German services sector stabilises in June, PMI shows
The HCOB final services Purchasing Managers' Index rose to 49.7 in June, up from May's 2-1/2-year low of 47.1 but slightly below the preliminary reading for June of 49.4.
Any reading above 50 indicates expansion, while a reading below that number signals contraction.
"Service providers have been having somewhat of a tough time for three months now," said Hamburg Commercial Bank chief economist Cyrus de la Rubia, adding that since the COVID-19 pandemic, activity in the sector has been more volatile.
The survey revealed an easing decline in new business as well as a fall in work backlogs for the 14th month in a row.
Employment continued to rise modestly for the sixth consecutive month, as firms sought to expand capacity.
"Taking a positive view, this could be interpreted as meaning that service providers are confident that they will soon receive more orders," said de la Rubia.
"Being a bit more sceptical, higher employment could suggest that more people are needed to achieve a similar level of activity as before." Due in part to the government's economic stimulus package, "we expect economic growth in Germany to pick up in the second half of the year, benefiting not only the construction sector and industry, but also the service sector," he said.
The composite PMI index, which comprises services and manufacturing, climbed to 50.4 in June from 48.5 in May.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
4 hours ago
- Economic Times
Mass layoffs in 2025: Microsoft, Meta, and more big names slash jobs — is yours next?
Live Events FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The wave of layoffs is not over. In fact, 2025 is shaping up to be another challenging year for workers in a variety of industries, including technology, retail, and even space exploration. Many of these decisions are based on AI and automation, leaving thousands to wonder if they will be around the world are reducing staff in the name of efficiency, restructuring, or preparing for an AI-powered such as Meta, Boeing, and Chevron are laying off thousands of workers, while CNN and BlackRock are making targeted reductions. The workplace is rapidly changing once two years of large-scale job losses in the tech, media, finance, manufacturing, retail, and energy sectors, layoffs and other workforce reductions are happening again in there are a variety of reasons for staff reductions, cost-cutting initiatives are occurring in tandem with technological advancements. According to a recent World Economic Forum survey, 41% of businesses globally stated that they anticipated laying off employees over the next five years due to the development of artificial job cuts have previously been announced by companies like CNN, Dropbox, and Block. Meanwhile, the WEF predicts that by 2030, tech jobs in big data, fintech, and AI will have doubled.1. Adidas – Cutting up to 500 jobs at its German headquarters to simplify operations.2. Ally – Letting go of around 500 employees (under 5% of staff) to restructure, while continuing to hire in other areas.3. Automattic – Parent of Tumblr and WordPress is reducing its global staff by 16% due to market competition and the need for efficiency.4. BlackRock – Trimming around 200 roles (about 1% of workforce) to better align with strategic goals.5. Block (formerly Square) – Laying off nearly 1,000 workers as part of a streamlining effort, not directly linked to financial issues.6. Blue Origin – Jeff Bezos' space company is cutting about 10% of staff to refocus on manufacturing and launch goals.7. Boeing – Cutting 400 jobs tied to its moon rocket program due to delays in NASA's Artemis missions.8. BP – Eliminating a total of 7,700 roles worldwide (including 3,000 contractors) to simplify its structure and cut costs.9. Bridgewater Associates – The world's largest hedge fund is letting go of about 90 employees to stay lean.10. Bumble – Slashing around 240 jobs (30% of its team) as part of a major strategic reset.11. Burberry – Cutting 1,700 jobs (18% of staff) in a bid to save £100 million by 2027 amid poor financial performance.12. Chevron – Planning to reduce 15–20% of global workforce by 2026—about 9,000 jobs—to improve efficiency and integrate Hess.13. CNN – Cutting 200 TV-focused roles as it pivots more toward digital content.14. Coty – Also undergoing job reductions, though exact figures not specified here.15. Morgan Stanley – Set to lay off up to 2,400 staff, about 2–3% of its global workforce, to improve operational efficiency.16. Paramount – Announced a 3.5% workforce cut in the U.S. as part of cost restructuring.17. Porsche – Plans to eliminate 3,900 jobs gradually over the next few years.18. Microchip Technology – Letting go of 2,000 employees due to lower demand.19. Meta (Facebook's parent) – Cutting around 5% of staff to stay lean and focused.20. Intel – Reducing at least 15% of its factory workforce, primarily in manufacturing.21. PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) – Planning to cut about 2% of its U.S. staff.22. Salesforce – Cutting more than 1,000 jobs as part of ongoing streamlining.23. Starbucks – Laying off 1,100 corporate roles in a reorganization businesses are restructuring due to rising costs, shifting priorities, and increased use of artificial most cases, yes. According to a World Economic Forum survey, 41% of companies expect artificial intelligence to reduce their workforce.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Mass layoffs in 2025: Microsoft, Meta, and more big names slash jobs — is yours next?
The wave of layoffs is not over. In fact, 2025 is shaping up to be another challenging year for workers in a variety of industries, including technology, retail, and even space exploration. Many of these decisions are based on AI and automation, leaving thousands to wonder if they will be next. Companies around the world are reducing staff in the name of efficiency, restructuring, or preparing for an AI-powered future. Companies such as Meta, Boeing, and Chevron are laying off thousands of workers, while CNN and BlackRock are making targeted reductions. The workplace is rapidly changing once again. ALSO READ: Who is Joey Chestnut, who has reclaimed hot dog eating crown in epic comeback at Nathan's contest? Live Events After two years of large-scale job losses in the tech, media, finance, manufacturing, retail, and energy sectors, layoffs and other workforce reductions are happening again in 2025. Although there are a variety of reasons for staff reductions, cost-cutting initiatives are occurring in tandem with technological advancements. According to a recent World Economic Forum survey, 41% of businesses globally stated that they anticipated laying off employees over the next five years due to the development of artificial intelligence. AI-related job cuts have previously been announced by companies like CNN, Dropbox, and Block. Meanwhile, the WEF predicts that by 2030, tech jobs in big data, fintech, and AI will have doubled. Here's a breakdown of some of the biggest names being dropped this year. 1. Adidas – Cutting up to 500 jobs at its German headquarters to simplify operations. 2. Ally – Letting go of around 500 employees (under 5% of staff) to restructure, while continuing to hire in other areas. 3. Automattic – Parent of Tumblr and WordPress is reducing its global staff by 16% due to market competition and the need for efficiency. 4. BlackRock – Trimming around 200 roles (about 1% of workforce) to better align with strategic goals. 5. Block (formerly Square) – Laying off nearly 1,000 workers as part of a streamlining effort, not directly linked to financial issues. 6. Blue Origin – Jeff Bezos' space company is cutting about 10% of staff to refocus on manufacturing and launch goals. 7. Boeing – Cutting 400 jobs tied to its moon rocket program due to delays in NASA's Artemis missions. 8. BP – Eliminating a total of 7,700 roles worldwide (including 3,000 contractors) to simplify its structure and cut costs. 9. Bridgewater Associates – The world's largest hedge fund is letting go of about 90 employees to stay lean. 10. Bumble – Slashing around 240 jobs (30% of its team) as part of a major strategic reset. 11. Burberry – Cutting 1,700 jobs (18% of staff) in a bid to save £100 million by 2027 amid poor financial performance. 12. Chevron – Planning to reduce 15–20% of global workforce by 2026—about 9,000 jobs—to improve efficiency and integrate Hess. 13. CNN – Cutting 200 TV-focused roles as it pivots more toward digital content. 14. Coty – Also undergoing job reductions, though exact figures not specified here. 15. Morgan Stanley – Set to lay off up to 2,400 staff, about 2–3% of its global workforce, to improve operational efficiency. 16. Paramount – Announced a 3.5% workforce cut in the U.S. as part of cost restructuring. 17. Porsche – Plans to eliminate 3,900 jobs gradually over the next few years. 18. Microchip Technology – Letting go of 2,000 employees due to lower demand. 19. Meta (Facebook's parent) – Cutting around 5% of staff to stay lean and focused. 20. Intel – Reducing at least 15% of its factory workforce, primarily in manufacturing. 21. PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) – Planning to cut about 2% of its U.S. staff. 22. Salesforce – Cutting more than 1,000 jobs as part of ongoing streamlining. 23. Starbucks – Laying off 1,100 corporate roles in a reorganization push. FAQs Why are companies like Meta and Boeing laying off employees in 2025? Many businesses are restructuring due to rising costs, shifting priorities, and increased use of artificial intelligence. Are these layoffs related to AI replacing human roles? In most cases, yes. According to a World Economic Forum survey, 41% of companies expect artificial intelligence to reduce their workforce.
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Cease the cess: on the GST and reforms
The eighth anniversary of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India, on July 1, coincided with the poorest tax collections the indirect tax system has seen in some time, highlighting the need for structural changes in the system. The latest GST collections stood at ₹1.85 lakh crore in June 2025, the lowest in four months. This amount was just 6.2% higher than the collections in June 2024, the slowest growth rate in four years. Looking past the gross collections, the data show that once refunds are accounted for, the growth in the government's actual collections was just 3.3%. Further, the revenue from domestic transactions, excluding imports, was an anaemic 4.6% higher than in June last year — barely faster than the average rate of inflation since then. Being a consumption tax, a dip in GST collections reflects a dip in economic activity. But it also reflects inefficiencies in the system, which must now suitably be addressed eight years on. A common demand is for fuel to be included in GST. There is, however, strong resistance to this from State governments, since fuel and alcohol are the few sources of revenue States have with them that are independent of the Centre. However, this cannot be reason enough to perpetually keep these items excluded. It is 'one nation, one tax' after all, and it is high time that the goal was achieved in full. As for the revenue hit to States, the Centre must accede to their request for a higher share in central taxes. The Centre must also stop increasingly relying on non-shareable cesses for its revenue. For their part, States must resist the temptation to use this higher amount on election-oriented untargeted freebies. Trust goes two ways. The other popular reform is a reduction in the number of GST rates. This, too, is overdue, and the GST Council's fitment and rate-setting committees are examining the issue. Connected to this is the question of what is to be done with the GST Compensation Cess, which is levied over and above the 28% slab. It was originally intended to compensate States for any losses arising out of GST implementation for a period of five years. It was then extended until March 2026 to repay the loan taken by the Centre to pay this compensation since the COVID-19 pandemic had disrupted revenues. The Centre should avoid the temptation to subsume this cess into the broader GST rates. Instead, with its job done, the cess must be removed. Taxation is not just a covenant between the Centre and the States. It is also one with the people. Removing a cess that is no longer needed will not only garner public praise but could also spur some sorely needed urban consumption.
