
Oil and gas have boomed in New Mexico. Its schools are contending with pollution's effects
'It happens a lot,' Amari explained from the backseat, glancing up from his Nintendo Switch. The symptoms usually show up when the sixth-grader smells an odor of 'rotten egg with propane' that rises from nearby natural gas wells and wafts over Lybrook Elementary School, where he and some 70 other Navajo students attend class. His little brother often misses school for the same reason.
'They just keep getting sick,' Amari's father, Billton, said. 'I have to take them out of class because of the headaches. Especially the younger one, he's been throwing up and won't eat.' The symptoms are putting the kids at risk of falling further behind in school.
Lybrook sits in the heart of New Mexico's San Juan Basin, a major oil and gas deposit that, along with the Permian Basin in the state's southeast, is supplying natural gas that meets much of the nation's electricity demand.
The gas pulled from tens of thousands of wells in New Mexico has reaped huge benefits for the entire country. Natural gas has become a go-to fuel for power plants from coast to coast, sometimes replacing dirtier coal-fired plants and, by extension, improving air quality. Locally, oil and gas companies employ thousands of workers, often in areas with few other opportunities, all while boosting the state's budget with billions in royalty payments.
But those benefits may come at a cost for thousands of students in New Mexico whose schools sit near oil and gas pipelines, wellheads and flare stacks. An Associated Press analysis of state and federal data found 694 oil and gas wells with new or active permits within a mile of a school in the state. This means that around 29,500 students in 74 schools and pre-schools potentially face exposure to noxious emissions, as extraction from the ground can release unhealthy fumes.
A measurable effect on students
At Lybrook, where Amari just finished sixth grade, fewer than 6% of students are proficient at math, and only a fifth meet state standards for science and reading proficiency.
Other factors could help explain students' poor achievement. Poverty rates are higher in some areas with high levels of gas development, and students at rural schools overall tend to face challenges that can adversely affect academic performance. AP's analysis found that two-thirds of the schools within a mile of an oil or gas well were low-income, and the population is around 24% Native American and 45% Hispanic.
But research has found that student learning is directly harmed by air pollution from fossil fuels — even when socioeconomic factors are taken into account.
And it's not just New Mexico where this is a risk. An AP analysis of data from the Global Oil and Gas Extraction Tracker found over 1,000 public schools across 13 states that are within five miles of a major oil or gas field. Major fields are collections of wells that produce the highest amount of energy in a state.
'This kind of air pollution has a real, measurable effect on students,' said Mike Gilraine, a professor of economics at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada, who studies connections between air quality and student performance.
In 2024, Gilraine cowrote a study showing that student test scores were closely associated with air contamination. Each measured increase in PM2.5, a type of pollution created from the burning of fossil fuels, was associated with a significant decline in student test scores, Gilraine found. Conversely, researchers have documented that reductions in air pollution have led to higher test scores and fewer absences.
'To me the surprise was certainly the magnitude of the effects' of air pollution on students, Gilraine said. 'It's hard to find a similar factor that would have such an impact on schools nationwide.'
America's shift to natural gas has resulted in substantial increases in student achievement nationwide, Gilraine's research shows, as it has displaced dirtier coal and led to cleaner air on the whole. But there has been little data on air quality across New Mexico, even as it has become one of the most productive states in the nation for natural gas. State regulators have installed only 20 permanent air monitors, most in areas without oil or gas production.
Independent researchers have extensively studied the air quality near schools in at least two locations in the state, however. One is Lybrook, which sits within a mile of 17 active oil and gas wells.
In 2024, scientists affiliated with Princeton and Northern Arizona universities conducted an air-monitoring study at the school, finding that levels of pollutants — including benzene, a cancer-causing byproduct of natural gas production that is particularly harmful to children — were spiking during school hours, to nearly double the levels known to cause chronic or acute health effects.
That research followed a 2021 health impact assessment that was done with support from several local nonprofits and foundations, which analyzed the effects of the area's oil and gas development on residents.
The findings were startling: More than 90% of people surveyed suffered from sinus problems. Nosebleeds, shortness of breath and nausea were widespread. The report attributed the symptoms to the high levels of pollutants that researchers found — including, near Lybrook, hydrogen sulfide, a compound that gives off the sulfur smell that Amari Werito associated with his headaches.
Those studies helped confirm what many community members already knew, said Daniel Tso, a community leader who served on the committee that oversaw the 2021 health impact assessment.
'The children and the grandchildren need a safe homeland,' Tso said during an interview in March, standing outside a cluster of gas wells within a mile of Lybrook Elementary.
'You smell that?' he said, nodding towards a nearby wellhead, which smelled like propane. 'That's what the kids at the school are breathing in. I've had people visiting this area from New York. They spend five minutes here and say, 'Hey, I got a headache.' And the kids are what, six hours a day at the school breathing this?'
Lybrook school officials did not respond to requests for comment.
Despite risks, oil and gas can pump money into schools
Researchers have identified similar air quality problems in New Mexico's southeast.
In 2023, a team of scientists from a coalition of universities conducted a detailed, yearlong study of the air in Loving, a small town in the Permian Basin. Local air quality, researchers found, was worse than in downtown Los Angeles, and the tested air contained the fifth-highest level of measured ozone contamination in the U.S.
The source of the ozone — a pollutant that's especially hazardous to children — was the area's network of gas wells and related infrastructure. Some of that infrastructure sits within a half-mile of a campus that houses Loving's elementary, middle and high schools.
A small group of residents has spoken out about the area's air quality, saying it has caused respiratory problems and other health issues. But for most locals, any concerns about pollution are outweighed by the industry's economic benefits.
Representatives of the oil and gas industry have claimed the air quality studies themselves are not trustworthy.
'There needs to be a robust study to actually answer these questions,' said Andrea Felix, vice president of regulatory affairs for the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association (NMOGA). Felix said other sources of emissions, such as cars and trucks, are likely a larger source of air quality problems near wells.
'Companies follow the best available science' for well placement and emissions controls, Felix said, and also contribute huge amounts of money to the state's education budget through streams like royalties and direct expenditures. In the most recent fiscal year, oil and gas revenue supported $1.7 billion in K-12 spending in New Mexico, according to a NMOGA report.
Officials with Loving Municipal Schools are also skeptical of the alarm over the wells. Loving Superintendent Lee White said the school district used funds from the oil and gas industry to pay for a new wing at the elementary school, a science lab for students, turf on the sports field and training and professional development for teachers. He said the industry's contributions to state coffers can't be ignored.
'Are we willing to give that up because people say our air is not clean?' he said during an interview. 'It's just as clean as anywhere else.'
As White spoke, a drill rig worked a couple of miles east of Loving's elementary school while parents poured into the gymnasium to watch kindergartners collect their diplomas. White touted the district's success, saying the elementary school scores above state averages for reading, math and science proficiency, while Loving's high school students far outpace the state average for college and career readiness.
But environmental groups, attorneys and residents continue to push for limits on drilling near schools.
Those efforts saw a boost in 2023, when New Mexico State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard issued an executive order prohibiting new oil and gas leases on state-owned land within a mile of schools.
Industry representatives decried the move, saying it added potentially insurmountable costs and barriers to drilling operators. However, AP's analysis found that relatively few wells would be impacted even if the rule applied to all of New Mexico; only around 1% of oil and gas wells in the state are within a mile of a school.
In the years since, residents of areas where exploration is heavy have lobbied for legislation prohibiting gas operations within a mile of schools, regardless of land status. That bill died in committee during the most recent session of the New Mexico legislature.
Advocates have also sued the state over an alleged lack of pollution controls. That suit is currently pending in state court.
____
AP journalist Sharon Lurye contributed to this report from New Orleans.
____
The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Am I drinking more than everyone else? Use our tool to find out
While we all know about the serious dangers of alcohol, the truth is that we're still a nation of drinkers. Whether it's a pint on a Friday night down the pub or a bottle of wine with your other half at home, alcohol is entrenched in our lives and routines. Around half of UK adults drink at least once a week, and that figure rises to 60 per cent among adults aged 65 to 74, with numbers falling in the younger age brackets (18-24) as they swap boozy sessions for nights in the gym. Yet across the generations, many of those who are still keen on a drink are consuming even more alcohol than ever before. And the consequences of this are dire: in 2022, there were over 10,000 alcohol-specific deaths in the UK – the highest number on record. Naturally, it's hard to keep track of how much alcohol you're consuming – and, of course, we might shy away from totting up the number of units we drink each week. Yet the more alcohol you regularly drink, the more likely you are to face serious health problems. With this tool, you can find out exactly how much you're drinking, how it compares to others your age and gender – and if you're drinking more than them. The health risks of drinking alcohol are well established – from liver disease and heart problems, to cancer and mental health issues. The more alcohol you regularly drink, the more harmful it is – and the more likely you are to face these very serious consequences. For this reason, UK guidelines state it is safest for men and women to drink no more than 14 units a week, spread over three or more days. This is equivalent to six pints of beer or six 175ml glasses of wine. Women who drink more than 14 but less than 35 units per week, and men that drink more than 14 but less than 50 units per week, are classified as 'hazardous drinkers'. Those who exceed these limits are harmful drinkers. 'There's a sense that if you drink over 14 units a week, you're immediately in massive trouble but, of course, there's a big difference between drinking 15 or 50 units,' says Dr Piper, chief executive of Alcohol Change UK. 'It's important to note that this is a sliding scale – so essentially the less you drink, the better it is for your health.' Even though 1-14 units of alcohol a week has been classified as 'low risk', 'it's still not safe or healthy,' Dr Piper clarifies. In fact, whilst those who drink at higher, harmful levels experience more direct harm, a significant portion of alcohol-related harm – such as injuries, violence and drinking-driving incidents – comes from individuals who drink within lower-risk or moderate drinking guidelines. We often hear of Gen Z being the 'sober generation'. A Drinkaware study found that one in four members of Gen Z, those aged 18 to 24, is completely teetotal. However, Dr Piper says there's still a significant amount in this bracket who are drinking a harmful amount. In 2022, adults aged 16 to 24 were the most likely to drink to harmful levels or possibly be dependent on alcohol, highlighting these vast disparities. Meanwhile, men aged 65-74 top the charts for most units of alcohol drunk per week with an average of 11.9. Dr Piper says that an increase in harmful consumption is 'the biggest trend' in the UK and is being fuelled by 'a complete mix of people across different ages and genders' – from Gen Z to those in midlife and beyond. Between the genders, in 2022, there were fewer male non-drinkers (16 per cent) than female (22 per cent). Plus, more men than women drink at least once – and also more than 14 units – per week. Do you binge drink… and who does the most? The NHS defines binge drinking as 'drinking heavily over a short space of time' and it can be extremely dangerous. For men, it involves drinking more than eight units of alcohol in a single session, or more than six units in a single session for women. Regular binge drinking increases your risk of accidents and falls, heart problems, serious mental health issues and alcohol poisoning. In 2022, 19 per cent of men reported binge drinking in the last week compared to 15 per cent of women. Whilst adults aged 55 to 64 were the most likely to binge drink, those aged 75+ were least likely. Worryingly, the proportion of adults who admitted to binge drinking remained fairly stable between 2011 and 2022 at 17 per cent. Are you at risk of alcohol dependence? Alcohol dependence, otherwise known as alcoholism, describes the most serious form of high-risk drinking. Someone with alcohol dependence may feel like they're not able to function or survive without alcohol and will often need to drink more over time to feel the same effect. They'll continue to drink despite knowing the harmful consequences and may prioritise alcohol over their family, friends and career. The World Health Organisation developed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screening tool for dependency. Dr Piper explains: 'It's for people in the highest groups who may have an alcohol dependency or are drinking a harmful or hazardous amount of alcohol.' Women who drink more than 35 units and men who drink more than 50 units per week are classified as harmful, but not dependent, drinkers. 'These people will experience weekly harms from alcohol, whether that's hangovers, elevated blood pressure, anxiety, depression or relationship issues,' Dr Piper explains. There is no clear line between harmful and dependent drinking, so dependence can vary in severity. In the AUDIT test, a total score between 0 and 40 is calculated. A score of 20 or above signifies 'possible alcohol dependence', whilst a score of 16-19 suggests 'higher risk drinking behaviour', a score between 8-15 suggests 'increasing risk drinking behaviour', and a score of 0-7 signifies 'low risk drinking behaviour'. Despite the growth in non-drinkers in the 16-24 age group, young people are at greater risk of alcohol dependence, according to AUDIT test results. As Alcohol Change UK highlights, it's not just about how much you drink, it's about why you drink, and your relationship with alcohol. Young adults may be relying on alcohol to cope, with one study showing that Gen Z is more likely to report drinking to 'escape' which carries higher long-term risk. Young adults are also suffering from more mental health problems than previous generations, increasing their vulnerability to using alcohol as self-medication. Whilst young men (aged 16-24) drink the lowest average amount of units per week (4.8), 20 per cent of them are at risk of, or have a possible alcohol dependence, whilst just 10 per cent of men aged 65+ fall into this category. Among women, the same is true. 20 per cent of young women are drinking harmfully or are possibly dependent on alcohol, while this figure drops to just 3 per cent among those aged 65+. A sobering thought.


Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
Democrats decry extra US scrutiny of solar, wind projects on public lands
WASHINGTON, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Four Democratic U.S. senators on Friday slammed last month's directive by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum requiring his office to review decisions on every wind and solar power project on federal lands, saying it will lead to delays and discourage private investment as power demand rises. The lawmakers said the directive creates a bottleneck that will block progress on wind and solar energy, which accounted for the vast majority of new U.S. power generation added to the grid last year. "Rather than ensuring an efficient permitting process for all energy resources, it appears this directive actively disfavors renewable projects in favor of more expensive, and more polluting, technologies" such as fossil fuels, said the letter to Burgum from Senators Martin Heinrich, Ron Wyden and two others. They urged Burgum to rescind the directive and restore a transparent and timely permitting framework for renewable energy. The Interior Department did not comment on the letter. But a spokesperson said the "enhanced oversight will ensure all evaluations are thorough and deliberative." President Donald Trump has called wind and solar unreliable and expensive, and has pushed policies to boost U.S. production of oil, gas and coal. Heinrich, ranking Democrat on the Senate energy committee, represents New Mexico, which has bountiful oil, gas, wind and solar resources. Interior has said the reviews would apply to rights-of-way, leases, construction and other permitting activities. Trump has ordered several measures aimed at restricting wind and solar. His spending law accelerated by several years the phase-out of tax credits for the renewable power sources. Solar and wind companies have said Interior's directive was at odds with Trump's broader goal to slash burdensome regulations and boost energy for new data centers and artificial intelligence, which are hiking U.S. power demand for the first time in two decades. Former President Joe Biden's Interior Department had been reviewing more than 65 utility-scale onshore clean energy projects, with nearly 200 more in the queue, the senators said.


Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Engie first-half profit falls on lower gas price
PARIS, Aug 1 - French utility Engie ( opens new tab posted a 9.4% fall in half-year earnings on Friday, as higher income from natural gas distribution failed to offset lower energy prices and hydropower production. Europe's largest gas network operator said first-half earnings before interest and tax (EBIT), excluding nuclear, came to 5.1 billion euros ($5.82 billion), compared to 5.6 billion euros a year earlier. "These results are solid in normalising market conditions and in an uncertain economic and geopolitical context," said CEO Catherine MacGregor. Engie said last month that a colder 2025 had resulted in an increase of 6.5 terawatt-hours (TWh) of gas distributed versus the prior year. However, that was tempered by a 2.1 TWh drop in French hydropower production due to less rain, and a 2.2 TWh drop in nuclear production, after Belgium permanently retired Engie's Doel 1 nuclear plant in February and took the Tihange 3 plant offline in April for life-extension upgrades. Engie has sought in recent years to exit the nuclear business, refocus on its core natural gas holdings and reinvest the profits into renewables. The lower rainfall affected profit at the group's renewables and flexible power unit, which includes batteries and gas-fired power plants as well as hydropower plants, with EBIT down 13.4% to 1.98 billion euros in the first half. Engie said it continues to invest in new projects, and is moving ahead with three wind and solar projects that have already received a final investment decision in the United States, after President Donald Trump signed the annual U.S. budget into law. "Our clients and counterparties in the U.S. have adapted to the new market reality, notably by adding contractual clauses that better share residual risks, which will allow us to proceed with these three projects with confidence in the coming weeks and months," MacGregor told journalists on a call. U.S. projects at earlier stages are being treated more cautiously, however, as certain green tax credits under the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act have been rolled back, increasing costs, she said. ($1 = 0.8757 euros)