboy optimism in a time when earnestness gets the finger and moral clarity is in short supply. Superman delivers a simple, potent message: You don't need X-ray vision to see people as people. Director: James Gunn Writer: James Gunn Starring: David Corenswet, Rachel Brosnahan, Nicholas Hoult, Edi Gathegi, Anthony Carrigan, Nathan Fillion, Isabela Merced Release Date: July 11, 2025 More from A.V. Club Murderbot ends on notes of melodrama and melancholy Nacho Vigalondo retreats to an unimaginative dream world for Daniela Forever David Zaslav reportedly "dismissed" a Black Superman movie for being "too woke" Solve the daily Crossword
