Explain ‘insufficient evidence' against Zamri and Firdaus, AGC told
PETALING JAYA : The MIC has urged the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) to explain how it concluded that there was insufficient evidence to charge independent preachers Zamri Vinoth and Firdaus Wong for allegedly making offensive remarks against non-Muslims.
MIC president SA Vigneswaran said the decision raised concerns of inconsistency in enforcing the law, pointing out that nearly 900 police reports had been lodged against Zamri.
He warned that inaction could create the perception of bias and embolden others to make similar remarks.
'The AGC must explain how (these cases involving) public (and allegedly) inflammatory remarks that triggered mass police reports are now deemed to lack sufficient evidence for prosecution.
'This decision lacks transparency, and risks being seen as biased.
'We urge the government and authorities to apply the law equally and to protect all Malaysians regardless of race and religion from targeted provocation,' he said in a statement.
Vigneswaran maintained that laws on sentiments involving race, religion and royalty (3Rs) must be applied fairly and not be used selectively to protect certain groups.
Earlier, law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said had said the AGC did not find enough evidence to prosecute Zamri or Firdaus over remarks they had allegedly made.
She maintained that further investigations could be done if there were new developments since criminal cases were not subject to the statute of limitations.
The Malaysia Hindu Sangam also urged the AGC to explain the decision not to prosecute the duo, saying it should clarify what constitutes 'sufficient evidence' to prosecute cases involving religious provocation.
It said this would help restore trust in the legal process and prevent further division in Malaysia's multi-religious society.
In March, Zamri was remanded over a Facebook post on the controversial relocation of the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman temple in Kuala Lumpur. He was released the same day.
Police reports were also lodged over past comments he had made about Hindu rituals, which were alleged to be offensive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
Auditor General appointment valid, no retirement needed says AGC
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has clarified that the appointment of Datuk Seri Wan Suraya Wan Mohd Radzi as Auditor General complies with constitutional and legal provisions, dismissing claims that she should retire. The AGC stated that under Article 105 of the Federal Constitution and subparagraph 1(1) of the First Schedule to the Audit Act 1957, the Auditor General can be appointed from the public service. 'Referring to Clause (2) of Article 105 of the Federal Constitution, when Datuk Seri Wan Suraya Wan Mohd Radzi was appointed as Auditor General with effect from June 13, 2023, she would no longer hold any other appointment in the Federal service,' the AGC said. This means she is no longer part of the Administrative and Diplomatic Officers service scheme but remains a member of the general public service under Section 3 of Act 62. 'Since her appointment as Auditor General was in order, there is no need for her to be retired in the interest of the country,' the statement added. Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil also affirmed that Wan Suraya's appointment is valid and does not conflict with the Federal Constitution. - Bernama
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Can the rakyat shape Malaysia's digital privacy rules?
PETALING JAYA: Isn't it better to help shape the rules protecting your data than to learn about them only after they're decided behind closed doors? To this, Malaysian Integrity and Governance Society president Datuk Seri Dr Akhbar Abdul Satar said: 'Transparent rules help maintain public confidence and trust that their data will only be used lawfully and not arbitrarily.' Akhbar said a transparent process makes regulatory changes open to scrutiny and public input, preventing opaque or unilateral policy-making. Including input from service providers, industry players, civil society, and the public leads to more robust and widely accepted policies. He added open consultation fosters trust between the government and the people—trust that is essential when dealing with data rights and digital freedoms. Most importantly, inclusive participation helps identify blind spots, resulting in smarter, more practical solutions for all. 'Whatever law or framework is introduced, human governance is important. Without having good integrity of handlers, it will not be effective,' he told The Star when contacted about the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission's (MCMC) announcement on its newly launched open consultation for its Proposed Regulatory Framework. The framework aims to support law enforcement in tackling online threats like fraud, impersonation, and cyberbullying, while also ensuring data privacy through clear legal and operational safeguards. Noting that Malaysia currently lacks a mandatory statutory retention period for electronic data—resulting in variability and uncertainty—Akhbar emphasised the crucial need for a clear legal framework. He said this would enhance the management of communication data retention and disclosure, which are essential to protect citizens' rights by establishing clear boundaries on data access and use, balancing privacy with investigative needs. 'Well-defined regulations establish boundaries for access and use of data, providing safeguards for both citizens' privacy and the integrity of investigations. 'Without clear laws, service providers and law enforcement agencies may implement data practices inconsistently, undermining criminal investigations and legal proceedings. 'Laws clarify what constitutes admissible electronic evidence, ensuring electronic records collected are permissible in Malaysian courts,' he said. Akhbar, former president of Transparency International Malaysia and founder of the Malaysian chapter of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, emphasised that a robust framework will strengthen enforcement agencies' ability to respond to online crimes in several ways including streamlined data access, enhanced collaboration, improved victim protection, and compliance monitoring. 'Clear guidelines ensure that authorities like the police and MCMC know how to lawfully request and obtain data needed for complex cybercrime investigations, such as online fraud and cyberbullying. 'Established procedures foster stronger collaboration among agencies such as the Royal Malaysia Police, attorney general's chambers, and MCMC, as well as with digital platforms, which is vital for quickly tackling online threats.' Pointing out that well-defined reporting and evidence standards aid in securing justice for victims of cyberbullying and scams, Akhbar added a transparent framework helps monitor compliance levels among service providers and identify areas for improvement in law enforcement support. Akhbar opined that striking the right balance between national security and individual privacy requires a careful, principles-based approach. He said data collection for security purposes must be proportionate and strictly necessary, as overreach only erodes public trust, and added that requests for personal data should be subject to judicial oversight or independent review to prevent misuse. Stressing that service providers must operate with clear accountability and robust compliance measures, Akhbar said transparent practices, along with legal protections like the Personal Data Protection Act, are key to ensuring that security measures respect individual rights. On the framework's implementation success, Akhbar said it hinges on resolving key structural and operational challenges. 'Many stakeholders still lack the training and awareness needed to meet new data requirements effectively. Inconsistent legal interpretations, uneven technical capabilities, and weak safeguards heighten the risk of data misuse, particularly when handling cross-border requests.' Stressing the need for a clear, coordinated response, he recommended that comprehensive, regularly updated guidelines must be backed by targeted training. 'Agencies should prioritise secure, interoperable systems, with independent oversight to ensure accountability and uphold data protection standards.' Akhbar urged the public to actively participate in MCMC's public consultations, highlighting the importance of voicing their views on draft codes related to data retention, social media, and messaging platforms. 'These consultations are periodically announced and open to all—including individuals, industry players, and advocacy groups—who are encouraged to submit feedback through official channels such as email or online forms.' He emphasised that details on submission methods and deadlines are regularly published on MCMC's website and in official press releases, making it easy for the public to stay informed and involved.
Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Management failures worsened January violence, says prison officer
A Taiping Prison officer told a Suhakam inquiry that the overall environment there was 'unfit for both staff and inmates'. (Facebook pic) KUALA LUMPUR : A Taiping prison officer has criticised the facility's management, saying poor leadership and the inexperience of junior officers contributed to the violent scenes during an inmate relocation exercise in January. Ahmad Rizal, a prison inspector, testifying at a Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) inquiry here today, said many younger officers were ill-equipped to handle high-risk situations and claimed the overall prison environment was 'unfit for both staff and inmates'. He said junior officers were 'not trained or ready' for high-tension operations such as the Jan 17 transfer of more than 100 inmates from Hall B to Hall E. 'I was shocked when I first arrived,' he said, describing the cells as dark and cramped, with barely a few feet of space in each room. Rizal urged Suhakam to recommend improvements to the living conditions at Taiping prison and to consider replacing officers whom he described as unfit to handle volatile situations. He said inmates at other prisons were less likely to lash out due to lower stress levels, citing a more humane environment. Rizal was referring to the root of the Jan 17 incident, where inmates resisted relocation to Hall E after complaining about the lack of proper toilets in the hall's cells. He also alleged that some staff were colluding with inmates to sell banned items. 'We can catch the inmates, but when it comes to officers, we don't have enough proof,' he said. Psychological toll and regrets When shown CCTV footage of the Jan 17 incident, Rizal admitted he lost control and said the experience took an emotional toll on him. 'I couldn't sleep for months. I cried as soon as I got home. I felt like I had failed my family. I was afraid I wouldn't be able to protect them,' he said. He added that he had been undergoing psychiatric treatment since March and is on medication for depression and insomnia. He said his symptoms began in 2023 but worsened during his time at the Taiping prison. He said he had repeatedly asked for a transfer away from high-risk duties, but that his requests were denied. Rizal made these remarks at the Suhakam inquiry into the alleged abuse of more than 100 inmates by around 60 wardens during the Jan 17 relocation. The commission is investigating claims of brutality that allegedly led to the death of one inmate and injuries to several others.
