logo
Is this EU-US trade deal a good one for Ireland?

Is this EU-US trade deal a good one for Ireland?

RTÉ News​5 days ago
Yesterday the EU and US reached agreement on a framework deal that ends months of uncertainty and avoids a full-blown trade war between the two blocs.
While there is still a lot to be ironed out, there's a decent level of detail that has been announced.
What's included in the deal?
It introduces a 15% import tariff on most EU goods being exported to the US, which is half the 30% rate US President Donald Trump had threatened.
This baseline tariff will apply across the board, including for Europe's crucial car manufacturing sector, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors.
However, there will be no tariffs on aircraft and their components, some chemicals and generic drugs, certain agricultural products, and critical raw materials.
As part of the agreement, the EU has also committed to buying around €640 billion worth of US energy products over the next three years. This will largely involve purchases of US liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil and nuclear fuels.
While Brussels has also said it will spend at least €515 billion on American military equipment.
It's unlikely the deal will go much beyond those sectors in terms of what the EU agrees to buy from the US. For example, it's not expected the EU will have to commit to allowing in and buying more US beef as part of the broader agreement.
What are we still not sure about?
Some important elements of this trade deal still have to be thrashed out, such as what it will mean for the EU's dairy and spirits sector.
Dairy and especially spirits, make up a huge chunk of Ireland's near €2 billion in annual food and drink exports to the US, so from an Irish perspective clarity in this area will be crucial.
Essentially, we don't know yet for example if Irish whiskey exports to America will be subject to a 15% tariff. If so, that will have significant financial implications for the many distilleries here that rely heavily on the US market.
Some sectors are also calling for clarity on whether exports going from Northern Ireland (NI) to the US will be treated differently to Republic of Ireland (ROI) exports to the US.
America and the UK agreed a trade deal in May that included a baseline 10% tariff on many goods exported to the US, and this agreement includes goods being exported from NI.
However, the dairy industry has pointed out that it operates on an "all island basis" with integrated supply chains and cross-border trade in raw milk, ingredients, and finished products.
It says that any divergence in tariff treatment between NI and ROI (for example 10% for NI and 15% for ROI) could create huge issues and added cost for processors and farmers.
Who pays the tariff?
This means American-based companies will have to pay an extra 15% in tax to the US government on any goods they buy from the EU.
These companies can either choose to absorb some or all of the cost of this extra 15% themselves, get discounts from the EU supplier they are buying from to cover the increase, or add the cost onto the price of the product, which would mean US consumers end up paying more.
Ultimately though, the Irish and EU companies selling into the US will likely take a hit with this deal. US firms buying their goods may look for discounted prices to cover the new tariff rate, while if their products end up being more expensive in US shops then sales could drop if American consumers decide they are too expensive.
So, while EU companies will be impacted financially by the new tariffs, it's worth noting consumers here will not have to pay any more as a result. They would only need to start worrying about higher prices if the EU implemented reciprocal tariffs on US goods.
But that's far more unlikely now we have a deal.
Is this a good deal for Ireland and the EU?
It depends on your perspective.
Right away, it takes the threat of an escalating trade war off the table.
This adds a degree of certainty for EU businesses that hasn't been there for months.
While they were hoping for no tariffs, there was a lingering threat of 30% tariffs - which is now gone.
And while there is now a 15% tariff, at least they can makes plans in a more stable economic environment.
That's what proponents of the deal are highlighting....it brings much-needed certainty.
There are obvious benefits for the bloc's carmakers. Before this agreement there was a 27.5% tariff on cars being exported from the EU to the US, which will drop by 12.5.%.
The US has a €200 billion trade deficit with the EU (meaning America buys a lot more from the EU than the other way around). EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has accepted that deficit needs to be cut. "We have to rebalance it," she said.
However, not everyone in the EU is happy.
Eurosceptic Hungarian PM Viktor Orbán said: "Donald Trump ate Von der Leyen for breakfast."
French minister for Europe Benjamin Haddad said the deal is "unbalanced".
Critics such as Haddad point out the EU is accepting a 15% tariff, while not placing a tariff on US goods entering the single market, and hasn't leveraged the scale and power of the single market as much as it could have in negotiations.
But the dealmakers in Brussels will say the EU had much more to lose if there was no deal, given how much the bloc sells to the US, and that it's worth making compromises to protect more than €1.6 trillion in EU-US trade every year.
What happens next?
Over the next few weeks, European Commission and American officials will flesh out the agreement made yesterday.
This is when we'll get more specifics on the spirits sector and issues around NI/ROI exports to the US for example.
Then EU member states will have to approve the deal, which could come into effect before the end of the summer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Maga versus the EU: are European regulators a target in Trump's war on online ‘censorship'?
Maga versus the EU: are European regulators a target in Trump's war on online ‘censorship'?

Irish Times

time10 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Maga versus the EU: are European regulators a target in Trump's war on online ‘censorship'?

A fortnight ago, US secretary of state Marco Rubio revoked visas and thus blocked a judge and members of his family from entering the United States. Accusing the judge of a 'political witch hunt' against former Brazilian leader Jair Bolsonaro – a far-right populist with close links to Donald Trump 's 'Maga' movement – Rubio maintained that this involved 'a persecution and censorship complex so sweeping that it not only violates basic rights of Brazilians, but also extends beyond Brazil's shores to target Americans'. 'President Trump made clear that his administration will hold accountable foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States', he said. Censorship of free speech has become a very important issue for the Trump administration, particularly on restrictions on what is said online. READ MORE Some on the right in the US are concerned that regulations imposed on Big Tech in Europe are blowing back across the Atlantic and targeting conservatives. In Washington, where Republicans control the White House and Congress, this is a politically explosive charge. Rubio had announced in late May a new policy that would impose visa bans on foreign nationals the administration deemed to be censoring Americans and suggested this could include officials regulating US tech companies. He said it was unacceptable for foreign officials to demand American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reached into the United States. Rubio's visa ban on the Brazilian judge may not have been headline news internationally, but it was noticed in Brussels and among those regulating Big Tech. It is understood that following Rubio's policy announcement in May some figures in Ireland's media regulatory body, Coimisiún na Meán , made enquiries to the Department of Foreign Affairs as to what this could mean. No one was really sure. Coimisiún na Meán is responsible for the application and enforcement of the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA) in Ireland. But the European Commission also monitors areas such as ensuring very large online platforms conduct regular risk assessments on illegal content or material that could negatively affect elections, security or public health. The visa ban on the Brazilian judge showed Washington's policy shift in May was not just rhetoric; regulators, officials and their families could be banned from entering the United States. Musk and Zuckerberg In early July a Christian advocacy group called ADF International argued online that the EU's DSA represented a threat to free speech 'and must be repealed'. Shortly afterward Elon Musk , owner of social media platform X, replied: 'Yes'. It was an indication of the concern among US tech companies at what they saw as unfair overseas taxation and regulation. In January Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg argued that Europe had 'an ever-increasing number of laws institutionalising censorship'. These comments were rejected by politicians in Europe who, in turn, were alarmed by Musk urging Germans on his social media platform to vote for the far right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in elections. Ideological and financial concerns There was a time when many on the right in the US viewed the tech industry as a bastion of Silicon Valley liberals. In more recent times, the US tech sector has forged close links with Trump. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that after Trump's election last November, tech chiefs including Zuckerberg and Google's Sundar Pichai met the incoming president at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida and that the need to curb 'harmful policies' overseas consistently came up in their conversations. The concerns of Big Tech and Trump's Maga movement appeared to be aligning to a degree. Dubliner Ian Plunkett, a tech policy analyst in Washington, DC, told The Irish Times that Big Tech companies had adopted a pragmatic approach under the new Trump administration. Those companies that stood by Trump at his inauguration in January were following the power, he said. Many in Trump's Maga base considered regulatory enforcement in Europe as an attack on American innovation, he said; in the eyes of those in Trump's base, US companies had developed this global technology but other countries then had the temerity to impose taxes through the enforcement of regulations that they regarded contrary to their interpretation of the freedom of speech provisions in the US constitution. Trump supporters may have ideological concerns about European regulators curtailing their free speech, but the US tech sector is also looking at the potential financial impact of European regulations. It was widely reported in the US in recent months that Musk's X social media network faced potential fines of up to €1 billion for violations of the EU's DSA, although this has been denied by the European Commission . Over recent months the House of Representatives committee on the judiciary, chaired by republican Jim Jordan, has been carrying out an investigation into 'how and to what extent foreign laws, regulations and judicial orders compel, coerce or influence companies to censor speech in the United States'. Last week in an interim staff report, the committee strongly criticised the DSA as 'the EU's comprehensive digital censorship law'. The report argued that this legislation stemmed originally from claims of Russian interference in elections in the US and in France. In the theology of Maga, this is considered heresy, as it implies that Trump did not win the White House fairly in 2016. The report describes as 'inaccurate' EU claims that the DSA applies only to Europe and that it targets only what is harmful or illegal. 'Non-public documents reveal that European regulators use the DSA to target core political speech that is neither harmful nor illegal and to pressure platforms, primarily American social media companies, to change their global content moderation policies in response to European demands,' the report said. 'Put simply, the DSA infringes on American online speech.' The report points to an EU Commission workshop last May where, it maintains, a hypothetical social media post stating: 'We need to take back our country' was categorised as 'illegal hate speech' that platforms were required to censor under the DSA. The committee described the term as 'a common, anodyne political statement'. 'The DSA incentivises social media companies to comply with the EU's censorship demands because the penalties for failing to do so are large, including fines up to 6 per cent of their global revenue,' the report said. 'If 'extraordinary circumstances lead to a serious threat to public security or public health in the Union', regulators are even empowered to temporarily shut down platforms within the EU.' Ireland 'unusually exposed' Members of the House committee that drew up the report were in Ireland this week and held meetings with tech companies and Coimisiún na Meán. The delegation's visit also came in the week that X lost a legal challenge to aspects of Ireland's online safety code that are viewed by the Irish Government as crucial in protecting children. But it was not the first time that visitors from Washington had travelled to Dublin to discuss online regulation. Staff at Coimisiún na Meán met representatives from the US state department on May 30th 'following a request from the US embassy to better understand its functions and international collaboration'. On May 19th, state department officials told Coimisiún na Meán the visitors from Washington would 'like to understand how Ireland navigates balancing the protection of freedom of expression with the need to address and mitigate hate speech and online harms. 'They would like to understand how the Media Commission approaches implementation of the DSA and domestic hate speech laws, including their impact on American companies.' A note prepared by Coimisiún na Meán after the meeting said it had provided an introduction to fundamental rights, 'including on empowering users who can see if and why their content has been removed or restricted online under the Digital Services Act'. 'Some general discussion on freedom of expression and the differences between US law and European and member state law followed.' Coimisiún na Meán told The Irish Times in June that the US officials 'did not seek any changes to any aspect of An Coimisiún's regulatory work at this meeting, nor did they express any concerns in relation to it'. The US state department said officials from the bureau of democracy, human rights and labour had visited Ireland 'to underscore the administration's support for freedom of expression and the ability of all voices to be heard in the political process and to learn more about the Irish government's approach to protecting human rights'. Dr TJ McIntyre, associate professor at the Sutherland School of Law in UCD and chair of civil liberties group Digital Rights Ireland, said the fact that so many big tech companies have headquarters in this country meant Ireland was 'unusually exposed' in the arguments over regulation and censorship. The extent to which Irish law affected some of the right-wing agenda being promoted by some firms and their owners meant 'you can expect further interference in the Irish democratic process' to try to enable them to continue with that agenda, he said.

Cork video game studio urges greater backing after global success of 'Ready or Not'
Cork video game studio urges greater backing after global success of 'Ready or Not'

Irish Examiner

time10 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Cork video game studio urges greater backing after global success of 'Ready or Not'

A Cork video game studio is celebrating 2m console sales of its first-person shooter game Ready or Not, but says more supports are needed for the industry to thrive in Ireland. Ready or Not was released internationally by Cork studio Void Interactive for PlayStation 5 and Xbox on July 15, having been released initially in 2023 on Windows for PC. Sales of the first-person shooter game, which sells for around €50, exceeded 2m in the two weeks following its release on console, taking its total global sales to 11m. First established more than seven years ago by Julio Rodriguez, Ryan David Post, and Stirling Rank, Void Interactive is based in the National Esports Centre on the South Mall in Cork City, employing 70 people in total, who work remotely. Void Interactive CFO Philip Nathan, COO Stirling Rank, and CEO Julio Rodriguez celebrate the success of their first-person shooter game 'Ready or Not' with David Cronin at the National Esports Centre in Cork. Picture: Gerard McCarthy Its flagship product, Ready or Not, is a tactical first-person shooter game set in the fictional dystopian US city of Los Sueños, depicting a modern-day world in which Swat police units are called to defuse hostile and confronting situations. Following the significant uptake in the game so far, the company is actively looking to expand its teams, offering remote positions for developers spanning across graphic design, animation and programming. 'We want to hire as many people as we can in Ireland,' said Philip Nathan, chief financial officer of Void Interactive. Speaking on the release of the game for console, Mr Nathan said: 'Surpassing the 2m milestone has been an incredible success for us. It can be so hard to estimate, as it is so reliant on the consumer market and how it reacts. 'Our lowest estimation for the release was 800,000, while our highest estimate was 2.75m, which we are on track to exceed very soon, with demand remaining strong.' 'Ready or Not' was released internationally by Cork-based Void Interactive for PlayStation 5 and Xbox on July 15, having been released initially on Windows for PC in 2023. Picture: Speaking to the Irish Examiner, Mr Nathan says the company's establishment in Cork was an easy decision, noting: 'The founders always knew this would be a global business and we needed a strong area to facilitate this. 'Our founders are from Mexico, Australia, and New Zealand and wanted an English-speaking city with strong European ties. "They also didn't want a capital city, which made Cork the perfect choice for the company." While its staff are fully remote, Void Interactive is based in the National Esports Centre, located in the Republic of Work on South Mall. Officially opened in March 2025 following €1m investment in gaming infrastructure, the National Esports Centre created 10 new jobs along with further positions in gaming, media, and technology expected as the centre continues to expand. The hub is used by professional eSports athletes, aspiring gamers, developers, gaming researchers, and students and is also home to WYLDE, Ireland's first professional Esports academy, which was founded in Cork in 2021. Gamer Karina Shastak, Steve Daly of the National Esports Centre and Philip Nathan of Void Interactive with Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Wylde Esports player Ciarán Walsh at the official opening of the Esports Centre in Cork in March. Picture: Gerard McCarthy Recent years have seen Cork City become an epicentre for Ireland's growing video game industry, but despite a strong ecosystem, Mr Nathan says more needs to be done for Ireland to realise the opportunities available within the sector. 'Ireland has a thriving film and TV industry, which offers everything from heavy supports to generous tax breaks. While this is great, the video game industry should get similar attention. 'The video game industry is valued significantly higher than TV and film, and is only growing larger. 'The current generation of retirees is the first to grow up with mainstream video games, which means a growing customer base with the industry now targeting every generation. 'There is so much potential for the Irish Government, universities, and Enterprise Ireland to get behind this and allow for Ireland to become a video game hotspot in Europe." The global videogame market is projected to grow by 3.4% to $189bn (€165bn) in 2025, compared with last year's growth of 3.2%, according to a report by video game research specialists Newzoo, with this projected growth reflecting concrete changes, hardware cycles, pricing trends, install base growth, and title pipelines. 'We've seen this happen in Cork before, where one company comes and a whole industry follows,' Mr Nathan said. 'In 2005, McAfee set up here, and it wasn't long before the city became a hub for cybersecurity companies. The Government was quick to take notice, and universities altered their offerings to cater for the heightened demand for computer science graduates. There is an opportunity here to do that again and replicate previous success. 'I've reached out to universities and government agencies, offering sponsorships and other things. I said, whatever they wanted, we would give it to them. I never got a response. 'I hope that changes in time, and people begin to see the opportunity that lies in front of them.' Looking forward, Mr Nathan says sales of Ready or Not are expected to total 5m by the end of 2025, with a further 2m to 3m sales anticipated over the next five months, and the company also looking to add extra levels to the popular game in the near future. 'We are constantly investing in ways to improve the game and user experience,' says Mr Nathan. 'And while we do that, we are also looking to diversify our offerings and develop new games, while always keeping Ready or Not our main focus and at the core of our business. 'There are a lot of exciting things in the pipeline, and we're looking at a very busy few years ahead.'

Negotiation on EU-US trade deal continues, with tariffs pushed back for another week
Negotiation on EU-US trade deal continues, with tariffs pushed back for another week

Irish Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • Irish Independent

Negotiation on EU-US trade deal continues, with tariffs pushed back for another week

This gives European Commission negotiators more time to clarify details of the new trade deal, as they try to extend the range of goods to which the 15pc rate will not apply. On Thursday, the commission said it had not been able to achieve a zero-for-zero carve-out for the drinks sector. France is already pressing for parts of the deal to be renegotiated. 'It's a stage and we won't stop here,' French foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot told broadcaster France Info. 'We want new concessions, guarantees on wine and spirits, a readjustment, [and] a rebalancing on the service sector – in particular digital services.' Speaking after a meeting of the trade forum in Government Buildings, Tánaiste and Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Harris said it was Ireland's understanding that the EU's 15pc rate was fully inclusive – incorporating existing tariffs – unlike the UK's 10pc. Confirming that pharmaceuticals will remain at a zero per cent tariff until the White House completes a Section 232 investigation – which determines how specific imports will affect US national security – Mr Harris said he had been informed by Brussels that this was likely to conclude in about two weeks. 'Without a deal between the US and the EU, today would have seen 30pc tariffs introduced by President Trump on the EU, and significant counter-measures by the EU to the tune of around €90-odd billion,' he said. 'There's absolutely no doubt that would have been a moment of catastrophe in terms of our economic well-being as a country. We'd be in a very different and a much worse position, I think, if we were standing here today with no deal. 'You don't have to take my word for that if you just see the executive order last night and all of the tariffs levelled in other countries, including countries that didn't have deals.' On Thursday night, Mr Trump signed an executive order to introduce tariffs on more than 60 countries. Most of these will take effect on August 7, but a 35pc levy on some exports from Canada came into effect immediately. The highest rates were slapped on Syria, Laos and Myanmar, which now face tariffs of about 40pc. A rate of 35pc was applied in Switzerland. The country has a big trade deficit with the US, reaching $38bn (€33bn) last year, but the White House implied that Switzerland was also being penalised for its pharma industry. ADVERTISEMENT US trade representative Jamieson Greer told BloombergTelevision: 'They ship enormous amounts of pharmaceuticals to our country. We want to be making pharmaceuticals in our country.' As usual, the extended deadline gives these countries more time to negotiate a deal with the US before the tariffs are applied. If introduced, however, it will mean the US is applying an average rate six times higher than when former president Joe Biden was in office. Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said: 'The average US tariff jumps from 13.3pc to 15.2pc, a seismic shift from the 2.3pc average before Trump retook office.' In a briefing to its members after the trade forum, Ibec pointed out that clarity was still needed on precisely what goods would drop to a zero tariff after August 7. 'Goods that may benefit from zero tariffs or zero-for-zero tariffs ... (including aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generic medicines, semiconductor equipment, selected agricultural products, natural resources, and critical raw materials) will require the final EU-US joint statement to confirm which specific HS codes will be exempt,' Ibec's Danny McCoy said. 'Negotiations on additional zero-for-zero arrangements not covered by the joint statement may continue in the weeks ahead.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store