Don't ignore dragon: Top policy expert explains why India's $10 trillion dream can't become reality without China
trade relationship with China
, said Samir Saran, President of the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), in a conversation on the ANI podcast. He noted that India's growing economy will need strong commercial links with its largest trading partner, even as strategic and defence differences continue. 'There is no way that you can be a $10 trillion economy without having a substantial trading relationship with China,' Saran said, while emphasising the need for clarity in national interest and sectoral safeguards.
India should learn from China-US relationship model
Citing China's approach to the US, Saran said both countries traded extensively even while investing in deterrence capabilities. 'China built capabilities to deter the U.S. while expanding
trade
with it. We must do the same—build deterrence and roll out the red carpet for economic engagement.'
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
MCA
PGDM
Cybersecurity
Data Science
MBA
healthcare
Management
Leadership
Design Thinking
Technology
Data Analytics
Others
Product Management
CXO
Finance
Degree
Public Policy
others
Data Science
Operations Management
Artificial Intelligence
Digital Marketing
Healthcare
Project Management
Skills you'll gain:
Programming Proficiency
Data Handling & Analysis
Cybersecurity Awareness & Skills
Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
Duration:
24 Months
Vellore Institute of Technology
VIT Master of Computer Applications
Starts on
Aug 14, 2024
Get Details
'We have to take a page out of their book and do to China what the Chinese did to the Americans: have political muscularity and an economic embrace,' he concluded.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
Trade and security must be dealt with separately
Saran also cautioned against linking Pakistan's use of Chinese-origin missiles with direct involvement by China. 'The challenge is not about the hardware. The challenge is about the potential of collaboration during conflicts,' he said. He added that India should focus on diplomatic efforts to prevent military coordination between China and Pakistan rather than only on arms transfers.
China returns as India's top trading partner in FY24
According to Global Trade Research Initiative (
GTRI
) data, China reclaimed the position of India's top trading partner in FY24, overtaking the US after two years. India imported goods worth US$ 101.74 billion from China, comprising over 15 percent of total imports. India's exports to China also grew, reaching US$ 16.65 billion, led by iron ore, engineering goods, marine products, and chemicals. Total bilateral trade reached US$ 118.40 billion, according to India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF).
Live Events
Strategic tensions didn't halt trade
Samir highlighted despite the Himalayan border standoff during the pandemic, trade between India and China continued to grow. 'That's pragmatism,' Saran said, referring to India's decision to ban certain Chinese apps while allowing
commerce
to continue.
He argued that India should draw clear boundaries around 5–6 critical sectors to avoid Chinese involvement, while remaining open in others. 'Political muscularity and economic embrace is fine,' he added.
Investment gap needs correction
Saran said the investment imbalance must shift in India's favour. 'The trading advantage is with China. The balance of investments must belong to us,' he said. As per IBEF data, China ranks 22nd among foreign investors in India, with cumulative
FDI
of US$ 2.50 billion since 2000—just 0.35 percent of total inflows.
He suggested that if
Chinese firms
invested between US$ 50–100 billion in India, it could act as a stabilising factor in bilateral relations. 'That could create a sobering effect on strategic decision-making,' he said.
Engage with clarity and strength
Saran stressed that India must attract investment without compromising national interest. 'We should identify sectors where Chinese capital can contribute without compromising national security, and do this through rational, well-informed policymaking.'
Rejecting any suggestion that deeper economic ties would require India to soften its strategic position, he said, 'A strong economic relationship with China must be built on mutual respect, and that includes respect for India's political and military strength.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Democracies snubbed, dictators courted: Inside Trump's embrace of Pakistan
US President Donald Trump looks on as a member of the media raises their hand, at the White House in Washington, DC, US, August 1, 2025. File Image/Reuters On July 31, 2025, Lara Loomer launched a broadside against billionaire Tom Barrack, President Donald Trump's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria. Loomer, whose outside vetting of Trump appointees has led to waves of firings across his national security bureaucracy, pulled no punches. 'His [Barrack's] appointment to high-level diplomatic posts is alarming, given that his primary expertise lies in leveraging political connections for financial gain,' she wrote. His actions have enabled Islamists to thrive, even at the expense of US national security. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Barrack has a history of opaque financial dealings and what many view as political influence peddling,' she continued. 'His real estate empire, intertwined with Gulf investments, has long raised concerns about conflicts of interest and whether he is truly serving America or if he is flashing his political access.' She included in her tweet a copy of Barrack's 2018 indictment for acting as an unregistered foreign agent on behalf of Middle East interests. Barrack is the rule rather than the exception in Trump's inner circle. Many of the most influential people in the Trump administration have pre-service financial entanglements with Qatar. The US magazine Newsweek reported that, in addition to Trump himself, five major Trump administration officials have financial ties to Qatar: Chief-of-Staff Susie Wiles, FBI Director Kash Patel; Attorney General Pam Bondi; Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff; and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin. Democrats remain up-in-arms over Trump's acceptance of a $400 million jet from Qatar, alleging it amounts to a bribe; given Republican concern that a desire to influence motivates the $20 billion in assistance that Qatar provides American universities, it is hard to deny that Qatari money is not altruistic. For almost a quarter century, successive American presidents have cultivated relations with India. The development of US-India ties has coincided with perhaps the most contentious period in US foreign policy since the debate between isolationists and internationalists in the 1930s. Israel, Russia, NATO, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and China each became political footballs. India, however, stood out as a rare example of bipartisanship. Every US president from George W Bush to Joe Biden worked to cultivate US-India ties. That commitment to a US-India partnership included Trump, at least in his first term. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In his second term, Trump has staked out an opposite position. He approached Pakistani terrorism and its Indian victims with moral equivalency and even dined with Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir, mastermind of the Pahalgam massacre, at the White House. Just as intelligence operatives recruit and compromise targets with either blackmail, bribes, or buffeting ego, so too did Islamabad handle Trump, telling him how much he deserved a Nobel Prize and entrancing Trump with notions of gas deals. The numbers do not lie. On July 31, 2025, Trump slapped 25 per cent sanctions on India, greater than Pakistan (19 per cent), Bangladesh (20 per cent), Sri Lanka (20 per cent), and Afghanistan (15 per cent). Trump treats India with disdain, belittling its economy and privileging countries like Pakistan and Sri Lanka that are Chinese satrapies and Bangladesh and Afghanistan that are hubs for Islamist terror. Each of those countries to which Trump offers better terms ranks well below India on Transparency International's annual corruption index. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There is no proof that Pakistan, Qatar, or Turkey bribed Trump, though a commonality of Trump's two terms is the conflict of interest between public policy and personal business. Trump's reference to gas deals with Pakistan, his Qatari involvement, and his and Barrack's repeated endorsements of Turkish President Recep Erdogan are coincidences that no Indian should ignore, especially given the coincidences, Trump's policy choices, and the lack of any other logical policy-driven explanation. India must respond in the only way Trump will understand, by denying opportunities to American businesses until Trump or his successors change US policy and again ground it in a partnership of democracies and consensus against terrorism rather than a partnership with corrupt, terror-sponsoring dictatorships. Here, India's decision to abandon the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter makes sense. The US defence industry purposely spreads itself across states and Congressional districts in order to immunise itself from cutbacks by ensuring it always has several dozen, if not hundreds, of lawmakers willing to protect the corporate interest for the sake of their employees. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to the Congressional Research Service, F-35 components are produced across 250 different districts in 45 US states. The same pattern holds true with other platforms that the United States would like to sell to India. Cutting contracts makes single headlines, but sending diplomats to each Congressional district to explain why New Delhi made its decision will augment pressure on Trump, especially as midterm elections loom. Trump might even reverse course. While some politicians double down to save face, Trump knows no shame, and if the pressure is great enough, he might simply change policy and try to scrub his recent past in an Orwellian frenzy of sycophantic press and statements. This still leaves India with a problem in the short term: Given the threat China poses to India, some Indian politicians may wish to replace the F-35 with Russia's fifth-generation Sukhoi-57E; this would be a mistake, given Russia's failure to honour previous contracts. Rather, India might shift toward European aircraft until such a time that Trump departs and the United States can right its present wrongs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even if New Delhi abandons Lockheed Martin because Trump's antics have raised questions about American reliability, such systems represent not only a lethal combat platform but also a decades-long partnership of training and maintenance. Whatever animus New Delhi might have toward Washington, the long-term stability of Moscow remains a bad bet given the political vacuum that will develop after Putin's death. Trump treats India unfairly, but Trump is an old and, frankly, corrupt man whose time is limited. India will soon be the world's third largest economy; Trump's failure to recognise the benefits of that and the wisdom of choosing democracies over dictatorships and kleptocracies is America's loss. The current crisis, though, can be the stress test to prove the strength of US-India ties. Trump can become the exception that proves the rule. The US Congress still favours India over Pakistan, and every politician motivated more by national security than side business deals will remember which country sheltered Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and which country will drive the international economy through the 21st century. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bribery can never provide a solid base for bilateral ties like democracy and mutual interests do. Pakistan, like Turkey, will ultimately fall into the dustbin of past American partners no longer worth a future administration's time and energy. India must fight back but should not go scorched earth out of animus toward a man for whom the curtain of power is already closing. Michael Rubin is director of policy analysis at the Middle East Forum and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Firstpost.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
CK Hutchison's Panama Port subsidiary seeks legal protection amid contract dispute
Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. Get updates on your preferred social platform Follow us for the latest news, insider access to events and more. A subsidiary of a Hong Kong conglomerate entangled in US-China tensions appealed on Friday for legal protection for businesses in Panama after the company's contract over its Panama Canal port assets has been faced with lawsuits in the Central American for the rule of law is essential to assure businesses that Panama is a safe place to invest in, Panama Ports Company , under Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings , said in a Comptroller General filed two lawsuits on Wednesday, seeking to declare unconstitutional a contract that granted the operation of ports at both ends of the canal to the Hong Kong subsidiary, and to nullify its renewal four years ago, saying it was "abusive" of Panama's turn, Panama Ports Company said its operations have had a positive impact, from building world-class ports to creating more than 25,000 direct and indirect jobs and contributing billions of balboas - Panama's currency - to the country's said it wants to work with the government in Panama for a better future."Regarding the ongoing legal actions, we firmly believe that respect for legal protection and the rule of law are essential in order to provide businesses and investors with the certainty that Panama is a safe country to invest in," it company operates the ports of Balboa, in the Pacific, and Cristobal, in the Atlantic, under a concession contract approved in 1997 and renewed in 2021 for 25 more years. CK Hutchison is controlled by the family of Li Ka-shing , the southern Chinese city's richest comptroller authority in April said that an audit of Panama Ports Company found irregularities in the renewal of the concession. But the company denied allegations that it had failed to pay about $1.2 billion to the Central American President Jose Raul Mulino said during his weekly news conference on Thursday that he fully supported the comptroller's case and would await the court's verdict."We have all seen what that contract has costed the Panamanian nation over time," Mulino said without elaborating. He alluded to some sort of public-private partnership for the ports, saying there was a lot of interest from private companies, but that it was in the early stages and provided no Hutchison Holdings' initial plan, announced in March, to sell its port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes the US investment firm BlackRock Inc., also got caught up in tensions between Beijing and President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the canal, initially welcomed that plan. However, it apparently angered Beijing and drew a review by Chinese anti-monopoly months of uncertainty, Hutchison said on Monday that it may seek a Chinese investor to join a consortium of buyers, which also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, a subsidiary of the Mediterranean Shipping initial deal, valued at nearly $23 billion, including $5 billion in debt, would have given the consortium control over 43 ports in 23 countries, including the two at the Panama Ports Company said Friday it would communicate with the Panamanian government "at the appropriate time," affirming that it believes engaging with the government "is vital to discuss the way forward for" the government maintains it has full control over the canal and that the operation of the ports by Hutchison does not mean Chinese control of it.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
US tightens family immigration policy with stricter vetting and interview rules
Effective August 1, 2025, USCIS is tightening screening for family-based visa petitions to combat fraud and ensure national security. The updated policy clarifies eligibility, handling of multiple petitions, overseas filing for US citizens, and interview requirements. Approved petitions do not guarantee legal status, and USCIS can initiate removal proceedings if ineligibility is found. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Who can apply and what to submit: It explains who is eligible to file a petition and what documents must be included. Handling multiple petitions: If a person files more than one petition for different relatives, or if there are other related filings, USCIS will take that into account when making a decision. When you can file from outside the US: US citizens living abroad, especially military members and government employees, can file petitions directly from overseas in some situations. Where the petition goes after approval: If USCIS approves a petition, but the person applying for the green card cannot adjust status in the US, the case may be sent to the National Visa Center to continue the process abroad. When interviews are required: USCIS explains when it will call both the petitioner and the beneficiary for in-person interviews. Approval doesn't mean you can stay: Even if a petition is approved, it does not give legal status. If the person is found to be ineligible for any reason, USCIS can still begin removal proceedings. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( USCIS ) has released a detailed policy update effective August 1, 2025, aimed at tightening screening procedures for family-based immigrant visa petitions. The updated guidance, part of the USCIS Policy Manual, reinforces the agency's efforts to detect and deter fraudulent applications while verifying the authenticity of family relationships.'Fraudulent, frivolous, or otherwise non-meritorious family-based immigrant visa petitions erode confidence in family-based pathways to lawful permanent resident (LPR) status and undermine family unity in the United States,' USCIS stated in its agency underlined its focus on national security and compliance with immigration laws. USCIS said, 'We are committed to keeping Americans safe by detecting aliens with potentially harmful intent so they can be processed for removal from the United States.' The update is designed to ensure only genuine and verifiable family ties lead to permanent updated guidance includes the following key points for those applying through family sponsorship:The policy guidance is effective immediately and applies to all pending petitions as well as new ones filed on or after August 1, reiterated that the update is part of broader efforts to protect the integrity of the family-based immigration system, stating that this change will improve the agency's capacity to vet marriages and family ties 'to ensure they are genuine, verifiable, and compliant with all applicable laws.'
